addocarr facing three month ban.Just sack him off now fmd.But expect us to be in the market way harder now cause simmo always injured.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Yea both him and Kobi will start in flegg I'd say. Both are big and athletic but very raw. "
"There used to be the unicorn versus realist distinction on 1EE. That distinction is still fair and makes sense because people can rationally disagree about whether they should have hope or despair.
Now there is the 'keep your 7 who got selected for…"
Now there is the 'keep your 7 who got selected for…"
"Nope, I do not think it is true that the club can withhold salary. Clubs cannot unilaterally stop contractual payments. The case of interest here is Radley's 10 game ban where the Chooks lowered the financial penalty by not paying Radley "match…"
"I stand by the Fox. Support the man.
Good player and does great community work."
Good player and does great community work."
Replies
Soooo we have to pay him for 12 weeks to sit in the stands due to his own actions. Sack him . It's not even a debate. The clubs not a charity, and there's only two reasons those in favour of giving him yet another chance want to do so. And ones becuse he's not a shit player.
There are some outlets saying Parra have a duty of care. If released, I believe a club would take him on once 12 week ban is done. But also he is 32 this year and off-contract. So tough call for the club. But I said before it might be taken out of their hands.
Though I thought the ban can be cut by a few weeks if he admits fault and seeks assistance, which he did.
32 next year july 28 is his birthday LB
Sorry mis spoke as I meant next year. He is 1995 born so year 32 next year. I'm talking in league calendar it seems haha.
pretty sure a suspension over 6 weeks means the club can withold salaries as part of the rlpa agreement wiz
Nope, I do not think it is true that the club can withhold salary. Clubs cannot unilaterally stop contractual payments. The case of interest here is Radley's 10 game ban where the Chooks lowered the financial penalty by not paying Radley "match payments". Turns out that meant, not his base pay, but his match fee. His match fee x10 was less than the proposed straight fine, while the Chooks then sought dispensdation from the NRL to use that non-paid money to hirer another player. IOt was all a rort by the Roosters, of course, to lower radley's financial penalty and try to get salary cap exemption.
Also, Radley agreed to the penalty. The NRL collective bargaining agreement does permit a club to deduct a small fraction of match payment from a player if the suspension is greater than 8 weeks. This is what the Chooks were exploiting.
Unfortunately some things in life are non negotiable. He needs to be sacked.
stick by him. don't chuck him to the wolves.
I'd keep him for cup or backup. Sign a new winger.
Our backline is flimsy as it is. He has one year left, let him stay IMO. Treat it like an injury and he'll go PNG or Super League by end of the year.