3,2,1s

3. Dylan Walker

2. Tulagi

1. Tuivsti

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • 3 Moses- we do not win without his kicking game 

    2walker- changed our attack when he came on

    1- smith- best attacking footy he's played and his long balls to our halves really opened up our attack.

    hon mentions pezet da Silva tuilagi and tuivati 

  • 3 - Kelma

    2 - Isaiah

    1 - Bailey

     

    Credit to our bench and the punch they provided.

  • 3. Iongi

    2. Walker

    1. Big Sam

  • 3 - Mitch Moses - Can give the most credit to other plays, but quitely simply if Moses isn't there, we don't win. Especially in the last 10 minutes when we hit back in the lead. The players were buggered and Moses' kicking game was perfect. He kept dropping that ball between the 10m line and the dry line every single time. Massive.

    2 - Kelma Tuilagi - his best performance in a parra jersey. Has so much potential to be a elite backrower, I hope it continues.

    1 - Sam Tuivati - he is the real deal. Must keep him at all costs.

  •  3. Walker

    2. Kelma

    1. Iongi

  • 3 Iongi (high ball, safety + width & speed and in attack)

    2. Walker -chased the colliion & experience in the ruck frustrated the ponies.

    1 - Kelma - Kelma 2.0 gave a case to be in starting 13 now.

  • 3 - Walker 

    2 - Smith

    1 - Tuilagi 

    Samrani was good. Kelly needs to stay in reserves.

    Pezet was good but also a bit lucky with his rebounding kicks turning into tries. That's often the difference between rocks and diamonds. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jdb junior paulo 👉🚪👋
"This is where the backrowers are so important there a halves best friend if there hole running hitting outside in targeting defenders running a fade basically it gives the halves reads and options that's what we want to look out for around Pezet…"
7 minutes ago
D_STOFFBERG replied to Herbert Hamilton's discussion Fight off spoon again
""
42 minutes ago
Yobz replied to Yobz's discussion 2026 Disrupter Rule - Why wasn't this a penalty to the Eels?
"If the purpose of the rule is to not have "one hand interfering with the opposition player", it should be worded as such."
55 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Yobz's discussion 2026 Disrupter Rule - Why wasn't this a penalty to the Eels?
"1. The rule is dumb and incredibly vague.
2. It's a coin toss decision
3. According to The Bunker in this game, basically making it look like you're going to go with 2 hands is good enough.
Can't wait for this stupid rule to ruin a rep/finals game."
58 minutes ago
More…