We have played terrible this year and have massive issues we need to fix but in yet another game we hardly received a penalty.  From the 4th minute till about 70th minute we didn't receive 1.

Penalties wouldn't have changed our season however it points to poor performances from refs and our inability to influence or talk to refs.  Why aren't our players in refs ear reminding them the penalty count.  Always see other teams do it and get a penalty pretty shortly afterwards

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • We have no leaders, we are coached by a clown who holds nobody accountable for discipline, we deserve everything we get.

    Its not rocket science.

  • Because we have a gutless coach who doesn’t stand up for his team.
    • Thats probably true too, BAs a meek little mouse in the pressers, no balls.

      \uap>297988341?profile=original
      • Didn't know they were tied up, or in gaol.

  • Because we don’t apply any pressure.
  • As the others have said. We don’t apply pressure. We don’t earn respect from other teams. We have a reputation as being losers. As such, decisions go against us.
  • All points above are fair but even if we are lacking leadership and respect etc that shouldn't affect the penalty count. 

    It proves that refs are useless and too easily influenced which is huge concern for the game.

    • ^^ This

    • Midge, totally agree with you as that pair tonight were as bad as any I have seen this year.  If we got a fair shake in the penalties, then we could have won, also the line ball calls.

  • Dumb team coached by a man who is a fraud, he has never been a head coach and never will be.

    The sooner Arthur gets sacked the better it will be for the Eels.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hector replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Pod cast paul kent had Steve Gilles on on is management company as Lomax manager Dear Clinton he states it was the storm that contacted them regarding interest in Lomax not the other way round way around  (the he said they said)  is now out there…"
45 minutes ago
Tin Tim replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Parra can't & wont lose this, any outcome will be in the Eels favour. Second the Storm ain't the only team that going to ask about Lomax, you'll find whoever can come up with a good deal will win Lomax signature. "
46 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"A simple player swap for the sake of it is not good enough. Using Howarth as an example, does he make Parra better? Maybe a little, but he's no Lomax and Lomax will make Melbourne a lot better. Unless it's Munster, Stefano or Coates, no deal…"
47 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"The only scenario where Lomax has some standing and this is a complete hypothetical is if Parra are not acting in good faith. Say if Lomax already approached Parra and said he wanted to come back and Parra said " no, we don't want you anymore " OR…"
58 minutes ago
More…