THESE are the frightening financial figures NRL clubs didn’t want you to see.

Figures from official auditing that reveal a $42.7 million disaster in a secret NRL document into the financial health of all 16 premiership clubs.

Only three clubs — South Sydney, Brisbane and the New Zealand Warriors — made a profit last season while Parramatta and Penrith in Sydney’s west lost a combined $14.4 million.

The crisis is set to prompt the NRL to implement a new salary cap on non-player costs, amid fears of an ‘arms race’ as club spending spirals out of control. The AFL already has a $9.4 million cap on football operation at each club.

The 16 NRL club chief executives were sworn to secrecy when they were shown the audit results at a meeting in Auckland last Friday before the Nines tournament.

It was agreed only the average club loss of $2.7 million would be revealed to the media before the document was leaked to The Daily Telegraph by from someone inside the room.

The figures are for football operations without taking into account Leagues Club grants, which only nine of the 16 clubs benefit from. The losses came despite grants of $7.87 million from the NRL last year. Under the deal struck with the clubs and commission chairman John Grant at the end of last year, the clubs will receive an extra $1.5 million a year in 2016 and 2017.

Importantly the NRL and clubs have agreed to hold talks on ways to contain costs within football departments in future.

A lacklustre 2015 on the field by the Eels was matched by their poor balance sheet.
One of the options is to have a cap on football department expenditure from 2018, similar to a salary cap for players. It already has the support of the majority of clubs.

“The growth in non-player expenses has been extensive in all sports,” said Dragons chief executive Peter Doust.

“Some would say it’s become an arms race. It’s something that needs to be discussed because we can’t be going outside our means as we continue to grow. Club sustainability and looking after the players are what’s most important.”

The poor performances of Parramatta ($8 million loss) and Penrith ($6.4 million) are the most disturbing results for the game.

Both clubs faced extra costs in game development and junior funding in an area where the AFL is pumping in millions of dollars to fully establish a growth base for GWS.

Parramatta also had to cope with a substantial salary cap fine. The saving grace is that both the Eels and the Panthers are supported by strong leagues clubs.

Even North Queensland reported a loss of $360,000 despite winning the competition.

They did employ two former first grade coaches, John Cartwright and David Furner, to help Paul Green and also spent $1 million on a new high-performance unit.

The Rabbitohs were the biggest success story, on the back of their grand final victory the previous year. Their membership grew to 35,000 — more than double most clubs — which provided income of more than $4 million alone.

Losses by the Titans ($3.3 million) and the Knights ($1 million) will be felt throughout the game because both clubs need to be topped up by their owners — the NRL — to ­balance the books.

Neither club has support from a leagues club. The fact NRL grants will increase to $9.37 million next year will make it more appealing for potential buyer to step in.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/special-investigation-how-nrl-clubs-lost-a-staggering-427-million/news-story/04e725fbb2c2b347756e92b2d3326c63

ALARMING new financial figures revealed from a leaked NRL document show desperate clubs lost a combined total of $42.7 million on the 2015 season.

The Parramatta Eels were the worst off with a football operations loss of a staggering $8 million before they were bailed out by their Leagues Club.

The Penrith Panthers also lost $6.4 million and the Canberra Raiders $5.4 million in a season that saw only three clubs finish the year with a profit.

RABBITOHS — $1.4 million profit

Financially the most successful club in the competition on the back of winning the 2014 premiership and signing up 35,000 members as a result. Membership income is now worth $4.5 million alone. They also have no junior leagues costs because of the thriving Souths Juniors.

BRONCOS — $800,000 profit*

The $800,000 profit is an estimate figure provided to the NRL. As a privately owned company, the official profit will be revealed to shareholders at the end of the financial year. In a much stronger position than the Sydney clubs from having Brisbane to themselves.

*Estimated

WARRIORS — $600,000 profit

Struggled on the football field for much of the year but have a strong membership base and merchandise sales. Also have a huge advantage, similar to Brisbane, of having no competitors and an entire country to themselves.

COWBOYS — $360,000 loss

Won the premiership but still lost $360,000. Employee costs were $2 million more than the previous year. The club also invested heavily on a new high performance unit. Officials expect a stronger 2016 result on increased crowds, membership and NRL grant.

KNIGHTS — $1 million loss

Considering they finished with the wooden spoon, a $1 million loss was an acceptable result. The NRL has to pick up the shortfall as the owner. Losing Wayne Bennett’s salary saved $1 million. Budgeting to break even this year with the increased NRL grants.

WESTS TIGERS $2.1 million loss

The poor financial result matched the team’s performances on the field which resulted in lower gate takings than previous years. Also had to pay out chief executive Grant Mayer. Financial position will be clearer on March 31, with Balmain’s deadline to pay back $5 million for a share of joint venture.

SHARKS — $2.2 million loss

Lost $2.2 million but will be boosted in future years from sales of the Woolooware Bay unit development next to Remondis Stadium. Would have been a worse result but for increased membership. Also didn’t get a major sponsor until late in the season.

DRAGONS — $2.6 million loss

Lost $2.6 million and will get a leagues club grant of only $700,000. Still heavily relying on funding and support from the NRL. Licensed club is now making $5 million profit. Facing a more difficult year because it is the Roosters’ turn to get Anzac Day gate takings.

SEA EAGLES — $2.9 million loss

Lost $2.9 million in a result that reflects on the poor performances of the team. Also had a huge staff turnover and had to pay out the final year of Geoff Toovey’s contract before hiring Trent Barrett. Have to survive with no leagues club support.

TITANS — $3.3 million loss

Finished with a $3.3 million loss which will have to be covered by the NRL until they find a new owner. Crowds were down last year and sponsors were difficult to find because of a number of serious off-field issues. Also still paying for former coach John Cartwright.

BULLDOGS — $3.5 million loss

Absolutely no alarm bells despite a $3.5 million loss by the football club. A grant of more than $4 million from a thriving Canterbury leagues club will actually leave them with a profit. Also did well from the Back to Belmore games.

STORM — $3.8 million loss

On face value a loss of $3.8 million for a club without the support of a Leagues club would be a worrying result. The fact is it’s a much better result than previous years when losses were reported of up towards $7 million.

ROOSTERS — $3.9 million loss

No wonder veteran chairman Nick Politis has been at the forefront of the campaign to get the clubs extra funding from the new broadcasting deal. The football club lost $3.9 million which is far worse than the $1 million the previous season after they won the premiership.

RAIDERS — $5.4 million loss

It’s been a huge struggle in the national capital as a loss of $5.4 million would indicate. Fortunate to have the support of a strong Queanbeyan Leagues Club. Need better results and better gate takings this season. Also looking to trim costs.

PANTHERS — $6.4 million loss

So much for that five-year plan — they’ve ended up with a $6.4 million loss and failed to make the finals. Had to pay out Ivan Cleary and also have Phil Gould’s salary which is far greater than general managers at other clubs. Losses will be covered by Panthers Leagues Club.

EELS — $8 million loss

It’s hard to put a positive slant on a club that loses $8 million but the Eels spend $2 million on junior and game development. They also spent $1 million on a new high performance unit and paid a salary cap fine of over $400,000. Leagues club made more than $12 million profit.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/breakdown-of-every-nrl-clubs-finances-after-combined-427-million-loss-in-2015/news-story/7b8458e48e8923fe547d3229b74f68cd

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Who was in the room that leaked this info, that's what I want to know? Not only leaked it but the exact amounts for every club?
    They should be stretched, whipped, hot needles under the fingernails then whipped some more.
    Just my opinion...
    • that's something that crossed my mind also, I am thinking that it's an NRL official not a Club Official  

  • "The figures are for football operations without taking into account Leagues Club grants"

    This article is just a poor attempt to make it seem as if Parra are in some sort of financial mess. We are in a lot stronger position than most teams due to our leagues club, that also applys to Penrith.

    I agreed that it would be better if the NRL side was self sufficent i think this improving with Membership as we are likely to hit 25000 this year. We should be able to get as many members as Souths IMO

    the daily telegraph has had a slow news day so Phil Rutherdickhead decided to take a swipe at Parra

    • Agree, don't see the issue for Parra.
      I do see an issue for NRL owned clubs being continually bailed out by the NRL.
      It's pretty much indicating the NRL owned clubs are poorly managed, yet they want to tell everyone else how to run their clubs
  • Terrible news.

  • Agreed, the leagues club is the house that Jack built - and it was founded to support the football club. It supports the club including a massive junior development program, supports its members, funds numerous other social and sporting activities, is heavily involved in a number of very worthy charities, had a number of extraordinary expenses this year and STILL made a very healthy profit.

    If every club had the financial foundations that we have the NRL wouldn't be propping anyone up.

  • Haha they make it seem so undercover, the info was leaked by someone in the room. I'd say only half of this is correct as I know for the WT that the only thing keeping them going are NRL loans and the Wests Magpies side of the venture. Melbourne can't be going too bad if they moved to a half decent stadium a few years back plus their member numbers have increased.
  • The $8 million loss would have incorporated money spent on the new training facility I'd assume. Which would be a fair whack of the total. Only report the negatives in regards to Parra though, carry on.
    • Yes, after the recent positive headlines it was only a matta of time really. You could sense the journos squirm!
  • Truly said guys!

    What crap. Parra Leagues club exists and is profitable because of the Eels. It was the reason it was set up in the 1st place. They go hand in hand.

    Did any other leagues club make Parra's profit? I dont think so.

    Anyway, for too long we have been the sleeping giant of th NRL time. Once the team get winning Premierships, all those Parra fans that would pack Parra Stadium in the 80's will come rolling back. Just look at the Anzac day game we played vs Wests Tigers. It was a sell-out and 3/4's of the stadium were blue and gold.

    It was said in the 80's that Parra had the most fans. I still believe that. Our marketing has improved tremendously in the last 2 years with membership on the rise. Parra fans are out there. They just need to be reeled in.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

macybrown replied to Grunta the great's discussion Game Day Blog - Sea Eagles vs Eels
"This game needs a qualified ref"
50 seconds ago
Will 5150 replied to Grunta the great's discussion Game Day Blog - Sea Eagles vs Eels
"Matto on report for the shot on Gnome... is this game serious?"
1 minute ago
macybrown replied to Grunta the great's discussion Game Day Blog - Sea Eagles vs Eels
"So far we're on track with usual v 12 men"
4 minutes ago
My Bob replied to Grunta the great's discussion Game Day Blog - Sea Eagles vs Eels
"First act of Man by Matterson all year, and it was on the dwarf. "
4 minutes ago
More…