Minutes vs Impact?

In recent years Beau Scott was a formidable opponent. I have no qualms about that. 

But i have ask when does it become apparent that the minutes you play(less then 16 a half last year)  vs the impact you and culture you bring wear thin?  

Iam of the opinion that he is taking up a spot in the 17 where we could have a player who will have greater effect or should i say more value then what we are getting from Beau. I know what some will say or but in defence we tighten up and his experience helps. Now that is true but for what a whole 30minutes a game? I see better value elsewhere. 

So tell me your thoughts on Beau and if his value in our 17 is worth it and why?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Big fan here, hes been outstanding for the club but think he'll be struggling to hold a 17 spot this year.

  • He’ll be in the team. We are a much better defensive side when he’s on. You need old heads like Scott to win a comp. look at the sharks with Gallen Lewis and Heighington and Melbourne with their aging stars. Old heads are vital you can’t have a pack all under 30
    • I certainly agree with you. Gallen averages 60 minutes . Its a far cry from 30 or so from Beau. 

  • Thats a very personal question Scott and this is a family site.

  • He’s been great for the Eels but I’m beginning to think he’s almost past his use by date. Cant see him being used as much this year.

  • His toughness and experience is still invaluable and really can't be accurately measured. It comes down to a feel thing I would imagine for BA. The other thing is that the player himself has too much pride in his own performance to hang on one season too many.

  • He shouldn't be in the 17 at full strength. Definitely not a starter and we already have Edwards as our utility forward,
    I don't like Beau hogging a bench spot when we already have the smallest pack in the NRL.
    No impact
  • I'm not a fan of him being in the side
    Another prop should take Scotts bench spot
    I'd have Vave in the place of scott He's going to have a bigger impact
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
" Thanks Bluey,
Could be, dunno. But I wonder whether Walters would change his tune if his players do a Lomax on him, signing multiple contracts and chats with others while still under contract with him.
 Or maybe tell him they did the right thing…"
16 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Eels' 2026 Backline?
"Daz, good blog and you have addressed a very pertinent issue."
18 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Eels' 2026 Backline?
"Cobbo was a chance, Staggs, Farnworth, Best ( Best maybe given rhetoric) but none of them Cobbo (not likely) would have come to Parra. Losing Lomax was a killer but to coin one of my favourite sayings, you cannot control the uncontrollable!
We need…"
19 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Thanks Mutts. I’ve enjoyed your commentary on this as well.
Like you, I feel, after looking at timelines despite initial concerns, Lomax made some form of provisional agreement with Melbourne first. Reading between the lines of what Tripp said (Feb…"
22 minutes ago
More…