After Cameron King copped yet another injury in the Eels floppy start to 2018, the head-honchos at Parramatta are apparently looking into Robbie Farah as a potential solution to the hooker problem.

Farah's unwanted at South Sydney, and they would be willing to pay 50% of his contract. With Parramatta having some space in the cap, it's just a matter of agreeing on the finer points.

Expect this to be announced before the Eels take on the Tigers in Round 4.

Thoughts - do you think Farah will make us better?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Thought he was going to Canberra
    • From what I've heard, he'd prefer Parramatta due to the chance to be a long term starter, rather than a backup.

  • Yes
  • Won’t happen.

    BA is happy to have kaysa and king for 2017.

    theres a reason we haven’t signed another hooker and that’s  Reed Mahoney. 

    Rejected peats, rein and whoever else, have faith wait till this kid gets his chance. 

    • At 20 years old Mahoney might be another year or two away from NRL. I suppose the club needs to decide whether our current hookers can do the job and if not, then an experienced hooker at the end of his career on a 1-2 year deal might be the way to go. That would take Robbie to 36 though. I reckon this year is his last, so not sure if he would be the right player.

    • Farrah may be behind his best years but he may also be the best person to teach mahoney and get him to nrl level quicker. Kaysa and king arnt nrl standard hookers neither would make the bench on any consistent top 8 team

  • Can we fucking not
    • You seriously think king and shity Pritchard are better then farah lol they are concussed every 2nd week and can't tackle.
    • Okay but how much would we pay him? If Souths pay 90% of his salary then cool. Not the 500k we have left over.
  • Ebay coach
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"To reply to your "questions": Framing the deep issues in terms of Victim-Blame-Games is next to useless, a projection & divisive. Worst still is your fanatical solution: a Civil War & carting masses to "work camps". Yep, as long as the president…"
13 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Hoe, I re-read first thread and  I was close to a celebrating vibe in it. I did not celebrate, but i went close.I despised him. I did not debase myself by pretending to be upset that he, rather than anyone else, was dead. He was a divisive talking…"
32 minutes ago
MeelK replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"In many ways I agree Randy. I have absolutely no problem with our current flag, and would support it till the day I die. Conversely, if our great democracy decided it was time for something new, I'd be fine with that too. I'm more about what the…"
39 minutes ago
MeelK replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Yeah it's a good point HOE, I guess circumstances would or should dictate how others, inlcuding us, should respond."
48 minutes ago
More…