After Cameron King copped yet another injury in the Eels floppy start to 2018, the head-honchos at Parramatta are apparently looking into Robbie Farah as a potential solution to the hooker problem.

Farah's unwanted at South Sydney, and they would be willing to pay 50% of his contract. With Parramatta having some space in the cap, it's just a matter of agreeing on the finer points.

Expect this to be announced before the Eels take on the Tigers in Round 4.

Thoughts - do you think Farah will make us better?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Thought he was going to Canberra
    • From what I've heard, he'd prefer Parramatta due to the chance to be a long term starter, rather than a backup.

  • Yes
  • Won’t happen.

    BA is happy to have kaysa and king for 2017.

    theres a reason we haven’t signed another hooker and that’s  Reed Mahoney. 

    Rejected peats, rein and whoever else, have faith wait till this kid gets his chance. 

    • At 20 years old Mahoney might be another year or two away from NRL. I suppose the club needs to decide whether our current hookers can do the job and if not, then an experienced hooker at the end of his career on a 1-2 year deal might be the way to go. That would take Robbie to 36 though. I reckon this year is his last, so not sure if he would be the right player.

    • Farrah may be behind his best years but he may also be the best person to teach mahoney and get him to nrl level quicker. Kaysa and king arnt nrl standard hookers neither would make the bench on any consistent top 8 team

  • Can we fucking not
    • You seriously think king and shity Pritchard are better then farah lol they are concussed every 2nd week and can't tackle.
    • Okay but how much would we pay him? If Souths pay 90% of his salary then cool. Not the 500k we have left over.
  • Ebay coach
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels demand the NRL hand over all information relating to its involvement in the Lomax saga
"Mutts, well said. I wouldn't be surprised if that's being discussed behind closed doors. It's ironic in some ways, we'd be more okay with Lomax playing for the Warriors than the Storm. "
10 seconds ago
macybrown replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels demand the NRL hand over all information relating to its involvement in the Lomax saga
"Guess if he says he didn't, it might be just a smartarse way of saying there's nothing evidentury tho :(
we all know he would've responded to that rubbish ...perhaps in a phone call."
1 minute ago
Muttman replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels demand the NRL hand over all information relating to its involvement in the Lomax saga
"Barnett from the Warriors opens up an interesting scenario. Warriors could take Lomax today and we get Barnett. If Lomax refuses then he has zero chance of claiming that he's being restrained. If I'm Parra I'm already trying to put this deal…"
6 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"...either way it goes HOE, both the club and our Atticus win the moral victory for all of us ;)
but damn I hope we can win both 🤞"
7 minutes ago
More…