You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights. Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
Replies
He says Hayne has to keep performing well to see about his contract. Thats calling the kettle black. You wouldn't even get a gig in the bush if it was based on your performances
Im on the fence about this. Hayne was great last night and he looks fitter now than in a long time.
The problem is that Hayne only plays well when his contract is up for renewal.
Best to keep him to 1 year contracts to avoid complacency
I gather Brad Arthur is waiting to years end to decide that his a shit coach, and he needs to start packing his bags and leave the joint????????????????
Wow that is what incredible but he signs players like Evans to 3 years and is playing chicken with a superstar that use to carry this team, like he did again last night at centre. If that was Inglis last night guarantee he would have got man of the match in a losing side, that is not something that comes along regularly. Compare what Jarryd did to what Jennings did and has been doing and what they are paid... Bernie u need to step in now and do ur job cause this clown has lost the plot
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 5 Next