Arana Taumata

Anyone remember this guy from years gone by.This guy got sacked by something like 7 clubs all for ill discipline behaviour.I see he’s been picked up by Wenty and named at number 7.He was there last week and picked up a try as well.I doubt he has a Parra contract though.I remember him debuting at the Dogs in 2008 and recall him scoring 2 long range solo tries in his first 2 games.He got sacked after a handfull of games for 1 of his many stuff ups.The last time he was sacked was cause he was caught by police with a substantial amount of pain killers of some sort without any prescriptions.Bringing him up will probably be irrelivant but put it this way.If clubs are willing to employ him after 7 chances then he must be a talent.Who knows he can probably make a fist of our dummy half issues.All unlikely but just a thought.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If he is on a Wenty contract, then yes he could be a valuable option for them.

  • Had potential , massive gronk .  He even got sacked from a bush footy club . 

  • Didn't he hit a woman? Or was that someone else?.

    • I think he hit everyone . Women , men , tranvestites and then stole the doctors script book hahaha .   What kinda loose cannon flogs the docs book of prescriptions and thinks he’ll get away with it . 

  • A highly talented youngster who hust couldn't stay out of trouble. He will most likely get into trouble again but if he doesn't and can live up to half his potential then Wenty and maybe Parra will be very lucky.
  • More sleezy trouble than Fong .
    Wenty is his level. Hope he makes a good go at it. But no chance of 1 st grade.
  • With a name like that he should be at mt panorama
  • Played i the Wagga comp a few years back and has serious mental health issues.
  • You are right played for Tumut Blues
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
39 minutes ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
2 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
3 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
4 hours ago
More…