A Hayne Blog

There were only 2 Hayne blogs on the main page, so I thought we needed another.

Image result for Jarryd Hayne

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Dogs emerged from no where as contenders even know they have blown there cap go figure comin from the lurker so not trust worthy . People sayin he was our best player last year realise he’s just a polished turd amongst turds
    • Well said.

      He's an imposter.

  • Hayne's been off contract for a week... just another week to go before he can join the queue at centrelink.

    He's not worth more than the $500K we paid him this year, Hopefully this has been a lesson to him not to price himself out of the market.
    • Some deadshit club will sign him.

      Come on down Saints.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Yes, he played five decent games and took home 500k. That’s 100k for 80 minutes of work.

      It took him around twenty rounds before he looked fit. This wasn’t the first season he has looked unfit.

      He returns, we get the spoon. All his fault? Not sure but it is a coincidence and not the first time we have won the spoon with the best player to have ever drawn breath, in the squad.

  • The last 3 lines l thought you were talking about how parra played this year.
  • Haha

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"In all essence this case is very black n white but Lomax's lawyers will be looking for avenues that will highlight different that's the key here is for us not to get drawn into the Lomax arguement but to stay on track and highlight what's been…"
2 hours ago
Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
6 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
8 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
9 hours ago
More…