Replies

  • Thanks for posting Brett. Very informative. I've been swayed on this issue on a daily basis and there's more intelligent and qualified people than I who will determine his fate, but it's great to read an article that expresses an alternative to the standard mantra that dominates the media.

    • The interesting thing is that at no point does the writer take a side on Izzy's statements. You're left actually wondering what her views are. Should always be that way with journalists. There are a couple of supposed journos on this site that could learn from that.

      • Yes, it gets us to question society and it's behaviour in the whole issue. Which is a very pertinent point, if this had of occurred in the 70's or 80's it would have barely caused a ripple, is that good or bad who knows.

         

      • She does take a side she says she doesn’t agree with the statements. Then she says he is free to make them. Which he is. But his employer is also free to sack him for making them. Which they have. 

        • You aren’t just free to sack employees at will for posting a quote from the Bible .  It’s about time employers got a reality check when it comes to social media . I hope Falou bankrupts the ARU and sets a precedent.   

           

           

  •  So - are gay folk going to hell or not?

    Are there gay people in Heaven? 

    Im very confused with the whole thing.

    • This is something that depends on which version of the bible you are reading. Most just state that these people cannot enter the Kingdom of God (ie whilst they are sinning). It doesn't say anything about going to Hell, and that would require a total rejection of God.

      • Again, going to Hell isn’t God rejecting Man, it’s Man rejecting God. 

        Essentially Hell is eternity separated from God.

        • And If Man and everything were created in God's image, it's also Man rejecting both Man's and reality's essential nature.

        • tumblr_p9jx32Xduh1w29u9yo1_400.jpg

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"Damn it HKF, I was gonna ask where did Didly Squat come from to look them up.
Next you'll say Hock isn't coming."
39 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"I am not too disheartened by that. If we got him then great but he is 29, having a few injuries and though a really good Winger he is an average Centre. I would rather Murray Taulagi."
39 minutes ago
HKF replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"Spot on, other clubs are starting to announce signings but we have signed didly squat,  no didly is not a winger."
44 minutes ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"I'm more interested in who the Eels are going to sign to replace Lomax instead of worrying about the players that don't want to be at Parra. When are we going to hear some good positive signing news or it that it"
1 hour ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"Really ?"
1 hour ago
Titan replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"He can enjoy a second straight season of reserve grade. It will kill his chance of finding a new club on decent coin after that"
1 hour ago
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"Ye we buy has been and never will be,s like this Ruby union kid"
1 hour ago
Muttman replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"Yep 100% of it goes to the cap"
2 hours ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"Only thing going for us to keep him is that it's his final year, and if he wants another big contract he needs to perform. Unfortunately we are fcuked. Cheers to the signing committee."
2 hours ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"FMD what a surprise "
2 hours ago
Trent replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"matto still has good footy in him"
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"He's back, its in the tct report "
2 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"bite the bullet and pay him out...does that contribute to loss on the cap though ?"
2 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"Rueben garrick to sign with the roosters"
2 hours ago
Axel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"There are more questions than answers regarding Matto and unless you are part of the inner sanctum of the club, we can only speculate.
From the outside, it looks like Matto burned his bridges with Ryles and is persona non grata. The sooner he's…"
2 hours ago
ParraEels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Matterson’s back @ training today. What now.
"That's last year's training gear"
3 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>