Replies

  • Thanks for posting Brett. Very informative. I've been swayed on this issue on a daily basis and there's more intelligent and qualified people than I who will determine his fate, but it's great to read an article that expresses an alternative to the standard mantra that dominates the media.

    • The interesting thing is that at no point does the writer take a side on Izzy's statements. You're left actually wondering what her views are. Should always be that way with journalists. There are a couple of supposed journos on this site that could learn from that.

      • Yes, it gets us to question society and it's behaviour in the whole issue. Which is a very pertinent point, if this had of occurred in the 70's or 80's it would have barely caused a ripple, is that good or bad who knows.

         

      • She does take a side she says she doesn’t agree with the statements. Then she says he is free to make them. Which he is. But his employer is also free to sack him for making them. Which they have. 

        • You aren’t just free to sack employees at will for posting a quote from the Bible .  It’s about time employers got a reality check when it comes to social media . I hope Falou bankrupts the ARU and sets a precedent.   

           

           

  •  So - are gay folk going to hell or not?

    Are there gay people in Heaven? 

    Im very confused with the whole thing.

    • This is something that depends on which version of the bible you are reading. Most just state that these people cannot enter the Kingdom of God (ie whilst they are sinning). It doesn't say anything about going to Hell, and that would require a total rejection of God.

      • Again, going to Hell isn’t God rejecting Man, it’s Man rejecting God. 

        Essentially Hell is eternity separated from God.

        • And If Man and everything were created in God's image, it's also Man rejecting both Man's and reality's essential nature.

        • tumblr_p9jx32Xduh1w29u9yo1_400.jpg

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Clayton replied to Blue Eel's discussion Jerome Luai Has More Get Out Clauses!
"You slag off so much at this club, might be time to find another one."
12 seconds ago
Hell On Eels replied to Blue Eel's discussion Jerome Luai Has More Get Out Clauses!
"Good blog, Bluey.
I like Luai, and he could cover 6-7. My queries are on the fit, value and/or timing.
Would Ryles go all in for Luai, and be prepared to lose talent we're developing in our pathways? Lorenzo, Risati, or even Paps.
Why would he come?…"
58 seconds ago
eel_fan_boy replied to Blue Eel's discussion Jerome Luai Has More Get Out Clauses!
"He never said "that's why I have get out clauses". It was braith anasta speculating on the situation and saying Luai would be thinking "that's why I have get out clauses"."
26 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"You won't though BE the way they are setup now like McEluff he only left because his time was up due to the constitutional rules.
They won't be actively looking for those solutions your saying because basically there throwing themselves under the…"
33 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Do you listen to Napalm Death bobbo?"
42 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Remember when TDS had to be a starter or he wouldn't have come?...good times"
43 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"HOE, all problems in any organisation at some point in time are not known, especially by the masses, they exist but are not known or identified or acknowledged. It takes just one person to say something, that begins the ball rolling,  another person…"
46 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Love me an old lady who knows how to rip a hot one...there are more of them than you think and for some reason they really like Randy 😀
Also that's an American bong. They are rubbish. Be more patriotic"
51 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"I remember not needing glasses....must be nice "
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"My solution begins the same way as always.
Identifying if we have a last minute problem in negotiations closing contracts.
Investigating if we do. Why - what is missing, what are we getting wrong, or what is it we can't compete on.
If we have a…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Blue Eel's discussion Jerome Luai Has More Get Out Clauses!
"102"
1 hour ago
Bob Smith replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Yeah, he's not as bad some some make out."
1 hour ago
Bob Smith replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Ok, bud."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"PS Bring Randolph along as well, I have someone that he will get on well with!"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"It's Ok Anal I will be able to accomodate you at the nursing home, we only have Unicor-ns there of course....when was the last time you had a hor-n Anal.....none of that funny business at the "home" by the way......though Tuesday's are grab a Granny…"
2 hours ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"So the Eels are bit like 'Spakfilla'"
2 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>