Replies

  • "So if you don’t do the things that Facebook approves of, they’re going to cut you off from their platform"

    Fark I'm shitting myself. Imagine if they banned me from something I don't use. Crazy lefties.

    The right would never impinge on your personal liberty or freedoms. Except for things like the US patriot act and, hmmm a little program called Cointelpro.

    One side might ban you from a social media platform, the other murders you in your bed ( See Fred Hampton)...

    3460137419?profile=RESIZE_180x180

    • I think what is starting to happen is that if a customer bad mouths a company on social media then patron search will identify them as a trouble maker and companies will ban them - like they will not be able to get an Uber. But could easily go further and you could be blacklisted for this political view or that depending on how the company decides to customise the search. The tech already exists as was done for the Chinese government to thought control its population

      • You'd have to go pretty far in your criticism to get a company to not want to use you for profit. 

        Let's say worst case scenario a company decides to stop allowing people of a certain political viewpoint to not access there service. There essentially undermining there own ability to be a profitable entity.  

        The whole point of a company is to make money for shareholders. It would be a strong decision to vote against making profit for a moral position, something I can't see being done regularly enough to become an issue.

        • It is already happening 

          • Any examples you can point to?

            • Using tech the ones in the article

              However it is nothing new 

              Racism, sexism, classes etc have been around forever and businesses have been happy to lose money and not serve people who belong to one group or another. In the US there have been businesses who have refused to serve people who wear apparel supporting a political group they dislike.

              • After reading the original article, there drawing loooong bow trying to link the tech thing to China's system.

                The insurance company examples are nothing they haven't been doing for decades just with a modern twist, rather than just your health records, the patronscan uber  / airbnb ones basically mean if you act like a carnt other businesses can be made aware, just like people get  known for there reputation in a small town, just supersized. For the majority of the population these are non issues because they don't act like twats, ergo non ban, ergo no issue. 

                Asian culture is vastly different in it's outlook on the dynamic between the individual and the group. In the west we're told to put individual wants and needs first. Asian countries it's all about being a good citizen, don't bring shame on your family, hence the greater acceptance of the idea of social monitoring and conformity.

                This is just the extension of that normal human tension between the individual and the pressure to conform to a cultural norm, not a grand technocratic minority report conspiracy.

                But these wafflers like to jump at " faceless men, deep state, silicon valley, bureaucrats, intellectuals, global elites etc etc" that are trying to secretly steal your freedoms, when in fact everybody already regulates there behaviour to some extent to fit in and comply in society.

                • One point is how does patronscan differentiate between   Someone who was wronged by a company sharing that on social media and someone unfairlly slandering a company. 

                  Another point is what is to stop the company legally  using patron scan for barring people who express support for one political group

                  Google Facebook twitter etc are explicitly trying to change the way people vote. 

                  At the moment there is a deficiency in the law where it is legal for companies to discriminate based on political views. This needs to be corrected.

                   

                  • It says in the original article that " Judgment about what kind of behavior qualifies for inclusion on a PatronScan list is up to the bar owners and managers. Individual bar owners can ignore the ban, if they like." 

                    So " bad behavior " isn t set by the company, rather the users. And can be ignored if they chose.

                    Traditional media outlets ( Cough cough Murdoch) have explicitly tried to change voters opinions for years and years. 

                    But I take your point as to the stratification of opinion and feedback loops that occur on social media. Essentially there algorithms are designed to present you with similar content with what you have interacted with in the past.

                    So that generally means things you really like, or things you really hate, and you get an polarized  view of a topic, or you come to think things are happening more than they probably are.

            • Isreal Folau and Qantas

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Wizardssleeves official receipts replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"So HOE, what's your thoughts on the "tolerant " burning the flag in public and the support for them to do so on the likes of the ABC and we'll known left leaning platforms  ?  Does this not make you start to question the values of those leading the…"
11 minutes ago
Nitram replied to Clintorian's discussion Depth looking good with Volkman and Twiddle on Fire in NSW Cup Finals
"Yeah great point, depth is very underrated. It is definitely more important than having one or even two absolute superstars in your side. Looking back, it is crazy to think we went into 2024 without a replacement halfback or five/eigth. Some will…"
19 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"HKF, it is unclear what you mean. Can you clarify?
After CK's murder, the right launched definitively claimed it was "the left" that was culpable. Are you denying this?
Also you say there was a receipt to the effect that "the killer was a right wing…"
23 minutes ago
Wizardssleeves official receipts replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"I dunno, I must live in some trans paradise down here where they don't get assaulted , nor abused, and are working in every other shop I walk into .  
It's almost as if they're socially accepted and the horrible universe where trans kids daily…"
25 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"It would be more accurate to say that disputes over what constitutes identity and how identity should relate to politics is important to understand if one wants to understand political conflict. For instance, identity politics as calls for equality,…"
28 minutes ago
Wizardssleeves official receipts replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"I don't know, how flaky are you ?  I'm not religious , in fact I'm the complete opposite of religious.  I think religion is dumb. However I liked Kirk and appreciate the fact he had some very wise views , whilst also keeping me amazed how someone so…"
39 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Bob, once you give up on a solution that matches liberal-democratic-secular norms, whatever solution one has arrived at can be dressed up in all kinds of rationality but it will be pernicious. Thinking the only option is to amplify violence is to…"
40 minutes ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Thanks MeelK and likewise, as HoE said, you're always very balanced.
Randy, I get it, genuinely. You're a highly intelligent person, and your views on many things clearly come from being such a deep thinker, as opposed to being reactionary or…"
40 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"LOL, Randy. Subtle."
44 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Meelk and Anguilliade, I would be happy with a new flag, but I doubt our contemporary politics could achieve enough social license to change it, or at least to radically change it. I left the union jack off my body decades ago when inking some…"
44 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Meelk, is there in fact a thing as "the flag itself"? It is ultimately a piece of cloth with a design that has some set colour scheme. We bring meaning to that combination of cloth, design and colour. We load the object with symbolic value. BUT "we"…"
47 minutes ago
Zip zip replied to Yeah Man's discussion Sign Pezet Asap
"Pezet to me is similar to Hawkins but with a better kicking game. Don't know if he would suit Moses, unless Moses reverts to more of a 5/8, with emphasis on his running game.
Wishart on the other hand would be better suited to the Eels halves.
 "
48 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Six pages in and this blog is mostly fair remarks. In that spirit, what happens when we unpack the evidence in to-date and ask does ANY of it justify the public call by Republican leaders and influencers for open war on "the left", mass censorship…"
1 hour ago
Richard Jackson replied to Clintorian's discussion Depth looking good with Volkman and Twiddle on Fire in NSW Cup Finals
"Yeah it was brilliant to see Twidle and Volk stand-out again Clintorian.
And i was amazed we held on to the ball for almost all the game.
Twidle putting his winger over twice early settled us down and allowed us tp play footy instead of catch-up.
I…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"It only takes one clip that resonates and you're instantly swinging
How fucking flakey do you think I am Wiz?"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Agreed Meelk, the things our Flag represents(democracy, egalitarianism and cold beer) are what have me looking at Trump and the USRight and thinking about the fact that I may have to actively defend those things here. "
1 hour ago
More…

 

We Could Of Won This Year

If only we didn't lose Moses at the beginning of the year we could of won this comp this year. The form we were in. The quality of the finals from all teams this weekend has been the most average I can remember. Please anyone but the Broncos win it.…

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Mark yesterday
Views: 814

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>