• "So if you don’t do the things that Facebook approves of, they’re going to cut you off from their platform"

    Fark I'm shitting myself. Imagine if they banned me from something I don't use. Crazy lefties.

    The right would never impinge on your personal liberty or freedoms. Except for things like the US patriot act and, hmmm a little program called Cointelpro.

    One side might ban you from a social media platform, the other murders you in your bed ( See Fred Hampton)...


    • I think what is starting to happen is that if a customer bad mouths a company on social media then patron search will identify them as a trouble maker and companies will ban them - like they will not be able to get an Uber. But could easily go further and you could be blacklisted for this political view or that depending on how the company decides to customise the search. The tech already exists as was done for the Chinese government to thought control its population

      • You'd have to go pretty far in your criticism to get a company to not want to use you for profit. 

        Let's say worst case scenario a company decides to stop allowing people of a certain political viewpoint to not access there service. There essentially undermining there own ability to be a profitable entity.  

        The whole point of a company is to make money for shareholders. It would be a strong decision to vote against making profit for a moral position, something I can't see being done regularly enough to become an issue.

        • It is already happening 

          • Any examples you can point to?

            • Using tech the ones in the article

              However it is nothing new 

              Racism, sexism, classes etc have been around forever and businesses have been happy to lose money and not serve people who belong to one group or another. In the US there have been businesses who have refused to serve people who wear apparel supporting a political group they dislike.

              • After reading the original article, there drawing loooong bow trying to link the tech thing to China's system.

                The insurance company examples are nothing they haven't been doing for decades just with a modern twist, rather than just your health records, the patronscan uber  / airbnb ones basically mean if you act like a carnt other businesses can be made aware, just like people get  known for there reputation in a small town, just supersized. For the majority of the population these are non issues because they don't act like twats, ergo non ban, ergo no issue. 

                Asian culture is vastly different in it's outlook on the dynamic between the individual and the group. In the west we're told to put individual wants and needs first. Asian countries it's all about being a good citizen, don't bring shame on your family, hence the greater acceptance of the idea of social monitoring and conformity.

                This is just the extension of that normal human tension between the individual and the pressure to conform to a cultural norm, not a grand technocratic minority report conspiracy.

                But these wafflers like to jump at " faceless men, deep state, silicon valley, bureaucrats, intellectuals, global elites etc etc" that are trying to secretly steal your freedoms, when in fact everybody already regulates there behaviour to some extent to fit in and comply in society.

                • One point is how does patronscan differentiate between   Someone who was wronged by a company sharing that on social media and someone unfairlly slandering a company. 

                  Another point is what is to stop the company legally  using patron scan for barring people who express support for one political group

                  Google Facebook twitter etc are explicitly trying to change the way people vote. 

                  At the moment there is a deficiency in the law where it is legal for companies to discriminate based on political views. This needs to be corrected.


                  • It says in the original article that " Judgment about what kind of behavior qualifies for inclusion on a PatronScan list is up to the bar owners and managers. Individual bar owners can ignore the ban, if they like." 

                    So " bad behavior " isn t set by the company, rather the users. And can be ignored if they chose.

                    Traditional media outlets ( Cough cough Murdoch) have explicitly tried to change voters opinions for years and years. 

                    But I take your point as to the stratification of opinion and feedback loops that occur on social media. Essentially there algorithms are designed to present you with similar content with what you have interacted with in the past.

                    So that generally means things you really like, or things you really hate, and you get an polarized  view of a topic, or you come to think things are happening more than they probably are.

                • Pretty incisive commentary Magpie.....looks like you got your identity back.

                  Ethical funds management would seem to be an area that identifies some of these type of issues. That said social media will continue to have repercussions in physcology and political correctness.

                  This will not change until people realise that the "world of social media" and the personalties that make it up are not real people.Many are living what they think is a reality inside a bubble.

                  We have seen that repeatedly on this site with multiple aliases, bullying and in some cases a belief that they are fighting a battle against something they will never understand......what it does tell you is the disparate views held and just how easily led the public is by so called site leaders.


This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Sir SuperEel 22 Hail King Arthur’s discussion was featured
The Parramatta Eels come into this round 14 clash sitting in outright third position having won 11 games and lost two. They have won their last three in a row with triumphs over the Tigers, Bulldogs and Sharks. Meanwhile the Dragons sit in 12th with…
16 minutes ago
Brett Allen replied to The True Parra fan's discussion Is 30000 members achieveable
"AFL clubs get as much if not more government help than NRL clubs. But that is what membership is about, it’s about the fans collectively supporting the club, being supporters not consumers. "
25 minutes ago
Nitram replied to GRUNTA's discussion Game Day Blog - Eels vs Dragons.
"I'm confident. I expect us to win this one. That's bad though because like I've said in other posts the last time I was confident was rd 23 2017 when we lost to lowly Newcastle. "
39 minutes ago
CarloEEL2 replied to MeelK's discussion HOE, where art thou?
"You sound like a fabulous dad and I really rate them !!! Good luck to your family x"
42 minutes ago
GRUNTA replied to jwm's discussion I saw your lights on and just thought I'd drop in.
"G'day JWM, nice to have you aboard.
Just be careful of Italians, reptiles and Audi drivers on here. They make Liberace look like Allan Border ;)"
43 minutes ago
GRUNTA replied to GRUNTA's discussion Game Day Blog - Eels vs Dragons.
"Hoping he sets off where he finished last week, Graham.
I'd love to see him playing at his best every week. Keary like.
49 minutes ago
GRUNTA replied to Chuck Norris.'s discussion Paul MARY McGregor walks away. Will this affect us ?
51 minutes ago
Graham polkinghorne replied to GRUNTA's discussion Game Day Blog - Eels vs Dragons.
"Wet track Eels by 8.
MOM Dylan Brown,  good game last week. "
52 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to The True Parra fan's discussion Is 30000 members achieveable
"They are missing the mark in terms of marketing if clubs really believes that. People will be more and more reluctant to hand over cash for a non-charity, especially ones that get a leg up from governments."
52 minutes ago
GRUNTA replied to GRUNTA's discussion Game Day Blog - Eels vs Dragons.
"Boys should be on song after last week regarding a wet track.
Surely it won't be as wet as Sunday, and damp conditions should prove to be a walk in the park for the boys after last week.
It's a pity the weather isn't fine. I reckon the Eels would op…"
1 hour ago
GRUNTA replied to GRUNTA's discussion Game Day Blog - Eels vs Dragons.
"Great analogy the batsman one.
Top stuff!
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to playthedoors's discussion Addo-Carr
"I can't believe how naive you are P&B."
1 hour ago
the eggman replied to the eggman's discussion No Smith, No Munster, no worries.
"Jarome Hughes and Vunavalu will be out next week also."
1 hour ago
Longfin Eel replied to GRUNTA's discussion Game Day Blog - Eels vs Dragons.
"Bankwest drains very well. Other than a slippery ball is won't make much difference."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to the eggman's discussion No Smith, No Munster, no worries.
"Moses was good against the Storm when we got robbed in Melbourne in 17 his first year here."
1 hour ago
paul taylor replied to GRUNTA's discussion Game Day Blog - Eels vs Dragons.
"Bloody raining again .   Slog and flog .   Needed nice dry track to run into some form before The Storm game.   Should still win with matto back .,parra by 6 mom Browny "
2 hours ago


Game Day Blog - Eels vs Dragons.

Will dead cats bounce?This is a game the Eels should win looking at the form of both teams, the talent of both teams and the home ground advantage.Having said this, how many times have we seen a team lose a coach and lift?This won't happen tonight.…

Read more…
33 Replies · Reply by Nitram 39 minutes ago


It looks like Addo-Carr is coming back to Sydney. Would it not make sense to talk to his manager to offer him a 3 year contract at the Eels and at the same time talk to Ferguson's manager and organise a 3 yr contract with the Dogs or Tigers from…

Read more…
8 Replies · Reply by Poppa 1 hour ago

<script src=""></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>