Social Blogs

Second Interview with the Man on the Hillnother round

Posted by Parramanaic on February 9, 2019 at 1:58pm in Humour

me: Testing one two three...testing, testing...I think I got it working...right, I managed to somehow calm the Man On The Hill down by buying him a round...Feeling better?

MOTH: Beer's taste like piss, did ya piss in this or something?

Me: just drink the (bleep) thing, will yah? The 1EE wants a decent interview without you going off your rocker. You know, that last interview sucked?

MOTH: Ask me some better questions then, (bleep).

Me: This year, how it looks to you?

MOTH: Dunno, we bought okay. Fergo, he's a decent buy. Nothing like big Semi. Man, he can (bleep) run. Guess chasing them goats in Fiji would do that ta ya

Me:You think missing Semi ruined our season?

MOTH: Who?

Me: Semi.

MOTH: Who?

Me: For (bleep) sake SEMI!

MOTH: Oh...him...yeah, yeah suppose so. Yeah...shit, just missed out on a (bleep) free spin...(bleep)

Me: Who think you think will be our best player?

                     (silence. Just the sound of the YEEEHAAA from the poker machine)

Me: Did you hear my question?

MOTH: Shit...see that? If that (bleep bleep) just joined up with that (bleep bleep) then I would've won feature...what question?

Me: Our best player?

MOTH: Uhhh... that bloke we got from Manly, what's his name?

Me: Shaun Lane?

MOTH: (Bleep) yeah yeah yeah...free spin!

Me: You think BA will last the season?

MOTH: You ask that before (bleep). Ask another question, like am I gonna get me end in tonight with Fat Susie?

Me: Who's...uhhh...Fat Susie?

MOTH: That one there with her legs opened? You blind or something (bleep)? The one's who's flashing her undies at me!

Me: Mate, think I'm wasting my time here...

MOTH: Shit! Again...you're (bleeping) bad luck, man, why don't you just (bleep) off and who's this One Eyed Eels site you talking about? Is that a poofters site or something? (Bleep) off, will yah?

Me: I guess the interview is terminated. Thank you for wasting the one eyed eels time, Man on the hill, any last words?

MOTH: Yeah...tell that (bleep) Frankie (bleep) Fong I got crabs from him. 

Me: uhhh righto...guess that's the end of the interview with the...uhhh....man on the hill...sorry for wasting yout time...

MOTH: (Bleep) won (bleep) ffity bucks now I can shag Susie!

 

 

 

Views: 141

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

★
★
★
★
★
Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –
Follow

Latest comments

Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
2 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
4 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
5 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
6 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
6 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yep, but fuck I hope not. The Nrl should be on parras side here"
6 hours ago
The Badger replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Our side says it's black & white. His side says it's more grey."
6 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"I think the wording was 'opportunities outside of the NRL'. That's what Sarantinos said in the press release. "
7 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"For sure it is. He has other options but only wants Melbourne. I think there's a whisper that the Storm have been behind this from the beginning. If that comes to light this could be huge. "
7 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, there must be something like that. The wording of the contract centred around Parra thinking he was definitely playing R360. The contract could be void. "
7 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Never thought of such foul play. But it is cheating Melbourne, so I wouldn't put it past them. "
7 hours ago
fishbulb replied to Poppa's discussion Shark Attack..... Moses told to be wary of the surf!
"That"s because i'm Abnormal. Fight right in here."
7 hours ago
BringBackSemi replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"One would suspect that when he originally signed with Parra, it was before he had that breakout season at the Dragons, which resulting in him playing rep footy. His contract was on less money than at the Dragons, and he probably believed he was…"
7 hours ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's a restraint of trade but Parra mentioned other 15 clubs and he said no. Isn't that restraining his own trade?"
7 hours ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"I urgently messaged my contact to ask that question. He said he hasn't seen Zac in weeks but hasn't heard Melbourne until it was released to media. But he did say if it was the plan all along he wouldn't of been told in case it leaked, if it leaked…"
7 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Haha, Bluey. Hopefully, more fringe posters come out of the woodwork. This blog is now 7th; still rising. I'm expecting an eternal cycle of positivity and negativity, sometimes sliding from one extreme to the other. Keeps things interesting. "
7 hours ago
More…

Social Blogs

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
Started by Aj in Sports
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1973

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
Started by tyler in Current Affairs
0 Replies
Views: 269

 

Eels Blogs

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>