Social Blogs

Second Interview with the Man on the Hillnother round

Posted by Parramanaic on February 9, 2019 at 1:58pm in Humour

me: Testing one two three...testing, testing...I think I got it working...right, I managed to somehow calm the Man On The Hill down by buying him a round...Feeling better?

MOTH: Beer's taste like piss, did ya piss in this or something?

Me: just drink the (bleep) thing, will yah? The 1EE wants a decent interview without you going off your rocker. You know, that last interview sucked?

MOTH: Ask me some better questions then, (bleep).

Me: This year, how it looks to you?

MOTH: Dunno, we bought okay. Fergo, he's a decent buy. Nothing like big Semi. Man, he can (bleep) run. Guess chasing them goats in Fiji would do that ta ya

Me:You think missing Semi ruined our season?

MOTH: Who?

Me: Semi.

MOTH: Who?

Me: For (bleep) sake SEMI!

MOTH: Oh...him...yeah, yeah suppose so. Yeah...shit, just missed out on a (bleep) free spin...(bleep)

Me: Who think you think will be our best player?

                     (silence. Just the sound of the YEEEHAAA from the poker machine)

Me: Did you hear my question?

MOTH: Shit...see that? If that (bleep bleep) just joined up with that (bleep bleep) then I would've won feature...what question?

Me: Our best player?

MOTH: Uhhh... that bloke we got from Manly, what's his name?

Me: Shaun Lane?

MOTH: (Bleep) yeah yeah yeah...free spin!

Me: You think BA will last the season?

MOTH: You ask that before (bleep). Ask another question, like am I gonna get me end in tonight with Fat Susie?

Me: Who's...uhhh...Fat Susie?

MOTH: That one there with her legs opened? You blind or something (bleep)? The one's who's flashing her undies at me!

Me: Mate, think I'm wasting my time here...

MOTH: Shit! Again...you're (bleeping) bad luck, man, why don't you just (bleep) off and who's this One Eyed Eels site you talking about? Is that a poofters site or something? (Bleep) off, will yah?

Me: I guess the interview is terminated. Thank you for wasting the one eyed eels time, Man on the hill, any last words?

MOTH: Yeah...tell that (bleep) Frankie (bleep) Fong I got crabs from him. 

Me: uhhh righto...guess that's the end of the interview with the...uhhh....man on the hill...sorry for wasting yout time...

MOTH: (Bleep) won (bleep) ffity bucks now I can shag Susie!

 

 

 

Views: 141

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

★
★
★
★
★
Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –
Follow

Latest comments

Parraborn1 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion What player each NRL club would need to cough-up to snare Lomax
"I'd argue that nobody wants Lomax except for Melbourne who are desperate for short-term acquisitions. "
1 minute ago
iamnot replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"that's on Lomax, his agent and his legal team, not Parramatta. If R360 made promises to him they couldn't fulfil, its on Lomax to take R360 to court. "
28 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"If you lost Joliffe would you replace him with Matto?....it's like replacing your car with a banana"
29 minutes ago
iamnot replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"R360 didn't exist at all when Lomax requested, and obtained, the release. It still doesn't. Lomax never had a contract there, as neither did any other player, including RTS. So, Lomax doesn't have an argument that his circumstances have changed. And…"
31 minutes ago
iamnot replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Absolutely Melbourne have been cooking this up for months, no doubt in breach of anti-tampering laws. But the NRL don't want to go digging there again. "
33 minutes ago
iamnot replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Exactly. And the court cannot rule on what would be considered 'fair value'. That is purely up to Parramatta to decide. "
35 minutes ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Probably believed he was worth more is more likely right. However that is on him. He could have went to Parramatta and said "Hey, since i have signed with you i have played Origin 2 years in a row and toured for Australia, could we look into an…"
1 hour ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"We did the opposite of restrain his trade, we encouraged and facilitated his trade. However, this is not about winning or losing of Lomax plays NRL again in the next 3 seasons. This is about us receiving something in return for his services. Under…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Lol Lomax cried to the NRL, Melbourne did also. Never been told no in a long time. Gallop did once and got abused by many in the game for doing the right thing. "
1 hour ago
LB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"I doubt it as outside the NRL would include SL even. Union, AFL, UFC, Boxing, Golf even. If R360 didn't eventuate there is an ample amount of opportunities still there."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"In all essence this case is very black n white but Lomax's lawyers will be looking for avenues that will highlight different that's the key here is for us not to get drawn into the Lomax arguement but to stay on track and highlight what's been…"
5 hours ago
Clintorian replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Not to mention all the other teams in Rugby he could be playing in."
8 hours ago
Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
11 hours ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
11 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
13 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
13 hours ago
More…

Social Blogs

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
Started by Aj in Sports
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1973

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
Started by tyler in Current Affairs
0 Replies
Views: 269

 

Eels Blogs

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>