Was 4 matched for Montoya who called Kyle Feldt a "f****t" too much? was it too little? or was it just about right, opinion is divided as it is such a touchy topic thought do we believe what he received was good enough or not?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I didn't see the game, did Feldt make a complaint?

    • Apparently after the game he did not sure 100% sure on that though, got heard on the refs mic.

      • If he made a complaint fair enough, but I hate that the refs are mic'd up for all to hear. These sort of things should be dealt with internally without public knowledge. Has he been given the opportunity to apologize for something said in the heat of the moment? 4 matches is a pretty stiff penalty in my view.  

  • LB, obviously a sensitive subject, so will tread carefully, but:

    Montoya - 4 weeks - For verbally abusing an opposition player in the heat of battle, granted he did use a very poor choice of word.

    NAS - 0 weeks, 0 penalty - For trying to seriously injure a player while their head was turned.

    Campbell - 0 weeks, 0 - penalty - For breaking & puncturing Russell's lungs.

    Junior - 1 week, sin bin & penalty - For smashing someone in the shoulder so hard, their head whiplashed into it afterwards but they did not require an HIA from an independant Doctor.

    Which of these incidents had the least impact on the game, the players team, physical well being, or ability to play the game in future weeks?

    They should ask Russell & Maka which they'd have preferred to be on the end of.

    If Montaya had a history of doing this, if he went out of his way to attack gay players, then some education there is definitely needed. But is that the case, or was this just a mistake (a stupid one nontheless)? He's apologised and looks as though he genuinely was sorry for it.

    I just cant respect anything the NRL / MRC do at the moment, they've 100% lost it, and desperate attempts to be seen 'doing the right thing' to the public is just further embarrassment after what they've missed lately.

    • Sorry but I can't let go of the Junior tackle, they replayed it a bunch of times on 360 last night whist discussing it and couldn't reach a unanimous verdict amongst the panel. They were saying that during a game a players head is contacted numerous times throughout a match which goes without punishment - the issue arises with the MRC when the contact is "forceful".

      Having watched it numerous times there is an argument that it was Brimson's head that made forceful contact with Junior's shoulder given the initial point of contact was shoulder to shoulder, the speed that Brimson was moving at and that Junior was more or less stationary when the tackle was made. As everyone has said - whiplash. I guess I have to leave it and move on but it's got me beat why we didn't dispute this one. 

      • Understand where you are coming from Adam, and when it comes down to purely the incident itself - 100% agree.

        I can understand not fighting it purely because in todays game, they see anything relating to contact with the head as black & white with no extenuating circumstances. I don't think we would've won, especially with the MRC trying to back the decision of a sin bin despite the independant Doctor seeing no need for an HIA.

        But if you feel we would've won, 100% respect your opinion on it. This is also the issue (as others have raised) with this ridiculous system of you can accept less of a punishment by pleading guilty. Players should not be tempted to accept something they dont agree with purely because it could cost them another week if they fight it. What a cop out that is from the NRL / MRC.

         

  • IMO , if by saying the word " f.gg.t " he did so intending the player be potentially demeaned for his sexuality then , yes , Montoya deserved the 4 weeks penalty at a minimum . Though I guess he would never admit that was his thinking though .   Otherwise , if that word was chosen in haste and not meant to be a reflection of Montoya 's opinon about Feldt's sexuality then the penalty seems very harsh , a public apology should suffice surely . Crikies footy guys are grown men , so whatever happened to the saying " sticks and stones ......". . ??? 

    • See i've been around footy fields a lot in terms of park footy, you hear that word and others alot and i would say 99/100 times that say that word simply to say they are weak or as a term to disgruntle the other player, not to knock their sexuality.

      If a player is gay then you say it then fair game for that player to receive punishment, same if you use a racist term to a player of a different race.

  • Well that's light considering I was banned for almost 4 months for using the four lettered version.

    As for calling someone that on the field, big fucking deal, Jesus soon they'll ban talking as anyone can be offended by anything if they so choose. 

    Everyone has a right to be or to not be offended but where do we draw the line on common sense? I don't think Montoya really gives a shit either way it's just a sledge FFS.

    Is Feldt even gay? And if he is why would he be worried by that sledge?

    End of the day this shit stops if people stop giving it air time. Move on....

    • The NRL is full of shit. Montoya should have got a 1 week ban and a five grand fine.

      Bryan Fletcher called Dean Widders a Black C and all he got was a five grand fine and lost his captaincy at the bunnies. The bunnies, a club with a huge Aboriginal fan base! This was worthy of a 4 week ban, if any.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Yeah Man replied to LB's discussion New favourite emerges for Jonah Pezet
"We don't need to release Lomax for Pezet media don't know our cap situation"
5 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion New favourite emerges for Jonah Pezet
"I think he would be ok but he is primarily, particularly in open age footy been a Halfback. Where Pezet has played 6 in QCup as well as FG."
7 hours ago
Longfin Eel replied to LB's discussion New favourite emerges for Jonah Pezet
"Iongi. He will need an upgrade or he will be ripe for the picking for other clubs."
8 hours ago
Sonic Boom replied to LB's discussion New favourite emerges for Jonah Pezet
"Sanders played a bit of 6 here with us coming through. He has a really good running game. I think he would be fine playing 6"
8 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Us ....Fans are the Poor Bitchs whom need Saving
Or Mr Magtterson, "
10 hours ago
fishbulb replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Lucky Jonah. Does that mean we have a Mary Magdalene too?"
12 hours ago
Kurupt - Porn Addict, But I'm In Control replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Let's see a winger or someone that could replace Moses in the future?"
14 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Considering the fact Pezet or the chances of him getting here are hear not there I deal in reality who exactly is here."
14 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Jonah Pezet...Mitchell Moses...Did your mum read you the bible or did you grow up in a chook pen?"
16 hours ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Huh ? What you blabbing about Bro"
16 hours ago
Cumberland Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Lomax - Don't need a 6 as we have Joash Papalii but Eels need a winger "
16 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"LOL...how about bold allcaps size-boosted with an exclamation mark...... YIPS!."
17 hours ago
HKF replied to Anubis's discussion NFL Superbowl LIX Continuous thread
"Along with those stats I mentioned above purdy is also more accurate than Jones. With adjusted (drops taken into consideration) completions percentage purdy is 2nd this year with Jones 11th."
17 hours ago
HKF replied to Anubis's discussion NFL Superbowl LIX Continuous thread
"The rams are stacked, they could Win the superbowl. "
17 hours ago
BEM replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Yipps for a couple of games?
You're hilarious 😂 "
17 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax or Pezet. Vote 1
"Fishy, I just realised our halves pairing may be a couple of stone cold Old Testament characters. Jonah and Moses. None of this Hillsong TimmyMannah prosperity cult crap. Old Testament, Home of Fire, Brimstone and Smiteing thou's fucking…"
17 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>