Was 4 matched for Montoya who called Kyle Feldt a "f****t" too much? was it too little? or was it just about right, opinion is divided as it is such a touchy topic thought do we believe what he received was good enough or not?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I didn't see the game, did Feldt make a complaint?

    • Apparently after the game he did not sure 100% sure on that though, got heard on the refs mic.

      • If he made a complaint fair enough, but I hate that the refs are mic'd up for all to hear. These sort of things should be dealt with internally without public knowledge. Has he been given the opportunity to apologize for something said in the heat of the moment? 4 matches is a pretty stiff penalty in my view.  

  • LB, obviously a sensitive subject, so will tread carefully, but:

    Montoya - 4 weeks - For verbally abusing an opposition player in the heat of battle, granted he did use a very poor choice of word.

    NAS - 0 weeks, 0 penalty - For trying to seriously injure a player while their head was turned.

    Campbell - 0 weeks, 0 - penalty - For breaking & puncturing Russell's lungs.

    Junior - 1 week, sin bin & penalty - For smashing someone in the shoulder so hard, their head whiplashed into it afterwards but they did not require an HIA from an independant Doctor.

    Which of these incidents had the least impact on the game, the players team, physical well being, or ability to play the game in future weeks?

    They should ask Russell & Maka which they'd have preferred to be on the end of.

    If Montaya had a history of doing this, if he went out of his way to attack gay players, then some education there is definitely needed. But is that the case, or was this just a mistake (a stupid one nontheless)? He's apologised and looks as though he genuinely was sorry for it.

    I just cant respect anything the NRL / MRC do at the moment, they've 100% lost it, and desperate attempts to be seen 'doing the right thing' to the public is just further embarrassment after what they've missed lately.

    • Sorry but I can't let go of the Junior tackle, they replayed it a bunch of times on 360 last night whist discussing it and couldn't reach a unanimous verdict amongst the panel. They were saying that during a game a players head is contacted numerous times throughout a match which goes without punishment - the issue arises with the MRC when the contact is "forceful".

      Having watched it numerous times there is an argument that it was Brimson's head that made forceful contact with Junior's shoulder given the initial point of contact was shoulder to shoulder, the speed that Brimson was moving at and that Junior was more or less stationary when the tackle was made. As everyone has said - whiplash. I guess I have to leave it and move on but it's got me beat why we didn't dispute this one. 

      • Understand where you are coming from Adam, and when it comes down to purely the incident itself - 100% agree.

        I can understand not fighting it purely because in todays game, they see anything relating to contact with the head as black & white with no extenuating circumstances. I don't think we would've won, especially with the MRC trying to back the decision of a sin bin despite the independant Doctor seeing no need for an HIA.

        But if you feel we would've won, 100% respect your opinion on it. This is also the issue (as others have raised) with this ridiculous system of you can accept less of a punishment by pleading guilty. Players should not be tempted to accept something they dont agree with purely because it could cost them another week if they fight it. What a cop out that is from the NRL / MRC.

         

  • IMO , if by saying the word " f.gg.t " he did so intending the player be potentially demeaned for his sexuality then , yes , Montoya deserved the 4 weeks penalty at a minimum . Though I guess he would never admit that was his thinking though .   Otherwise , if that word was chosen in haste and not meant to be a reflection of Montoya 's opinon about Feldt's sexuality then the penalty seems very harsh , a public apology should suffice surely . Crikies footy guys are grown men , so whatever happened to the saying " sticks and stones ......". . ??? 

    • See i've been around footy fields a lot in terms of park footy, you hear that word and others alot and i would say 99/100 times that say that word simply to say they are weak or as a term to disgruntle the other player, not to knock their sexuality.

      If a player is gay then you say it then fair game for that player to receive punishment, same if you use a racist term to a player of a different race.

  • Well that's light considering I was banned for almost 4 months for using the four lettered version.

    As for calling someone that on the field, big fucking deal, Jesus soon they'll ban talking as anyone can be offended by anything if they so choose. 

    Everyone has a right to be or to not be offended but where do we draw the line on common sense? I don't think Montoya really gives a shit either way it's just a sledge FFS.

    Is Feldt even gay? And if he is why would he be worried by that sledge?

    End of the day this shit stops if people stop giving it air time. Move on....

    • The NRL is full of shit. Montoya should have got a 1 week ban and a five grand fine.

      Bryan Fletcher called Dean Widders a Black C and all he got was a five grand fine and lost his captaincy at the bunnies. The bunnies, a club with a huge Aboriginal fan base! This was worthy of a 4 week ban, if any.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

JC replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"You don't think panthers got the calls?."
1 hour ago
JC replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"The panthers are great, there is no denying it but boy do they get every decision go their way. "
1 hour ago
Parra_Greg replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"I keep banging on how fucked the game is ........OK in the 80s it was just us dogs and manly  ............how good is the game now ?"
3 hours ago
Parra-all-the-way replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Maybe eels weren't so bad, didnt see tonights game, but on face value, we scored more and clearly panthers head and shoulders better than everyone. Eels might be a chance v tigers. Win that game and we back on track. Just hopefully no more injuries!"
3 hours ago
sloth replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Yep.. I know the season is early and lots can change but don't see anyone putting up much of a fight at this rate.
Storm had 94% completion rate but still had 50 put on them wtf.
 "
3 hours ago
Yeah Man replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Season has  ended and its April "
3 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Penrith just do things way better then anyone else. They hardly drop the ball. One thing i've noticed is in the first 15 min they have 68 percent possesion to 32 percent the opponent. This is where they do their damage put on 20pts in the first…"
3 hours ago
Joel K replied to Roy tannous's discussion Charlie guymer extends till 2028
"MoN is doing the bare minimum 
I like the re-signings but that isn't winning a comp, sooner he goes the better"
3 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"I was thinking the same, the next best team gets to be flogged by Panthers in the GF... we've already done that."
4 hours ago
Joel K replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Yeh this is not a good year to be a top four team, this is a once in a generation team
The grand final will be a 2022 repeat"
4 hours ago
ParraPride replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Hope the panthers start getting a losing streak soon!"
4 hours ago
Darren Munro replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Penrith left some tries out there. Melbourne got plenty of leg ups from the ref's. Melbourne's middles look worse than ours. We have players out lol."
4 hours ago
Yobz replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"and if we beat the Tigers by 85 points we can be in 8th spot on the ladder!"
4 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"It's not just that, their left side with Jenkins and McLean looks absolutely lethal at the moment."
4 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Roy tannous's discussion Charlie guymer extends till 2028
"Good to see him extend, he's a great player that's still developing and gives us a fair amount of utility value. Looks like they needed to lock him up with Doorey's recent injury."
4 hours ago
jjeel replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Agree. Our form looks good"
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2266

 

R5 vs TIGERS: The Trial

  It is a little known fact that Franz Kafka’s The Trial (1925) had a baby with Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot (1953), producing what literary historians know as The Parramatta Eels. In Kafka’s novel, Joseph K is an entirely unremarkable bank…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 192

Vale Neville Glover

Former Parramatta Eels winger Neville “Nifty” Glover has died aged 70.  He played 121 games for Parramatta and 13 for Penrith between 1975–1983, scoring 59 tries, and represented both NSW and Australia in 1978.  Glover was a highly regarded winger…

Read more…
10 Replies · Reply by Parra_Greg 14 hours ago
Views: 608

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>