Replies

  • This is ridiculous, how many times does a man have to front up to court over this.

    I hope it's not chewing up tax payers money.

    • I doubt Hayne was ever on legal aid where the government pays an accused legal fees . Hayne would likely have paid out of his pocket as much as it cost to keep his new legal team going including senior counsels ( SC / QC 's ) for now three trials plus his  appeal to the Court of Appeal.  If he was on legal aid there is a chance the new trials would not have proceeded so as to reduce / eliminate future public legal aid bills for representing him .  

      • Driza, I don't understand how a man that's been found 'guilty' can have another trial to prove he's not guilty?

        • That mean's you don't understand the appeal system JB and why i repeatedly suspect your low intellect.

          • Yes Poppa I don't understand the system totally, I've never been in trouble with the law and neither has anyone close to me.

            I really don't understand how someone can have enough evidence stacked up against them to be convicted but then come back for a re-trial only to be proven not guilty.

            Sounds like a circus to me and a waste of taxpayers money.

            • Surely you have heard of "appeals" JB and again if you had half a brain you would know it was a hung jury the first time and close to it the second time...."enough evidence stacked up" is not relevant if not accepted for any number of reasons, e.g. a court found Cardinal Pell guilty and a team of high court judges dismissed all the charges.

              Maybe it less Bugs Bunny on TV for you JB and one or two of the thousand TV shows that cover the law......if you ever do get caught by the law JB a quick insanity plead should be enough for you along with extracts from IEE under your name.

            • An appeal can ony be granter when evidence is not allowed to be presented in the original trial or evidenve has been found that could impact the original decision.

          • John as you know , fortunately people are no longer burnt to the stake after mere suspicion of practising which craft . A person charged by police ( called the accused or defendant ) is entitled to procedural fairness both during the police investigation and as well during the court process. The procedural fairness owed to him /her during the court hearing ( in Haynes case the court hearing was one of trial by jury ) includes that the trial judge properly instructs the jury as to the lawful way the jury is to weigh up the evidence in determining the accused's guilt or innocence of the charge . In the first trial the jury were not able to arrive at the required majority decision to make a finding of guilty ( i.e. called " a hung jury"  ) in respect of Hayne . 

          In the second trial the required numbers in a different jury of 12 people found Hayne guilty . Hayne thought the second jury's decision was unfair so he used his legal right to appeal to a higher court . Hayne persuaded the court hearing his appeal to both set aside the finding of guilt by the jury as well as Haynes conviction by the court that had followed the jury's decision .(  The reason for the appeal courts decision was I think from memory that the trial judge incorrectly instructed the jury as to the way they should arrive at their decision (meaning Hayne was wrongly convicted and that is why he is entitled to a new trial ) . This requirement for @procedural fairness has been in our legal system since we first inherited from England when the first fleet arrived in 1788 . 

          • Witchcraft sorry not which craft . ( You know riding on a broomstick lol )

        • JB that is why our system is considered one of the most fairest in the land with built in corrections through the whole process.

          For the uninitiated and just for clarity in a nut shell

          1st Trial the jury couldnt agree on guilt 

          2nd Trial - At end of the end of the trial as the Judge explained legal principles to the new jury , These directions are provided to the jury by the judge at the end of a trial and provide guidance on how to apply the law, before they deliberated.  She made statements that were not true about the case. She used phrases that were meant to lead the jury into what they have to consider, her phrases were deemed extreme and had no basis in law. The result was the Jury were mislead by the judge in what they had to consider to find guilt, she basically changed the rules.

          Officailly the Appeal judges found that "Judge Syme's directions to the Jury were so Flawed that it neccesitated the appeal to be allowed" 

          Hope that helps. For the record if you were going away to Jail for an extended time wouldnt you at least want the process to be correct and beyond reproach.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Ryles sets the record straight on DBrown
"He was paid on potential, simple as that. I went down the route that he is good but not great since 2021. He is still an NRL quality 6. Not one you build your club around though like Newcastle might have to do."
1 minute ago
Poppa replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Game Day Blog R20 vs Raiders: The Future is Now
"Ah! the voice of reason Coryn.....never underestimate it."
43 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Game Day Blog R20 vs Raiders: The Future is Now
"Paulo has a very good season, I think the influence of one of our correspondent's is unduly been talked about.
An  version of the older Papalini is a better guide to his future.
The comparison to Benji is disingenous.
Just saying I have no AI on…"
46 minutes ago
Neegan replied to Alfred's discussion Dylan Brown
"Older the wiser right! With age comes patience's they say.Lucky for as we are parra fans,who have needed patience's 😞
Gday Randy,"
55 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Alfred's discussion Dylan Brown
"They performed it...Neil did the hard work
 "
58 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Alfred's discussion Dylan Brown
"After your "baby seal" performance.....butcher's block may be Karma for you.....I am sticking with the orthopaedic surgeon, they are more like "chippies" than butcher's."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Alfred's discussion Dylan Brown
"I always thought that was the Monkees...."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Alfred's discussion Dylan Brown
"Actually, opiates might help me trust the plan, ignore my lyin' eyes and believe in Ryles.
                I'm a Ryliever   (N.Diamond, mutilated by bored Randy)
 I thought drugs were more or less a medi-thing . . that for our ailments now a…"
1 hour ago
Trent replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Win the spoon or blood jnrs for next year
"should be doing everything to win this rebuild blooding youth is a excuse "
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Game Day Blog R20 vs Raiders: The Future is Now
"Paulo finishes his career with Parra.
Moses will definitely be an Eel in 26 if not we are spoon favourites with no real replacement of his ilk on the horizon.
Ryles isn't the new Benji."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Alfred's discussion Dylan Brown
"I'm on the butchers block this tuesday....so we both gonna be sucking down the Oxy's, steppin' on leprechauns and shitposting for rehab. 
Good Luck
I didn't delete the gif...must've triggered someone else."
1 hour ago
Big Kev the Eel replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Game Day Blog R20 vs Raiders: The Future is Now
"Q5. Will Paulo finish his career in first grade or be demoted like Brown 
Q6. Will Moses be an Eel in 2026? The last remaining piece of the old spine.
Q7. Is Ryles the new Benji?"
1 hour ago
Parramatta Tragic replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion BACK TO THE FUTURE (WHICH IS NOW)
"Hi DM,
Top left is the great Ray Higgs, who aptained us into our fist two Grand Finals in 76 and 77. You would want him in your team if you were playing for your life. He and Dick Thornett  the best two second rowers in our history. To the left with…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Ryles sets the record straight on DBrown
"You don't catch the gay...someone has to give it to you"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Alfred's discussion Dylan Brown
" Had to look those words up Randolph.....so I may not be quiet the " sesquipedalian" the obstreperous one sounds like me.
PS I am glad you removed the Gif on bludgeoning the baby seals, that was emotional and even rewriting and thinking about it now…"
2 hours ago
Darren Munro replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Ryles sets the record straight on DBrown
"His been overpaid ever since his been here. I got lambasted for saying so. I read somewhere walker and dearden are only on between 500k to 600k. People on here saying his worth twice that. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣"
2 hours ago
More…

NSW Origin Squad 2025

WESTPAC NSW BLUES SQUADAmpol State of Origin, Game OneSuncorp Stadium, Brisbane Wednesday 28 May1. Dylan Edwards (Penrith Panthers)2. Brian To’o (Penrith Panthers)3. Stephen Crichton (Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs)4. Latrell Mitchell (South Sydney…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 284

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>