Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"I mean hopefully he comes back against Souths, with the week off mind you, and is more confident."
5 minutes ago
EA replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"I see more in Sorovi than Roksuka but I agree Bloomfield is the best of all with Howlett having the lowest ceiling. Howlett will be your Meaney/Chester type of player. Versatility and plenty of effort but don't expect him to be an elite player.…"
13 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"LB, be cateful, some are going to be offended that you would introduce facts into a discussion about lower grades' success or not and what it might mean or not. "
35 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Well you're right about one thing, Chiefy. Einstein did say time is relative to the motion of the observer, and your motion is toward any conclusion that can be made (by whatever means necessary) highly negative. 
By your logic, though, the Bunnies…"
39 minutes ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Howlett probably played so many games last year for the same reason he has only played one game this year; because that's how many games he was needed for.
As for Sorovi, there's other reasons a player might not be ready for the step up. He's big…"
47 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"But LB I want Chiefy to articulate the premises. Because that's kinda like helping the comedy routine achieve its true glory?!"
58 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"Agreed with LB and Captain. Ideally the team doesn't fall are when our best player is selected for rep games, and ideally not is he injured. 
I am reminded of every footy head on the footy talk shows who talk about players that govt their team-mates…"
1 hour ago
Offside replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"I'd go strange.
 
Moses at this point in his career should make rep footy his  priority its the only chance of winning anything he has a few more years with us and his premiership window is definitely shut."
1 hour ago
Angry Eel replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"100%. Putting my Parra hat on I don't want him picked. Putting my NSW hat on it's an easy pick for me. If he's fit, he's the man for the job"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"Parra G, did I state any happiness about Moses' injuries in and around Origin season? No, I didn't. Instead, my point remains: we can be very unhappy about injuries, but to extend out to Rep selection being problematic simply opens up a series of…"
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"2026 finals footy is fast becoming a dream. Chances of playing finals appears to be very slim. Why keep one of the best halves in the Country from playing Origin. Mitch wants to play Origin, he is more then capable of being selected. Why would we…"
1 hour ago
The Captain replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"Bingo! Spot on LB.
If he's fit he'll be picked and he absolutely deserves to be.
Like every single club we want our best players playing for us week in week out still. I'm thrilled for Moses when he's picked, and sad for our team. 😁"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"If medical team fail him, then pass him for Origin not much we can do. NSW would have their own doctors to test him out. If Moses chooses to play our hands are tied.
Many say "Just tell him he is not playing". We can do that but he has every right…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"Will he be picked? Yes.
Should he be picked? Yes he is one of the best halves in comp so it makes sesne, with some doubt over the preparation for him missing 3 weeks.
Do i want him picked? No."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Oh i was more so saying it is not overly important, hence my admission of only one title in the 80's. As you said it is not overly important. It is an oddly placed competition. Those who are great are either in NRL or NSW Cup by the time they are…"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Add the years of failure from every team Einstein "
2 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa May 27
Views: 281

 

Thomas Jenkins

I have no inside intel or contacts within rugby league circles, but this is one rumour I keep seeing in different parts of the internet.  Social media, Penrith forums, other eels forums etc.Milky Jenkins apparently is going to sign a 3 year deal…

Read more…
49 Replies · Reply by LB yesterday
Views: 2033

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>