Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Parra fan on The Hill replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"In return for lomax we should ask for the storm to buy all our Top 30 a boat. The boys can then rip up Parra River with donuts"
34 minutes ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"We should. He'll be out of puff and sorts. Target him all game long."
36 minutes ago
Blaze replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Lomax isnt on our cap, hes was released and cap space freed. his breaking the condition of his release, we should not be settling for a mid level player unless its multiple players.
if we were smart he would not be playing rd1 against us either. "
1 hour ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"I think Warriors will be interested in a theee team swap or maybe even the Knights. I wonder if Josh King is interested in heading back up to Maitland, you probably think immediately Nup Bellyache loves Kingy, but I think every good coach is happy…"
1 hour ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Yes 1000% Lomax is going to play Centre at Storm"
2 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
" I don't think Lomax  wants  to play Wing. Its a huge huge bugbear to him and appears to be the catalyst of why he keeps leaving clubs mid contract.
 "
2 hours ago
Richard B'Stard replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Matt Burton
"Yep, there has been some amusing talk, but its all a load of bollocks innit.Dogs will offload him soon and he'll retire to a weak club that pays massive overs for him."
2 hours ago
Richard B'Stard replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Matt Burton
"All the pundits love him, which in-turn gets punters like yourself excited. Sure, he kicks big floaty bombs which is lovely, (some might say a bit of a gimmick) but has he ever really dominated a game? "
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"😝"
2 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"I don't disagree that Williams is better on the edge than in the middle and that he is better than Blore. However I do believe that Blore is significantly better that Kelma, therefor making us better. 2 year deal means he isn't getting in the way of…"
3 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"If we take Coates he will likely be interested in PNG in what, 2028? I don't know if we would sign him if it means 1.5 seasons then we are back where we started with a high price winger. Yes he is great but the whole point is we shifted money out of…"
3 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"I still can't believe the nrl are involved it's got nothing to do with them.
Its a contract dispute between Lomax and Parra firstly then Melbourne secondly.
I said this weeks ago if this goes bad for us it will be because the nrl gets involved.
This…"
4 hours ago
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"I hope we get a player who we need from storm who we want i be happy anything else make Lomax sit it out for next 4 years"
4 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Well Cronulla want to free up cap space to keep 1-2 players for next year, using Ramien's money to front load deals. Why should Cronulla lose 2 players for nothing other than cap space? I doubt they go that far. Ramien is enough as they have two…"
4 hours ago
Bateau Bay Eel replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"Yep this is exactly the outcome that I think will happen, all monetary & no player"
4 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion Eels and Storm in last minute talks before courts
"I think a Storm player, Lomax and Ryan Matterson are all sleeping on their decisions tonight with answers due tomorrow."
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2141

 

What's the Iongi Update?

Does anyone else find it weird that the chat on Iongi has gone very quiet? We've heard nothing from the NRL or the club directly, only through newspaper articles.May it be because the NRL don't see it as much of a serious issue? What do we think?…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Acme 8 hours ago
Views: 997

Modern Day best 17

Evening everyone, how good is it having footy back.Now i want to do something different as a series. I will have surveys maybe once a day to decide who is the best player per position to create an overall top 17. Now positions like Fullback for…

Read more…
7 Replies · Reply by LB 15 hours ago
Views: 480

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>