Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Mitchy replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Cowboys rumoured signings
"Look, a lot will be known by season end for me; like a few I am concerned we have not signed anyone of note yet, besides Sua, and with aging leaders too (Moses and Paulo) we need to see what is happening for the future.
I have mentioned before we…"
1 minute ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Don't have to convince me Coryn, i agree they should have scouts there and bring them into our system."
10 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - End of Season SG/HM Player Review
"I hope so. He is still HM eligible next year. Got POTM in u16 city vs country at fullback. Absolutely carved it up. I would skip HM second year and go straight to SG ball centre and progress him to JF in 2027. Then push him to debut for nrl in 2028…"
16 minutes ago
Yehez replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - End of Season SG/HM Player Review
"Do you think Seuseu be in Ball next year EA? Even ending 2027 in Flegg? I've only seen highlights but he does look incredible. "
20 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - End of Season SG/HM Player Review
"In SG ball. Bloomfield best back. Stirling Famui best forward. Coaches award Cameron Bamblett. Players player and best and fairest Steven Nunn. So in both grades the players player and best and fairest were the same players. "
20 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - End of Season SG/HM Player Review
"The only 4 HM players I mentioned are the ones that took out the awards tonight. Lorima Seuseu best back. Jake Capovilla best forward. Liam Martin coaches award. Harden Bell players player and best and fairest."
23 minutes ago
Yehez replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Cowboys rumoured signings
"Ffs these two will be backups there.
Our fans either complain when we sign players towards the end of their careers who are just steady eddies like Katoa because we should sign guys in their prime who are game changers, but they complain again when…"
25 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Cows obviously thought these guys were better fits as they have a young back line so they've plugged in experience.
Forget those guys you mention LB why not check out this guy whose a ex leaguee making his debut for Moana Pasifika who are folding…"
45 minutes ago
Parraboy replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Cowboys rumoured signings
"been hopeful since 1994 😪"
46 minutes ago
LB replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Cowboys rumoured signings
"Not who we haven't bought and not replacing people are the same thing. We just don't sign for sake of it. Many here loved the Kelly signing when it happened as we signed someone. When there is better on the market. Now if we miss those on the market…"
47 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Cowboys rumoured signings
"I am so hopeful going big after November 30 ....if not I really have no more to say on this matter at that point that will be useless"
58 minutes ago
ParraEels replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
""
1 hour ago
Parra-all-the-way replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Cowboys rumoured signings
"Im more concerned about the lack of anyone being signed, so many players let go, and to be let go with who coming in? Are we planning on relying on our juniors? 
Its not the who is getting bought, more the fact that there is not alot coming in to…"
1 hour ago
Zip zip replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"I'm thinking the same. Neither will be the long term no.6
Wouldn't surprise me if we're looking at Matt Burton, although I thought we should have had a crack at Jake Clifford to partner Moses when he was sitting on Cowboy's low ball offer there for…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Dragons? He declined them before coming to us. Melbourne is realistic."
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Taulagi is available. Jenkins is available. Xerri and Timoko are more likely available. I disagree with that. Backs I feel there is some value. Middles is where it is bare.
Tell me Coryn, with them available, would you rather any of them over Ramien…"
1 hour ago
More…

 

Injury Report Round 13

Looks like Simmonson will return this year, have lost Paulo for 8 weeks. Penisni for another 8-10 weeks and Moses is TBCInjury Report:Simmo - Round 23Will - Round 21-23Paulo - Round 21Mitch - TBCR Penisni - To return next weekFletcher & Tago - Round…

Read more…
11 Replies · Reply by Offside 1 hour ago
Views: 436

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>