Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Darren Munro replied to LB's discussion BA's Round 8 presser
"Or Bennett has already been signed and Ba is doing his best to keep it together. "
38 seconds ago
Darren Munro replied to LB's discussion BA's Round 8 presser
"Exactly "
2 minutes ago
Strange-eel replied to Muttman's discussion Souths Anzac Jersey
"Flops aren't illegal anymore it seems.
 "
25 minutes ago
Cranky Brad is here!!! replied to Electric Eel 2's discussion Lomax is a freak
"Put a bigger wooden spoon sticker over it. The people who the car will have a good laugh. "
50 minutes ago
Cranky Brad is here!!! replied to Electric Eel 2's discussion Lomax is a freak
"I used to think Flanagan was the one to get parra over the line. Dragons will definitely get better if they get the players, but why would you let the best player you have walk? I'm glad he didn't come here now. "
52 minutes ago
Cranky Brad is here!!! replied to Electric Eel 2's discussion Lomax is a freak
"A heap on here said he couldn't play and were pissed off we had rumors of chasing him. I kept trying to explain he is talented as and a few years ago when he was happy he was killing it. Glad he has found that already this year. Can't wait to see…"
54 minutes ago
fishbulb replied to Muttman's discussion Souths Anzac Jersey
""
1 hour ago
Colin Good replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R8 v Manly: The Rise and Fall of the Eels
"Parra have a hard road ahead in playing these teams twice Panthers Storm manly Roosters Brocos and South's "
1 hour ago
LB replied to LB's discussion BA's Round 8 presser
"If we win, I'll openly say how wrong I was and I'm not afraid to do that. Let's hope I am wrong EA."
1 hour ago
LB replied to LB's discussion BA's Round 8 presser
"We've had an issue of Brown not playing how he should due to organising. Now we have a named a Halfback and still will be organising.
But at the end of the day it doesn't matter if you cannot defend and don't have the attitude, you are right Coryn."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion BA's Round 8 presser
"Seriously we don't need to be worrying what Sanders or DB do with the ball we don't.
If Sanders Lane and co can't  hold up on there side the argument what we do with the ball is moot right.
Its what we do without the ball that is the key to our…"
1 hour ago
Frank The Tank replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R8 v Manly: The Rise and Fall of the Eels
"Losing cures the scenario we are in - winning will just paper over the cracks.
No arguing we need a clean out at the top. MON and a few others need to go as well, but the best chance of that happening is if we get rid of the coach first and then…"
1 hour ago
Longfin Eel replied to Muttman's discussion Souths Anzac Jersey
"I thought it was North Queensland. "
1 hour ago
Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him replied to Muttman's discussion Souths Anzac Jersey
""
1 hour ago
Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him replied to Muttman's discussion Souths Anzac Jersey
"I am getting unlimited joy watching that white Aboriginal from Canberra getting pumped playing for Souths . How embarrassing considering the media circus surrounding him wanting to move to win a premiership.  What a loser . "
1 hour ago
adnan replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R8 v Manly: The Rise and Fall of the Eels
"This week is the week of floggings"
1 hour ago
More…

 

BA's Round 8 presser

https://www.parraeels.com.au/news/2024/04/25/coachs-media-round-8/What a master, saying a long time since he's seen them play like that. It was a long time, try two weeks prior against Canberra. Saying it is one loss, try 2 out of 3 games putting up…

Read more…
37 Replies · Reply by Darren Munro 38 seconds ago
Views: 720

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>