Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

The Captain replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Cleary is trusting the process after 4 back to back premierships and another on the way. Their team just walloped a team by 50, the team they walloped just put 50 on us. The process they're trusting has proven incredible success behind it... that's…"
13 minutes ago
John Boyle replied to Roy tannous's discussion Charlie guymer extends till 2028
"Agree Muttman, barely anything to be overly excited about like most seem on here seem to be.
Wish they would announce the signing of a Casey McLean or something of that standard."
37 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Coryn, I suggest you go back to the blog asking if anyone is losing faith and have a read over some of the comments made after our loss to the Panthers. Are the 1eyedeel community in a state of panic? Are they trusting the process? Are they sticking…"
42 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Listening to the Clearys in the presser they sound very much like  Bill Walsh the famous 49er nfl coach.
Cleary Snr talks about the process and preparation more so than anything else week to week getting the players up to perform and the result…"
1 hour ago
parra supporter replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Thought we weren't that bad last week, we just looked terrible against the panthers. Can't remember a time where a team has been so far ahead of the pack. Perhaps not since us in 2001"
2 hours ago
JC replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"You don't think panthers got the calls?."
5 hours ago
JC replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"The panthers are great, there is no denying it but boy do they get every decision go their way. "
5 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"I keep banging on how fucked the game is ........OK in the 80s it was just us dogs and manly  ............how good is the game now ?"
7 hours ago
Parra-all-the-way replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Maybe eels weren't so bad, didnt see tonights game, but on face value, we scored more and clearly panthers head and shoulders better than everyone. Eels might be a chance v tigers. Win that game and we back on track. Just hopefully no more injuries!"
8 hours ago
sloth replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Yep.. I know the season is early and lots can change but don't see anyone putting up much of a fight at this rate.
Storm had 94% completion rate but still had 50 put on them wtf.
 "
8 hours ago
Yeah Man replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Season has  ended and its April "
8 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Penrith just do things way better then anyone else. They hardly drop the ball. One thing i've noticed is in the first 15 min they have 68 percent possesion to 32 percent the opponent. This is where they do their damage put on 20pts in the first…"
8 hours ago
Joel K replied to Roy tannous's discussion Charlie guymer extends till 2028
"MoN is doing the bare minimum 
I like the re-signings but that isn't winning a comp, sooner he goes the better"
8 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"I was thinking the same, the next best team gets to be flogged by Panthers in the GF... we've already done that."
8 hours ago
Joel K replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Yeh this is not a good year to be a top four team, this is a once in a generation team
The grand final will be a 2022 repeat"
8 hours ago
ParraPride replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"Hope the panthers start getting a losing streak soon!"
8 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2267

 

R5 vs TIGERS: The Trial

  It is a little known fact that Franz Kafka’s The Trial (1925) had a baby with Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot (1953), producing what literary historians know as The Parramatta Eels. In Kafka’s novel, Joseph K is an entirely unremarkable bank…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 203

Vale Neville Glover

Former Parramatta Eels winger Neville “Nifty” Glover has died aged 70.  He played 121 games for Parramatta and 13 for Penrith between 1975–1983, scoring 59 tries, and represented both NSW and Australia in 1978.  Glover was a highly regarded winger…

Read more…
10 Replies · Reply by Parra_Greg 19 hours ago
Views: 616

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>