Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Joeyboyz replied to The Ghost of Danny Crnkovich's discussion Eels podcasts
"I like TCT, but it's a very hard listen without nodding off. Those 2 are boring personalities."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"Not according to them."
2 hours ago
EA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Anyone see Simmo in an interview. He tore his hamstring off the bone just prior to pre season starting. So he never had an nrl pre season this year and only returned to training just before the sharks trial game. This bloke is so injury prone now.…"
2 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"It might hit news once 1 of the factions trying to destroy the club get involved.  We know too well some factions have buddies in the media who will let them attack the club any way they can.
If it does talking Parra won't be mentioned and he will…"
3 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"Why was he around the players that long to spread so much negativity. "
3 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"That is how podcast and YouTube wanna be's build subscribers.  They cause drama, talk about the drama, go on other shows causing more drama and engagement increases.
It doesn't matter if someone had a go at them earlier if they can get attention out…"
3 hours ago
Richard B'Stard replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"Poor bugger might need to spend some time away from the game and reconsider his priorities in life."
3 hours ago
LB replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"How does he act at games? I have heard anything of that nature? Not saying it's not true either.
It reminds me of a comment that lead singer of Nickelback once said in an interview I heard and always stuck with me after their first hit became global…"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"Weird thing is he tags Hello Sport yet called them out earlier in the year calling them names as they made a slight post about Troy saying he is leaving the SGA. Hello sport responded "big news out of Parra" in a sarcastic way and Adam had a go at…"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"I wouldn't say lose lose. I mean maybe I am seeing this as less than it is but I don't think his following is as big as what many think. Not like this will hit the papers or radio. 
If it does, I will come back here and say I was wrong and surprised…"
4 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"But, Poppa, you might have missed the trap into which my question was leading our R&R experts.
If it's about rich clubs breed success, then either:
A) R&R teams' relation to ontield success is fractured through much broader financial relationships…"
4 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"Nothing wrong with critisism but don't expect to be invited to events with players and staff present which is what Captains club offers.  Is he banned from attending games or just the privilegesbthat come with Captains club membership. 
He has been…"
4 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Correct, Poppa. I listed some figures which bring into doubt Chiefy's "fans pay your wages" claim. But we can directly test Chiefy's degree of sincerity. Does Chief think the wages of Politis at Chooks is paid by fans?"
4 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"I've answered that question, Chiefy. I've stated that I don't share your assumption of a 1-to-1 linear relation recruitment/retention to ladder position. Because I disagree with that premise, the burden is not mine to isolate decisions and correlate…"
4 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"Looks like he is hoping a show with fans will invite him on to talk and grow his own fan base tagging different shows and podcasts but they won't give him any support as he is no one.
Just another fan who thinks he has insights and knowledge beyond…"
4 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"I think this is a lose lose for the club. Social media is here to stay and any club whether it be the epl or American football are going to face criticism towards players , coaches or the administration. I don't know exactly what happened here and…"
4 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 249

 

RECRUITMENT

Seems like every week there are good quality players coming onto the market or that are available that would add something to our team and roster but we aren't seeming to be as active in the player market as we were earlier this year. EG Keon.…

Read more…
79 Replies · Reply by EA 2 hours ago
Views: 1784

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>