Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Nitram replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Yeah actually think if you slow it down enough the qlder held back murray first. Penalty try if you really want to slow it down and get pedantic."
1 hour ago
shane replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"so many on here talking crap. Cleary kicking was good and help win the game, Moses kicks goes strat to fullback or winger and they make 10 or plus metres tothe defense, thats not great kicking and doesn't win you games where Cleary kicked a 40 / 20,…"
1 hour ago
Parrafan101 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Well they (NSW) base their game plan around Mitchell Moses long kicking game, Strnage is a gun player but when we're in a tight grind and possession not going our way Moses can just kick us to a win with field possession."
8 hours ago
Old School Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Everyone saying QLD blew NSW off the park in first 20 mins. The scoreboard might suggest so, but not really the case. In fact, it was only the 4-5 pathetic errors between 9-20 minutes that gifted QLD repeated good ball sets. Prior to the first shit…"
8 hours ago
Darren Munro replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Loz doesn't look well. 70kgs ringing wet. Look like a kid wearing his dog shirt."
9 hours ago
Colin Good replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Coaches that dull the game through the middle all day is so boring and the marjority of tries are scored through moving the ball "
9 hours ago
Bear replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Firstly we won, well done. We were in the first 40 pedestrian,  Laurie played the old win the battle in the middle ploy. Kudos to him ,why have a super fast team ( koula, strange, staggs) exploit the 6 against, using our speed, if you don't use…"
11 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Depending on fitness, Moses should play game 2 if Daley is smart.  Cleary couldn't kick us out of trouble until his 40/20.  Qld started nearly every set between their 20m and 30m line as Cleary long kicking game was poor, while we played from inside…"
11 hours ago
Colin Good replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"The reason why Queensland scored in the first half a good place to start is to teach players to play the ball properly, for professionals to make these mistakes is embarrassing "
12 hours ago
JC replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"In the 19. You can't possibly drop strange after his performance plus the fact they won, lucky as it was.
We're qld really as dominant as being made out?, sure they were absolutely red hot for the first 20 minutes and nsw were absolutely terrible…"
13 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"LMAO!"
13 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
""
13 hours ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"Haha.. I thought so, Meelky. "
13 hours ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"When referring to elite, generational talent, whatever $$ it takes, Coryn. "
13 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Laurie is about is good as Mal Meninga...just that Mal didnt have to do shit for 8 years ..another coaching myth"
13 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Yep keep Mitchell Moses out of Origin..He has nothing to prove..Hes needed more in club games"
13 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa yesterday
Views: 208

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>