Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Richard B'Stard replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ashley Klein's $400K gambling problem
"This explains an awful lot. "
7 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ashley Klein's $400K gambling problem
"If a referee has a gambling problem that big, corruption has to be a massive concern. Shame on the NRL for sweeping it under the carpet. I hope he's been investigated and come out squeeky clean with his account being monitored "
15 minutes ago
KENDOZA replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ashley Klein's $400K gambling problem
"400k fmd. Referees 100 percent are gambling on games just like the players. "
29 minutes ago
Frankie Fong replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ashley Klein's $400K gambling problem
"Doesn't surprise me , he's the most arrogant ref in the game who has made some of the most disgraceful decisions that have cost teams games ."
29 minutes ago
rex macmundi replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ashley Klein's $400K gambling problem
" Say no more "
39 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ashley Klein's $400K gambling problem
"Gee, makes you wonder. The fascinating thing is the NRL have known for 4 years 😳"
43 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Ashley Klein's $400K gambling problem
"Is it bad that I'm not surprised?"
45 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion The Ticking Time Bomb
"I think Ryles will stay committed to the club until his contract is complete regardless of the on field results. It's a shame that the club has been riddled with injuries this year as I think the Eels would have definitely made the top 8 this year…"
58 minutes ago
JC replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion The Ticking Time Bomb
"I think its more a case that we are too conservative. The club had to take a measured conservative approach after the salary cap debacle and has slowly and steadily rebuilt the clubs integrity. 
As a bi product of that i feel the club has become…"
1 hour ago
JC replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion The Ticking Time Bomb
"It ultimately does lead to sackings eventually if results continue to not be good enough, well it should anyway. 
My question to you, as you are opposed to sackings at this point, when is the right time to make changes, sackings, demotions,…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Steel be with you's discussion Talking Parra Podcast and the ongoing soap opera
"Lol and as soon as we mention this, he pops up again with another explanation. Mentioning how much money he has spent on his tickets, that are going to be refunded by the way. Says he wants to move and feels he is not owed anything yet talks about…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"That is not the question, going to Penrith is very attractive regardless of Cleary being there or not. Nathan will still be there.
The question that should be asked is why did Ryda turn them down? And why say he will be there eventually when he did…"
1 hour ago
Joel K replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"A year under Ivan Cleary will do wonders for anyone"
2 hours ago
LB replied to Steel be with you's discussion Talking Parra Podcast and the ongoing soap opera
"Pokemon is crazy level rage at the moment. Pokemon Go would be better, he gets out of the house to catch them."
2 hours ago
LB replied to Steel be with you's discussion Talking Parra Podcast and the ongoing soap opera
"You have hung around him? If so what was he really like?"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion The Ticking Time Bomb
"Good point NOS about the load bearing aspects, I had/have not given enough thought to that aspect."
3 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
8 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 326

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>