Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Angry Eel's discussion Clayton Faulaulo
"Also, the guy you said is the most talented back that's leaving to Perth was prioritised over Faulalo when at Parra. Arthur kept that Rouse Hill Rhinos connection and already played Russell by then. So if anything lean on BA being the reason.
Lets…"
6 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"The asx200 rose 1.62% yesterday, whatever happens in the footy I'm all good thanks."
12 minutes ago
LB replied to Angry Eel's discussion Clayton Faulaulo
"But that’s exactly why I think the conversation has drifted away from the original point.
This started because someone said “of course he’s a Parra junior” after a few good games, basically implying we’ve let another star walk out the door. My whole…"
29 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !

Adam MaGrath  at 5pm"
30 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"Why are there so many blogs with the same theme (and the same people with the same responses)? Thank goodness it's game day and there will be something else to talk about come 3pm"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"It's the worst and I mean worst time to resign players for a club like ours now.If you are a young up n comer a clubman coming off contract an elite talent it's perfect timing with more money and opportunities on the market the options are there for…"
3 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Angry Eel's discussion Clayton Faulaulo
"It's not just 1 game, he's played a handful of games and look like a pretty slick player. Sean Russell is no gun. He's developed into a decent 1st grade centre but has never appeared to be a player with a high ceiling.  Mate our outside back…"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Angry Eel's discussion Clayton Faulaulo
"Could a MON Voodoo doll be a possibility? Does Chief engage in witchcraft by any chance?"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"In terms of Talking Parra. I would take that with a grain of salt at the moment. Primarily due to both those two parties having a fall out months ago. One side carried on about not having access anymore, on April fools day made a joke saying "We…"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"Well PF how do we know another club didn't want them? Maybe no other club or maybe one other wanted Jenkins? You gonna say no thanks?
But in terms of elite, well not sure that is going to happen. Maybe one might come available later but rarely does…"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"Ok few things. I do not really agree the defence as a whole is better than BA's at this stage. I mean this year we are setting records. Before you say injuries we conceded 86 points in first fortnight. Also, saying the roster that MON has given him…"
5 hours ago
Michael W. replied to Angry Eel's discussion Clayton Faulaulo
"Chief, your obsession with MON is consuming you. You eat, sleep, drink and probably masturbate to MON. You probably have a room filled with MON memorabilia, and a pentagram, or in your case a MONagram, just so you can try and do some weird shit with…"
6 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Angry Eel's discussion Clayton Faulaulo
"Mate don't forget Captain Ben Roger's too."
7 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"They better be elite, if they another club doesn't want them type im gonna go ahead and sit myself out for the 27 season."
7 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"We'll see if they can get more signings over the line. In just going off what's happened previously. "
8 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"*2025"
8 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 223

 

Should we be concerned !

As we head into June and not far off the middle of the season, attentions really begin to look at 2027 rosters across the NRL.So far the club has signed a very good talent in Jayd'n Sua. He has played 6 origin games for Queensland (last in 2024) and…

Read more…
23 Replies · Reply by Adam Magrath 12 minutes ago
Views: 426

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>