Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
"Pou, you are equating non-compliance with threat, so there is no "step beyond" lack of compliance whereupon threat steps in. 
I mean you have also regurgitated DHS propaganda that immediately called shooting victims domestic terrorists engaged in…"
4 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
"Where is the contrary evidence Poh? read the wired link. They were shittalking and gaslighting the victim immeadiatly. "
4 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
""
8 minutes ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
"'Generally more circumspect'? You're obviously unfamiliar with the Brereton Inquiry.
I also don't think this killing was righteous. It was tragic at best and murder at worst. But it's also an inevitable outcome of a situation where law enforcement…"
9 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
"Randy, you F-head. Does that make it better? Have I settled it?!
PS: Prof Daz is a F-head. Heard it here first NOT. Half of 1EE tells me it every second day. I'm not going to return the favour though. An argument or reason can be bad without that…"
11 minutes ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
"No it's not the lack of compliance, as you keep spamming here. It's the threat toward ICE that is escalating this situation. That's a step beyond lack of compliance."
12 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
14 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
"Pou, try to read what you're writing with even just an ounce of reflexivity. Kirk's speech can't be considered threatening but you think protest at Trump is necessarily threatening?
Best yet: "The world would be in trouble if "moral criticisms is…"
14 minutes ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
"I wouldn't be pointing anything at them, that's for sure. Do you know what it's like to be amongst a hostile crowd where you know some of them are armed and feel justified in killing you? Training is only going to reinforce that by the time someone…"
15 minutes ago
Steve replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
"Laughable response mate, its well known you champion every leftist cause from climate change to hating Trump, you love this shit. And you're more wrong than you are right or should I say left"
19 minutes ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
"I think Trump has been great for America. Unfortunate for the rest of the world, but we have been sucking at their teat for a long time."
21 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
"Not at all. I was refering to your perspective on the righteousness of the shooting of an unarmed restrained man. It just didn't sound like your role was combat oriented as those chaps are generally more circumspect.
No disrespect Pou, and,…"
22 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
"Pou, if the training for ICE agents does not permit them to distinguish between citizens holding cell phones up to record them and enemy combatants with guns, either those ICE agents lack sufficient training to distinguish between phones and guns or…"
22 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
""Submissives like you"   Thats not fair and if you know FM and his history he is not a submissive, submissives can have all sorts of scenarious applied to them......mostly sexual......where are you on the scale Randolph, presumably see yourself as a…"
23 minutes ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
"I don't follow the news too closely. The first I heard about this incident was here. The only media article I've seen about it was the Bellingcat one linked earlier. Then I watched a press conference on YT where the head of ICE or whatever gave his…"
25 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Irony is Dead
"Steve, please provide an argument rather than just a description of what you take to be my political leanings. 
Are you saying that the government executing its own citizens in public is the "sensible centre"?"
27 minutes ago
More…

Irony is Dead

It was not so long ago, on the venerable pages of 1EyedEeel, that those of us unfortunate enough to have landed on the left of the political spectrum were scolded for apparently celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk. No, we said, we are not…

Read more…
76 Replies · Reply by Prof. Daz 4 minutes ago
Views: 202

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1970

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>