Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Poupou Escobar replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Rokosuka hurt his knee in his last SG Ball game against Souths in round 6. He got it strapped after 10 minutes and finished the game, but he was limping the whole time. Bloomfield has school commitments, as you say. Howlett was the other talented SG…"
57 minutes ago
EA replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Watching the junior grades, for the life of me I cannot understand what the fuck they are doing with outside back development. We lost to dogs tonight in JF and if we swapped outside backs the result would be different. Leigh, Tuala and Nelson are…"
2 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"If he comes to sydney it will be with either dogs or roosters"
3 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Not surprised, Poppa. The biblical Moses didn't exist either. Like most biblical things, it's fake news. "
3 hours ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Stevo it seems more likely that Da Silva is the preferred option, more game time the better for his development. With Edwards, who can do similar to Smith but with the added benefit of playing middle as well, he can have mor versitlity without…"
4 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"But you see DB frees Ponga up that's the key and at the sametime Holbrook is slowly but surely will turn him into that game controller all the flashy stuff can be left Ponga while DB goes through his maturation of learning how to run a side.He's…"
4 hours ago
Mitchy replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Yeah - well that is a matter of opinion Tin. Ponga for me is the danger; and you say earning his money....well thats ok but I would like to know how he earned it weekly with Parra. He played v inconsistently IMO but each to their own."
5 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Suli is a analytics type of signing for not much money.
Read it how you will do we not have a shot at the top talent available.
Suli to me doesn't move the needle enough for me he's strong very straight linish and hasn't found a long term home now…"
5 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"To be honest the knights have DB and KP on pretty much the same money.
I like the Newcastle side purely because of the strike they pocess on both sides.
When DB was saying last week he thought he was a lifer at the Eels it breaks your heart seeing…"
5 hours ago
JC replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"You are kidding right?, earning $1.3m you reckon?, more like he is earning the $900k he was on at parra and I was one of his biggest fans. Do you believe we should have matched the knights offer?."
5 hours ago
Tin Tim replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"We miss Browny, killing it for the Knights. Earning his money week after week & throwing pies on faces that bagged him out. Ha ha"
6 hours ago
Stevo replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Well thats a question for someone who is in the know and that aint me. JR is probably saving Smith from himself (sounds weird considerig he's playing cup) or purely managing the injury hehas or just wanting to see how TDS goes with more minutes or…"
6 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Holmes has scored about 10 tries a year in the same backline.  Suli 2 a year  
 "
7 hours ago
Poppa replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Good point Rocky, this starting to feel like a Russell Crow production!"
7 hours ago
Poppa replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"This one is for you Daz, there is a strong possibility Moses is not his real name!/? having two Moses could be encouraging fake news."
7 hours ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Ok, if the case why is he playing and why not rest up so it is 100% clear? We have Edwards at least so no need for him right now if not 100% also why play full 80?
He could be back next week and all good but I just find it coincidental that Ryles…"
7 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa May 27
Views: 278

 

Thomas Jenkins

I have no inside intel or contacts within rugby league circles, but this is one rumour I keep seeing in different parts of the internet.  Social media, Penrith forums, other eels forums etc.Milky Jenkins apparently is going to sign a 3 year deal…

Read more…
49 Replies · Reply by LB 11 hours ago
Views: 1885

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>