Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"Tigers are slow starters as well so hopefully they are the same again."
2 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"When Penisini, Iongi, Doorey and Hopgood are out injured then year that will make it ordinary. Had those 4 be able to play it looks better of course."
2 hours ago
ParramattaLurker’s discussion was featured
 1. Joash Papaili2. Bailey Simmonson3. Brian Kelly4. Sean Russell5. Josh Addo-Carr6. Jonah Pezet7. Mitchell Moses (c)8. Jack Williams9. Rylex Smith10. Junior Paulo11. Kelma Tuilagi12. Kitione Kautoga13. Dylan Walker Interchange:14. Tallyn Da Silva…
4 hours ago
EA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"I dont think other teams were because many coaches and players have questioned these decisions and like eels so many teams have conceeded a lot of points. It is just eels have been the worst of the lot and a big reason to do with that is we probably…"
4 hours ago
The Captain replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"Which is odd if true because VLandys is a pretty open book - he wants a faster game with more tries so he can sell more TV ad time and make the NRL worth even more in broadcast rights. 
We should have been ready for the touch footy. Other teams were."
4 hours ago
EA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"The press conference prior to the Panthers game on the eels website. https://www.parraeels.com.au/news/2026/03/27/round-4-coachs-media--...
They were speaking about NRL rule changes and how its changed the product of the game etc. JR said "all I…"
5 hours ago
Darren Munro replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"100%"
5 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"When did he say that?"
6 hours ago
Colin Good replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"Will Jason Ryels make the stupid statement the game plan will be to play through the middle, if parramatta do that a flogging is in store "
7 hours ago
Strange-eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"That's an ordinary looking team."
7 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"Straight up, I'm hoping i'm just plain wrong ! But seriously Papalii, Simonsson, Kelly, Russell as our 1st grade NRL finals bound backline, I just don't see it. The new Temu Eels Backline would hardly worry most teams. Happy to have egg all over my…"
7 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"They are not favs, $2.19. We've actually been brought into $1.68 and line from -1.5 to -3.5."
7 hours ago
Longfin Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"Agreed Zip. Time to see what the juniors have got. I think a turnaround for this tram will need some thinking outside the box. Clearly we are not Melbourne who can buy whoever they want to fill a gap, all within the salaries cap of course."
7 hours ago
Zip zip replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"💯 
Jr probably is more a lock these days. Better to use him there to attract defenders and get an off load. Williams is better on the edges. Teancum Brown and Tuivati makes more impact than any forwards we have. Unleash the new generation. "
7 hours ago
Flow Basket replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"Next man up I'm right behind this team could be top 8bnext week"
8 hours ago
Billy Bob replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"Totally agree mate if this is the staring team we will be smashed at the start again "
8 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2264

 

Cayless to apply for Manly job?

Gal apprently believes Nathan Cayless will apply for Manly job. Lol doubt he gets it but never a harm going for it.Cayless did an alright job in Cup last year and has done ok this year so far.What is funny is this comment on facebook that will…

Read more…
13 Replies · Reply by adnan 12 hours ago
Views: 538

RELAX

Reading people comments here and other forums the verwhelming majoirty of people feelings are quiet negative and very pessimistic. Being 2-2 with having played 3 best teams in the comp including beating defedning permiers at home . We are just in…

Read more…
15 Replies · Reply by Parra_Greg 10 hours ago
Views: 669

Anyone else lose faith

I'm not talking about eels I'm talking about our stupid recruitiment and retention team.Like how can a group be so fcken stupid,surely we can petition to get em out of the club cause they fcken suck.Like you look at all the other clubs signing guns…

Read more…
56 Replies · Reply by Parra_Greg 10 hours ago
Views: 946

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>