Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Hopefully convenient as well, everyone saves face.....yes a blind man may actually ask the question, could have Moses played last night?
IMO going into this game history told Daley that Moses had to be picked, but his instincts and bias was to his…"
2 minutes ago
Sparky the Eel replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Does ponga now miss weeks?
"NRL hate Parra simple they would rather to 
A. see the Eels fold
B. Merge with another club soley for the Stadium
C.Never asist them to win another premership (Ref's run the game as per NRL instructions)
 "
2 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Yehez you looking for a job with the Chiefs, I was thinking you being an assistent to Mallee but Mallee couldn't lead a poodle through Paris, so you can be Chief Head Hunter and Mallee your assistant.....good luck with that one!"
16 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"I love it when a plan comes together Cappy, your Avatar can vouch for that LOL"
22 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"That's fine, its a discussion, not in the "idiot" category of some on here over the last 24 hours. 
In some ways I hope you are right as I like to see Moses do better than he currently is.
This is maybe a bit rhetorical but when Moses made his mark…"
32 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Hahaha you're on a roll there Pops  good stuff!!"
37 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"I agree they don't suit each other, but I can almost guarantee they'll both be selected if they're both fit.
I doubt Mitch will be fit enough though, he's playing injured, so it's probably a moot point."
39 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V'landyball: The Momentum Wars
"Origin last night.
2-1 restarts until almost the 60th minute.
R11 Eels v Storm (not unlike R1)
Storm 4-0 restarts in the first 30 minutes. Advantage: 3 v 12 minutes of death zones. A big fatigue factor. We probably should have made many more errors…"
43 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"Excellent stuff, Super.
I'd have a Hybrid, diversified system adapting to market conditions. Not purely Buffet, Turtle trading, or blue chip investment. Three categories to complement our juniors.
1. "Confidence" marquee buy  2. Momentum movers  3.…"
44 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Completely disagree with you on this one Pops. No I won't accept that NSW wouldn't have won if Moses was there. Again I reiterated kicking is THE most important factor in origin. Cleary was under pressure for 60 mins last night and was forced to run…"
47 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"You only need one playmaker in the side, a side with more ready made play makers because of the status of the players picked......precludes the likes of Moses, kicking is important but not a factor when you have someone like Cleary there. Moses…"
1 hour ago
Angry Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"I completely agree with you about Cleary obviously but I can't see how you say they don't suit each other when they've only played 1 game together for a win? Your kicking game is everything in origin and having a secondary kicking option in Moses is…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Does ponga now miss weeks?
"Meelky.....don't mention the war!"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Moses should only be there as No 19 if anything happens to Cleary.....they just don't suit each other Cappy."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Accept if Moses played last night instead of Strange, NSW would not have won!
Cleary and Moses do not work as a combo....... when Sterling and Mortimer vied for the NSW job, they never picked them as a combo."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"This might sound unpopular, but Cleary is leading the Dally M's, kicked a 40/20 to win the game, kicked the ball that Tedesco scored from, scored a try and lifted the team......Oh and Moses should take his place because Moses has been only…"
1 hour ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa yesterday
Views: 205

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>