Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Yehez replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 14 Team List v Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs
"Yeah I overestimated. Closer to 3m/3.2m. Paulo 900, Mitch 1.3, Hopgood 0.7, Simmo 0.5. THat's 3.4m. Maybe I'm overestimating Simmo. "
1 hour ago
Parrafan101 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 14 Team List v Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs
"Didn't I said this a week ago, they'll pick him for game two. Because Cleary favours to play next to Moses."
4 hours ago
Big Bee replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 14 Team List v Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs
"Lol
 "
4 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Unity is Strength: Back the Badge
"People are forgetting this is the most connected sqaud we've had, we're building something and if we get it right and add a few pieces to the right positions we are on our way to be the next panthers. Patience and time it takes, I hate the R&R…"
4 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Unity is Strength: Back the Badge
"Why we handing memberships in, I'll back the players and always will support them. We have core group of great young men that deserve a taste of the trophy. We'll get there but it's about everything and everyone buying in to what Ryles is doing and…"
4 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Unity is Strength: Back the Badge
"Soon, if these players keep developing could be there next year. We just need a star Five eight and Prop and maybe a  good bloody winger/Centre."
4 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 14 Team List v Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs
"Hi Rex, My name is Handy Randlinger. It has been Zero Days since my Personality Replacement  I chose the "Blandizer" package hoping it would make me more like everyone else than anyone else. This is the Way
Alignment is the priority so I splurged on…"
5 hours ago
EA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 14 Team List v Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs
"I think he means 4M when you combine the salaries of all the players injured with those 4 being on the highlest salaries. I would say its more than 4M cause Moses and Paulo together are probably 2M. Matto, Pezet, Hopgood, Simmonson, Richie, Tago,…"
5 hours ago
Gucci replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 14 Team List v Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs
"I reckon people dont even watch the game."
6 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 14 Team List v Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs
"yehez if those 4 players take up 4 million the cap is stuffed"
6 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Unity is Strength: Back the Badge
"I wouldn't care if my mate has a blow up with the club, it's betweem him and the club, I wouldn't hand my membership in.  Unfortunately it is the way of the world now.  Get outraged take sides and broadcast it for everyone to see.
If people who…"
6 hours ago
Joel K replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 14 Team List v Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs
"Who cares really. We aren't playing for anything. 3rd year in a row we have been out of finals contention early"
6 hours ago
Michael W. replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 14 Team List v Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs
"Pick a better team, back up that mouth of yours."
6 hours ago
LB replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"Yes, what the hell haha. How did i forget that? Other than Ivan though i cannot remember another."
7 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 14 Team List v Canterbury-Bankstown Bulldogs
"Did you watch the game? Edwards played in the middle while Da Silva was on. The reason Ryles seems to prefer Edwards at the moment is he can sort of do what Smith does at Hooker but can play in the middle as well."
7 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Unity is Strength: Back the Badge
"No. This is the first full show I've ever watched. Previously I've watched parts but wasn't impressed with certain things. Today's podcast was informative.  Nothing over the top"
7 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa May 27
Views: 257

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>