Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Mallee57 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"What exactly does his position entail and what type of salary would he be pulling in?"
4 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"So he basically gets almost $30000 a fortnight for doing what exactly? "
5 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"ok ok it is April 1st cmon Chiefy "
9 minutes ago
EA replied to Roy tannous's discussion Anyone else lose faith
"Jeez so did we stuff up or dragons overate him"
33 minutes ago
John Boyle replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"Can he take Paulo with him ?"
49 minutes ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"I guess he could get a run if a back is injured Richard, like to see him in and Renzo as well."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"Well Hopgood was our best forward in the games he managed to play and Penisini has/had definiately sharpened up .....Doory is always subjective."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"It's a worry waking up Chiefy, mainly because you could be lying next to me......that would concern me greatly, I think I need Barbara as a buffer.
Of course we all have our dreams, Iknow your one is pretty special BA, MON and you Chiefy.....that's…"
1 hour ago
Colin Good replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"Did you see J R Foxtels interview prior to game ,also how many back line movements did you notice,that's where tries are scored Daz "
2 hours ago
Sonic Boom replied to Roy tannous's discussion Anyone else lose faith
"Hes playing flegg for st george lol"
3 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"Its a miracle a clown like o'neill is still running the football department  - absolutely incredible.   They squarely put all the blaim on Brad Arthur and claimed immunity for all the contractual stuff ups and lack of foresight. 
You can bet that…"
4 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"Don't start me on Matterson.  Sure he's had his head knock dramas, but O'neill and the club totally assed up the length of his contract "
4 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"Hock has written a book whilst in transit with all this time.  No joke its a real release 
 "
4 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"He does have a wedding to pay for soon. Eloping would suit."
4 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"Colin, I thought Ryles talked about our short passes in the middle not just "burn through middle"? The Eels lack hulking mobile props for that middle power game plan"
4 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"LB, are we sure it's just injuries? Penisini has been criticized for his handling and passing and falling off 1-on-1 tackles for a while, and many were calling for Hopgood to be dropped last year. Doorey has been a polarizing prop (loved by some,…"
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2264

 

Club Statement

Club Statement: Leadership UpdateThe Parramatta Eels today confirm a change in the club’s football leadership structure, with Mark O’Neill departing his role as Head of Football, effective immediately.We thank Mark for his service and commitment…

Read more…
23 Replies · Reply by Mallee57 4 minutes ago
Views: 881

An idea

Wondering last night and what people thought, imo walker is most effective off the bench, can we start ryley at 13 and talyn at 9 with walker on the bench, then you bring in walker to lock, ryley to 9 and talyn to the bench for a break?

Read more…
3 Replies · Reply by LB 7 hours ago
Views: 218

Cayless to apply for Manly job?

Gal apprently believes Nathan Cayless will apply for Manly job. Lol doubt he gets it but never a harm going for it.Cayless did an alright job in Cup last year and has done ok this year so far.What is funny is this comment on facebook that will…

Read more…
13 Replies · Reply by adnan yesterday
Views: 588

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>