Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Poupou Escobar replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Mason and Scope on Parramatta Recruitment and How Premierships Are Won
"But Galvin didn't play a single game for us. The closest he got was as 18th man in round 5: Magpies v Eels - Round 5, 2021 - Match Centre | NSWRL
The next year he played nine Harold Matts games for Wests, including the grand final: Magpies v Sharks…"
49 minutes ago
Slippery. replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?

 I'm not saying that Moses should take a pay cut.  All I'm saying is that if playing in a competitive side is so important to Moses, negotiating for every last dollar does nothing but make the overall roster weaker. Some players are willing to…"
2 hours ago
LB replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Bostock or herbie?
"Again Parrafan, going from confident we get Jenkins and Burton, to this comment. Which is it?"
2 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Bostock or herbie?
"knowing our R&R team we'll get some 30 year old in the backline and call it a day."
3 hours ago
LB replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"Daley though couldn't care less for Parramatta or any clubs. He cares about winning the series and to him Moses is the best chance of winning the series. For him if he gets hurt playing Origin, just put Strange on and move on. Only one more game…"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Bostock or herbie?
"You know what Clintorian, playing Herbie at 6 claim is not that crazy haha."
3 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"Why would Moses take a pay cut when he's and Australian, NSW rep player. He's not greedy, look at knights they have so many on Moses salary yet we suffer because maybe we have a shit front office that has no clue how to demand, spend or move players…"
3 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Brown to debut?
"It's insane to think if we win this week we have equal wins to both broncos last year premiers and Raiders last year minor premiers.  Going through their team lists vs ours I don't see anyone outside Moses and JAC getting a run in either team so as…"
3 hours ago
Vasily Arkhipov replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"Maybe representative honours substitute for club limitations.  Block one, and the other may topple. Just a thought. "
4 hours ago
Vasily Arkhipov replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"The shed construction is beginning to speed up. Through weather and the visctitutudes of life it's progress was slow, but with the ground now levelled , and the frame timber base prepared.  l am excited to report its coming together nicely  It is to…"
4 hours ago
Michael W. replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Bostock or herbie?
"Both contracted until '28, they won't leave."
4 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Bostock or herbie?
"We'd have to pay extreme overs for both. Herbie would be worth a crack and play him at 5/8."
4 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"I'm torn about this one.
We all know what a fit Moses can do and how dangerous he is, and the Blues desperately need his boot. There's nothing more I would love to see than Moses wrap up an Origin series in Game 2 and cement his Origin legend.
But…"
4 hours ago
Roy tannous replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Bostock or herbie?
"To get Herbie outta redcliff I hate to say it but 1.5-1.6 mil making him the highest paid in nrl and for bostock around 600-800 will get him out 100%"
4 hours ago
LB replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Brown to debut?
"Nothing to do with F/A at this stage, though it is better. We have more wins than Gold Coast but they have already had 2 byes. That's why they are ahead of us."
5 hours ago
Joel K replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Brown to debut?
"You called it"
5 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa May 27
Views: 285

 

Bostock or herbie?

Please tell me eels will go hard for one of these guys, one a star of the future, one an English international (who would be my preference). We would have the cash to pay them the overs needed to pry them out of Redcliffe!?

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by LB 2 hours ago
Views: 175

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>