Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Mitchy replied to Diggs for PM's discussion Season over let’s blood the kids coming through
"Agreed - we have no one else banging on the door from reggies; it is more about making subtle changes to pack; Sam to start for example and Bira Moretti on bench; that is all I would do.
You cannot have Lorenzo playing with an inexperienced spine -…"
1 minute ago
Big D replied to Diggs for PM's discussion Season over let’s blood the kids coming through
"Must be June. We seem to be having this discussion around this time every year, and yet nothing changes."
3 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Diggs for PM's discussion Season over let’s blood the kids coming through
"Let's face it, O'neill and his recruitment team has all bases covered especially in development and recruitment!.
How do you feel about that situation Super. You've hardly said a word on r and r"
6 minutes ago
MeelK replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Wiz and Frankie returning today
"Welcome back to the (sanitised) funhouse boys!"
11 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Diggs for PM's discussion Season over let’s blood the kids coming through
"Ryles has debuted almost everyone he can this season.
Twidle, Brown, Nanva, Pryke all debuted this season from our pathways. You don't really have anyone else you could debut."
24 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Diggs for PM's discussion Season over let’s blood the kids coming through
"We wouldn't be debuting Talataina without Mitch at halfback. That would be a hiding to nothing."
27 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 3 2 1 v dogs.
"I actually agree with you, I thought Kelma really stodd up in the 2nd half and bent them back. I've said it a couple of times here, but I think we should move him into the middle as he's a massive and destructive unit. He's not mobile enough in this…"
30 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to jamie's discussion The Captains
"Well, you really are."
30 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 3 2 1 v dogs.
"Yeah Jack hardly has a bad game, great motor and just all effort. Can't fault his game. Kelly has been pretty good 😂 "
31 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 3 2 1 v dogs.
"Have noticed Ado is playing 1-2 spots in and getting more involved in games. He's been really good lately. "
32 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to jamie's discussion The Captains
"Who?  and for who."
32 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Diggs for PM's discussion Season over let’s blood the kids coming through
"Ridiculous "
35 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Diggs for PM's discussion Season over let’s blood the kids coming through
"Lorenzo is a turnstile.  Whats the use of putting him in the nrl when he can't defend in cup
In my opinion Lorenzo is zero hope fot the 6 spot in 27. And maybe even 28 "
36 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Yehez's discussion Kane Evans
"We all love footy, but it can absolutely be a toxic culture and 'Coming out' would have put his career in jeapardy, so I really feel for him here and having to keep that in all these years. 
Good on him for coming out and ejecting some of these…"
40 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R14 v Dogs: King's Birthday Battle (L14-12 in the fight again, another close loss, our 3rd, 6 points)
"Whose the starting half we are missing, outside of Moses.....don't say Pezit!"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R14 v Dogs: King's Birthday Battle (L14-12 in the fight again, another close loss, our 3rd, 6 points)
"There is a continuance of critism of our halves, I think they did a fair job, especially Joash who did a lot of defensive work and was in most of our plays....I think Joash may not be the long term answer with a marquee signing required with our…"
1 hour ago
More…

 

The Captains

So Mitch Moses sits out the game and passes his fitness test this morning and is named to play starting Origin.Critta plays injured, injury gets worse and subsequently is ruled out of Origin.But he leads his team to a win.Thoughts???

Read more…
15 Replies · Reply by Michael W. 30 minutes ago
Views: 349

3 2 1 v dogs.

Just couple of shot outs from that game, 3. Kelma - thought he was our only player who actually bent the line a little. Strong hitups and just a good game. 2. Jack Williams - his usual good footy nothing I could complain about 3. Iongi or TDS. -…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Clintorian 30 minutes ago
Views: 235

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>