Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion We Don’t Lose Games in Moments. We Lose Them in Minutes.
"Thanks Mutts, I did. But it was only after looking at the patterns and zones in Foxs' match graphs over the last few weeks.  Then, I heard Reni Matua mention "death zones" to Braith Anasta in their podcast, and it all crystalized.
I believe the term…"
6 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Hell On Eels's discussion We Don’t Lose Games in Moments. We Lose Them in Minutes.
"Mate did you come up with this analysis yourself re zones? It's incredibly insightful. "
42 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill' Sack ! replied to Hell On Eels's discussion We Don’t Lose Games in Moments. We Lose Them in Minutes.
"My take is that our forwards have been beaten convincingly in every match both in defence and attack, especially in the first 30 minutes when.teams have their starting packs on.
The dragons had the majority feild position, but lacked the finesse in…"
49 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill' Sack !'s discussion Eels Targets 2027
"I'm persisting with him I like the athleticism and ball skills on the edge he's an ascending player not a descending one.I think out of all the back rowers we have I think JR rates him highly as he's picked every week.You also got o have some sought…"
4 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Offside's discussion Panthers then daylight
"I would love to Penrith GPS stats vs other teams.  They seem to maintain line speed all game where other teams have to pick and choose as you can not physically maintain top level line speed pressure all game but Penrith do.  It also doesn't affect…"
7 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Offside's discussion Panthers then daylight
"How do Penrith maintain line speed, pressure and intensity for so long each game.   Sports science is always developing and I believe they have found a loophole.  Every club works hard and have the toughest preseason ever so I don't believe 1 team…"
7 hours ago
Richard Jackson replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill' Sack !'s discussion Eels Targets 2027
"EA, Apa played 7 in cup 2 0r 3 weeks ago and managed the game perfectly. His passing game is a thing of beauty and he never delivers a bad pass. The guy has time and is poised, calm and calculated as opposed to Lorenzo, who runs first and when he…"
8 hours ago
Darren Munro replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill' Sack !'s discussion Eels Targets 2027
"🤣🤣🤣"
10 hours ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill' Sack !'s discussion Eels Targets 2027
"I recon Sua will get resigned once Flanno is sacked.
8. Kolomantangi
9. Liddle
10. T Couchman
11. Sua
12. Halangahu
13. Stewart
14. R Couchman
15. Egan
16. Pasifika Tonga
 
Invest in these players. They should fuck of Lawrie, Sele, Guler, Kerr,…"
10 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill' Sack !'s discussion Eels Targets 2027
"So would you say Twidle shies away from contact? Is he one to only really attack and that is it?
I see Lorenzo being an all-round player that really needs help with defence and that's it."
10 hours ago
Darren Munro replied to Offside's discussion Panthers then daylight
"Last night Penrith had 55% possession and Melbourne completed at 94%. I don't think I have ever seen that. Penrith never seem to get major injuries.  "
10 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill' Sack !'s discussion Eels Targets 2027
"Couchman twins can really build around. Ryan on an edge and Toby up front. Now Saints new coach will try to keep them hard and they are local boys but Toby will play Origin soon, he will be worth big $$$.
All you need is the get one and more likely…"
10 hours ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill' Sack !'s discussion Eels Targets 2027
"He has never played 7 coming through. He lacks the defence, kicking game and game managment skills to be a 7.
Twiddle has a great highlights package but the really small things and 1%ers which are non-negotiable for NRL players is something he lacks."
10 hours ago
Darren Munro replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jayden sua and cook told to look elsewhere
"I would buy sua and play him in the middle. We need some power in the middle. Leave Jack on the edge. "
10 hours ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jayden sua and cook told to look elsewhere
"It's there, i said the reason that players, Other than Su'A, are available (like Xerri and Timoko) is for a reason. The clubs do not want them for a reason and we are just solving those clubs problems. Xerri and Timoko i wouldn't mind being at the…"
10 hours ago
LB replied to Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug's discussion Congratulations Michael Ennis!
"He was one of the places where the team did well with him there but he wasn't an assistant."
10 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2271

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>