Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"The issue what your finding here with the constant TOer is continually swapping out combinations.You can't compete that way we've got to keep these guys together for as long as possible.I mean right now if true not only are you losing Pezet in 27…"
13 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"Nailed it Chief. "
13 hours ago
The Captain commented on HKF’s status
"Unfortunately you can't fix stupid and bored - two attributes these destabilizing morons have in spades.
We only have to look at the Tigers if we want a reminder of what happens when you let power hungry, unintelligent and inexperienced people run…"
14 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"I can only guess that The bears offered somewhere around 550k, and we didn't want to get into a bidding war for a player who is replaceable.  Russell doesn't have good athletic ability for an outside back, and our for and against suffered for it in…"
17 hours ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"Except Brian Kelly."
18 hours ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"From the talk on Nanva many saying he would be a better back-rower."
18 hours ago
Longfin Eel replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"Russell has a few young players breathing down his neck. It really depends on injuries and form of these guys. A great opportunity for a young bloke to cement a first grade spot."
18 hours ago
The Badger replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"In another blog, EA stated him/her/them is in India"
20 hours ago
Frank The Tank replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"Russell has surprised the hell out of me this year and it's been great watching him develop.
If true it will be sad to see him go. 
My bet is we don't sign anyone and just promote from within."
21 hours ago
Frank The Tank replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"This.......is the Parra way unfortunately."
22 hours ago
HKF commented on HKF’s status
"View as a web page

Dear JOHN

I am writing to inform you that a petition has been lodged by a group of Members for inclusion in our 2026 AGM. There are four distinct resolutions proposed by the group that seek to reverse the governance reforms…"
23 hours ago
KingGutho replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"Araz nanva is about the only one, and Cyrus Bloomfield  who can play centre and fullback, other then that no one "
yesterday
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"This is great. A fantastic advertisement for any fringey, we are now a club you can come to and grow within. Ryles is the one! Good on SR for continuing to work hard and now provide for his family by cashing in. All the best to him"
yesterday
Gaz Nelson replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"Yep agreed. Russell has come along way and is now a serviceable player, doesn't do a whole lot in attack but is a big body that plugs a whole. 
Looking forward to see what Richie can do. Just hope he's not another project "
yesterday
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"Well Kelly makes a bit more sense now."
yesterday
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Ouch
"Well Brown saw out his contract too. He was a free agent when signing for Newcastle. Yes had options but still a free agent as he didn't activate it."
yesterday
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
11 Replies · Reply by Flow Basket on Wednesday
Views: 1330

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 107

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>