Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Joel K's discussion Bulldogs and Dolphins in talks with Apa Twidle
"We are only now seeing some of the halves who were highly touted years ago start to come good after refining their game in reserve grade or struggling for years such as Tannah Boyd and Jake Clifford.  They still aren't great halves but are much more…"
1 hour ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Joel K's discussion Bulldogs and Dolphins in talks with Apa Twidle
"Was Twidle debut as good as Fa'alogo for Melbourne.  Is he better prospect than Iongi who waited behind Edwards.  Players who wait and develop without rushing their debut, starting roles or big money early are seeing the benefit of it over young…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Bulldogs and Dolphins in talks with Apa Twidle
"Like Ethan Sanders, who after one game people were annointing breakout star of the year. Ever since Round 1 he had a good Round 2 and has been average since.
1 game does not make a player."
2 hours ago
The Captain replied to Joel K's discussion Bulldogs and Dolphins in talks with Apa Twidle
"Control the narrative Pops. We knew we were going to debut Apa. We must have known for some time he was on the cusp. 
This reaction by his manager implies the narrative wasn't controlled. I guarantee a Politis would have already taken both Apa and…"
4 hours ago
The Captain replied to Joel K's discussion Bulldogs and Dolphins in talks with Apa Twidle
"Thanks for bringing the receipts Bluey.
There's such a lack of information around as to who actually does what.
I have also seen that even though MON was originally touted as the GM of Football he has more recently been referred to in the press as…"
4 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Joel K's discussion Bulldogs and Dolphins in talks with Apa Twidle
"On another note tom duffy killed it tonight for brisbane. I bet madge must be thinking why did i sign pezet"
4 hours ago
Yeah Man replied to fake midget pseudoachondroplasia's discussion Ryles coaching
"Yeah like only so much he can do with incompetence of MON, plus every week's we getting multiple injuries per game.  "
4 hours ago
Yeah Man replied to fake midget pseudoachondroplasia's discussion Ryles coaching
"That's just not happening if they leave be rugby or PNG. Ryles is good coach just need better RR to give him talent to work with."
4 hours ago
ParraPride replied to Joel K's discussion Bulldogs and Dolphins in talks with Apa Twidle
"If he is patient enough to wait 1 more season, there'll be plenty of opportunities around the corner for him."
5 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to Joel K's discussion Bulldogs and Dolphins in talks with Apa Twidle
"SuperEel 22 Super, with respect! I'll reply and explain why as you've asked.
Here is an excerpt from the Eels management when they signed Mark O'Neill.
In recognition of the increasing complexities of managing an elite sporting environment, the…"
5 hours ago
JC replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's Sack !'s discussion Strong rumoured loan deal happening
"I didn't think I needed to explain it would be to play 6 as we definitely don't need a fullback. 
I knew straight away it was the mention of mon that got super and yourself to jump straight in and I make no apologies for criticising mon as I believe…"
6 hours ago
Will 5150 replied to Joel K's discussion Bulldogs and Dolphins in talks with Apa Twidle
"Holy crap... that made me laugh and cry at the same time. All I have ringing in my head is "sad but true"..."
6 hours ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's Sack !'s discussion Strong rumoured loan deal happening
"I would say your right, but you obviously did not suggest that.....now nodding the head and saying WTF....if you could not have waited to get MON in the equation and explained your thinking  it may have stopped my negativity....I cannot speak for…"
6 hours ago
Yehez replied to Joel K's discussion Bulldogs and Dolphins in talks with Apa Twidle
"He can indeed. He can be a more "involved" winger sorta like Lomax was maybe sometimes. But Apa doesn't have metres out the back in him. We'll need Penisini and whoever is left center to do the work then. "
7 hours ago
Eel4lyfe replied to Joel K's discussion Bulldogs and Dolphins in talks with Apa Twidle
"Re-sign Apa, its simple. The kid has alot of raw talent. He plays whats in front of him and has a footy brain. He can play anywhere in the back line and is even big enough to play lock. Yes he has some errors in his game, but there is more up side…"
7 hours ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to Joel K's discussion Bulldogs and Dolphins in talks with Apa Twidle
"If we lose Apa they all involvement in R&R need not be sacked but shot in the back of the head for crimes against Parra.
Apa should start for the remainder of the season either at wing/ centre fullback. All we have in the back line left is Brian…"
8 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2288

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>