Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Adam Magrath replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"I like it Randy, a concise response:) No need to write a 15 paragraph essay for something that can be said in one word."
43 minutes ago
Yehez replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Regarding Ryda, Pryke could go to bench in cup and Ryda starts.
Or, Teancum could be in the NRL 17 if we don't sign a prop or Paulo retires/goes as well. 
Mataele has impressed me last two outings but as Chief said he tends to tire easily and can…"
1 hour ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"We will sign Cole, Averillo, Keppie and Mariota, and re-sign Paulo, Mataele and Will Penisini."
3 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Well Yehaz i do think there is a chance a player or two does leave from our top 30 before Round 1. Could Moretti be one of them?
I think ideally Talagi would be starting in Cup next year. Hopefully is pushing to start end of this year but Ryda does…"
4 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Thomas mikalaele. Clayton fualalo. Moses leota"
4 hours ago
Yehez replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Yeah that's why I suggested those two. I can see Walker, even Paulo, plus Pryke, Mataele, Lokeni, all leave end of year. Maybe we keep 1 or 2 as depth. So that means Koina/Talagi/Jezaiah get another year in cup but be next man up. Still leaves us…"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"I do not mind either Pryke or Mataele staying for a year as depth. Both? nah. I think Pryke more likely, as he more likely is content with a dev deal. Mataele i do not see getting an extension. Had a nice game v NQ and played decent for us but also…"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Fotuaika not a bad shout. Someone like that but i do wonder how much the club wants to invest in Tuivaiti, Brown, Koina and Talagi as the future middle rotation as well we might be more content just going with a decent 1-2 year option."
5 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"I hope Mataele goes aswell. Ive watched a few replays and he tires very quickly. Pryke aswell.  We have better players like Brown "
5 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Well he has said he is happy at Canterbury. He can simple say it as a professional, let's not get media on us 24/7 about it. Come September, Burton will be given permission to 
If Burton does stay for less and to play Centre, then what about that he…"
6 hours ago
Yehez replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"A middle and an outside back. 
Jackson Ford or Fotuaika for the middle. Middle of the road, late 20s, and could be tempted. Fotuaika form has not been outstanding but maybe that's why a new lease of life would help.
Outside back, left centre…"
6 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Nice and fair blog Chief.
Either way i feel there will be signings, more so due to who is off-contract. We only have 22 signed up for 2027, at least 6 spots need to be filled by Round 1 next year. Russell, Matto and Pezet we know are definately…"
6 hours ago
Jack Eelson replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"I'd 2nd that "
6 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"110% confident is the minimum"
6 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Can't get him til 28' unless Dolphins release him. Not sure why on earth they would do so early."
6 hours ago
Richard Jackson replied to Fiddy's discussion Burton to Eels?
"In Hindsight you are right poppa, He showed last nite, what he can produce. Never listen to me."
6 hours ago
More…

 

Signing predictions !

If you can only name one player who you think will be most likely coming to Parramatta for 2027, who will it be ?Whether you truly have inside info or just an educated guess, it doesn't matter. The whole excersize of this blog is to create some…

Read more…
25 Replies · Reply by Yehez 1 hour ago
Views: 580

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>