Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Joel K replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"It would've been a poor signing but the fact Mark O'Neil couldn't get another signing over the line is poor
When is he going to get sacked?"
2 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"So the Eels missed out on Barnett, and Keon K and Haas before him. Just how much of a tragedy those missed opportunities will be might be determined by what happens with the Eels' current prop protégés Tuivati and T. Brown? Even though the Eels were…"
7 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Yeh, bingo. Poor signing or not, we went after him and didn't get him."
13 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Eels2025's discussion Anyone else feeling a parramatta win tonight?
"Win v Broncos? No, can't see it, barely even feel it. Of course as an Eels Tragic I'd be ecstatic to be wrong in this case. However, another 50+ loss to start the season has me thinking the conspiracy theory - that the Eels tanked against the Storm…"
17 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Would have been a terrible signing, yuck 🤣🤣🤣"
18 minutes ago
Die hard eels Supporter replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"It also looks like they are entering the desperate stage for the signings as they offered him overs so the next player that might come along the Eels will give him a huge offer if they are great "
18 minutes ago
Die hard eels Supporter replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"I know right, we offered him a 100k more and an extra year, not as an option and we still couldn't land him. I'm alright with not signing this player but far out the Eels can't sign anyone for shit. We also need like 2 extra backline players"
20 minutes ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Its up to the club to turn itself around on the field. We were heading in the right direction with a blip last week.
If you want in demand players when you havent proven youre a compeitiive side week to week you have to pay huge overs. Simple as…"
22 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Whether you think signing him or not is a good or bad thing isn't the point.  Here we have yet another player that we clearly wanted to sign and they turned us down. In this case we offered more money, are closer to his family in Taree and he still…"
24 minutes ago
Richard B'Stard replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Poor Broncos, it must be devastating for them to be able to keep adding internationals to their roster."
24 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Eels2025's discussion Anyone else feeling a parramatta win tonight?
"Hope so "
25 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Good! Glad he signed with Broncos "
26 minutes ago
Joel K replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Glad we didn't sign him.
Keaon was the signing to make, he wanted an extra year but we didn't give it to him."
28 minutes ago
Parra Eels Fanatic replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"good that we didn't sign him but it is a worry that players aren't signing with us . Galvin ; keoan , Barnett. Even with our offers be higher and more years "
30 minutes ago
Zip zip replied to Muttman's discussion Barnett signs with Broncos
"Good. 
Eels looked too desperate, with the 3 years and $2.6m for an aging forward who recently had an ACL injury."
38 minutes ago
Zip zip replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Will Penasini out - Jordan Samrani in
"Samrani is a bigger body with a little more speed. Anyone else think Penisini may be more suited to wing, with his strong carries and he does lack a bit of speed a skill in the centres to create opportunities for his winger. Can he be used more like…"
40 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2188

 

State of the Site 2026

With the 2026 season now underway I thought I would provide an overview of how the site is tracking both in numbers and in overall feedback we've been receiving. Analytics 2025 built on the 2024 season and 1 Eyed Eel continues to grow. Numbers-wise…

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by Hell On Eels 1 hour ago
Views: 104

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>