Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"Galvin initially wanted to go to Penrith."
8 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"1. Galvin was always going to the dogs where his junior trainer was stationed  
2. Pezet is a 7 and wants to play halfback.   Easy. 
 
3. Dragons offered Keon insane money.   Parramatta aren't that desperate.   So easy to understand this.  They…"
11 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"It may be, but this is an extremely unreliable source."
26 minutes ago
Kenny Power replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"Barnett was only useful if we could get him this year 
and obvious he has been negotiating earlier to go there , decided to quick "
34 minutes ago
parra supporter replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"Ah well, end of the day broncos have hass cap space (1.2mil) that has freed up. Was always going to be hard to compete"
44 minutes ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"With AFB now eligible, Haas, May, Utoikamanu, Koloamatangi, hard to see where Barnett fits for NSW."
48 minutes ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"I mean we thought a losing battle as Brisbane do have things we currently don't. 
1) premiership chances
2) Madge relationship
3) a lot more money
 
I mentioned my thoughts that i was a little hesitant having Barnett purely on age and coming off…"
49 minutes ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"Though i agree Chief about Barnett, i understand why Analyst is saying in that once again we publicly state we want a star player and again miss out. 
Could it end up we don't need another middle and our current juniors work out? Definately a…"
52 minutes ago
Gucci replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"He will be turning 33 when he arrives at the Broncos. They most likely had a player wanting to return to New Zealand also so it works out best for them. Sorry he is good but nothing special at that age. Would be surprised if he even makes the origin…"
57 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"What I don't get is, people say he doesn't want to uproot his family and move to Melbourne for 1 season, but yet uprooted his family and moved to the super league England for 8 games? Maybe Europe was more photogenic for Mr Insta."
1 hour ago
Green Eel replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"I am not too concerned about this; call me petty, but I'd rather Lomax be sidelined unless an offer too good to refuse is on the table."
1 hour ago
Eels2025 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Another one bites the dust.
"Not a loss at all. 32 coming off an ACL."
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"His defining moment was also not wanting to play at the beginning of 2024"
1 hour ago
BEM replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Game Day Blog R1 vs Storm: Gilgamesh and the Beer Goddess
"I can't see us beating them at their home ground in round 1.
Storm 30 Parra 12"
1 hour ago
Pickled eel replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"mattosmattos career defining moment courtesy of storm. I don't recall him returning to his best after this Kafusi special."
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"Super if he was very concerned about his concussion situation why has it been reported that he would have agreed to joining Melbourne if there was a guaranteed extra year as opposed to a club option. 
Braith reported last night that Matterson would…"
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2154

 

1EE Modern day Eels team: Halfback

Ok so going through these rapid fire, particularly this one as this i reckon would be 100% for one player. I did some Halfbacks to make it respectful but not many to choose from.Dylan Brown won the vote at 6.https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HGCBD291.…

Read more…
10 Replies · Reply by Rabz S 18 hours ago
Views: 303

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>