Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to EA's discussion What is your NSW team?
"Guymer was off-contract first. Also, just cause we want to extend Tuivaiti earlier doesn't mean he wants to. He might want to test PNG and Perth as well. Who knows
You can say to a player "here is a new 3 year deal" he can say "I'll have a look at…"
12 minutes ago
Zip zip replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Dragons will have 5 players on close to $1m next year. Gutho, Holmes, Keon, Metcalf and Drinkwater. Leilua and a couple good young forwards may get pushed out. Would be a good get for Parra. MoN needs to monitor the situation closely. 
 "
16 minutes ago
MattL replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"I can't see them letting him go early with a run at the finals looming, but in a perfect world, Metcalf to Dragons could see Sua coming over to us early. This would be great as he's usually left side from memory which is where Lorenzo will likely…"
18 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"They have a good bunch of young forwards coming through and both metcalf and drinkwater are great additions along with Kolomatagi. 
We on the other hand cant even keep our best juniors although we've bought nobody,  and our number one up and coming…"
46 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Joel K's discussion Ryles on 2gb
"I love getting a good "No Touch!".  "
52 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion What is your NSW team?
"Exactly "
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Joel K's discussion Ryles on 2gb
"JC, Thanks for that explanation you make a lot of sense with what you say and the "touch" analogy is interesting as realalistically I have no real idea of how that game has evolved to the state you imply, I assume similar principles must exist in…"
1 hour ago
Darren Munro replied to EA's discussion What is your NSW team?
"Must say this was hard with the injures and out of form players.
 
Eddy 
Fox
Trell/best
Koula
T'oo
Moses
Natty 
Fonua Blake 
Api
Barnett
Angus
Preston
Murray
Brayley
Big O
Ford
Yeo
Graham
Twal
 "
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"It's what they have to do if they haven't got that on the roster we were much the same if we'd have landed Galvin or Kolomatangi we were offering close or exactly the same type of money.
This is the thing the market and demand dictates…"
1 hour ago
Darren Munro replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Metcalf is a very good player of high potential. However, 40 odd games over 5 to 6 years with an asking price of 1 million.  Forget about it! On the plus side sua may get released early."
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to EA's discussion What is your NSW team?
"Also, ask yourself,  why is Guymer signed until 2028 yet our only decent prop going forward in Sam Tuivaiti only signed until 2027 and can negotiate in November 
There's something wrong there"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"if we can get sua early just good to build combinations with Moses and get used to the team. Pretty much the main reason I'd push for it "
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"very desperate signings no doubt. Similar to Newcastle just throwing money around "
1 hour ago
shane replied to EA's discussion What is your NSW team?
"1 Tedesco
2 Bostock
3 fatrell
4 Critta
5 Jenkins
6 Strange
7 Cleary
8 Kolomatangi
9 Robson
10 Ford
11 Olakatou
12 T. Coachman
13 Yeo
14 Brailey
15 Barnett
16 Preston
17 R. Coachman"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"For sure TMM is in the 20 this week. And they still have young Hansen and Cleary. Metcalf is completely out of the picture. Especially if Nz can get a player as well somehow out of it "
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to EA's discussion What is your NSW team?
"Im bot the selector.  Also, i supported him earlier when  I mentioned Moses praising Guymer on the Horo podcast.  
I was just saying he was limited to the number of positions he can play 
Ill have to admit,  in Guymers first few games and debut,  he…"
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2418

 

Metcalf Dragons bound.

Bulldogs have pulled out of the race for Metcalf and his asking price is around 1 million dollars. Dragons most likely spot but to get him immediately I wonder if this means they will allow Sua to join us early to free up cap space to get Metcalf…

Read more…
11 Replies · Reply by Zip zip 16 minutes ago
Views: 418

Sualauvi Faalogo

I could of sworn this bloke failed a HIA last weekend. but he's allowed to play against us this week. what happened to the 10 day rest thingy???? I heard he had a fractured cheekbone. This has hurt my SuperCoach side immensely. you just know he'll…

Read more…
3 Replies · Reply by Flow Basket 17 hours ago
Views: 692

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>