Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Hector Bob Down replied to Mallee57's discussion Annoying Advertising
"Adguard works fine for me and it's free Strange in App Store "
6 minutes ago
Trent replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Gough & THAT Capt challenge
"Refs need to front the media like the coaches do "
57 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 6 Team List v Gold Coast Titans
"What is Nanva like"
6 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"Hard to win when they give the referees a free licence"
6 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"Agree Vegas is V'Landys peach pie. Doesn't benefit the Eels one bit. Tell him to stick it where the sun don't shine"
6 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion Annoying Advertising
"Would an early Christmas Card suffice and a scratchy "
6 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Gough & THAT Capt challenge
"Clearly shows how Gough really stuffed up. Is it honest ignorance on his part not knowing the actual tackle rule or does he consider himself that authoritarian that not one single tackle is completed in every game until a referee calls held. That is…"
6 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mallee57's discussion Annoying Advertising
"Oh, forgot to mention, there is a finders fee paid to 1EE of:"
8 hours ago
The Captain replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Gough & THAT Capt challenge
"Gough 100% stuffed the tackle/held call up, which happens. That's annoying but forgivable.
But him refusing the challenge, that's doubling down on a call he would have known was wrong. That's why he's been benched this week. 
If he'd just let the…"
8 hours ago
The Captain replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"I mean I would have done the same thing. The NRL doesn't want to open this particular can of worms.
Our only shot at this was a backroom deal with the higher ups in the NRL, as soon as we spoke out of turn to the media I knew we were cooked.
Looked…"
8 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Gough & THAT Capt challenge
"On Mallee's point, about stopping of momentum and a tackle being complete regardless of whether the ref calls held, it is interesting to look at the laws of the game. This is because Mallee's suggestion is correct. But Google or AI Overview is not…"
8 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"If i'm ryles i'm installing its us v the nrl. Best way to get back is start winning some games. When the nrl want to acknowlegde tell them to fuck off. But we have a soft cock front office would any other club employ buckets,rodgers or jim no way"
9 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 6 Team List v Gold Coast Titans
"We have nothing to lose. Fox is not 100 percent rest him 1.papa 2.nanva 3. Penisini 4. Kelly 21.allemadine 22.tatiana 7. Mitch"
9 hours ago
Clayton replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Gough & THAT Capt challenge
"Actually, being so close to the try line it was a classic sin bin offence by the player knocking the ball out. Not since probably Henry P, have we witnessed such an incompetent performance. Touchies were bad too. Missed a blatant strip that led to a…"
9 hours ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's Sack !'s discussion Strong rumoured loan deal happening
"That Clayton Faulalo would suit me.
 "
9 hours ago
EeLmatiC replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's Sack !'s discussion Strong rumoured loan deal happening
"And we hate Blake Wilson
 "
9 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2284

 

Gough & THAT Capt challenge

Did Gough make a mistake in the "can't Captains Challenge" incident (Williams' almost-try) with 2:56 remaining in the first half against the Tigers Round 5? Is that and other referring indiscretions - basically orchestrating thee game - why Gough…

Read more…
9 Replies · Reply by Trent 57 minutes ago
Views: 355

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>