Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Clintorian replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Safely, no. It would have only came off their cap if they signed Lomax."
3 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 1 Team List v Melbourne Storm
"I like Kelly in the centres "
4 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 1 Team List v Melbourne Storm
"Wouldn't surprise me "
4 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion 1EE Modern day Eels team: Centres
"Yes, we are looking at players how they played for Parramatta."
5 hours ago
Acme replied to LB's discussion 1EE Modern day Eels team: Centres
"Tahu for me I'd say.
Are we only considering games played for the Eels?"
6 hours ago
Stevo replied to Comedian's discussion Great we won the battle but not the war
"Ha I reckon we've just brought oursleves a premiership "
6 hours ago
Stevo replied to LB's discussion Barnett swap for Lomax
"You defiently wouldnt say NO to a quality player like Barnett and with Matterson on the brink of medical retirement he'd be a great addition"
6 hours ago
Acme replied to Comedian's discussion Great we won the battle but not the war
"I'd hope the NRL are able to move on quickly and would see it in their best interest to do so. They have not come out of this looking good at all.
It wouldn't surprise me if at some point during the season, they see an opportunity to screw us over…"
6 hours ago
Doombaby69 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Cool thanks."
6 hours ago
Zip zip replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Parra should sniff around for Campbell Graham. Quality centre and Bunnies surely are as tight as with their cap"
6 hours ago
LB replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"No they offered $750k transfer fee. Dave Riccio jumped ship that $300k he understood why we rejected it, but felt $750k was ridiculous. Ummmm $350k, nor $750k nor any money helps us onfield."
6 hours ago
LB replied to Comedian's discussion Great we won the battle but not the war
"Can it happen? Sure. Will it? Well.....NRL fans are on our side, they will want Melbourne losing. Dud calls and fans will know what is going on."
7 hours ago
Doombaby69 replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Lachlan Harper is reporting that Storm offered a transfer fee of $750k for Lomax. Is that total bull dust??? I though it was around 300k. "
7 hours ago
Poppa replied to Comedian's discussion Great we won the battle but not the war
"Well put Kenny Power, as soon as people get over the 'inferiority complex" that seem to go hand in hand with Parra supporters the better.
The reality is that Parra were born to be a powerhouse and its only through this complex we find ourselves…"
7 hours ago
Clayton replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Outstanding comment "
7 hours ago
Ghost Fromdapast replied to Muttman's discussion Eels win in the Supreme Court
"Zac Lomax spotted at Rebel Sports buying up Table Tennis and Golf gear !
 "
7 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2149

 

1EE Modern day Eels team: Centres

Thank you everyone for voting on Wingers.The Fijian flyer won unanimously while Eric Grothe Jr. and Luke Burt tied. The tiebreak will come at a later date as we could have one on the bench.Now onto Centres.https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GDDW2PW1.…

Read more…
2 Replies · Reply by LB 5 hours ago
Views: 54

Barnett swap for Lomax

Now Lomax deal to Melbourne is dead, for now, there media circles swirling that Parramatta could use Lomax to try and acquire Barnett. Sending the incumbent NSW Origin Winger to New Zealand in exchange for the NSW Prop Barnet.Is it a fair trade? On…

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by Stevo 6 hours ago
Views: 131

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>