Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

BringBackSemi replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Was a big Lomax fan but how he has conducted himself is a massive letdown. The guy has shown a complete lack of integrity and intelligence. Why would the Storm want this kind of person at their club (other than Bellamy going all out in his final…"
2 hours ago
fishbulb replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"He'll be super sad if he doesn't a contract with them?"
2 hours ago
fishbulb replied to LB's discussion NAS was offered $800k from Parramatta
"A Yogo and not a Yogo 2? Bloody MON, no wonder NAS turned us down."
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Never mind strong arming us...If NRL don't come down hard on our side then all of their tough talk is exposed as so much hot air"
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion The bad smell of Parramatta returns
", including reversing the member resolution passed at last year’s AGM regarding “fit and proper” individuals.....because scumbags."
4 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to ScottX's discussion Is Parra entering a good luck cycle?
"Can't say I appreciate you saying that maybe I need a suspension..ruh-roh....and here I thought we were getting on so spiffingly But then you decide to go squealing about me above my head and so back to square one we go...square 2 maybe, whatever, I…"
4 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Better than that, include penalties for breaking contracts in all player contracts and ensure both players and Agents pay a price. That will then at least make players second guess running out on a club."
4 hours ago
Bear replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Must be getting close to the seasons start.....rumours of old parra factions causing ripples, lomax rumours by the hundred, and huge overs rumours for NAS, click bait galore. Stop the shit get the season under way already. GET  IT ON , yeehaa"
4 hours ago
ParraEels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"That's a cop out.
No trade has been restricted. He can play anything and anywhere other than NRL. He signed the terms of his release as he saw it benefited himself. Now that he can see what everyone with a brain was saying to begin with and he came…"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Money as in on the cap?"
5 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Based on what? Hearing from many within the game he has no legs to stand on, including lawyers saying so too. Only way we end up with nothing i believe is NRL saying to us just give him to them and strong arming us which i doubt they care to do."
5 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion NAS was offered $800k from Parramatta
"Well Shane Gillis was on Kent podcast and i understand he would say professional things but god he talks a lot of shit. Supporting Clinton and Lomax."
5 hours ago
LB replied to LB's discussion NAS was offered $800k from Parramatta
"Just going off the report, didn't say NAS said that. I said he admitted offer from Warriors, should have reworded that it was mentioned a $800k offer."
5 hours ago
Acme replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"So, in a matter of weeks, he's gone from having multiple options available (R360, Japanese Rugby, The Force, MMA), to being restrained from trade so badly that it's affecting his mental health. Utter bullshit.
He's stitched himself up by leaving one…"
5 hours ago
will replied to LB's discussion NAS was offered $800k from Parramatta
"nas,  papenhauzen and lomax are all schifofske managed,  there are a lot of issues there"
5 hours ago
will replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Clubs urge NRL to back Parra over Storm's pursuit of Lomax
"Lomax is saying the restraint in trade is causing him mental health issues"
6 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Friday
Views: 1914

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 222

 

NAS was offered $800k from Parramatta

Nelson Asofa-Solomona admits offers from the Warriors and also reports are he had an $800k offer from Parramatta. Not sure how long the deal was and whether 100% true. But if it is, why offer that much and it seems they are desperate to get a middle…

Read more…
8 Replies · Reply by fishbulb 2 hours ago
Views: 307

Make your own rules.

All this talk of the NRL changing rules and wanting to add this and that. Stuff let us decide what rules we should do.What are some rules you would love to see the NRL incorporate, they can be serious or dumb ones i do not care this blog is for a…

Read more…
10 Replies · Reply by Michael W. 6 hours ago
Views: 154

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>