Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Muttman replied to Offside's discussion Samrani vs Penisini
"Even the Knights have 2 Origin Centres these days. (And an Origin FB and the Kiwi 5/8). "
48 minutes ago
EA replied to Offside's discussion Samrani vs Penisini
"I remember watching him in nsw cup. He was at left centre with Naiduki on the wing. I remember every week saying he should make his nrl debut. He was such a good defender at 18/19 years old. I would argue since then that his attacking threat has…"
49 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Pato's discussion Xerri
"Michael, you are dumb. Doesn't mean you are a bad bloke.
The whole game of managing a roster is value for money. Will Penisni gets paid the same as the great Centres in the game and he isn't one. Move him on, it's not harder than that. Hos brother…"
1 hour ago
Yehez replied to Offside's discussion Samrani vs Penisini
"He did and he more importantly has this tendency to switch off and look despondent and defeated and his effort goes down by 30 %. 
I made my piece that he might not reach the potential we hoped of him becoming an origin level back, which he was…"
1 hour ago
Maj. John Reisman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion Ryles/Moses comments on Pezet
"and fair enough Anasta and others have all said the same things he's a work in progress. He still gets run over too easy and makes silly mistakes. "
2 hours ago
EA replied to Offside's discussion Samrani vs Penisini
"I think the disappointing part for Pensini was the poor defence last week against Melbourne. Yes everyone was shit. But he missed a one on one tackle for Leo to score. He also got burned in the frist half by Leo but Iongi saved the day."
2 hours ago
Yehez replied to Offside's discussion Samrani vs Penisini
"Penisini ended last year well and he can be a good attacking threat. I won't want Penisini away from the team yet.
But the competition is good and Samrani is doing well. I'd still give Will first crack when he's back from injury. "
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Offside's discussion Samrani vs Penisini
"Corey Oates is the comparison he should strive to become."
2 hours ago
Mitchy replied to Offside's discussion Samrani vs Penisini
"Penisini may be a different player under Ryles and he has another 20 odd games under his belt -this year will tell"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Offside's discussion Samrani vs Penisini
"101 your Avatar is most suitable to your intellect.....you had him missing 50 in your previous post."
2 hours ago
Offside replied to Offside's discussion Samrani vs Penisini
"I hope so but you often see all a player needs is that change.
Also it often doesn't work"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Offside's discussion Samrani vs Penisini
"He is not if you compare him in speed to the Penrith, NSW and Australian winger, he could be just as effective. Sivo was slower than Peni .....I have always said Peni would/could be a great winger.
I don't believe that Simo is gifted with much as a…"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jdb junior paulo 👉🚪👋
"That's where your credability lets you down 101, you better get used to Penisini because the coach loves him!"
2 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to Offside's discussion Samrani vs Penisini
"Except for Josh Addo- Carr, and our spine I don't rate any of our backline.Russell has improved out of sight and i'd persist with him if he was staying, but for everyone else, Nope. Will has played over 100 games and still his highlight reels aren't…"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jdb junior paulo 👉🚪👋
"Yes, hear you Richard, but I assume you mean as a 5/8 not a half? i.e Pezet fits Moses shoes and Twidle has Pezets. I have not seen any of these kids but I will go with the opinions you guys provide."
2 hours ago
Trent replied to Offside's discussion Samrani vs Penisini
"Also 6+tackle busts"
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2202

 

Samrani vs Penisini

Hard to compare but I think the right edge looked better with Samrani on the weekend.There is no doubt Will has alot of talent but he looks like one of those players who would excel somewhere else since his debut he hasn't really been challenged for…

Read more…
21 Replies · Reply by Muttman 48 minutes ago
Views: 680

Xerri

Daily Telegraph reporting Xerri has asked for an immediate releasehttps://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/bulldogs-stunned-by-bronson-xerris-request-for-immediate-release/news-story/f5eea3cb8483e25f00580eae1fd61d8a

Read more…
49 Replies · Reply by DYNASTY.LOADING 1 hour ago
Views: 2165

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>