Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Muttman replied to Muttman's discussion Sack Mark O’Neill.
"Jim Sarantinos (CEO) can do it. Matt Beach (Chairman) can demand that the CEO do it. By not acting, they're both saying they're happy with his performance. Blows my mind!"
47 seconds ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion Today’s Game- Utterly Disgusting
"What led to the Tigers having the ball in that situation?"
2 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion Today’s Game- Utterly Disgusting
"😂 Of course the coach and captain won't bag the referees as it costs $10k. I'm more than certain they would have liked to"
3 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion Today’s Game- Utterly Disgusting
" But you just did 😂"
6 minutes ago
JC replied to Muttman's discussion Sack Mark O’Neill.
"The club won't listen because they have no football experience, even if they got rid of him they wouldn't know who to replace him with. "
8 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Muttman's discussion Sack Mark O’Neill.
"Who can actually do it? Who has the authority to be able to ask for his resignation "
8 minutes ago
Eels tragic replied to Muttman's discussion Sack Mark O’Neill.
"Well said Mutts.  Our recruitment or lack thereof has been left wanting for years now.  The buck stops with O'Neill.  Just like in coaching if you are not performing you are terminated.  We have got a cutting edge world rated centre of excellence,…"
20 minutes ago
Who Cares replied to Nitram's discussion How do we field a competitive side based on our top 30?
"After watching NSW cup a few times and again yesterday i like the look of Nanva: He is big and runs hard and fast"
20 minutes ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Mallee57's discussion Today’s Game- Utterly Disgusting
"Your comment is not worth responding to"
44 minutes ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Mallee57's discussion Today’s Game- Utterly Disgusting
"Dave commonsense on here is very hard to find . Im in total shock expept for Ryles part where Questions of sighin him that we have a blog where in my humble opinion is spot on i sat there yesterday in total shock at the bullshit that was going on"
44 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Charlie Guymer
"Therein lies our problem. The majority of our FG squad are back up players at other clubs. In fact, a lot were actually that before coming to us, even Iongi.
Iongi = back up at Penrith. Simmonson = back up Canberra. Pezet = back up at Melb. Hopgood…"
59 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Mallee57's discussion Today’s Game- Utterly Disgusting
"Your right LB, keep up the commonsense."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion We Don’t Lose Games in Moments. We Lose Them in Minutes.
"If they had all that gear on, I think the modern day footballers would end up killing each other in the collisions.....that said the old fashioned footballer was probably "street" tougher but probably not professionally tougher."
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to Codswallop's discussion Eels will make the 8 this year
"Your "name" says it all!!"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion We Don’t Lose Games in Moments. We Lose Them in Minutes.
"Blue Eel I'm not hanging my head in shame over Talagi, he would not have made our first grade side for most of his time at Penrith, they "the Cleary's" have done a magnificent job of bringing him through.....it would not have happened at Parra, he…"
1 hour ago
Longfin Eel replied to Mallee57's discussion Today’s Game- Utterly Disgusting
"Yep, they have realised Wests will take in most of Bradfield, so there are opportunities there for more paying fans. We aren't getting any help from the NRL, so we need to build in a way that goes around the NRL."
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2276

 

Sack Mark O’Neill.

It’s well overdue that the club hears directly from its members and fans. For too long, we’ve had a Head of Football who has mismanaged contracts, missed key recruitment targets, allowed homegrown talent to walk, and overseen player acquisitions…

Read more…
4 Replies · Reply by Muttman 48 seconds ago
Views: 91

Charlie Guymer

What does everyone think of the news Charlie has extended with us ?To me there is a huge emphasis on athletic edges at the moment with the way the game has gone . There needs to be some sort of athletic edge . Whether they be big, fast, tall ,…

Read more…
9 Replies · Reply by The Badger 59 minutes ago
Views: 343

Let the man speak his mind

Jeez...every press conference ryless just has to say the same shit cause if he speaks his mind it's a fine.Like seriously just let the man speak his mind fmd cause you can see how bad he was itching to speak it.fck me so annoying,fck the fines and…

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by Mallee57 9 hours ago
Views: 208

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>