Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 2026 team 😍
"1.Iongi
2. Simonson
3.Penasini
4.Howarth 
5.Foxx
6.Pezet
7.Moses
8.De Belin
9.Smith
10.Paulo
11.Tuilagi
12.Williams
13.Hopgood
14.Da Silva
15.Walker
16.Morett
17 Tuivaiti "
14 seconds ago
The Badger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 2026 team 😍
"KitKat in 
Tuilagi on the bench
Backing up from reserve grade on the bench Papalii 18th and Talatiani 19th (just because he has been anointed as the pathway project player).
Nil players from Storm as we grab our crotch and tell them to suck on that…"
19 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Buzz Rothfeild SMH - A Howarth Lomax Swap Deal?
"Do the Ralph Wiggum tactic
"3 crayons and my milk?"
MON will counter if it's a Chocolate milk they have a deal."
33 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Strangest part about the Lomax situation.
"Agreed"
37 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 2026 team 😍
"Exactly my thoughts Eli. I honestly think Tualagi is better suited to the middle with his size and movement, having him on the bench gives us an option for both positions."
43 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Strangest part about the Lomax situation.
"I think Ryles and Browny could see this unfolding through the year and has played the situation superbly. Letting him go early with the provision that he comes back to the Eels puts the ball in our court for any decisions made, they have played him…"
46 minutes ago
BEM replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 2026 team 😍
"Kautoga in for Williams and Williams on the bench instead of Guymer."
49 minutes ago
BEM replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Buzz Rothfeild SMH - A Howarth Lomax Swap Deal?
"We don't need another edge forward.
We need a winger.
We hold all the cards so we demand who we want and not just accept who the Storm offers.
Then again, Sarintinos and O'Neil would probably release him for a pie and coke and think it's the trade…"
52 minutes ago
Axel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Buzz Rothfeild SMH - A Howarth Lomax Swap Deal?
"Journos must have a bonus plan centered around how many Eels stories they can generate every month.  Especially in the off seaon LOL"
1 hour ago
macybrown replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Storm prob advised no problem we can sort that es given the circumstances of Katoa being out they'll be very confident thry can work that. Reckon he sought legal advice before signing can't imagine his manager  be thst stupid not too.
it's so much…"
1 hour ago
HKF replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 2026 team 😍
"Kautoga in for kelma."
2 hours ago
GM replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Buzz Rothfeild SMH - A Howarth Lomax Swap Deal?
"💯👌"
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"I really think the Storm have been in Lomax's ear way before we all think.  Id say as soon as 360 fell through,  the Storm were in contact pushing him to go ahead with wanting the release.   
Also so conveniently they have a million just sitting in…"
2 hours ago
macybrown replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Buzz Rothfeild SMH - A Howarth Lomax Swap Deal?
"What happens in relation to Lomax here is a massive deal not just for nrl as a whole, but us too.  why have  clauses and conditions  if no one follows them at all??  there should be no exchanges at all. Doing so definitely makes us look like turkeys…"
2 hours ago
The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Daz, excellent expansion in my statement. May I add that Folau was sacked and thus took RA to court for unfair dismissal reasons. RA probably felt the court costs and commercial issues outweighed 'winning' in court. 
As you stated, this settlement…"
2 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 2026 team 😍
"Taulagi is that strike edge you can play for 25/30 min. Jack can move into middle "
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Tin Tim Jan 1, 2026
Views: 1837

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 182

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>