Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

EA replied to LB's discussion 1eE Modern day Eels team: Bench Props
"I am glaad he is not at the club anymore but does it feel harsh that Gutho wont get a spot in this team?"
5 hours ago
EA replied to LB's discussion 1eE Modern day Eels team: Bench Props
"I wonder if Ice will get the 17 spot. I guess it depends if he was here for long enough"
5 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion The 50+ Statistic
"Not sure what you mean"
6 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion The 50+ Statistic
"Anything is possible"
6 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Mallee57's discussion The 50+ Statistic
"Next you'll be worrying about walking under ladders 🪜 "
6 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 2 Team List v Brisbane Broncos
"Nothing like a schooner of reality "
6 hours ago
Strange-eel replied to Mallee57's discussion The 50+ Statistic
"Yeah
 "
6 hours ago
Michael W. replied to LB's discussion 1eE Modern day Eels team: Bench Props
"Reg and Junior."
7 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 2 Team List v Brisbane Broncos
"I think we'll see a much better performance.  It wasn't skill or lack of football nouse in both attack and defence that brought us undone,  it was purely fatigue brought on with a combination of sin bins, flamboyant passing and crazy offloads.   
I…"
7 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 2 Team List v Brisbane Broncos
"Last year 2 teams who got flogged in round 1 bounced back in round 2 while 2 got beaten. There are also plenty of examples of teams being flogged winning the following week.
Last year Roosters got beaten 50-14 round 1 against broncos then beat…"
7 hours ago
Parraboy replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 2 Team List v Brisbane Broncos
"More Mongrel in him as well, we're missing some mongrel in our pack "
8 hours ago
Zip zip replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 2 Team List v Brisbane Broncos
"I'd like to see Samrani on the bench at the expense of TDS. Samrani is really coming of age, much like Russell. He can fill back row or centre/wing easily. Walker needs to have more minutes as lock and hooker when Smith has a rest.
That would be our…"
8 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 2 Team List v Brisbane Broncos
"Williams missed his fair share of tackles, a couple of clangers aswell.  
I think if kelma does the job he'll keep his spot and Williams will stay at prop "
8 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 2 Team List v Brisbane Broncos
"They are basically the same type of player but Moretti is better and more consistent in his runs."
8 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 2 Team List v Brisbane Broncos
"How though? He had a full pre-season? Unless coming back from injury you are a professional athlete you should be ready to go come Round 1."
8 hours ago
Michael W. replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 2 Team List v Brisbane Broncos
"He copped a 2wk ban, 1wk with an early guilty plea, or 3wks if unsuccessful."
8 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2185

 

1eE Modern day Eels team: Bench Props

Dylan Walker narrowly edged out Daniel Wagon for the Utility spot.Now onto Bench Props where the best two will get on the bench.https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PSSXZSS 1. Hayne2. Burt3. Lyon4. Tahu5. Radradra6. Brown7. Moses8. Cayless9. Marsh10.…

Read more…
3 Replies · Reply by EA 5 hours ago
Views: 102

The 50+ Statistic

 I found this statistic interesting and wasn't aware it was a 113 year record. Can the Eels make history by breaking this record and also a 40 year drought? Let's hope so. Records are meant to be broken. Strangely enough the Eels were Newcastle…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Mallee57 6 hours ago
Views: 222

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>