Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Well you maybe right, but can Anasta continue to be a player manager, if he becomes a CEO or Head of Football for Parra.....nice to have's are usually just that, I saw Sharon Stone as a nice to have, but I am sure I would have lost interest if she…"
1 minute ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"This is starting to sound like Animal Farm.....where's Sluggy when you need him, bloody sleeping PIG. Actually 1984 we lost the premiership after 3 in a row.... really what is 40 years in history?"
7 minutes ago
Sparky the Eel replied to Joel K's discussion Volkman shopped to Super Leage clubs
"Panthers off contract in 2027 Nathan Cleary, Isaah Yeo, Liam Martin, Brian To'o, Moses Leota, Mitch Kenny, Isaiah Papali'i, Blaize Talagi and Paul Alamoti in a perfect world we snag all of them get them lining up with Ado Carr , Moses , Williams &…"
11 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Chiefy dont bother giving suggestions the opposing view are not providing ANY and are happy as it stands and intellectualise/insult our position and or suggestions.
Fairplay to you for at least trying to come up with alternatives.
It appears the…"
13 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Jesus if that is the baseline for top level recruitment department ability we really are in trouble "
17 minutes ago
Fiddy replied to Joel K's discussion Volkman shopped to Super Leage clubs
"lets be real, he is a turnstyle in defence...watch the cowboys game again..."
19 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"ok Super if its not hard to find that out.....cheap shots are ok from Moderators huh ?
then Ben Rodgers, MON and the whole team need a review and make there position tenable or should be sacked"
19 minutes ago
Seraph replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Not defending MON here, but im all fairness Chiefy, we dont know what/if any are the metrics for the KPIs. MON and Jim came in at a time when things were upside down, so 'success' then vs success now could be very different things
Dont get me wrong,…"
25 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"How can our complaint lack specificity...Its quite clear the Recuitment department headed by MON.
why is it different when it comes to the coach I dont understand ?
and how is it scatter gun.   The opposing view has been very clear in the issues.…"
25 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion Speed, Power, Athleticism, But Not Specifically Size; These are the Key Areas Emerging Under These Rules Forced on Teams
"Thanks JC, the main thing is you are still teaching us (me anyway), even if it was 30 years ago and we may have opened a front that is still worthwhile....LOL
Personally I didn't have much to do with touch football outside of school days, there…"
29 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Thats false.. If the recruitment people below Mark aren't meeting kpi's, then its up to Mark to deal with the issue. 
If Mark isn't hitting kpi's , its up to Sarantinos to deal with Mark
Thats tge same for all clubs"
34 minutes ago
JC replied to Poppa's discussion Speed, Power, Athleticism, But Not Specifically Size; These are the Key Areas Emerging Under These Rules Forced on Teams
37 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"100% agree"
38 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Each club's approach to recruitment is different. Phil Gould is a law unto himself and operates completely differently to virtually every other GM/Head of Football in the game. The Dogs don't actually have a head of recruitment, whereas Parramatta…"
38 minutes ago
KingGutho replied to EA's discussion What is your NSW team?
"1: J Tedesco 
2: C Graham 
3: L Mitchell 
4: S Crichton 
5: B To'o
6: J Luai
7: N Cleary
8: T May
9: R Robson
10: AFB
11: H Olakauatu
12: H Young 
13: I Yeo
 
14: M Barnett 
15: C Murray
16: S Utoikimanu 
17: M Burton 
18: A Crichton 
19: C Watson…"
41 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Ok Prof Daz...if we are scapegoating/misidentifying then WHO IS ACCOUTABLE.
Why are you deflecting and accepting ?
honestly are you happy with a 40 year premiership drought and no clear plan forward or action in the recruitment stakes 
Im happy to…"
42 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2421

 

Metcalf Dragons bound.

Bulldogs have pulled out of the race for Metcalf and his asking price is around 1 million dollars. Dragons most likely spot but to get him immediately I wonder if this means they will allow Sua to join us early to free up cap space to get Metcalf…

Read more…
134 Replies · Reply by Poppa 1 minute ago
Views: 2015

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>