Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

EA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 15 Team List v Canberra Raiders
"90% sure. Haven't announced the team officially but I have been told he is in with Petrus and Ryda."
8 minutes ago
EA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 15 Team List v Canberra Raiders
"Haha "
9 minutes ago
Titan replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Wrong McLean"
19 minutes ago
Offside replied to Diggs for PM's discussion Season over let’s blood the kids coming through
"Filled in against the tigers when pezet went off and we looked better.
Was a half in juniors I don't see it happening but he has good left foot kicker aswell"
24 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"And people will say to Kent "You said he signed" when Kent said three quarters done. So even he knew the quality of the source might not be great."
25 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Awesome that guy has great credibility."
29 minutes ago
Vasily Arkhipov replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Ok. Thank you for sharing. "
30 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Michael Carrayannis who's close to the dragons said the news was incorrect "
30 minutes ago
Eels95 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Fingers crossed that all of that is correct. Just another case in point of not going nuts over a Paul Kent rumour. "
32 minutes ago
Vasily Arkhipov replied to jamie's discussion The Captains
"The wife is looking at purchasing wall beds.  Have you ever come across thesr?  Maxwell Smart like. Bed folds down, then you clip it back up. Swing it around and you have full desk with storage. How good is that!  Thing is, costs a bomb. Italian…"
32 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Paul Kent strikes again. Strike rate not good. 
Now if we get Jesse McLean, that is not a bad signing. Makes me think do we see Jenkins as a Centre? 
If we nab Jenkins, Leniu, Su'A, McLean that is a nice haul."
33 minutes ago
Gaz Nelson replied to Diggs for PM's discussion Season over let’s blood the kids coming through
"I like it, would be a big step-up on Joash in defence. "
40 minutes ago
The Badger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 15 Team List v Canberra Raiders
"Geez, I was hoping a relative of 'The Rock' was playing for us. Coulda got a few TPAs then."
48 minutes ago
Vasily Arkhipov replied to Mallee57's discussion IF Moses played against Dogs. Would Eels Have Won
"...and brightened up your birthday. "
1 hour ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Wow how good is the lower grades going
"You still haven't answered the question I've asked multiple times. If he is such an obvious future representative superstar, why wasn't there a bidding war for him? Why was it Perth, an expansion club building a roster from scratch, offering more…"
1 hour ago
Vasily Arkhipov replied to Parra_Greg's discussion Mitchell Moses
"Shed is progressing nicely. Have fastened the frame, laid the geotextile cover and started with the gravel.  Soon thereafter, the paving sand followed by the 65 x 6 5 pavers. I am most excited about this. Live is good. "
1 hour ago
More…

 

Eels news

Courtesy from the cumberland throw Apparently The SMH Carrayannis has said the Moses Suli links with Parramatta are incorrect. Jayden Sua out 14 weeks. Pectoral Jessie Mclean linked to.the EelsMilky Jenkins Spencer Leniu Burton Moses Suli. - No. -…

Read more…
7 Replies · Reply by Titan 19 minutes ago
Views: 149

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>