Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Jman replied to Mannah-Brow's discussion Game Stats tell the story
"Pretty much , no strength,limited athletic ability and a serious lack of skill 
 "
16 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Charles Guymer
"I do wonder if, despite all that has transpired and the mud that has stuck to him and the $$$$, whether Lomax is still glad to be rid of us
 "
20 minutes ago
LB replied to Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug's discussion Ryles Is Letting Us Down With His Trash Selections
"And that's ok to have in this squad, a back up like him."
33 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner; The cattle is the problem, this maybe the catalyst to make us do some drastic things!
"Yes Cappy, I was venting rather than solving
This a post I just made on another blog which gives me more a positive fixing mode LOL
We do not need any scapegoats, just players looking in the mirror and comparing their reflection with what the…"
56 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R11 Game Day Blog, Magic Round v Storm: Trauma and Redemption (L34-8)
"Why would that not be, if we played inferior to an opposition that was better than our current crew?"
58 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner; The cattle is the problem, this maybe the catalyst to make us do some drastic things!
"The cattle problem (squad composition) has been getting progressively worse since we made the GF all those years ago. And our results have followed suit.
It was decided by the powers that be that BA was the problem. Yet here we are several years…"
1 hour ago
Nitram replied to Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug's discussion Ryles Is Letting Us Down With His Trash Selections
"Our players just arent that good at footy. It doesnt matter which ones you pick it isnt going to make a difference. Looking at the reserve grade list playing today and the only realistic options are:
Nanva
Twidle
Talataina
Pezet
Brown
Kautoga
 …"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R11 Game Day Blog, Magic Round v Storm: Trauma and Redemption (L34-8)
"We do not need any scapegoats IMO LB, just players looking in the mirror and comparing their reflection with what the coaching staff need and think of them.
I would love  this Parra team playing touch football against an elite Touch team, yes for…"
1 hour ago
Graham polkinghorne replied to Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug's discussion Ryles Is Letting Us Down With His Trash Selections
"Guymer misses to many tackles every game. He rushes up to put a hit on and misses more then hits. His a 200/250K back up."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R11 Game Day Blog, Magic Round v Storm: Trauma and Redemption (L34-8)
"Actually the coaching staff selected him!
I don't think our problem is fitness, you can have an outstanding quarter horse, but he will never win a Melb Cup..... so Chiefy my answer to that one is the type of cattle you have and what you can exchange…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R11 Game Day Blog, Magic Round v Storm: Trauma and Redemption (L34-8)
"your right Macy, you see things in black and white, which is good when baring your soul."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R11 Game Day Blog, Magic Round v Storm: Trauma and Redemption (L34-8)
"see my blog Will and LB, I saw what Ryles saw, without the diplomacy!"
1 hour ago
Graham polkinghorne replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Charles Guymer
"Guymer, Kelly, Kemla, Russell, Volkman, Pyke, Debelin,  for mine are not FG players. Our juniors may cover 2 or 3 of those. "
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R11 Game Day Blog, Magic Round v Storm: Trauma and Redemption (L34-8)
"I suppose Ryles hired the head of physical performance from the spoon winning Newcastle did he.  
If we're so weak and unfit as you say, why did O'neill recruit the Newcastle spoon winning trainer??
Also, when did I ever say O'neill was exempt from…"
1 hour ago
Pork Rind replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R11 Game Day Blog, Magic Round v Storm: Trauma and Redemption (L34-8)
"Stats show past couple years we even have lost games coming out of a bye."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Charles Guymer
"Yes Sanders who has had 2 good games all year with an underachieving Canberra team. Considering many here abuse Pezet that he is a 7 not a 6, guess what Sanders is the same and would have same issues if he played now for us.
Keep it in back pocket…"
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2429

 

Game Stats tell the story

Possession was Storm 52-48All runs Storm 176-155Metres Gained Storm 1680 - 1164Tackles Busted Storm 43-18Post Contact Metres 493-376Tackles Made Eels 277-271Missed Tackles Eels 43-18essentially we are as soft as butter with and without the ball.

Read more…
2 Replies · Reply by Jman 16 minutes ago
Views: 153

Same

Nothing new. Step and repeat. Copy and paste. Year after year.  Same results. Same demolition. Same small hope Same lost hope. Same press conferences.Same blog posts. Sam's conversations.Same taking about the same.  

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by Yehez 4 hours ago
Views: 139

Eels vs Bye - Who Wins?

Next week the Eels team will certainly have their work cut out for them when they go up against a relentless BYE team. It's obvious Captain courageous Mitch Moses who will be missing with Origin Duties will make the Eels job tougher in attempting to…

Read more…
3 Replies · Reply by Bourbon Man 11 hours ago
Views: 130

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>