Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Big Melbourne announcement tomorrow 10am
"Now there is a case that it is impossible to prove, however fans are smart and people will catch on.  Though issue is again how do you prove it."
21 minutes ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Big Melbourne announcement tomorrow 10am
"Order the refs to be blatantly biased and corrupt?  If that leaked it would be a really bad look for the game."
25 minutes ago
shane replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Big Melbourne announcement tomorrow 10am
"should of known better, the mole hasn't got anything right ever. no anounment just rubish from the mole"
59 minutes ago
jjeel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Big Melbourne announcement tomorrow 10am
"We will lose every penalty and six again count this year by a long way! "
1 hour ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Some are trying to argue that we did the same with Lomax leaving Dragons. Big difference. He was released with no conditions, 2 years remaining ripped up.
Dragons did not want compensation or anything just wanted him gone. He then went on to play…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Roosters need a 6 after DCE leaves, they want Moses and they pull strings and V'Landys storms in and drags Moses out of Kellyville and into Bondi. If Parra ask questions they will be threatened. The response is "let it go""
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"100 this is the issue now Melbourne have cried wolf the rules have changed and no matter how we look at this the fact the mentioned is involved is hurting us by the minute.
If it comes to it I hope the club continues its stance and goes to court…"
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion NRL ready to broker a peace deal with warring clubs over Lomax
"Who the hell is he, Specks McGee?"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Captain, so far V'landys has publicly kept quiet, which is telling. Out of character. The implied "intervention" threats are via the media. Perhaps, as a proxy.  What are you suggesting is his "gun to our head": our NRL licence or grants?
 "
2 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Big Melbourne announcement tomorrow 10am
"Should have announced eels get 09 title "
2 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Big Melbourne announcement tomorrow 10am
"It was a minute of my life i will never get back. It honestly was nothing. Not a jersey, or event, or sponsor, nothing. It was just a slogan."
2 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Big Melbourne announcement tomorrow 10am
"But to that i will say what if we say no? What are they going to do?"
2 hours ago
Stevo replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Big Melbourne announcement tomorrow 10am
"Melbourne playing games "
3 hours ago
Parra-all-the-way replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Big Melbourne announcement tomorrow 10am
"havent seen anything re: what the 10am announcement was? "
3 hours ago
iamnot replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Exactly what I was saying Captain. A player transfer from Melbourne was never likely to happen, given the RLPA involvement and restrictions around existing contracts. 
I also note that my suggestion of a cap increase (albeit $1M per season might…"
3 hours ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Joel K's discussion National Melbourne League
"Pretty good compromise iamnot, though I can see the other NRL clubs pushing back on this. They don't want Melbourne to gain an unfair advantage, but they won't want us getting one either."
3 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1941

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 252

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>