Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion The Club and Foul Play Injuries.
"That's a shame. Got what he deserved."
37 seconds ago
LB replied to Muttman's discussion Pezet: Hamstring 4-6 weeks
"I said it is done and should give him a go. Media all claimed it was brilliant but still always had that sense of "But why?" to it. If Lorenzo gets a run and does well, does Ryles treat Pezet like he did de Belin and the future is now?
Ilias is an…"
3 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Blue Eel's discussion The Club and Foul Play Injuries.
"Its just a hypothetical at this stage ......who's to say that their are any decent players available anyway....go through the Reserve Grade sides in Sydney and the Hotplus Comp in Brisbane and see who you find.....Tom Duffy former Australian…"
4 minutes ago
LB replied to Muttman's discussion Pezet: Hamstring 4-6 weeks
"Honestly, hamstrings are not to be messed with. He should honestly take the year off to get it right. He has to make sure he is good when he sees Madge in November."
5 minutes ago
EA replied to Muttman's discussion Pezet: Hamstring 4-6 weeks
"Yea seeing Brown in a knights jersey hurts"
9 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Blue Eel's discussion The Club and Foul Play Injuries.
"Read this after my post NOS, I think you are on the right track in this solution mode."
16 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Muttman's discussion Pezet: Hamstring 4-6 weeks
"Never understood this move at all.
Win now we were never that so what exactly was the point in signing Pezet unless there's been some horse trading and we end up potentially with one of Anasta's clients down the track that's the only angle I'm…"
18 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Blue Eel's discussion The Club and Foul Play Injuries.
"Nightmare Off-Season  Respectfully disagree in turn NOS my friend.
I feel that your comments are "hindsight" to an extent, I also do not see the signing of Kelly as any sort of success. I also do not accept Hoey's view on the "Sugar Daddies" I feel…"
21 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Muttman's discussion Sack Mark O’Neill.
"I like your thinking Pops - you could even leave Beach in as Chair but have Jim in as an Exec Director (so still retaining an exec role - it'll have a "C" in it, can be whatever). We still do have the issue that our board is a super vanilla board -…"
22 minutes ago
Eels95 replied to Muttman's discussion Pezet: Hamstring 4-6 weeks
"Bit late to the party.  It was confirmed by Parramatta at about 4pm yesterday.  
No matter how bad you think someone is going saying its good news they got an injury is just low."
36 minutes ago
Stevo replied to Mallee57's discussion Annoying Advertising
"Ad Ublock or Ad block pro to your browser, itll stop all ads"
37 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Mallee57's discussion Annoying Advertising
"If you don't get all of the internet ads how will you know if there are sexy singles in your area? 😂"
41 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Muttman's discussion Pezet: Hamstring 4-6 weeks
"I don't think there is. Let him go to Brisbane now. The experiment failed. Just admit it and move on."
48 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Muttman's discussion Sack Mark O’Neill.
"I agree with what you have said Cappy, the perfect fitting of this is make the GM Football position vacant along the lines I presented and see what applications are forthcoming.
Two people stand out to me ....Shane Richardson fits your model of a…"
55 minutes ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Blue Eel's discussion The Club and Foul Play Injuries.
"HOE, very respectfully disagree in entirety.
I see sugar daddy's, the need for 17m sombreros, as excuses, illusions, justification for failure & inaction to review, evolve, adapt.
Sure this would help in signing a Cooper Cronk, or a Haas, Cleary,…"
58 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Muttman's discussion Pezet: Hamstring 4-6 weeks
"Is there any point in him making a return? I'm thinking not "
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2282

 

Annoying Advertising

Does anyone else have very annoying Advertising stuff when you go onto the 1EyedEel Website or is it just me? I mainly use my iPhone as that's where I signed up. If I use my iPad I can't contribute to comments as I can't remember my password ( age…

Read more…
4 Replies · Reply by Stevo 37 minutes ago
Views: 58

New trend I’ve noticed

Have noticed most of the good nrl sides currently (Definitely not us) are taking advantage of the new blocking rules and just putting up bombs to end every set with good pressure forcing errors. We have no athletes to chase the kicks or pressure so…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Axel 17 hours ago
Views: 312

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>