Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"I had no issues with Guymer playing Centre and honestly felt he did fine. Was not a liability at all. Though me saying he was playing out of position must give him grace in the eyes of others as if you put Moses at Fullback you are going to get a…"
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"Have you watched Manly, Cowboys, and Titans play this year? They are mud, and completely out of form. I am definitely saying we should beat them. Anything can happen, but we're a better team than these 3. Tigers halves have both copped injuries, but…"
2 hours ago
Strange-eel replied to Muttman's discussion Sneaky ploy which makes Panthers defense so good.
"Both true.
 "
2 hours ago
Strange-eel replied to Nitram's discussion Charlie Guymer send off
"I havn't seen the replay but at the game is was WTF?"
2 hours ago
Blaze replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"Strong attack but almost non existant defence, if our defence doesnt improve through the year we will be around 7-10th range i reckon."
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"look I am very pessimistic but I do believe we have can be top 4, its just the way we a playing, I cannot see it happening.
If we get exponential improvement like last year....then yes we can beat anybody.....the way we are playing and presenting at…"
3 hours ago
Poppa replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"I don't think there is a game we play where you can say we should win.....if you are using Manly,St George,Titans and Cowboys as examples, then we on paper are no better than them.....
Wests are obviously stronger this year, as are Knights....but we…"
3 hours ago
Eels95 replied to Nitram's discussion Charlie Guymer send off
"I think the bigger issue is that you can't have a decision that is allowed to be challenged and then allow a quick tap. Especially when 80% of the time the ref sends them back and says I didn't give you the mark.
We genuinely wanted to challenge…"
3 hours ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Nitram's discussion Charlie Guymer send off
"I thought Charlie and another one of our players were pointing at someone to challenge the call also and there was no fair time window allowed by the referee before he responded the way he did."
3 hours ago
Poppa replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"Agreed LB, out of all our young forwards with the variations in the performances (Taiviti aside) I think Guymer is the most consistent in terms of performance, i say that because others have higher planes but Guymer is very trustworthy in his…"
3 hours ago
Muttman replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"I had us for the spoon. For a very large chunk of the season it was looking like a sure thing. Happy to lose that bet. No way you can watch the current Eels performances and suggest we're playing finals. We'd need a big spike in performance. "
3 hours ago
Will 5150 replied to Muttman's discussion Sneaky ploy which makes Panthers defense so good.
"It was a great segment and he's spot on... I did laugh at his language... "these f**ckers...".
If any other coach was smart enough, they are doing the same from this round. Mind you, they should have already been doing it.
Many will say it's against…"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"You realise Guymer played out of position right?"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"You're hoping."
3 hours ago
Nitram replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"If we manage to avoid anymore injuries between 9th and 12th. If we get more injuries fighting off spoon."
3 hours ago
Yehez replied to Eels2025's discussion Where do we see the EELS finishing?
"6th to 10th. 
More likely 7th to 9th. 
Yes, we have things to work on like Pezet, early game forward momentum etc......but so do other teams. And so far, there is plenty of other teams that have as much problems as us if not more. 
And I trust us to…"
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2238

 

Charlie Guymer send off

I know we won, but the Jacob Liddle "strip" penalty at the 24:21 to go mark needs to be called out as a failure of the ref's knowledge of the rules.A penalty restart cannot legally occur until the referee has officially designated the mark. Yet, as…

Read more…
3 Replies · Reply by Strange-eel 2 hours ago
Views: 212

Where do we see the EELS finishing?

Just eager to see where everyone thinks we will place on the table come season end?As of now, I have us between 6th-10th, just depending on injuries and how much our middle defence improves throughout the year. Another factor is if we unearth some…

Read more…
45 Replies · Reply by LB 1 hour ago
Views: 754

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>