Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Mallee57 replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"De Beliin has actually been good. He's a very good defender and a workhorse"
10 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion Eels Next Match vs Bulldogs
"The Bulldogs have definitely declined this year. Just noticed the Dragons look like having their first win this year against the Broncos 😳Very surprising! What's wrong with Broncos? "
12 minutes ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"We're acting like Sarantinos pockets money from the cap himself. He still needs the club to spend 95% of the cap like everyone else."
18 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"What about Gold Coast? They are behind us too. Dogs are level."
26 minutes ago
shane replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Looks like we only want plodders at our club just like Edwards reserve grade only and thats the type of players we get."
27 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"Hoe, I understand some including myself are getting emotional at times around the decisions of the club, but what do people expect.  It happens all around the world from the epl to American football.  If the team isn't performing then those employed…"
34 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Moderation Note: Forum Standards
"This message is not directed at the vast majority of members here, only a very small number.
Also, PG/Chief, regarding the closure of a blog:
Please refer to this blog and the Code of Conduct.
Criticism of other members, players, coaches,…"
45 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Maybe Super can help us out with that answer. And off we are resigning Debellin he'd be cheaper than anyone one else on the market that's how Sarantinos rolls."
45 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"If the asx rose yesterday, isn't it great that companies must be open and transparent to give the markets stability and credibility, moving forward. "
47 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Who? 🥸"
48 minutes ago
LB replied to Mallee57's discussion Eels Next Match vs Bulldogs
"He blames the refs every week and only won one out for what their last 7? I wouldn't worry to much."
49 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"I can't see how they are signing Averillo when they are getting rid of To'a and a couple of others to free up cap space to sign Fainua, the second rower. It doesn't make sense considering Averillo would be a lot more coin than To'a."
49 minutes ago
LB replied to Mallee57's discussion Eels Next Match vs Bulldogs
"Yeah he's resorting to blaming refs every week. I do agree the charge down no try was a bit silly, but the fact every week he blames refs shows the insecurity. He's too proud to change anything as if it works proves everyone right and him wrong.
He…"
50 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Blue Eel's discussion Should we be concerned !
"My reasoning is, Some people feel it's important, some people want things fixed , and there is a general feeling of not being heard by the club  or acknowledged by the club this gives concern to a lot of people. Members and by extension…"
51 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Glad for JDB! Been very tight in d.
If their looking for a cheap signing they should be looking at Schiller at knights. Big tackle busting winger. By the looks of it not going to sign any top flight players any time soon.
 "
52 minutes ago
Avon Barksdale replied to Mallee57's discussion Eels Next Match vs Bulldogs
"Saw no issue with the refereeing in that game so no idea what he's on about. But it does worry me that they'll get all the calls next week against us"
52 minutes ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 234

 

Eels Next Match vs Bulldogs

I've noticed some comments from Bulldogs coach Ciraldo that he's not very happy with the refereeing/bunker calls made yesterday in his team's loss to the West Tigers.Not too sure if his concerns are justified or not! As I've not actually watched the…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Mallee57 12 minutes ago
Views: 92

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>