Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Comparatively with others I believe EA, sorry if I mispresented you.....thought you implied he was only effective at fullback and not much anywhere else."
4 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Lack of success at a club ends up leading to a drop in money. Drop in crowd revenue, drop in membership, drop in merchandise, drop in sponsorship. 
I've seen this statement time and time again and under any form of decent interrogation it falls…"
12 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Haha, Chiefy. Heck, you're right. Over 3500 views. Not a bad job mate. Super isn't paying you enough.
Maybe we should have one more Suli blog just for good vibes and chuckles.
P.S. Who said that: Are you not entertained? Robbie Williams? I'll need…"
32 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Nor have I said it's all good enough, I've been on record saying I have no issues with MON being sacked. But also am pointing out things that they have done well. "
36 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"This blog got 3500 views,. are you not entertained? And yes its a Suli news blog"
48 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Chiefy,
I write enough blogs.
Once fans drive your decisions, it's time to walk away. That's Wayne Bennett.
IMO, he's right. So let's agree to disagree on this point.
Just for clarity, I'm not against change as the club decides, nor you repeating…"
52 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Also , i have nothing to gain from all of this. Ive always had the club first focus.  I could step aside tomorrow and relax in Mexico become a football fan"
59 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"I keep asking why Wayne Bennett keeps signing guys who seemed to be washed at other places Nikorima and Benji have been 2 guys that seemingly he coverts I still ask myself what is Bennett seeing that the rest of the nrl is missing."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"I'd sack everyone on our R and R side and wouldn't have any qualms doing so.
I'd also look to pair up an experienced team builder next to JR to oversee roster and recruitment decisions.IMO what I've seen the last 4-5 seasons it's not been good…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Coryn, good shout. 
He could also fill in at seven. What puzzles me is he has not been snapped up by an NRL club yet. Now. Dunno why. Is he wanting a pay day and 3 years say? Some clubs may baulk at that. Why? "
1 hour ago
Mad Mick Mcginty replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Yes it's all in the lap of the Gods time will tell "
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"I think at some point he will play for PNG. But i think it could be when he is like 28-29. Towards the back end of his career and perhaps achieved a bit. I am not certain many players will go there in their prime. The franchise at this stage is to…"
1 hour ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Not sure where you got that from. I rate Bloomfield "
1 hour ago
Joel K replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Parramatta Eels appoint Mark O'niell as football Manager
"I cant believe this guy is still here"
1 hour ago
Mad Mick Mcginty replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Could be but I don't know and neither do you . Maybe he will and maybe he won't. Time will tell "
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Super hoe 










I’ve said my piece. Now it’s over to the fans who support the current setup — you and anyone else backing this football management.
Put forward a proper case. Write the blog. Lay out the reasons why sticking with this structure…"
1 hour ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
8 Replies · Reply by Poppa yesterday
Views: 320

 

The Ticking Time Bomb

Disclaimer - I am trying to make this blog as little about R&R as possible, however that is impossible in parts. Of course, thats for the original blog & any posters should speak freely about whatever they please.In a pre-game interview on Monday,…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 27

Eels news

Courtesy from the cumberland throw Apparently The SMH Carrayannis has said the Moses Suli links with Parramatta are incorrect. Jayden Sua out 14 weeks. Pectoral Jessie Mclean linked to.the EelsMilky Jenkins Spencer Leniu Burton Moses Suli. - No. -…

Read more…
124 Replies · Reply by Poppa 4 minutes ago
Views: 3638

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>