Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"You're not paying me enough ploppa "
34 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Yeah I was being facetious. All are employed full-time by Parramatta."
42 minutes ago
LB replied to The Ghost of Danny Crnkovich's discussion Eels podcasts
"Oh you forgot one haha. 1Eyed eel podcast 😉😉😉"
49 minutes ago
LB replied to The Ghost of Danny Crnkovich's discussion Eels podcasts
"Only one I listen to is TCT and even then it is sparingly. "
55 minutes ago
The Ghost of Danny Crnkovich replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"We need Shane Richardson!"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Interesting Cappy, I don't disagree in principle, we definately are failing at the practice but what industry is not performance based these days.....its a dog eat dog world and the answer my friend seems to be owned by Bob Dillon who is blowing in…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"That comment makes no sense, the brothers were at Tigers,where is the criticism of Parra, circumstantially signing someone like him would require strong thought....he did have a reputation, but don't let me spoil the story....I would have taken him,…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Said it before being in a 40 yr vortex patience has run out.We are 10 yrs out of a salary cap scandal and from what it looks like no closer to what we all desire.
But I hear what you are saying."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"LB, with the exception of Rogers, who I don't know, the other 3 are employed full time by the club, given that MON has a Xmas Pantomine where he known for dressing and sometimes undressing in a spectacular table dance could be a part time exception…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"No one denies this but do you understand our particular circumstances Coryn, we made the rules so we couldn't cheat.... do you think that the TPA's out there are actually done on an arms length basis....of course not, but we made it hard for…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Ryles who says yes to these signings? As Coryn said, he deserves his fair share of blame for this too. There would not be one player that would come to Parra without Ryles agreeing to it. Now does he deserve a lot of it? No but still Pezet and De…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
""How many years have we been saying we need outside backs"
You tell me Cheefy? and what have you done about it, fcuk all....have you made a constructive comment in the process? we all aknowledge we have problems in the backline, not the least being…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"By what? A mere 25mins. Journo article at 7:35am, announced at 8am. Hardly call it a leak. Unless there was another one that you had in mind Analyst?"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"I don't think there is any question on that Daz, welcome to the world of commercial reality.
If the NRL wanted to run on a socialistic basis, they would contract all the players to the NRL, bring in a draft and go for a competetion that is based on…"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Cheefy, it seems that you won't allow LB to have fun and guess what, this concept that the fans pay their wages is a bit of a myth! if you do an analysis of the balance sheet you will see much of the income comes from aspects outside of the physical…"
2 hours ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"Nah there was a blog before Walker was announced."
2 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa on Wednesday
Views: 249

 

Eels podcasts

What are your thoughts on the different eels specific podcasts?Cumberland Throw- solid whole club analysis. I prefer their blogs which give a great run down of all grades while also giving their opinions.Parra cave podcast- find it a tough listen.…

Read more…
2 Replies · Reply by LB 49 minutes ago
Views: 90

Eels Next Match vs Bulldogs

I've noticed some comments from Bulldogs coach Ciraldo that he's not very happy with the refereeing/bunker calls made yesterday in his team's loss to the West Tigers.Not too sure if his concerns are justified or not! As I've not actually watched the…

Read more…
8 Replies · Reply by BlacJac 8 hours ago
Views: 699

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>