Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

macybrown replied to Bert de Naturál✌️™'s discussion Peter V’landys MIA: How the Lomax Affair Exposed Cracks at HQ
"Hey Bert! Great summary!
to me and sounds like yourself and thousands of others,  this is as much us vs Lomax and managers, as Storm n NRL's total audacity! So proud of our club no matter what happens in courts 🤞
 Im totally engrossed in this one!"
4 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
""
44 minutes ago
Angry Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bellamy extends 2028 - Ryles finishes 2028
"I'm not sure why you think it was a risk for him to take the Parra job. It's more of a risk to take over from Bellamy. 20 years of being in the top 8 versus a team that had plenty of room for growth. There was no risk in taking the Parra job"
58 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bellamy extends 2028 - Ryles finishes 2028
"Yep I reckon if he makes finals we extend til 2030 at least."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bellamy extends 2028 - Ryles finishes 2028
"Well that's the thing, if he badly wanted the Storm job he could have waited and been in the system. Why go to Eels and risk being sacked and ruining your chances altogether?"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bellamy extends 2028 - Ryles finishes 2028
"Thing is, yes Chief you make a great point, his family live in Wollongong. Always have. When he got the Parramatta job his family threw a street party as he was going to be home more often. 
When he worked for Melbourne his wife and kids stayed in…"
1 hour ago
BringBackSemi replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bellamy extends 2028 - Ryles finishes 2028
"They were saying on the Kenty Podcast that Cam Smith going to the Bronco's was about getting the experience required to fill Bellamy's shoes when he finally retires. His kids will probably have left school by the time Bellamy finally retires so it…"
2 hours ago
The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bellamy extends 2028 - Ryles finishes 2028
"Isn't he contracted here until end of 2029. Given our contract stance with Lomax, I can't see us letting him go if the club is getting into the finals etc.
Sorry, should have Googled first. End 2028 only."
2 hours ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bellamy extends 2028 - Ryles finishes 2028
"Surely Rylesy won't want to live in that shit hole again"
2 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bellamy extends 2028 - Ryles finishes 2028
"There's no upside to going to Melbourne and trying to fill those big shoes. Look at Man U since fergie retired. You're on an absolute hiding to nothing. If he takes us to the promised land he will be as revered as Jack Gibson"
4 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"This has all played out way too quickly for PVL to have had much say. The only thing PVL has said so far is he would of liked to get a deal done. Things then went legal and PVL would not be able to make any public comment right now. He will wait for…"
4 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"Papenhausen and NAS. At least 1.5 there"
4 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to CarloEEL2's discussion New training shirt with suburbs
"No but it has Telopea. Same same"
4 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Charbs's discussion Storm to face hefty bill if star loses Eels court fight
"I honestly don't see any valid points that favour Lomax or the Storm. The Storm were in negotiations with Lomax whilst he was still playing for the Eels. As well as Lomax in discussion with R360 whilst he was still playing for the Eels and under…"
6 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Bert de Naturál✌️™'s discussion Peter V’landys MIA: How the Lomax Affair Exposed Cracks at HQ
"Horse man is full.of hot air. Can't stand him or that south african dope in abdo"
9 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bellamy extends 2028 - Ryles finishes 2028
"Cam smith will be next storm coach. No way ryles goes there after waiting only to be fucked over. "
9 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2031

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 301

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>