Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Eli Stephens replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Finally a coach who actually knows what he's doing and makes decent decisions lol. Can sleep well at night 🤣 honestly don't care if the Lomax thing just happens in the background till mid season or whatever. He can wait "
3 hours ago
Longfin Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Yep exactly LB. Ryles is calling the shots here. It's comforting knowing that the club is backing his decisions. We would not be able to promote such a strong position if the club was not completely united. "
5 hours ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels demand 1 of 3 Storm stars in exchange for Zac Lomax
"Before this saga did anyone think that Samrani was Ryles pet project to mirror a player like Howarth?"
5 hours ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Sarantinos pretty much laid it out to Melbourne and all NRL clubs, pretty much if we receive something very good whether cap space or a rep player, he can leave. Ball is now in the court of the other 16 teams whoever can make the best trade…"
5 hours ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"I heard him say that on Kenty podcast. Kent pretty much laughed at him when he said Lomax goes for a challenge, Kent said yeah and money too. He saw through the rubbish.
But at the same time, Gillis is doing exactly what he should be doing,…"
5 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"Just defined roles is all you'll have a footy side and business side you'll have JR driving the football side for the FG team Nathan Browns job is looking after the pathways and final decisions roster wise will be on JR.JS probably has very little…"
7 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"He'll be back in the nrl eventually but eels going to make him sweat and get something out of it. No rush at all for parra 🤣"
7 hours ago
Blue Eel replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Being reported that Steve Gillies the other half to, his and Clinton Schifcofske's sports management company GS Sports Management is now releasing statements favouring Lomax and attempting to explain and clear a path for his return to the NRL.
It…"
7 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"Zero tackle has him contracted to the storm until 2027 for $1.1 million. "
8 hours ago
The Badger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"Lomax's agent now saying he left because Arthur was sacked and Gutho left. 
A grade sook! "
8 hours ago
LB replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Lomax has blown up his own career. And for what?
"If Melbourne go cold, which I think is possible, do not be surprised if a team like Sydney City come in."
8 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"Macy I think the clubs done well here they've outlined there terms and have the leverage.
I agree if we don't get what WE want and I mean exactly what we want he sits."
9 hours ago
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER replied to Roy tannous's discussion Does anyone know what it is ?
"Ye what happened to him he was going to manly 
Im glad he came to us but"
9 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Eels Dig In on Player Release, Demand Fair Value in Any Deal
"why not just make munster an offer now as his only contracted for 26 atm"
9 hours ago
BringBackSemi replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion Can someone please tell me
"From what I read, neither party is wanting a reunion. Lets face it, we tried him at centre and he had some issues defensively there so was moved back to the wing. Flannagan was right. Ryles doesn't want to pay a winger centre money, and someone who…"
9 hours ago
SuperEel 22’s discussion was featured
When Zac Lomax approached the Eels hierarchy in 2025 that he would like to depart the club only one year into a four year deal, it was clear the representative winger was going his own way.
Parramatta, while not exactly keen to release a marquee…
9 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1921

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 232

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>