Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Pou, Violence comes from the extremes on the politico-religo spectum. Hard far-right. Hard far-left. Hardline fanatic any ideology. To assume it's only one ideology that is the problem is a false reality. Dangerous even.
For me, the moral of the…"
17 minutes ago
KENDOZA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion National Schoolboys cup final 1pm today (ch 9)
"Is bamblett contracted long term?"
24 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
""
59 minutes ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion National Schoolboys cup final 1pm today (ch 9)
"Cannot believe of Cobi is not in their team. Must have some other serious wingers. Cobi was amazing in HM this year on the wing. His defence and finishing was elite. Arguably would have been in the HM TOTY."
1 hour ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion National Schoolboys cup final 1pm today (ch 9)
"Bamblett, Petrus and Davis are the big ones to watch. I think Bamblett is a better fullback than 6 to be honest. But to fit the electric speed of Davis, he is at 6.
Funny how our HM & SG ball fullback are both in the same team for St. Pats."
1 hour ago
Richard Jackson replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion National Schoolboys cup final 1pm today (ch 9)
"Thanks for the heads up Chief. Six parra guys in-I'm in."
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Gentlemen,
I really don't want this blog to be closed. It's been largely civil up to this point.
One post (Bob Smith's) has been deleted for breaching COCs. I already warned of this from the onset."
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Poppa, I am OK with radical and lunatic and I am a leftist. But I draw the line at ... duck. C'mon, that is literally dehumanizing. Even disgusting can be human."
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Well, Poppa, I thought I should ask the internet if it was true, that all smurfs are blue. The internet told me there was an episode with a yellow smurf and others with multi-coloured smurfs. Apparently the wife of the creator of the smurfs chose…"
1 hour ago
Flow Basket replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Some Rumours circling Pezet
"Joash is nearly my favourite player "
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Well I certainly didn't describe you that way..... but there is an old saying that "if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and goes Quack Quack....it is more than likely a DUCK!"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Eelawarra's discussion 1947 RUGBY LEAGUE NEWS (16 pages) EELS FIRST EVER GAME
"I had a problem with that "garment" Wiz..... in those days I couldn't afford any underware but I always wanted to look good from the outside. The womens change rooms were unfortunate but I had to get underware from somewhere!"
2 hours ago
Flow Basket replied to LB's discussion Three Sydney clubs circle Radley
" Head knocks and coke who wouldn't invest in that "
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Eelawarra's discussion 1947 RUGBY LEAGUE NEWS (16 pages) EELS FIRST EVER GAME
"Myopia does that to you!"
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Poppa, I thought that comment was spot on. But what do I know, I am a radical lunatic disgusting leftist"
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kirk, Part 3: The Deep Divide
"Poppa September 12, 2025 at 7:42am  

Bup, Meelk, AE and even Frank..... you bring credit to the discussion. i say that in deference to others that have assumed similar views.
I have stayed out of this discussion and just observed the commentary and…"
2 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>