Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Coryn Hughes replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Parra need an influx of at least 3 players one in the middle and at least 2 outside backs that's the low tide in the recruitment stakes.
If we are still rolling out anything that looks half pie like we've got now it's going to be a long year next…"
4 minutes ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Samrani locked in centre?
"I like Samrani. You can save a lot of money with having him as a full-time Centre option. Then more experienced he becomes, then you could look at him on an edge. He is good in defence, he is athletic for his size, has some pace. Good hands, has…"
4 minutes ago
paul taylor replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion RECRUITMENT
"We certainly have been poor in recruitment for many many years.  I certainly don't have a wrap on the current R &R committee .  But it is such a tough environment .  Our salary cap turmoil has our club hyper vigilant to auditing, compliance ,…"
1 hour ago
Offside replied to Roy tannous's discussion Samrani locked in centre?
"I think the comparison to big  Ben Smith is a good one the penguin was under rated as a centre and backrower injuries cost him a couple of seasons. Samrani is pretty similar "
1 hour ago
MeelK replied to Roy tannous's discussion Samrani locked in centre?
"It's a good point FM. I often think about a stat from the old NRL Under 20s comp (Toyota cup?). Only 5% of players in that comp went on to play more than 50 NRL games. Early hype is no guarantee of a long NRL career."
1 hour ago
Parrafan101 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Yeah you're right, I do say some stupid shit sometimes. Also hearing that Jenkins rumour is 100% true."
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"You "herd" a lot of things Anal, any chance one may come good one day?"
2 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"walker is on 600k and most of it is long serving player allowance"
2 hours ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"what possible benefit is pezet for 10 odd games to the dogs especially with a hammy injury blue eel"
2 hours ago
FP Slasher replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Girlfriend is having a baby, she ain't moving to NQ (it will take a lot of convincing), she's Kellyville local, he'll look to move to Sydney. Which club lands him, that remains to be seen."
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Agree with Axel, LB and Eelovution. The only caveat I would offer is that I understand the agony aunts, indeed I am often there with them, but I find it tedious when agony aunt morphs into talk of rye club, its management, its recruitment etc.
For…"
2 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Samrani locked in centre?
"You are forgetting our juniors."
2 hours ago
Angry Eel replied to Roy tannous's discussion Samrani locked in centre?
"Samrani is one of my favourites. He's easily our best option at centre atm but I believe his best position will be in the back row. We've got no ability coming through so we definitely need to go to market for 2 centres and a quality yardage/aerial…"
2 hours ago
Eelovution replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"Axel, one of the best replies on this site. Sick and tired of all the  'agony aunts' on here complaining about this and that. Looks like angst lives rent-free in their brains."
3 hours ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Moses Suli anyone?
"I mean we are all guilty of it at some points. I have been in the past. But it is just annoying to be fair that there is no in between. If the team is good it's "Premiers or nothing" or slightly bad "We are spooners for the next decade" all because…"
3 hours ago
SuperEel 22 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"I think his family were caught up in the NSW floods so he went home to help out
 "
3 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa May 27
Views: 268

 

Samrani locked in centre?

Samrani man.In his short career his done more then penisni since 2022.samrani gives us something we lacked since Lomax,presence in the air.can also come up with with some big plays like against the cows and intercept against newy.Although didn't win…

Read more…
11 Replies · Reply by LB 4 minutes ago
Views: 729

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>