Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

John Boyle replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"Need to focus on hanging onto the ball, especially after long periods of being under the pump.
Paulo, your job is to run straight and hard, win the contact before even thinking of an offload....... YOU ARE NOT A BALL PLAYER !
 "
1 minute ago
Hell On Eels replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Daniel Mortimer, 
Restarts are worse than penalities as there is no break in the clock, and no time to reset the defensive line, creating a vicious cycle of momentum and fatigue.
Actually, for most of the Storm v Eels game errors were equal.
Errors…"
15 minutes ago
Rabz S replied to LB's discussion 1eE Modern day Eels team: Utility, no.14
"Thanks mate, it worked."
17 minutes ago
Manuel Dortimer replied to EA's discussion Take Aways from the game
"Rubbish.  Have a look at the lopsideed scores the whole round.  Manly had 11 mins straight of possession before Canberra got the ball.  The NRL has called for this type of officiating and many teams were not ready for it.  If you put teams under…"
53 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Fox on Track for Rd 2
"Good news, Storm targeted our unorganised left side really well. Pezet was their first target, once they got him the domino of Kelly and Russell fell quite easily. Although, Storm really got us through the ruck all night as that's where their…"
54 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"TDS is not first grade level. Do not pick players who are not up to it. Joash is a fullback, do not pick players out of position.Walker is going to have to cover Smith for his rests. Walker is off contract, he will rise to the occasion."
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kemp: Eels vs Storm R1 refereeing was "Disgraceful"
"TolEllts, Great point. Once momentum kept going against us, we just had no answers. We lost our way. The ref was never going to let us win that game, but we could've avoided that huge blowout. And not get bullied as much.
We kicked for 66m in the…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"Iamnot, spot on. Manly get 4-straight restarts. Lead 14-0. Then, Raiders get 5-straight restarts. They come back 14-12. Must be just pure co-incidence it keeps happening...
I used to think refs were just used as an excuse by coaches, but nowadays…"
1 hour ago
iamnot replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"HOE - interesting that after blowing the pea out of the whistle for 48 mins (one set restart every 5 mins), there was only one blown in the last 32 minutes of the game. You can't tell me that players all of a sudden became ultra-disciplined. "
1 hour ago
iamnot replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"Could easily get rid of the kick for touch option on a penalty. Make it so that the only options are a tap restart or a kick for goal."
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 6 moreeee
"We keep talking about the great Raiders come back after being down early 14-0. You know what helped? Raiders got 5-straight six-agains after the 8th min after Manly's lead. Every restart till fulltime, bar one.  Restarts are worse than penalties…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"Look TDS ain't going anywhere anytime soon, but i think it is more paletable if Joash is that 14 where he can fill in at Hooker for short mins and also play other positions if needed, as opposed to a straight up Hooker. TDS can still be in the 19."
3 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion 1eE Modern day Eels team: Utility, no.14
"Gutherson "
6 hours ago
Parraboy replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"doorey should get dropped not up to it bro gets tired too easily, we need a bench of 
Walker
Tuivaiti
Moretti
TDS
stick solid with TDS, Ryley can't play 80 ATM"
7 hours ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"I think Ryles will go Williams to middle, Tuilagi on edge and Guymer 18. Just with Brisbane you'd want experience on that edge. "
10 hours ago
Alfred Mateo replied to Hell On Eels's discussion R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"JDB made a lot of tackles last week and only missed 2 but gees he's slow on his feet, so was Kautoga for thst matter. Would like to see Guymer or Moretti get a run-both are good with line speed in d.
Big fan of Ryley but he had his worst game as an…"
10 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2183

 

1eE Modern day Eels team: Winger (redo)

Jim Dymock is the Lock Forward, meaning the starting 13 is now complete bar the last Wing spot which was a tie between Luke Burt and Eric Grothe Jr.Now bias is Burt i hope gets it, i mean who would think Burt is my favourite all time player? Weird…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 114

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>