Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Parrafan101 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"BA had a roster and took him 5 years to get to a gf, seibold had manly and broncos couldn't do anything. It depends on you really coaches well."
27 minutes ago
Mitchy replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"The Warrior's should be doing this with the amount of athletic / fast kids in the broader union / league set up and so should we. Parra would need to be looking in such areas, as the demographics in the Parra comp have changed over the last 10-15…"
57 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Give majority of coaches a world class roster and they get to finals."
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"There probably only looking in there own backyard.
The Warriors have an open season on poaching or looking at this talent  there grabbing anyone who looks like they have any potential at high school level and there making no bones about it ,there…"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"https://youtu.be/90R3UYD8-6I?si=CdPrFjKjCdhmEq8N
Heres another one gents the top try scorer in Super Rugby this year just signed a contract to play in Europe he's been sitting in the NZR system for the last 6 years.
Guys built like Greg Marshew with…"
6 hours ago
Graham polkinghorne replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Not much to like about our chances of keeping Knights under 50. "
9 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Hes a great coach with the worst roster and he still gets them up for games, he's beaten quality sides that some sides struggle to play. Give him a world class roster he'd be playing finals every year, but the front give him ron massey cup roster."
9 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"It's just how they have done the presentation. Nothing to see here."
9 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Can we stop being so dramatic. Paulo has one year left at most he ain't going anywhere. I highly doubt Ryles leaves unless it is for Melbourne and even then unlikely to relocate. Fox wont go. Moses is the only one who could ask to get out.…"
9 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Not sure if you are or not. All i know, based on information given, was that Ryles pulled out due to Dragons getting involved in who he hired as assistants and their say on recruitment. He also wanted a 5 year deal and they were only going to go…"
10 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"I was being sarcastic."
10 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"I reckon if we don't sign Burton and some other elite talent i think Ryles, Fox and Moses also paulo walk. The people at front office doing this club no favours at all."
10 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Have they switched Tuilagi and Kautoga sides?  I wonder if it is to try them with different defensive supports, because both have been weak links but Tuilagi especially.  Maybe JAC can tidy up when he lets 3 or 4 line breaks go past him.
What sides…"
10 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Some journo said it after bellamy stayed on as storm coach and parra became available. More or less he didn't want to miss out on this opportunity.i believe ryles did at first agree to coach saints but backed out thinking he would get the storm gig.…"
10 hours ago
LB replied to Parra-all-the-way's discussion Cowboys rumoured signings
"I hope so as well. If not then yeah go for your life in knocking them as you can't defend it."
10 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Where did he say he regretted it? I saw an article saying he had no regrets at all declining St. George Illawarra.
He left them at the alter as they wouldn't let him have his own people in charge. Plus, yes they have good signings but are still a…"
11 hours ago
More…

 

Cowboys rumoured signings

With the news the cowboys are looking to sign ramien and katoa, how can it be that every club is looking to, and actually executing signings and the eels have zero. I just can't for the life of me understand what's going on.Is it a case we have a…

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by LB 10 hours ago
Views: 797

Injury Report Round 13

Looks like Simmonson will return this year, have lost Paulo for 8 weeks. Penisni for another 8-10 weeks and Moses is TBCInjury Report:Simmo - Round 23Will - Round 21-23Paulo - Round 21Mitch - TBCR Penisni - To return next weekFletcher & Tago - Round…

Read more…
11 Replies · Reply by Offside 14 hours ago
Views: 587

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>