Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Slow Moving 🤣
"Kearney win rate = 24%. Really hope Ryles does not get there but it is not looking promising! Kearney win rate in 2011 was 6 from 24 (and a draw) or 25% and in 2012 it was 3 wins from 19 games (16%) before he was sacked.
Out of curiosity I looked at…"
14 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Slow Moving 🤣
"Ritchie is a complete hack. 
If Ryles should be judged now then the Bulldogs should have sacked Ciraldo shortly after his first year. 
Coaches need time and support. Only time will tell with Ryles."
21 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Slow Moving 🤣
"The funny thing about Bulldog Ritchie's critique of Ryles is that Bulldog suggested Ryles has coached enough games to judge him, but Flanagan deserves a little bit more time before judging him, especially if the Dragons break their 10-match losing…"
30 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Roy tannous's discussion It just gets to a point
"Xerri had already been replaced by Tuala, so the Dogs are without one first choice centre, and that is it for their backs. By contrast the Eels go into the Dogs game without their first choice fullback and 5/8 (half their spine), and about their…"
58 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion The injury ward
"Our alledged pathways resemble wallaby tracks...no-one has any idea where they lead
 "
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Slow Moving 🤣
"Ryles win rate could be in Kearney territory by end of year. Fun Times"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Slow Moving 🤣
"Ryles is on 40% win rate
BA was 52% when sacked."
1 hour ago
Mallee57 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Who's responsible - 7 from or last 11 signings have been downright failures
"The best recruitment made by the Eels since the 80's was under Brian Smith and since his departure it's been bog below average and it doesn't look like improving any time soon."
1 hour ago
Mallee57 replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Slow Moving 🤣
"They can target all the players they want but there's ZERO indication any will come to Parra. The recruitment should have been done ages ago"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Slow Moving 🤣
"Yeah idk what his problem is haha, but he'd definitely start on the wing for us and Russell can go back to his centre spot. Better then any wing option we have "
1 hour ago
Mallee57 replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Slow Moving 🤣
"Seems that Ryles winning percentage is only 30% but when Brad Arthur was given the flick his winning percentage was 42% according to journo on NRL 360. He reckons Eels have gone backwards under Ryles but Anasta reckons Ryles is going ok and will…"
1 hour ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Slow Moving 🤣
"Hahaha Blake Wilson fmd, that farkwit has knocked back 3 times, why do we keep chasing him? "
1 hour ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to SuperEel 22's discussion The injury ward
"You keep saying to explore other pathways what pathways?  You have previously mentioned rugby and rugby 7s players from the Pacific Islands who have great athletes.  Yes they may transition to league but they have to want to come and play…"
1 hour ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Slow Moving 🤣
"If they can just get Taulagi just do that. So many different options but they just sit still 💀"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Slow Moving 🤣
"He's ahead of Laybutt for sure now."
1 hour ago
Alfred Mateo replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Slow Moving 🤣
"Maybe not this year but Tom Chester should be on the list. He's off contract next year and probably is behind Laybutt and Purdue. He's 24 now and starting to play some very good footy"
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2317

 

The injury ward

Given the raft of injuries across first grade I thought it best to collate it all together to see where we currently sit. Have sorted it into positions. 1. Iongi 2. Twidle 3. Russell (maybe back this week) 4. Samrani 5. Simonsson 6. Pezet 7. (Moses…

Read more…
50 Replies · Reply by Randy Handlinger 1 hour ago
Views: 1285

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>