Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"“To Andrew’s credit, he did not intervene in response to that text message....I wonder where he gets that information from?"
12 minutes ago
KingGutho replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"Does anyone know what browns weight is?
He looks pretty big and mobile 
he will definitely make a debut this year"
20 minutes ago
Stevo replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"I'd like to see him start the trial match against the roosters, see what the bloke has against a team like them and also to see if he can keep up as well and impose himself as a genuine first grader"
22 minutes ago
Stevo replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Yep here we go, hopefully more and more people will come and speak out against this type of treatment whether it be from the Storm, Roosters or any other team f
 "
24 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"What's his age LB. I heard he was 21 or 22.  Also. to put in that performance after only playing 2 games in cup last year is very impressive.  "
30 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Finally some mainstream scrutiny since Crawley's sudden silence.











Hagipantelis: NRL should be concerned by Storm CEO's audacious texts

By Charles Goodsir
Former Wests Tigers chair Lee Hagipantelis has been left staggered at the lack of…"
47 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"Yeah what was most impressive was he did not look tired at all really, he got one stint i believe so played a big portion of minutes straight. 
Have to remember as well he has only played 1-2 NSW Cup games."
59 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"LOL, but true. Villans get paid"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"I wouldn't say he gets Round 1 debut but he will get a debut at some point for sure. Just too many middles vying for spots at the moment. Once Origin and injuries happen he will get a look in."
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"The only TDS evident is Trump Dicklicking Sociopathy"
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"I see him on the same trajectory Tuivati had last year. He will definitely get some game time, I think that was clear by how much time they gave him in that trial. I watched the game again last night it it felt like he was everywhere. Really stood…"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Quiet, Piggy
 "
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"Can I add to that chief, whilst making the  most tackles for the game ,  made the most fantasy points for an all over performance. Played out of his skin and has really taken his chances. Loved his enthusiasm and the 1%ers.  His first stint started…"
1 hour ago
Anguillidae replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"If he has another performance like that in the next trial, he'll be very hard to ignore. This is exactly what we want - development players bashing down the door for a shot at first grade. Fantastic."
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Teancum Brown pushing his case for R1
"Yeah good point.  What id like to know is what numbers he was punching out in reserve grade last year.  We'll see if he goes well again this weekend.  "
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Ryles 2.0: 2026 gets off to a bright start in Eels trial
"I watched the game again and Samrani killed it. For me, he's too good for that level now and should be regularly fighting for a first grade spot with Simmo and Russell, and Richard Penisini isn't far behind him. Maybe our backline stocks are in a…"
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2079

 

V'Landys on Hello Sport

Happy Monday, if anyone wants a good laugh to start their week, skip to 32:50 mark and listen to this f***wit talk. It is laughable seriously. Claiming the offer of $300k was a great deal and we can put that into our junior system. But said we can…

Read more…
44 Replies · Reply by Randy Handlinger 1 hour ago
Views: 1689

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>