Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Joeyboyz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Disclosure Day
"When you consider that there are more stars in the universe than grains of sand on Earth and most of those stars have planets orbiting them (just like our sun), then the chance of life somewhere else is very very high in my opinion."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"Yehaz, now EA could correct me, but now it seems the next crop coming into NRL are primarily forwards, it seems from HM to first year SG ball players our backs could be stronger.
I know we have Bell, Polley and Capovilla, but with the likes of…"
2 hours ago
LB replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"Though you know my opinion of a blocked path in NRL. I agree he could very well make his start in the League at Wing or Centre or even Five-Eighth IF he develops enough. Though EA would know more if he could or not.
Though Iongi was in similar…"
2 hours ago
Strange-eel replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Disclosure Day
"There's already a lot of scientific evidence to suggest that we do not have any imaginary friends, so more evidence won't make any difference to the people of faith.
It is an interesting thing to think about however, life elsewhere in the universe.…"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"What if another club want to start. His path is, dear I say it around you, blocked as a Fullback. As a back-up he is fine but if a club is willing to give him a start he would take it.
I think Lorenzo is seen as an option but if someone like…"
3 hours ago
LB replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Disclosure Day
"Heard mixed things about the film itself. More so in the final act it gets a bit ahead of itself. 
Still to me, Spielberg's masterpiece is Jaws."
3 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"Yeah interesting and fair. "
5 hours ago
EA replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"I am not confident that Papalii wil get snapped up that easily. I think the bench spot is his future in the NRL for now. Can't see him being the first choice fullback for an NRL club right now with the amount of talent in that position. If he wants…"
6 hours ago
EA replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"Yea Gabrael played HM with us in 2022 but in 2023 he played SG ball for the dogs before moving to the sharks."
6 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"Papalii will get snapped up soon I think, if he elects to stay on a club friendly deal as a loyal servant in expression and passion for the club then that'd be great but I definitely see a home for Bamblett as our back up full back in the next…"
7 hours ago
Yehez replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"We have actually quite a lot of fullback prospects coming. 
Bamblett, Davis, Martin, Seuseu all look quite good playing there. Risati and Bloomfield have played there too. "
7 hours ago
LB replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"That's the thing. If he wants to play NRL for Parra it will be through 6. Thing is too is in NRL not many teams looking for a 1 either. If they have a great 1 they snap them up."
7 hours ago
Yehez replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"Ah yes forgot Guymer. 
Gabreal left us at HM really? I remember hearing so much about him for a while. Ah well."
7 hours ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"Bamblett is a gun fullback and will put pressure on Iongi in a few years, this is how these things should work. His path isn't blocked, he is just facing a challenge. He can play first grade on the wing, he will grow into his frame"
7 hours ago
EA replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"I believe we just have to build the next man up mentality up .Keep developing gun juniors because you never know when you may need one to replace an existing star. If they get poached then so be it, as long as the NRL team has a current star in that…"
8 hours ago
EA replied to Trev's discussion U19 origin
"M Gabrael left our club at HM level so he wasnt at eels when he mad the 19 team. From that 2023 SG Ball team, Tuivita, Sanders, Arthur & Guymer made the team. Talagi didnt play because he was in the NRL team. Richie did his ACL at the start of 2024…"
8 hours ago
More…

 

Disclosure Day

What would you think if definitive proof of alien life emerged? Would it consign all religious thought to, as Mark Twain once predicted, the fate of a stuffed ornament in museums? How would suggestive confirmation of the principles of uniformity and…

Read more…
3 Replies · Reply by Joeyboyz 1 hour ago
Views: 60

U19 origin

Looks like bamblett has been called in to the blues side at 18 man with Rex falling out and possibly will be named to start come game day. We now have 4 players in the squads in Bamblett, Petrus, Ryda and Koina. Is this our best rookie class in a…

Read more…
27 Replies · Reply by LB 2 hours ago
Views: 715

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>