Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Baracuda replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Our Dream 2027 team
"just want to clarify with Tago you have listed 4..."
52 seconds ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Our Dream 2027 team
"100% agree, Angry.
JR spoke publicly about Pezet having to ‘earn' the jersey over Joash, which clearly didn't happen.
He's a young coach & gets so much right we all applaud, just seems like this one was a really poor decision that has heavily…"
1 minute ago
Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Our Dream 2027 team
"We should have went with Sandon Smith, at least he was first-grade ready and still would have been cheaper than Pezet. Smith is killing it for the Knights right now and we're getting our pants pulled down with both Pezet and Volkman, while taking a…"
5 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Roy tannous's discussion Kelma to explore other options
"The way the game is going at the moment, I just don't think it's working for these large rangy backrowers. Both Kitone and Kelma are poor defenders at this level, mainly due to their lateral defence and scrambling efforts and our opponents are…"
25 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Do we not have anyone better then kelly
"Alamadien is much better.  Kelly worst purchase since Justin Poore"
31 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Roy tannous's discussion Do we not have anyone better then kelly
"I am truly complexed at how useless our club is at developing 1st Grade level outside backs. Our backup wingers and centers are nowhere near first grade level, and we stick with them year in, year out without finding another answer. I don't think…"
33 minutes ago
RB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Our Dream 2027 team
"He's already resigned"
55 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Roy tannous's discussion Kelma to explore other options
"It's at the NRLs discretion. They have to approve all player contracts and have previously denied heavily frontloaded or backended contracts if it looks like an attempt to circumvent the salary cap.
So basically it's up to VLandys and how much he…"
57 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Roy tannous's discussion Kelma to explore other options
"It's a good strategy to adopt, are there any limitations on front loading deals?"
2 hours ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Kelma to explore other options
"Well next year we have money, as seen how we offered Barnett and Keaon big coin. But you have to remember, as per NRL rules, a club has to spend minimum 95% of their cap. Currently the cap is around $12mil. Meaning 5% of the what can be left is…"
3 hours ago
JC replied to Roy tannous's discussion Kelma to explore other options
"Cap restrictions?, we lost a shit load of players on big contracts and replaced them with fringe players and juniors, if we don't have enough cap space to sign a couple of really good quality players than that proves mon and the recruitment team are…"
3 hours ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Mallee57's discussion What another Boring Year for Eels Fans
"You really are Delusional and need a lot of help or maybe as Pop has said your just a plant put on hear just to annoy the crap out people with stupid comments.. if not please  get the help you need . Or as i said  there is 16 other teams in th…"
4 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Roy tannous's discussion Kelma to explore other options
"If we are to improve defensively we need to start planting our flag in the ground with regards to combinations especially on the edge.It's consistency in selection imo that we'll start seeing real improvement.This is where injury and depth has…"
7 hours ago
Richard B'Stard replied to LB's discussion Experiences meeting Sporting personalities
"I met Sir Ray and he was the best, a complete gentleman."
8 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Mallee57's discussion What another Boring Year for Eels Fans
"Why Hector your the actual person that mentioned joining 1 of the 16 other teams 😂 I don't see anyone else mentioning that. Perhaps you should go over your own comment a few times. If you can't handle the truth then you have an issue you need to…"
9 hours ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to Mallee57's discussion What another Boring Year for Eels Fans
"I disagree with what it proves.
This squad was trending the right way over the back end of last season but we lost another 2 rep players , replaced them with reserve graders ... our senior guys like Junior haven't replicated last years form and our…"
9 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2326

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>