Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

BEM replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"We wouldn't get Hunt on low money and as far as I'm concerned, he is a better hooker than he is a 5/8.
Either Volkman or Papali'i are perfectly serviceable at 5/8 for now.
Iongi at FB, Samrani at centre and Fox on the wing is a good start.
We need…"
18 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 11 Team List v Melbourne Storm (Magic Round)
"Don't do it EA Paulo's starting in the middle this week that's the matchup he has to win with and without the ball."
20 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 11 Team List v Melbourne Storm (Magic Round)
"Horses for courses with regards to Paulo he's being used as a chess piece at the moment with regards to our middles.It worked against the Cows but I feel this week we've had to rearrange his usage.
It didn't go to plan because when he was off the…"
21 minutes ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"Halves debut (early or not) when they have shown they can handle reserve grade consistently. Talataina has shown glimpses but he isn't there yet.
Isaiya Katoa is a notable exception. He played a single NSW Cup game before his Dolphins debut, but he…"
31 minutes ago
Space Eel replied to Roy tannous's discussion What the lineup should be
"Guymer is reserve grade at best.
My grandmother runs harder."
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 11 Team List v Melbourne Storm (Magic Round)
"Coryn, what plan are you referring to (which didn't go to plan apparently). Paulo came off the bench about 20 mins in and played remainder of match, blocking a FG at the death. Ran 100m+. Are you saying that Paulo plan did not go to plan? Suspecting…"
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 11 Team List v Melbourne Storm (Magic Round)
"Because for some sowing discord is the point"
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 11 Team List v Melbourne Storm (Magic Round)
"Yeah, so further injuries and Harrison moves up the pecking order. And it makes sense IF players are capable who have been training in the systems, they are higher in the pecking order. This is not hard to understand for those without axes to grind"
2 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 11 Team List v Melbourne Storm (Magic Round)
"Dolphins beat Melbourne at Suncorp. So you sure NRL won't let Melbourne lose at Suncorp?"
3 hours ago
Kurupt - Your Mums Favourite Thug replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"If Metcalf wants to only play 7, I hope he signs with the dogs, so they still lose games for not having a genuine halfback in the team. "
7 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 11 Team List v Melbourne Storm (Magic Round)
"No worries mate"
11 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"That's what I tried to say, we need a star prop and 2 outside backs that have potential or is already a star before we focus on the five eighth position. If we want to stop gap for Lorenzo go and buy Ben Hunt on low money and play Lorenzo at 6 with…"
13 hours ago
Yehez replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 11 Team List v Melbourne Storm (Magic Round)
"We will concede a couple like these for sure. 
We need to focus on scoring ourselves, Storm still have a brittle underbelly. "
13 hours ago
Vasily Arkhipov replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 11 Team List v Melbourne Storm (Magic Round)
"No, he has settled down, getting married I believe "
13 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 11 Team List v Melbourne Storm (Magic Round)
"Is Matto actually a player "
13 hours ago
EA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 11 Team List v Melbourne Storm (Magic Round)
"I can already see it. Stefano runs and leaves 2 on the floor. Quick play the ball. Grant scoots behind the ruck for a break, gets to Papalii and finds Hughes in support to score under the posts. The commentator might as well start practicing…"
13 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2414

 

What the lineup should be

1.Isiah iongi2.Brian kelly 3.Jordan samrani4.Sean russell5.Josh addocarr6.Ronald volkman7.Mitchell moses8.Luca moretti9.Ryley smith 10.Junior paulo-Late mail switch/Charlie guymer11.Kelma tuilagi12.Jack williams13.Harrison edwards👀14.Tayln…

Read more…
10 Replies · Reply by Space Eel 1 hour ago
Views: 521

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>