Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Adam Magrath replied to Roy tannous's discussion You love to see it
"https://www.nine.com.au/sport/nrl/news-2026-craig-bellamy-neurodege...
Another reason why he should have pulled the pin."
1 hour ago
christeel replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Bahaha  !!!   poppy  since the  Bradman  era it's you  that's  been living  in denial  .... i see 3 pair's  of white  socks."
5 hours ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"No you don't understand what i am saying. We could want to extend, but they might not want to. Reason being they want to test the market, with two new teams on in the market that is why their management say "hold back" on signing extensions. Why…"
5 hours ago
ParraPride replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"CHT or Metcalf would be perfect next to Moses."
5 hours ago
Darren Munro replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"How much is pezet on? If Lorenzo is a flop we could be in a bit of trouble..I  would like a utility back that can cover multiple positions like Averillo.  Maybe they are grooming bamblett for this type of role. "
5 hours ago
TolEllts replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"Cap, unfortunately, our history in retaining players had been so bad. It appears the FO cannot and HOF cannot sell the vision to the junior players for them to stay and wait as shown 8n he number of. Players that had left for other teams. "
6 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓 replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Pops, ask your wifey Marcia to check your tyre pressures. Im not sure where she's going to insert the guage pop, but you could be on a winner tonight "
8 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"This is what Stefano said, October last year about leaving us: “Everyone had their say about it and what was going on with my brother, but it wasn’t that."
 


“They told me that I wasn’t going to be a part of the rotation going forward and that I…"
8 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"Clifford is the definition of 'bog average'. I cannot honestly remember anything he's ever done on the footy field, barely even noticed him. Hard pass."
8 hours ago
Poppa replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Never was much of an under armer Christee, wife said I spin my balls and stay in too long.....that was sometime back in the previous century!
All said in done it will be wonderful too have two hands again, if only I had something rigid to guide…"
8 hours ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Staring them point blank in their face and they don't do anything. Makes you sick."
9 hours ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"If this Petrus kid is from PNG then he's definitely going back, for money and country. Take that to the bank."
9 hours ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Correct in theory PNG salary is double to the Aussie teams, and let's not start on TPA's. On another note imagine the scenes when they win their first game. Huge!! "
9 hours ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"LOL"
9 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"The interesting part of this is Matt Cameron and co's plan because best believe he'll have a plan.In his podcast he mentioned he's 4 years advanced looking at his cap management and who and who isn't going to be available.
I'd be interested to see…"
9 hours ago
christeel replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"core blimey, poppy  all those  years  from bowling underarm especially  against anyone  from NZ .without further undo now that both  shoulders now turning back  that clock  defining age etc etc, and also  poppy  you  can kill  to birds with a stone …"
9 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2385

 

Jake Clifford?

Been a fan of this bloke for sometime.Strong kicking game,solid pass selection,good in the air and hard runner close to the line.With cows meeting with CHT and if they get him.Itll prob squeeze out cliffo.He'd actually go well with Moses I…

Read more…
25 Replies · Reply by ParraPride 5 hours ago
Views: 1075

Parra 2027 2028 2029

Our ceiling is prtty limited for these yearsWhat can we really do next year?Not muchEven with a full squad sideEven with Seal Russell leaving (a big big up)Even with One signing8th would be over performing for 2027.Ryles will be either signed or…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Parra_Greg on Tuesday
Views: 899

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>