Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

The Captain replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"Opinions are whether you like jazz music or not.
Facts are when someone is clearly failing at their publicly available job description.
This ain't about opinion Adam.
But given the sarcasm dial is turning up to 11 I think I'll drop out of the…"
4 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"I know right, who would have thought people would have their own opinions that may not align with yours."
59 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Centres
"That's the position the club is in though if we aren't paying or offering it at least we don't land the talent and then the waiting game continues with the juniors.I ask why isn't Parra a destination for the top tier talent to come to.How did we…"
59 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Aracom's discussion Parra 2027 2028 2029
"I think Parra has to push all its card in around surrounding as much top tier talent as possible around Mitchell Moses these are his last shot here at Parra to win a premiership once 27 is gone and f we sick to what we are doing Moses will be done…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓's discussion Do Parramatta sign him - Luai to become a free agent 27 , then Chiefs 2028
"No chance zero nada I don't know why we bring this up.
Jerome is looking for a payday here and he'll most definitely get it.
If PNG throw 2 mill per at him see ya not as though we are seriously in the conversation."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to jamie's discussion Ryles the Super Coach
"💯 your talking big picture here for me I've already put the line through us this year.I did that after week 3 after the Dragons victory way before the injury bug hit us.
I agree here I'm asking myself have we really moved the needle second year in…"
1 hour ago
Michael W. replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Centres
"Yet the experts see a different Stephano. They say he is the only forward who can hold his head up high, and from the Storm games I've watched, the experts are right. It just goes to show the difference of an opinion between someone who has played…"
3 hours ago
Michael W. replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Centres
"That is just a flawed argument BE. "
3 hours ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Centres
"His body and playing style is much more suited to Union . Even then he's probably not wallaby level because his skill set isn't well rounded .  I'd love to have the ability to sit down and cut up every try we've conceded Will has been involved in a…"
5 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"Learn something new every day, Poppa. So you're gonna build a huge right deltoid muscle and look like Popeye leaning over?"
5 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"The post above does not refer to "agenda", Muttman. Maybe another said it. Stick to what is said. I explained what was meant by cherry picking. It's not just picking out instances, it's the inconsistencies in evaluation that follow and the tendency…"
5 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"Blue Eel, I posted a sample of the receipts. It was a few saying "pay overs". Including one who denied they said it so I posted the receipt of them saying it.
This is part of what is annoying some of us here. Half-baked "club is terrible" Statler…"
5 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"Captain, if I applied the same logic to MON as you aplied to Gould, I would start out talking about what MON did right when the Eels were in the finals 2019-2022, and then I would proceed to the period when the Eels have not been in the finals…"
5 hours ago
Joel K replied to jamie's discussion Ryles the Super Coach
"Tuivaiti would be the best from that 2023 side
I don't really get the hype on Guymer, he gets folded in the backrow"
6 hours ago
Joel K replied to Aracom's discussion Parra 2027 2028 2029
"Winning starts in the front office
And our front office is 🗑️. "
6 hours ago
EA replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Thirteeen Minutes
"Yea long term I rate the other three. But it's also because I rate the other 3 very highly. Visconti has really impressed me. We shall see how they go as it's still early in the season for them "
6 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2375

 

Parra 2027 2028 2029

Our ceiling is prtty limited for these yearsWhat can we really do next year?Not muchEven with a full squad sideEven with Seal Russell leaving (a big big up)Even with One signing8th would be over performing for 2027.Ryles will be either signed or…

Read more…
3 Replies · Reply by Coryn Hughes 1 hour ago
Views: 186

Thirteeen Minutes

Trauma snowballing syndrome and the urge to blow things up isn’t just something buried in human DNA. It's now rebranded as “high standards". Forty Years can do that. Sometimes, all it takes is a few minutes. But let’s park the emotion for a minute.…

Read more…
72 Replies · Reply by The Captain 4 minutes ago
Views: 1097

Centres

We without a doubt have the worst centre pairing in the comp . You can look through every other side - neither of our centres would get a start in any of them . It's an area we have neglected in both recruitment and development. We have a rep level…

Read more…
41 Replies · Reply by Coryn Hughes 59 minutes ago
Views: 1070

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>