Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Seraph replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"Its ok guys, we're the Parramatta 'there's always next year' Eels.
Id love to know if the club would be asking a 'please explain' for why Sorensen wasnt sin binned. Worse than Hopgoods in rnd one and only a penalty? "
5 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"Wests look good too. At least Papali'i is a decent back-up, you can definately win games with Joash at the back. Particularly with an ok draw. Titans and Manly should win and can win with Joash at the back. Doorey is a loss, Moretti comes in at…"
5 minutes ago
Zip zip replied to EA's discussion Line Up next week
"1. Sack Sam Moa and find a new defence coach 2. Sack our strength and conditioning coach. Clearly players are skipping gym sessions at this $100m Centre of Excellence3. Throw everything at Tago and Xerri. We need both of them as our centre pairing…"
9 minutes ago
KENDOZA replied to EA's discussion Line Up next week
"Just seen today dragons sign phillip sami straight away available next week. Seems other clubs are buying up and we are doing nothing. Eels should grab tyrell sloan yeah he has defence issues but so does half our team"
11 minutes ago
Richard Jackson replied to Richard Jackson's discussion This is frightning
"If it was only a knee injury that is a massive relief.
From my viewpoint it was distant, unable to tell what was happening, and it was two hours till he was driven away,so at the time, I was doing it tough and very very concerned. Sounds like he may…"
20 minutes ago
Offside replied to EA's discussion Line Up next week
"Sounds like he'd fit into our 1st grade squad "
21 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"There was nothing definitive from him bar  the defense is the problem.
Down trodden though and not really enamoured or interested even though I thought the reporters went easy on the both of them.
Well we were an injury away we've lost our second or…"
22 minutes ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to EA's discussion Line Up next week
"Thanks m8"
25 minutes ago
Colin Good replied to EA's discussion Line Up next week
"Why are parra such a numb team , the cup team continues to play down thr centre while Penrith were down to twelve men for twenty minutes, doesn't seem to be any brains out there tonight "
27 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"Since the 22 GF we've just bled talent. Of course the talk from HQ is that it's all to be expected. But it really shows an unacceptable lack of planning. The era of player options should have seen those responsible fired. But no, they're all still…"
32 minutes ago
big 2nd rower replied to EA's discussion Line Up next week
"Williams is so bad as a starter he gets bullied by the big boys"
36 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion Line Up next week
"Guymer might me injured unless he is being rested for nrl next week. Cup finishing the game wk th

 twiddle
nanva
lokeni 
loizoi
alamadine
kruzz smitz
volkmam
brown
luke
jdb
funa iuta
latu
pryke

And no bench "
39 minutes ago
Old School Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R4 vs Panthers: Disrupt the Disruptors? (FINAL TEAMS IN)
"Katoa would be more chance of heading back to Panthers if the golden boy decides to move on for a new challenge."
39 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Archie's discussion Ragged dolled every week?
"It's the same R and R that's been around for the last 5-6 years MoN and co have been around since 2018-19 maybe even before JS has been our CEO after Bernie Gurr left so much the same.JR has recruitment responsibilities also he has input but for…"
46 minutes ago
Mannah-Brow replied to Archie's discussion Ragged dolled every week?
"I don't think it's the coaching that's the issue it is the poor quality of our roster, particularly our aging middles and our lack of depth out wide. If you weigh up losing Brown and Lomax against the recruitment of old and unwanted JDB and Kelly…"
51 minutes ago
EelsAgeMe replied to Archie's discussion Ragged dolled every week?
"I think you misssed this article. "
52 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2246

 

The "want"

Its not in the who, the why, or the how its in the want. How can  It take 2 front rowers and a large hooker to put down a winger its in the want. How can a so so 2nd rower run thru 3 first up tacklers , side step a 5/8 and get a pass away, its in…

Read more…
2 Replies · Reply by Yeah Man 2 hours ago
Views: 263

Ragged dolled every week?

It seems to be boys V men entry week watching Parra play. We simply have been ragdolled every week. We have skill with the ball but are always chasing given we are on the back foot.Does the Centre of Excellence have a weights room ... we look weak…

Read more…
7 Replies · Reply by Coryn Hughes 46 minutes ago
Views: 304

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>