Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

    • What he said ^ 

      • Shit  I agree with you both. I'm very concerned.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"You are the only one one here who thinks he left on his own accord.  Sarantinos said himself he sees himself as a future ceo at another club at some stage.   If that was the case,  why would Sarantinos leave the eels in such a lowly position?   …"
26 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Brad was about saving himself. 
- The way reserve grade was turned into.a holding yard for drifters rather than concentrate on development.  That was criminal 
- the choices he made not to have better assistants who could challenge him further down…"
33 minutes ago
JEELman replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Swings and roundabouts. It's just magnified because of the finals.
 "
41 minutes ago
Bourbon Man replied to CarloEEL2's discussion It’s a no from the red bandana
"I agree with you Wiz. The Dogs cut him loose because he was on big money, was carrying too much weight and was out with injury too often.
With us, he has lost the weight, has been relatively injury free, is teaching the younger players, is a clear…"
49 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Chiefy, what the fcuk are you talking about, there were no politics with Saratinos, he was doing his best to hold the ship together.....just reinforcing, he was not tapped or ousted as you have said......he volunteered because he realised we were…"
55 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
56 minutes ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"Though Coryn, we aren't giving Ryles what he needs, but where are the players dying to play for him? His message is not strong enough to pry them over. I mean BA at least was able to get some decent signings. He got Lomax basically on his own."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"He is also 19, let's see him after 2027 then pass judgement."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"To us, his value is only one year, until Talagi and Koina are ready. Once they are, he is expendable to us."
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Yes well.Super, you were making excuses for Sarantinos when I was pushing out blogs on why he should be ousted.    You were one of those people hellbent on making sure Sarantinos was untouchable.   Seems like a case of politics before on feild…"
1 hour ago
Bourbon Man replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"What does that mean? Who are these people?
Seriously guys - if you know something then let us all know. Otherwise it justs sounds like you are just making shit up. "
1 hour ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to shane's discussion Dragons land rising Eels winger The talented outside back has picked up a new deal in 2027 after a breakout junior season. Leo Twemlow Leo Twemlow WRITER | September 20, 2026 - 7:33am 1,462 The St G
"thanks EA"
1 hour ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Holbrook wasn't signed by Newcastle until September 2025. By then Brown, Mooney and Saulo had already signed. The only player recruited to the Knights after Holbrook signed was Sandon Smith who was happily released by the Roosters.
Peter O'Sullivan…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Exactly BA had to go through more than any other coach in nrl history off the field JR has had an easy ride in comparison don't worry about that discussion with Chief I told him that 3 years ago."
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Archie's discussion Warriors injustice?
"Holbrook who did he recruit he hasn't been there long enough.
DB is a OSullivan hire I think moreso he's the key.
Dolphins and Knoghts look eerily similar athletically."
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Paulo standoff with Eels
"This is what happens when you can't recruit you have these struggles.
We can't afford to let him go because we lack experience if we had have landed Barnett or Kolomatangi the club holds the cards in this negotiation.If we don't sign him and we go…"
2 hours ago
More…

 

Warriors injustice?

No warriors fan but seriously some of the worst refereeing or more so inaction of the bunker that I’ve ever seen. This game has gone to shit. The Cherry Evans no penalty / sin bin was bad enough but that shit was just appeasing the betting…

Read more…
30 Replies · Reply by Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 26 minutes ago
Views: 849

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>