Interest rates and zee big wanks, sorry, banks.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.news.com.au/finance/economy/interest-rates/westpac-refuses-to-pass-on-cuts-reducing-variable-rate-by-just-015/news-story/d6345f1407a54a1660bd7a3d0e4487c2

What's your take? Where does the reserve bank/ govt go from here to stimulate the economy?

Is the perpetual economic growth model dead?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I’ve been saying it for years, perpetual growth is impossible.

    How can the double digit growth that companies want and demand be possible long term? Without huge population growth this type of economic growth is impossible. I’m a capitalist, centrist, but I do think we need to reconsider or reboot our financial model/system or we may just be in for a major major depression.

    Also I don’t think privatisation of every bloody thing is the answer either. Governments need to control to some degree essential utilities, if not the avg joe blow can’t keep up with the cost of living. All mass privatisation achieves is the pushing up of prices to allow double digit growth for executives and their companies.

  • From here we go to negative interest rates and QE, and then we go to a recession.

  • These (experts ) in the reserve bank are leading us down an unowned path tempting young people to borrow at low interest rates than when rates rise leading to unaffordable repayments 

  • Should the govt. still be trying to get us into surplus?

    Can they still brag about being good economic managers?

    Are the big banks just see you in the N.Ts?

    • The govt shouldn't be hell bent on running a surplus - it's practically meaningless. What they need to do is try and find a way to deal with the massive amount of debt in the system. Unfortunately there's not much they can do - it's not like they can drop rates (remember when they dropped rates to "emergency" levels after the GFC - that was something like 4%!!). They're plugging on about the surplus, the unemployment rate (which is bullshit - UNDERemployment is an epidemic) and inflation (why the fuck do we need inflation - wages growth is flatlining)

      They are terrible economic managers. The economy has grown on a construction boom, coupled with a credit frenzy,  that can't (and hasn't) go on forever. We have been in a per capita recession for a few years now. Now they've junked the Aussie dollar which is a terrible outcome for many. Highly leveraged families (and Aussie families are as highly leveraged as anyone on the planet) have a very tough few years ahead.

      The big banks have already started taking profit hits. The bank's share prices, profits and dividends will all head south over the next 12 months.

      It's not a good look.

      • This reply was deleted.
        • "It's Time"

          Mate, they blow smoke up our arse at every opportunity, but when you look at all the indicators - and there's tonnes of them - I can't for the life of me work out how we're going to avoid some sort of pretty ruthless financial impact - not only in Australia but on a global scale.

          We've just dropped rates to the lowest level EVER and the bulk of the media is telling us that things are on the up. Please.

          One thing's for certain though mate - the rich will get richer and the poor (including the middle class) will get poorer.

      • Kram, I'm no expert on economics, but one thing I do understand about inflation is that Governments, or anyone with debt, like inflation as it reduces the cost of longer term debt. As an example, let's say you buy a house for 100k, and at the time have income of 20k. You might be making repayments of 5k per year, so it costs you 25% of your income to meet the payments. 10 years later, all other things being equal, inflation has meant that you are now earning 30k per year. So to meet your house payments it only requires approx. 16% of your income to meet your house payments. Governments will use this logic to reduce the burden of older debts, but in reality it's a never ending cycle.

        Another point is that without inflation there is less incentive for consumers to spend money, holding out in the hope that things will be cheaper at some future point. And an economy without consumer spending probably doesn't need expaining.

        Personally, why do we need inflation, well we probably don't, but that's why governments will always target inflation. You no doubt would understand all or most of this already, this is more a reply for others who might be pondering your question about why we need inflation.

        • This is true mate,and it is true that, long term, inflation will actually improve the average standard of living - provided of course that income keeps up with inflation. The irony with your example is that the Government don't include real estate in their inflation calculations - if they did it would be alot higher than what they report.

          At the moment inflation is a pie in the sky target as far as i'm concerned. The cost of living is going up but only as a result of increased costs in basic living expenses such as fuel, electricity, gas, water, and of course our burgeoning debt level. At the same time wages are, in real terms, going backwards. The upshot is that punters are spending less on discretionary spending (retail, restaurants, cars, holidays, tv's etc) and in the current climate their mindset has turned to "battening down the hatches". Car sales, retail sales etc have dropped off a cliff and alot of what was formerly being spent on a new SUV or big screen tele is now being directed to paying down debt. ALOT of middle class big-city families are getting nervous about their net worth - negative equity territory is a very real prospect.

          There's little to no confidence out there mate. I reckon the next couple of years are going to be very interesting times for everyone. I personally still very much see an economic melt down and a housing bust in our foreseeable future.... THen again I see an Eels premiership in the near future so what would I know :)))

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Michael W. replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"The way I see it LB is, on the right, Moses is a brilliant kicker, a great short side player and runner. On the left all I see is a fill in 5/8 that will be playing second fiddle to Cleary, and if it doesn't work you can bet it will be all on Moses."
4 minutes ago
WMD replied to LB's discussion War chest, what could we look at?
"Nice post and exciting times ahead for Parra.
We could potentially buy 2 (maybe 3) elite forwards, Galvin and still have room for someone like Cobbo. 
 
 "
10 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Frankie Fong's discussion AN ALTERNATIVE TO GALVIN
"Our Front Office wouldnt have the capacity to think outside the box like this Frankie.    Its too complicated
1. It safguards the club against one player manager monopolizing our squad.
2. Cobbo is a gamebreaker and X factor.  He will have to…"
14 minutes ago
Hugh replied to LB's discussion War chest, what could we look at?
"forgive my ignorance here, but we can potentially forward pay some players well to meet the 90% spendature requirement of salary cap ?
when you look at all the parameters of salary cap, it can be very easy pay "overs" for a player to come to a club,…"
20 minutes ago
Mannah-Brow replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Thanks NOS, always enjoy these reads. Our backline looks good and I like they way they are moving together in defence now, but our middle struggles and our edges don't fill me with confidence. Would like to see Matto included tonight, but he seems…"
36 minutes ago
AlShaw replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"I just don't see the same swagger in the Sharks as previous years, their attack isn't quite flowing yet and they're getting a bit frustrated at time. I don't want to see us run them into form. 
The kick chase is just so important, how often has…"
36 minutes ago
Kenny Power replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"I want it to be Cleary and Luis Moses is important for us 
plus Daley can't coach so NSW will lose series so better Moses not involved "
1 hour ago
Axel replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Great write up NOS. Thank you.
I feel AFB is the key to the Sharks. If we don't limit his post contact metres then they'll run riot.
I'm tipping us for a close win purely because MM did the job for us last week."
1 hour ago
LB replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"I would not say it would be a disaster. Moses' kicking would be lowered due to the left side sure but his kicking will still be a factor. Moses more so is there to take control and allow Cleary to play as he sees. The issue with Cleary of late in…"
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Eithe teAm to win in a high scoring match. Total points 51 - 60
 "
1 hour ago
LB replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"AFB, as apparent to SC podcast, is in doubt for tonight with shoulder issue. I bet he plays but his minutes might be limited. That helps. A lot of podcasts are giving us a chance and even tipping us for an upset. Normally do not like that. Sharks…"
2 hours ago
Blaze replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion We should have $4M buy players
"There was rumors spencer leniu was un happy at roosters. If he becomes available we would be stupid not to look at him.
Starling, bullemor, galvin, leniu, hass (can only dream)"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Ronaldo Mulitalo (30th), Sam Stonestreet (35th), Jesse Ramien (43rd) & Will Kennedy (46th).
This will decide the game wheather we can contain there back 5 coming out of yardage.The Moses kicking game can bury teams but we have to be able to contain…"
2 hours ago
Parraborn1 replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion We should have $4M buy players
"Gee, I'm glad you're not our Recruiter.
Grant Anderson - Going to Brisbane
Ethan Bullemor - meh
Bunty Afoa - Not too bad for a bench spot, but why would we if we have Sam Tuivati and Luca Morretti who are doing well. Stick with your juniors if you…"
2 hours ago
Parra2win replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion GAME DAY BLOG R9 V SHARKS
"Great write up NOS!
Contain their middle and trust in our edge defense.   Kick to the corners and make them earn metres.    Brown needs to run the ball and people need to run with him.   Riley needs to steal metres back at Brailey.   Sharks have a…"
2 hours ago
Michael W. replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion What half pairing will NSW go with you think
"It would be suicide to pair Cleary and Moses. Moses biggest asset is his kicking game, it will be nullified playing on the left, NSW would be better off with Luai partnering Cleary, but with Daley as coach, he's more than likely to play someone like…"
2 hours ago
More…

 

War chest, what could we look at?

So if Junior Paulo rumours are true and if Lane and Matto move on, Parramatta could have as much as $4mil to spend in 2026. NRL rules state they need to spend 90% of their cap so most of that $4mil will need to be spent. One issue being there is…

Read more…
2 Replies · Reply by WMD 10 minutes ago
Views: 141

AN ALTERNATIVE TO GALVIN

I'm not a huge fan of Galvin primarily because I think he has big ego and because who his manager is , having your halves both managed by Isaac Moses is a recipe for future disaster and we simply don't have the management who could handle Isaac if…

Read more…
39 Replies · Reply by Parra_Greg 14 minutes ago
Views: 1345

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>