I've been reading about the the demonstration that was talked up and actioned by the Indigenous players in the QLD-NSW game.

I kept reading about the Australian National Anthem being racist and exclusive of the first people but for the life of me plainly running the anthem in my head, I couldn't understand their appeal.I merely thought that it was a publicity stunt for whatever deep held personal shit stiring reasons like the ones we often come across from Anthony Mundine.

I then found this very good and analytical article on the issue and on the lyrics of our anthem both original and changed (as of 1984).

You know what? It changed my view completely and I do think Aboriginals have a case and I support them. I truly do. I didn't before the reading this article.

I will copy-paste below for all to read and comment.

The issue is, if there was to be a commitee formed for a potentially new anthem, would the old anthem amended to include Aboriginals be acceptable or would there have to be a completely new anthem written? In regards to the flag should it be changed or should both Anglosaxon and Aboriginal be recognised as equals and both be on the uniforms of people in the services and those representing Australia?

 

Full article: https://wwos.nine.com.au/nrl/anthony-mundine-nsw-origin-anthem-protest-cody-walker-josh-addo-carr/16b61541-169c-44bd-b7a4-d8f316f27091

The following are article extracts for discussion.

WHY COULD ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR BE CONSIDERED RACIST?

THE ANTHEM’S NAME

‘Advance Australia’ was a term used in propaganda material for the White Australia movement. Whether it was used in that context or not in the anthem, it still uses the same tainted language.

‘Fair’ is a term that means ‘beautiful’ but refers to a specific type of beauty: white beauty, that of fair complexion. It is a divisive distinction for many Aboriginal people; especially those impacted by the devastation of Australia's former assimilation policies, which between 1910 and 1970 created the Stolen Generations.

“Psychologically, you’re taught from a young age that white is pure and dark is evil. All these subconscious things you get taught,” Mundine said.

“The media always portray Aboriginal folk, dark fellas, to be inferior. There’s two justice systems. I can go on and on.

"I’m not trying to say anybody’s wrong for believing it [the anthem], I’m just trying to educate and let them see things from another perspective; especially from an Aboriginal person’s side.”

‘FOR WE ARE YOUNG AND FREE’

The concept of Australia as a young nation is only true in terms of the colonised, predominantly-white Australia. There is concrete evidence that Aboriginal people have existed in Australia for 50,000 years; other evidence suggests that they may have been here for twice that long.

Advance Australia Fair does not include any reference to Aboriginal people whatsoever. In omitting Indigenous Australians, the anthem echoes the false declaration of terra nullius: that Australia was ‘nobody’s land’ before British settlement, where in fact it was taken from its traditional owners.

The continued exclusion of Indigenous people is a shortfall in reconciliation efforts. Consider that New Zealand’s national anthem, as it is performed in public events, includes equal parts of the Maori and English languages.

The Australian flag also offers no reference to Indigenous Australians. Mundine believes that both the flag and anthem must change, given they ignore our First Peoples.

“Once you start to educate the people, we might get change. We might get a PM saying, ‘No, this is wrong,” he said.

“We’ve got to include the native people of this land, our brothers, and be one together. We’re a multi-cultural society now, but definitely the Aboriginal people have to be recognised globally.

“And the two things that are iconic for this country are the anthem and the flag. Something needs to be done, for the future and for the betterment of Australia in general.”

THE FORMER VERSIONS

Advance Australia Fair was not always as it is now. Before it became the official national anthem, it contained far more divisive material.

The themes of the original song heavily promoted the idea that Australia was a British possession, populated by expatriates and defended by force from “foreign foes”. It openly celebrated colonialism, a brutal process that dispossessed Aboriginal people of their land.

Indigenous people were not mentioned in the lyrics at all and still aren't.

The original version was four verses, written by Scottish born colonialist Peter Dodds McCormick in 1878, which went as follows:

Verse 1

Australia's sons let us rejoice,

For we are young and free;

We've golden soil and wealth for toil,

Our home is girt by sea;

Our land abounds in Nature's gifts

Of beauty rich and rare;

In hist'ry's page, let ev'ry stage

Advance Australia fair.

In joyful strains then let us sing,

Advance Australia fair.

Verse 2

When gallant Cook from Albion sailed,

To trace wide oceans o'er,

True British courage bore him on,

Til he landed on our shore.

Then here he raised Old England's flag,

The standard of the brave;

"With all her faults we love her still"

"Britannia rules the wave."

In joyful strains then let us sing

Advance Australia fair.

Verse 3

While other nations of the globe

Behold us from afar,

We'll rise to high renown and shine

Like our glorious southern star;

From England soil and Fatherland,

Scotia and Erin fair,

Let all combine with heart and hand

To advance Australia fair.

In joyful strains then let us sing

Advance Australia fair.

Verse 4

Should foreign foe e'er sight our coast,       

Or dare a foot to land,                             

We'll rouse to arms like sires of yore,          

To guard our native strand;               

Britannia then shall surely know,       

Though oceans roll between,                      

Her sons in fair Australia's land                

Still keep their courage green.                      

In joyful strains then let us sing     

Advance Australia fair.

The third verse was replaced in 1901, the year of Australian Federation, by what would become the second and final verse of the official anthem version:

New third verse

Beneath our radiant Southern Cross,

We'll toil with hearts and hands;

To make our youthful Commonwealth,

Renowned of all the lands;

For loyal sons beyond the seas

We've boundless plains to share;

With courage let us all combine

To advance Australia fair.

In joyful strains then let us sing

Advance Australia fair.

Major changes were made to Advance Australia Fair ahead of its adoption as the official national anthem in 1984.

‘Australia’s sons let us rejoice’ became ‘Australian’s all let us rejoice’, to be inclusive of women. ‘For loyal sons beyond the seas’ became ‘For those who’ve come across the seas’, to be inclusive of all migrants.

But the song still offered no recognition to Indigenous Australians and it retained language rooted in former prejudices. To this day, it makes no reference to our First Peoples.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • Well researched Parra fan. Our anthem and flag are certainly mired in the " White Australia" past. It's time for all Aussies to reach compromise. I would welcome change in both if it meant we all live in more harmony.

  • We've already got this discussion going. Please move any further comments to that blog. This one is closed.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Parrafan101 replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Strangest part about the Lomax situation.
"He was doing well at the club I doubt anyone hated him, r360 looked nice but Lomax was played by his manager not the Club and we gave him the opportunity to comeback. And he can comeback for less money or fuck off."
28 minutes ago
Parramatta Tragic replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"I'm no snowflake Daz and enjoyed the previous site incarnation of the cut and thrust of some political blogs, even though anything right of hard left was deleted including entire blogs. It is no longer worth entering into any type of political…"
36 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Strangest part about the Lomax situation.
""
1 hour ago
macybrown replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Buzz Rothfeild SMH - A Howarth Lomax Swap Deal?
"Hey Alfred reckon he would've got some sort of payout from R360 myself for his financial losses due to their stuff ups  ...he'll end up there anyway.
also, wonder what happened to Lomax's boxing career? Ha! Isn't thst the reason he dished up with…"
1 hour ago
macybrown replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Buzz Rothfeild SMH - A Howarth Lomax Swap Deal?
"HNY to you too our gal x
Wouldn't it be nice to start a year off with no footy dramas? Just hope we stay very strong on this one otherwise we may finish up as  an interim spot for all the gold diggers maybe...so simple to get out of a contract these…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Really cause Kautoga has been paired with Pezet on the left, Williams rotating into the middle with Tuilagi. Ryles started Kautoga all year and Tuilagi and Williams filled in the gaps.
Could be wrong but I don't see it at this stage.
Also what…"
2 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Strangest part about the Lomax situation.
"very talented guy but obviously is unsettled and doesn't know what he wants to do. Ryles picked up on that pretty quickly and just shoved him out the door basically lol "
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Strangest part about the Lomax situation.
"That's exactly right that last comment I mean if you are going to comeback Melbourne or alike is where you go but like you mentioned he better have his head on straight there as they won't be putting up with his shit that's for sure.
First sign of…"
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Thx Nitram. Do you think it true that because the Eels only applied the non-compete to the NRL, and otherwise did not stand in the way of Lomax going to Rugby (etc), any restraint of trade argument might fail due to demonstrated intent?"
2 hours ago
adnan replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Katoa is a melb problem. I still cant understand how they have a leg to stand on"
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"Parra Tragic, its sounds like you're being a snowflake. The fate of two members was explicitly discussed by Super and HOE so it's public knowledge, so no need for conspiracy theories about Randy. But as for cancel culture, there is censorship on the…"
2 hours ago
Parramatta Tragic replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Lomax hires lawyers against Parramatta
"You seem very well informed on Wiz and Fong, Randy. How is that? Are you a burner account for someone "in the know?"
If indeed they both have been banned again, can you please definately confirm that here as it will confirm that this place has…"
2 hours ago
iamnot replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Strangest part about the Lomax situation.
"I'd be interested to know if Schifcofske has been breaking the NRL anti-tampering laws, both old and new. He manages both Lomax and Papenhuizen. 
It had been clear for some time that Papenhuizen was not likely to be playing NRL in 2026. Injuries had…"
3 hours ago
HKF replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Brown at 7? Typo."
4 hours ago
EA replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Good depth if Russel, Guymer and Doorey can't make the 19."
4 hours ago
EA replied to Roy tannous's discussion Rnd 1 team vs storm
"Iongi
JAC
Kelly
Penisini
Simmo
Pezet
Brown
Paulo
Smith
Hopgood
Williams
Kautoga
JDB
TDS
Walker
Moretti
Tuilagi
Papalii
Tuivita"
4 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Tin Tim Jan 1, 2026
Views: 1851

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 188

 

Rnd 1 team vs storm

1.Isaiah iongi 2.Bailey Simonsson 3.Will pensini4.Brian kelly5.Josh addocarr6.Jonah pezet7.Mitchell Moses 8.Jmaine hopgood9.Ryley smith10.Junior paulo11.Kitione kautoga12.Jack williams13.Jack debelin 14.Tayln da silva15.Dylan walker 16.Sam…

Read more…
38 Replies · Reply by LB 2 hours ago
Views: 839

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>