I've been reading about the the demonstration that was talked up and actioned by the Indigenous players in the QLD-NSW game.

I kept reading about the Australian National Anthem being racist and exclusive of the first people but for the life of me plainly running the anthem in my head, I couldn't understand their appeal.I merely thought that it was a publicity stunt for whatever deep held personal shit stiring reasons like the ones we often come across from Anthony Mundine.

I then found this very good and analytical article on the issue and on the lyrics of our anthem both original and changed (as of 1984).

You know what? It changed my view completely and I do think Aboriginals have a case and I support them. I truly do. I didn't before the reading this article.

I will copy-paste below for all to read and comment.

The issue is, if there was to be a commitee formed for a potentially new anthem, would the old anthem amended to include Aboriginals be acceptable or would there have to be a completely new anthem written? In regards to the flag should it be changed or should both Anglosaxon and Aboriginal be recognised as equals and both be on the uniforms of people in the services and those representing Australia?

 

Full article: https://wwos.nine.com.au/nrl/anthony-mundine-nsw-origin-anthem-protest-cody-walker-josh-addo-carr/16b61541-169c-44bd-b7a4-d8f316f27091

The following are article extracts for discussion.

WHY COULD ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR BE CONSIDERED RACIST?

THE ANTHEM’S NAME

‘Advance Australia’ was a term used in propaganda material for the White Australia movement. Whether it was used in that context or not in the anthem, it still uses the same tainted language.

‘Fair’ is a term that means ‘beautiful’ but refers to a specific type of beauty: white beauty, that of fair complexion. It is a divisive distinction for many Aboriginal people; especially those impacted by the devastation of Australia's former assimilation policies, which between 1910 and 1970 created the Stolen Generations.

“Psychologically, you’re taught from a young age that white is pure and dark is evil. All these subconscious things you get taught,” Mundine said.

“The media always portray Aboriginal folk, dark fellas, to be inferior. There’s two justice systems. I can go on and on.

"I’m not trying to say anybody’s wrong for believing it [the anthem], I’m just trying to educate and let them see things from another perspective; especially from an Aboriginal person’s side.”

‘FOR WE ARE YOUNG AND FREE’

The concept of Australia as a young nation is only true in terms of the colonised, predominantly-white Australia. There is concrete evidence that Aboriginal people have existed in Australia for 50,000 years; other evidence suggests that they may have been here for twice that long.

Advance Australia Fair does not include any reference to Aboriginal people whatsoever. In omitting Indigenous Australians, the anthem echoes the false declaration of terra nullius: that Australia was ‘nobody’s land’ before British settlement, where in fact it was taken from its traditional owners.

The continued exclusion of Indigenous people is a shortfall in reconciliation efforts. Consider that New Zealand’s national anthem, as it is performed in public events, includes equal parts of the Maori and English languages.

The Australian flag also offers no reference to Indigenous Australians. Mundine believes that both the flag and anthem must change, given they ignore our First Peoples.

“Once you start to educate the people, we might get change. We might get a PM saying, ‘No, this is wrong,” he said.

“We’ve got to include the native people of this land, our brothers, and be one together. We’re a multi-cultural society now, but definitely the Aboriginal people have to be recognised globally.

“And the two things that are iconic for this country are the anthem and the flag. Something needs to be done, for the future and for the betterment of Australia in general.”

THE FORMER VERSIONS

Advance Australia Fair was not always as it is now. Before it became the official national anthem, it contained far more divisive material.

The themes of the original song heavily promoted the idea that Australia was a British possession, populated by expatriates and defended by force from “foreign foes”. It openly celebrated colonialism, a brutal process that dispossessed Aboriginal people of their land.

Indigenous people were not mentioned in the lyrics at all and still aren't.

The original version was four verses, written by Scottish born colonialist Peter Dodds McCormick in 1878, which went as follows:

Verse 1

Australia's sons let us rejoice,

For we are young and free;

We've golden soil and wealth for toil,

Our home is girt by sea;

Our land abounds in Nature's gifts

Of beauty rich and rare;

In hist'ry's page, let ev'ry stage

Advance Australia fair.

In joyful strains then let us sing,

Advance Australia fair.

Verse 2

When gallant Cook from Albion sailed,

To trace wide oceans o'er,

True British courage bore him on,

Til he landed on our shore.

Then here he raised Old England's flag,

The standard of the brave;

"With all her faults we love her still"

"Britannia rules the wave."

In joyful strains then let us sing

Advance Australia fair.

Verse 3

While other nations of the globe

Behold us from afar,

We'll rise to high renown and shine

Like our glorious southern star;

From England soil and Fatherland,

Scotia and Erin fair,

Let all combine with heart and hand

To advance Australia fair.

In joyful strains then let us sing

Advance Australia fair.

Verse 4

Should foreign foe e'er sight our coast,       

Or dare a foot to land,                             

We'll rouse to arms like sires of yore,          

To guard our native strand;               

Britannia then shall surely know,       

Though oceans roll between,                      

Her sons in fair Australia's land                

Still keep their courage green.                      

In joyful strains then let us sing     

Advance Australia fair.

The third verse was replaced in 1901, the year of Australian Federation, by what would become the second and final verse of the official anthem version:

New third verse

Beneath our radiant Southern Cross,

We'll toil with hearts and hands;

To make our youthful Commonwealth,

Renowned of all the lands;

For loyal sons beyond the seas

We've boundless plains to share;

With courage let us all combine

To advance Australia fair.

In joyful strains then let us sing

Advance Australia fair.

Major changes were made to Advance Australia Fair ahead of its adoption as the official national anthem in 1984.

‘Australia’s sons let us rejoice’ became ‘Australian’s all let us rejoice’, to be inclusive of women. ‘For loyal sons beyond the seas’ became ‘For those who’ve come across the seas’, to be inclusive of all migrants.

But the song still offered no recognition to Indigenous Australians and it retained language rooted in former prejudices. To this day, it makes no reference to our First Peoples.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • Well researched Parra fan. Our anthem and flag are certainly mired in the " White Australia" past. It's time for all Aussies to reach compromise. I would welcome change in both if it meant we all live in more harmony.

  • We've already got this discussion going. Please move any further comments to that blog. This one is closed.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Stevo replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"This is the strong stance we've all been hoping for from the club. Parra by putting this out in public like they have calling out the Storm like they have is gingtonbe huge. The NRL has no leg to stand on, RPLA is nowhere to be found and for once…"
1 minute ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Fine by us. Yeah we get nothing out of it on the field, but morale wise we set a reputation. By the time this is all sorted R360 could be up and going again anyway."
2 minutes ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Love this, pretty much saying F you to Lomax, Melbourne and the NRL. I will say, let's say Melbourne were dealing with Roosters or Dogs. Would they of tried this shit, bitching to the NRL, taking on Gould or Politis? They thought we would be bullied…"
6 minutes ago
Joel H replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Lomax isn't part of or paying the Union at the moment. So no representation. (No active player contract)"
6 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Could be a house for sale down the south coast shortly."
25 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Wow ! has a full hearing in the Supreme Court ever happened just one day after petition. I'm blown away by that. "
26 minutes ago
jjeel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Great work from all involved at the club"
36 minutes ago
Flow Basket replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"The nrl should pay our legal costs .lomax and storm are making a joke out of nrl system yet eels have to pay .how is an agent allowed to do this type of deal.
Did eels lodge lomax break contract with nrl 
Then again we could have said  no u must…"
37 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"RLPA conspicuously absent here. "
49 minutes ago
Hector replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"Zero tackle saying hearing set down for Friday tomorrow as all want Quick resolution for 2026 season. Can't see it getting Quick resolution myself "
53 minutes ago
sloth replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"If Lomax somehow weasels his way out of it then every single NRL contract is essentially useless. It's already a joke sometimes with how players force their way out e.g. Galvin most recently."
54 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"You know Bluey I always smelled a rat in him leaving us, the fact that he started planning it in July confirms something must have happened.......I have been bitterly disappointed in us losing him from the time it was confirmed.....cancelling his…"
56 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"It will be interesting to see what the courts think of the NRL contract fiasco. Legally, contracts are binding, so this could set a precedence. "
57 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"This is good leadership by the club. Amazing how much the club has turned around in the last 12 months or so. This agreement was signed in front of lawyers almost 2 months ago. Extremely weird he is fighting it. The nrl stepping in sounds like a…"
57 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels taking Lomax to court
"He can't legally claim mental health when he never stated mental health release. Parra has the power from here. "
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Parramatta Eels commence legal action to enforce agreement with Zac Lomax (Official Club Statement)
"A supreme court process can take a year or more to get to a hearing. It will probably take 4 to 6 weeks just to get it mentioned for the first time and that's assuming Lomax has been served now. Not much chance if both parties stick to their guns…"
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 1954

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 255

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>