I've been reading about the the demonstration that was talked up and actioned by the Indigenous players in the QLD-NSW game.

I kept reading about the Australian National Anthem being racist and exclusive of the first people but for the life of me plainly running the anthem in my head, I couldn't understand their appeal.I merely thought that it was a publicity stunt for whatever deep held personal shit stiring reasons like the ones we often come across from Anthony Mundine.

I then found this very good and analytical article on the issue and on the lyrics of our anthem both original and changed (as of 1984).

You know what? It changed my view completely and I do think Aboriginals have a case and I support them. I truly do. I didn't before the reading this article.

I will copy-paste below for all to read and comment.

The issue is, if there was to be a commitee formed for a potentially new anthem, would the old anthem amended to include Aboriginals be acceptable or would there have to be a completely new anthem written? In regards to the flag should it be changed or should both Anglosaxon and Aboriginal be recognised as equals and both be on the uniforms of people in the services and those representing Australia?

 

Full article: https://wwos.nine.com.au/nrl/anthony-mundine-nsw-origin-anthem-protest-cody-walker-josh-addo-carr/16b61541-169c-44bd-b7a4-d8f316f27091

The following are article extracts for discussion.

WHY COULD ADVANCE AUSTRALIA FAIR BE CONSIDERED RACIST?

THE ANTHEM’S NAME

‘Advance Australia’ was a term used in propaganda material for the White Australia movement. Whether it was used in that context or not in the anthem, it still uses the same tainted language.

‘Fair’ is a term that means ‘beautiful’ but refers to a specific type of beauty: white beauty, that of fair complexion. It is a divisive distinction for many Aboriginal people; especially those impacted by the devastation of Australia's former assimilation policies, which between 1910 and 1970 created the Stolen Generations.

“Psychologically, you’re taught from a young age that white is pure and dark is evil. All these subconscious things you get taught,” Mundine said.

“The media always portray Aboriginal folk, dark fellas, to be inferior. There’s two justice systems. I can go on and on.

"I’m not trying to say anybody’s wrong for believing it [the anthem], I’m just trying to educate and let them see things from another perspective; especially from an Aboriginal person’s side.”

‘FOR WE ARE YOUNG AND FREE’

The concept of Australia as a young nation is only true in terms of the colonised, predominantly-white Australia. There is concrete evidence that Aboriginal people have existed in Australia for 50,000 years; other evidence suggests that they may have been here for twice that long.

Advance Australia Fair does not include any reference to Aboriginal people whatsoever. In omitting Indigenous Australians, the anthem echoes the false declaration of terra nullius: that Australia was ‘nobody’s land’ before British settlement, where in fact it was taken from its traditional owners.

The continued exclusion of Indigenous people is a shortfall in reconciliation efforts. Consider that New Zealand’s national anthem, as it is performed in public events, includes equal parts of the Maori and English languages.

The Australian flag also offers no reference to Indigenous Australians. Mundine believes that both the flag and anthem must change, given they ignore our First Peoples.

“Once you start to educate the people, we might get change. We might get a PM saying, ‘No, this is wrong,” he said.

“We’ve got to include the native people of this land, our brothers, and be one together. We’re a multi-cultural society now, but definitely the Aboriginal people have to be recognised globally.

“And the two things that are iconic for this country are the anthem and the flag. Something needs to be done, for the future and for the betterment of Australia in general.”

THE FORMER VERSIONS

Advance Australia Fair was not always as it is now. Before it became the official national anthem, it contained far more divisive material.

The themes of the original song heavily promoted the idea that Australia was a British possession, populated by expatriates and defended by force from “foreign foes”. It openly celebrated colonialism, a brutal process that dispossessed Aboriginal people of their land.

Indigenous people were not mentioned in the lyrics at all and still aren't.

The original version was four verses, written by Scottish born colonialist Peter Dodds McCormick in 1878, which went as follows:

Verse 1

Australia's sons let us rejoice,

For we are young and free;

We've golden soil and wealth for toil,

Our home is girt by sea;

Our land abounds in Nature's gifts

Of beauty rich and rare;

In hist'ry's page, let ev'ry stage

Advance Australia fair.

In joyful strains then let us sing,

Advance Australia fair.

Verse 2

When gallant Cook from Albion sailed,

To trace wide oceans o'er,

True British courage bore him on,

Til he landed on our shore.

Then here he raised Old England's flag,

The standard of the brave;

"With all her faults we love her still"

"Britannia rules the wave."

In joyful strains then let us sing

Advance Australia fair.

Verse 3

While other nations of the globe

Behold us from afar,

We'll rise to high renown and shine

Like our glorious southern star;

From England soil and Fatherland,

Scotia and Erin fair,

Let all combine with heart and hand

To advance Australia fair.

In joyful strains then let us sing

Advance Australia fair.

Verse 4

Should foreign foe e'er sight our coast,       

Or dare a foot to land,                             

We'll rouse to arms like sires of yore,          

To guard our native strand;               

Britannia then shall surely know,       

Though oceans roll between,                      

Her sons in fair Australia's land                

Still keep their courage green.                      

In joyful strains then let us sing     

Advance Australia fair.

The third verse was replaced in 1901, the year of Australian Federation, by what would become the second and final verse of the official anthem version:

New third verse

Beneath our radiant Southern Cross,

We'll toil with hearts and hands;

To make our youthful Commonwealth,

Renowned of all the lands;

For loyal sons beyond the seas

We've boundless plains to share;

With courage let us all combine

To advance Australia fair.

In joyful strains then let us sing

Advance Australia fair.

Major changes were made to Advance Australia Fair ahead of its adoption as the official national anthem in 1984.

‘Australia’s sons let us rejoice’ became ‘Australian’s all let us rejoice’, to be inclusive of women. ‘For loyal sons beyond the seas’ became ‘For those who’ve come across the seas’, to be inclusive of all migrants.

But the song still offered no recognition to Indigenous Australians and it retained language rooted in former prejudices. To this day, it makes no reference to our First Peoples.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Votes: 0

Replies

  • Well researched Parra fan. Our anthem and flag are certainly mired in the " White Australia" past. It's time for all Aussies to reach compromise. I would welcome change in both if it meant we all live in more harmony.

  • We've already got this discussion going. Please move any further comments to that blog. This one is closed.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Perpetual Motion replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"I hear Hock is doing Didley."
42 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Been like that for the last 3 years you'd think someone would have got the damn memo.Yet there happy to let Lomax walk ok what now is the question are they waiting for someone to fall in there laps as it's clear there's nothing in the pathways ready…"
42 minutes ago
HKF replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Is didley coming with Hock?."
44 minutes ago
HKF replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"That's the problem for lomax,  he is a terrific winger but below average centre. "
46 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"I have never seen Busy, Fast, Jack or Didley play but we need to sign at least 2 of them"
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Well, he can't play center because he can't pass.  That's why his time in the game is finished 
That's 100% hkf. Winger is like playing prop attacking wise.  "
2 hours ago
Axel replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Playing wing got him blues and Australian jerseys. Some people can't see past their nose"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Brandon Smith"
2 hours ago
Frank The Tank replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"That's the issue, if we were replacing these guys with good talent, or any talent for that matter, no one would be saying jack about either of these guys.
The fact we've signed Didley is what's creating this constant what if discussions.
Fuck them…"
2 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Nelson Asofa-Solomona quits footy for new $1M boxing career
"Luckily I enjoy thinking about things as I don't seem to have a choice. If I don't actively think about some things the thoughts will intrude and I will end up chewing it over anyway. Randette knows how I tick and she helps me tock
Feel see do…"
2 hours ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Technically there is no higher,
but hes also played 2 finals games in his career .. both at the end of the season he debuted in.. hasn't come close to his potential as a player and hasn't mastered his favoured position or his best postion.  He also…"
2 hours ago
Parra_Greg replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"Last year it was endless blogs on Dylan Brown now Zac Lomax the guy is gone lets move shall we....who are we signing is vastly more important .....I see the signing goss on Keaon Koloamatangi has gone quiet ....Im not surprised "
3 hours ago
HKF replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"This is my take on zac lomax,  and it's only a guess, nothing more.
When the dragons rightfully moved him to the wing he was unhappy,  you have to work so much harder as a winger than you do as a centre,  those carries out of your own end into the…"
3 hours ago
Frank The Tank replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"No....we don't shake any fucking tree.
We wait for either the fruit to fall off naturally or wait for a storm. What a club.."
3 hours ago
Randy Handlinger replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"You are starting to question his sanity bluey, but perhaps this is his way of retaining it"
3 hours ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to LB's discussion Perth Bears GM refuses to rule out play for Zac Lomax
"There's more to this, why would he spend $4mill on a property in the central coast if he wanted to play in Perth? More to this story."
3 hours ago
More…

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>