Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Parrafan101 replied to Joel K's discussion Credit to the bench
"I feel JDB needs to start, towards the end when JBD came back on our defence felt more a bit clean through the middle."
6 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Joel K's discussion Credit to the bench
"Tuivaiti to start, and Junior on the bench could be a really easy fix. Honestly, I haven't seen Tui have a bad game yet, give him the start and see how he handles it."
15 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1s
"3. Iongi
2. Walker
1. Big Sam"
23 minutes ago
Strange-eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"When he picked up that loose ball, last year he burned everyone to the tryline."
24 minutes ago
Strange-eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"If we work on D we will be a decent side."
26 minutes ago
Strange-eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"Yes a better tean with Samrani. Defence sometimes outweighs offence."
27 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1s
"EA while no where near his best, his good contributions deserved a mention i thought. His long range kicks some over 60m saved us and kept the Broncs from near our line. Late in the second half it was instrumental in keeping field position down…"
28 minutes ago
Strange-eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"His thumb is still broken really."
29 minutes ago
Strange-eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"Both our rakes were good tonight."
32 minutes ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1s
"3 - Kelma
2 - Isaiah
1 - Bailey
 
Credit to our bench and the punch they provided."
33 minutes ago
Strange-eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"He has been very impressive."
33 minutes ago
Blue Eel replied to Roy tannous's discussion Can Pezet leave already
"This aged well."
33 minutes ago
Richard Jackson replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"Lapped in rd 1, down 20/6 early tonite but against all odds brought it home.      
Oh my beautiful boys!!!"
38 minutes ago
Jerry Bailey replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R2 v Broncos: Back on the Horse
"Next 5 matches at home at CommBank Stadium. Happy days!"
43 minutes ago
Parrafan101 replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1s
"Mate moses was the reason why we got back in the game. Without him we would have been blown out."
44 minutes ago
parra supporter replied to Angry Eel's discussion 3,2,1s
"3 Moses- we do not win without his kicking game 
2walker- changed our attack when he came on
1- smith- best attacking footy he's played and his long balls to our halves really opened up our attack.
hon mentions pezet da Silva tuilagi and tuivati "
48 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2188

 

BRONCOS 32-40 EELS

WHAT A WIN BOYZZZWhat a win, we stuck in there the whole game after a terrible start to the game. Tuilagi was brilliant despite an early high tackle leading to a try he scored 2 tries and was a brilliant ball runner of the edge. Iongi is the spark…

Read more…
2 Replies · Reply by macybrown 57 minutes ago
Views: 296

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>