Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Anguillidae replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Typical 'over-the-top' response from a leftie. It's quite obvious that we are talking about those who quite capable of work (not pensioners or those on disability support etc) yet choose not to. Riddle me this, genius... Would it be cheaper to train…"
8 seconds ago
Prof. Daz replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"The whole anti-PNG thing is straight politics. So I'm just making clear it's straight politics. Of course, HOE, you're entirely right to sanction me for getting political on our non-political footy site where the only politics that has ever had a…"
33 seconds ago
Prof. Daz replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"But now you have just doubled down on the same error, Mitchy. I asked you to show what was wrong about me saying straight calls to cut migration or cut government spending were mass over-generalizations. 
Now, take two examples in your reply.…"
5 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Gents, we're drifting into socio-politics. This is not the place to discuss pointy topics like Welfare and Immigration. Let's put our foot off the peddle, please. We don't want to close the blog or start deleting posts if it escalates."
18 minutes ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"They will, question is by year 2 or 3 how many of those signings see it out."
42 minutes ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"He's been on record saying he would never play against his dad again."
44 minutes ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"The tax free money is great but this can still fail if the compound doesn't fit with what players and their family want. Some might get to the end of year 1 and think "stuff this I want out." 
PNG could be a revolving door of players and it will…"
47 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Cut migration and reskill "everyone" on "welfare". Which skills? Who decides which skills? How do we decide those skills? Who pays for those skills?
Given this cure-all of cut migration and reskill has pinged exactly what to do, I'm sure you have…"
55 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Mitchy, it something wrong was said. Can you show the error in reasoning? Not just fall back on the rhetoric, but the actual error?
For instance, the IMF counts government subsidies as budget outlays. By the same logic you're calling for NDIS cuts,…"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Chiefy, is this the same Richardson who oversaw the Galvin Saga and was responsible for the player options that saw Luai go to PNG?
Can you let us know the sorting principle selecting some examples but ignoring others?
Also, you have not answered…"
1 hour ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"the png goverment set the tax rate not the nrl or australian goverment"
1 hour ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"unless player managers move the business to png then no it will be taxed in australia"
1 hour ago
Baracuda replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"what about life after Moses, could either one of them take the leading role ?"
1 hour ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"apparently tpas are only tax free if they are part of the contract which would put them on the cap and defeat the purpose of them,not sure how true this is macy"
1 hour ago
mongolian trotting duck replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"until albos money runs out sadly"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓 replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Utokimanu 
Khafusi 
Dylan brown 
Russell 
Mahoney 
Stone 
Sanders
Blaze talagi 
Apa Twidle 
Alex Twal
What more do I have to.say. And you.are excusing the club for this unbelievable failure. 
We have 3 times the amount of developed juniors doing…"
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2385

 

Jake Clifford?

Been a fan of this bloke for sometime.Strong kicking game,solid pass selection,good in the air and hard runner close to the line.With cows meeting with CHT and if they get him.Itll prob squeeze out cliffo.He'd actually go well with Moses I…

Read more…
28 Replies · Reply by Baracuda 1 hour ago
Views: 1164

Parra 2027 2028 2029

Our ceiling is prtty limited for these yearsWhat can we really do next year?Not muchEven with a full squad sideEven with Seal Russell leaving (a big big up)Even with One signing8th would be over performing for 2027.Ryles will be either signed or…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Parra_Greg on Tuesday
Views: 911

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>