Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

SuperEel 22 replied to LB's discussion 1EE All-time Eels team: Fullback
"My grandfather said Thornett was selected at fullback ahead of Langlands for Australia. That should tell you everything you need to know about how good he was."
3 minutes ago
Richard Jackson replied to LB's discussion 1EE All-time Eels team: Fullback
"Jarryd Hayne"
26 minutes ago
KENDOZA replied to LB's discussion 1EE All-time Eels team: Fullback
"Paul taylor. Great defender very underated. But would have to say thornett. Didn't johnny raper put him on his shoulders after a game? Just searched it raper and langlands carried him off on their shoulders"
31 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to LB's discussion 1EE All-time Eels team: Fullback
"Thornett"
42 minutes ago
shane replied to LB's discussion 1EE All-time Eels team: Fullback
"Hayne"
50 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 3 Team List v St George Illawarra Dragons
"I saw a clip of a dragons fan asking Jack why he was leaving which made him quite upset. Jarryd never took the field against the eels."
1 hour ago
Mallee57 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion VEGAS - HERE WE COME !!!! & its not the Storm !
"Davengas "
1 hour ago
Anguillidae replied to LB's discussion 1EE All-time Eels team: Fullback
" There are no options at that survey link at the moment?"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 3 Team List v St George Illawarra Dragons
"It can but also the current bench we use is effective as it is.
I feel with de Belin you either start him or don't play him. But Ryles may see him as an asset for the middle portion of the match before Hopgood and Paulo come back on to do the 1% in…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 3 Team List v St George Illawarra Dragons
"Why would that be the case? You play your best team regardless. If a player is able to play (no injuries, suspension or personal issues) and is your best option you play them no matter the opposition and the connection to them."
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 3 Team List v St George Illawarra Dragons
"Great point, our attack is fine it is how we start the game in defence and controlling the ruck earlier on."
1 hour ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 3 Team List v St George Illawarra Dragons
"All games are starting fast, i see De Belin not getting a look in unless injuries. Who knows, come Sunday he could be the first sub in the rotation with Walker, but if he doesn't get on then that is saying something to what Ryles prefers his middles…"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion VEGAS - HERE WE COME !!!! & its not the Storm !
"Yes. And don't believe Trump.  They need the $$ from the purchasing of oil from these gulf nations  otherwise America collapses. 
America relies on the purchases in USD not the actual oil.. "
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 3 Team List v St George Illawarra Dragons
"Parra don't need to be worrying about attack if you look at our defensive efforts so far we've given up 80 plus points in 2 weeks if we aren't settled in the ruck we are screwed.
Me I don't care what we do with the ball if we want to play finals the…"
2 hours ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion VEGAS - HERE WE COME !!!! & its not the Storm !
"Western nation? Iran is attacking Sunni gulf states as well."
2 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion VEGAS - HERE WE COME !!!! & its not the Storm !
"1st week: “We won”2nd week : “We’re winning” 3rd week : “Send help”4th week: "We don't need any body""
3 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2211

 

1EE All-time Eels team: Fullback

Ok so i have decided to do an all-time team with modern day included. The way i will do it is limited to nominees, particulaly with less modern day players as since they have been chosen in other survey's no point in adding others. For example, no…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by SuperEel 22 3 minutes ago
Views: 79

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>