Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

shane replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Totally agree LB. Strange played well and deserves to keep his spot and would be good for us to have Moses playing for us and getting more for our bucks so to speak."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Well done Shane. I for one am happy to see Strange stay as he played well. I do not see a need for Moses at 6 with Strange. But regardless of if Cleary deserves 7 or not he won't be dropped. Nor should he be at this stage."
1 hour ago
Nitram replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Yeah actually think if you slow it down enough the qlder held back murray first. Penalty try if you really want to slow it down and get pedantic."
3 hours ago
shane replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"so many on here talking crap. Cleary kicking was good and help win the game, Moses kicks goes strat to fullback or winger and they make 10 or plus metres tothe defense, thats not great kicking and doesn't win you games where Cleary kicked a 40 / 20,…"
3 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Well they (NSW) base their game plan around Mitchell Moses long kicking game, Strnage is a gun player but when we're in a tight grind and possession not going our way Moses can just kick us to a win with field possession."
10 hours ago
Old School Eel replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Everyone saying QLD blew NSW off the park in first 20 mins. The scoreboard might suggest so, but not really the case. In fact, it was only the 4-5 pathetic errors between 9-20 minutes that gifted QLD repeated good ball sets. Prior to the first shit…"
10 hours ago
Darren Munro replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Loz doesn't look well. 70kgs ringing wet. Look like a kid wearing his dog shirt."
11 hours ago
Colin Good replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Coaches that dull the game through the middle all day is so boring and the marjority of tries are scored through moving the ball "
11 hours ago
Bear replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Firstly we won, well done. We were in the first 40 pedestrian,  Laurie played the old win the battle in the middle ploy. Kudos to him ,why have a super fast team ( koula, strange, staggs) exploit the 6 against, using our speed, if you don't use…"
13 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"Depending on fitness, Moses should play game 2 if Daley is smart.  Cleary couldn't kick us out of trouble until his 40/20.  Qld started nearly every set between their 20m and 30m line as Cleary long kicking game was poor, while we played from inside…"
13 hours ago
Colin Good replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"The reason why Queensland scored in the first half a good place to start is to teach players to play the ball properly, for professionals to make these mistakes is embarrassing "
14 hours ago
JC replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"In the 19. You can't possibly drop strange after his performance plus the fact they won, lucky as it was.
We're qld really as dominant as being made out?, sure they were absolutely red hot for the first 20 minutes and nsw were absolutely terrible…"
15 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
"LMAO!"
15 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LAURIE DALEY
""
15 hours ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"Haha.. I thought so, Meelky. "
15 hours ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Which players would you target as a value investment?
"When referring to elite, generational talent, whatever $$ it takes, Coryn. "
15 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa yesterday
Views: 208

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>