Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Poppa replied to GM's discussion Welcome BK
"Simonsson looks like the one to be left out to me. I am sure with injuries "but" he will be a good back up, I have always regarded Simmo as a better centre than a winger (haven't we BEM).
Being a contrarian, which I do not believe Ryles is, I will…"
3 minutes ago
Poppa replied to GM's discussion Welcome BK
"Agree Adam, its circumstantial and my guess is Russell would still be prominent in Ryles plans and of course how far our season goes in an end performance situation.
I think initially Brown played badley enough to be dropped last year, but Ryles…"
32 minutes ago
Poppa replied to GM's discussion Welcome BK
"Tuilagi is an edge not a middle and DeBelin a 8,10,13"
39 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bears team shaping up - Wishart
"I totally agree, and just to be clear, I would have preferred us keep Pezet for a long-term contract.
But this is what's coming, so hopefully Papalii or Lorenzo workout as Ryles plans."
54 minutes ago
Bubba j replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bears team shaping up - Wishart
"Good to see the storm getting pulled apart can't stand that mob bears starting to take shape I still think they will struggle pretty hard for a few years but definitely be competitive "
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bears team shaping up - Wishart
"I think we all know which way Bellamy would go. He wouldn't want to stay to rebuild. I have said and just a feeling, he is going all out for this year to go out on a high. Then in 2027 he moves into a back room role out of the limelight.
I mean…"
2 hours ago
adnan replied to GM's discussion Welcome BK
"you said something positive for a change. NY resolution?"
2 hours ago
The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bears team shaping up - Wishart
"I hear what you're saying, but I don't want a player in FG that needs to be 'covered'. That will detract from the others own performance. We've already seen that happen. Moses tries too hard to do everything. It doesn't work.
The 5/8 ( whomever that…"
3 hours ago
Parra-all-the-way replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Storm announce wishart leaving
"Oh ok, thanks for the clarification "
3 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Storm announce wishart leaving
"He has met with bears but not locked in yet like Meaney, "
3 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bears team shaping up - Wishart
"Anyone else enjoying watching the Storm get raided, or is that just me?
Bellamy will have to make the call this year to stay for another rebuild or leave it to someone else to take over."
3 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bears team shaping up - Wishart
"That is actually a very average spine. There's no Katoa type for them to get like Dolphins did and build around them. Sexton is a place holder. Wishart will be 9 unless they cannot get a 6.
Not too impressive at the moment but it is unfair to…"
3 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bears team shaping up - Wishart
"By 2027 our spine will be absolutely humming. Iongi will be nudging QLD selection, Smith and TDS will be the sharpest hooker combination in the comp, and Moses will be even better than what he is now.
The biggest unknown is on the 5/8 role, and we…"
3 hours ago
Parra-all-the-way replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Storm announce wishart leaving
"Sounds like the bears?"
3 hours ago
The Badger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Bears team shaping up - Wishart
"Very average spine thus far. Above average to goodish players only in Meaney, Wishart and Sexton.
Having said that overall our 2027 spine ain't great either: Iongi (very good), TBA (bad), Moses (very good), Smith/TDS (currently goodish but…"
3 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to GM's discussion Welcome BK
"De Belin and Tuilagi come on down"
3 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Tin Tim Jan 1, 2026
Views: 1866

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 192

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>