Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

ParramattaLurker’s discussion was featured
 1. Joash Papaili2. Brian Kelly3. Jordan Samrani4. Sean Russell5. Josh Addo-Carr6. Ronald Volkman7. Mitchell Moses (c)8. Luca Moretti9. Tallyn Da Silva10. Junior Paulo11. Kelma Tuilagi12. Jack Williams13. Jack De Belin Interchange:14. Dylan…
1 minute ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1569121951237589&set=a....
This is the guy I'd go after if we are stop gapping."
4 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 11 Team List v Melbourne Storm (Magic Round)
"I thought Edwards was here due to the injury crisis.  Well, there's still a hell of a lot injured and Edwards isn't even on the 6 bench "
5 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"He will not come here to play 6 from all the links of what he has said. He will go to play 7."
9 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 11 Team List v Melbourne Storm (Magic Round)
"Same as last week..Wonder if Edwards will get a run."
19 minutes ago
Parraborn1 replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - End of Season SG/HM Player Review
"RE Ryda Talagi - Can we be realistic here and talk about the likelihood of him staying at Parramatta?
I've watched him play about 10 times throughout his development and he's impressed me each time. My concern is, are we developing him only for him…"
20 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Jiver's discussion Team sheet Tuesday - the questions
"Guymer for me. I think he missed 10 tackles and got caught on the deck numerous times. "
33 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Jiver's discussion Team sheet Tuesday - the questions
"He was bought to cover hooker and forward options.  Be a waste if a spot to have him playing Reggies. I can't see smithy playing this week."
35 minutes ago
Jiver replied to Roy tannous's discussion What the lineup should be
"JDB was pretty good last week I thought"
38 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Roy tannous's discussion What the lineup should be
"Papali should be in the side somewhere"
39 minutes ago
Darren Munro replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"I can't see galvin staying at the dogs. Gus's rep has been shattered from the decision. "
41 minutes ago
Gucci replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"Metcalf is a 6, plays like a 6, goes into the line with a late pass, doesn't have a long kick. If he wants to play 7 he won't be at Parra. If he wants to win more games he would look at any other club besides the Bulldogs and Dragons. He fixes…"
43 minutes ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion What the lineup should be
"With a bye around the corner, do you risk them a week early? I mean if they are 100% sure why not as Melbourne are gettable. But with a bye might be better to keep them on ice ready for Newcastle."
46 minutes ago
LB replied to Jiver's discussion Team sheet Tuesday - the questions
"Well if Smith is still out, who plays Hooker?
All he has to do from Dummy half is be as pedestrian as possible. Just feed forward and halves. 
Smith should be out this week, give him this week and next week off."
51 minutes ago
LB replied to Jiver's discussion Team sheet Tuesday - the questions
"Edwards will be in the 19. Depending on Smith will depend if he is in the 17. Pryke i reckon misses out. Pezet i could see being in the 19 instead of Lorenzo and i'm fine with that. Let's Lorenzo play a full game of Cup."
53 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"Hope we'd jump at it myself. "
57 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2412

 

What the lineup should be

1.Isiah iongi2.Brian kelly 3.Jordan samrani4.Sean russell5.Josh addocarr6.Ronald volkman7.Mitchell moses8.Luca moretti9.Ryley smith 10.Junior paulo-Late mail switch/Charlie guymer11.Kelma tuilagi12.Jack williams13.Harrison edwards👀14.Tayln…

Read more…
8 Replies · Reply by Jiver 39 minutes ago
Views: 310

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>