Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"NOS, I suspect everyone just wants to see tomorrow start today. Which is entirely fair. We're all sick of mediocrity. But when is change more symbolic than practical? I'm sure JR is weighing both up?"
1 minute ago
Prof. Daz replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Walker has been a defensive turnstile. Chooks brought DCE in to teach him despite him having years of FG. Brown was out early with back issues, right? Katoa was let go and signed elsewhere. Mamm was surrounded with veterans like Reynolds and Hunt.…"
3 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"I very much doubt that Volkman will be our 6 going into 27. He just doesn't have the speed over long distances. Over 10 or 20m, sure he has good footwork,  but there's no way Ryles is going to offer anything but a 1 year deal going forward.  I think…"
5 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"EA, good point. I've only seen a small sample size (looks talented). I liked what I saw in the trials. You've seen a lot of him, week-in, week-out. What's your view? Is he ready? The potential long-term solution at six?"
11 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Joel K's discussion Ryles on 2gb
"OK Coryn, now the argument has changed from a JR to BA comparison to an adaptation from season beginning. 
So I imagine any implication that JR is not getting critiqued for same stuff BA was critiqued for evaporates with the change in argument. I…"
12 minutes ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"What are your thoughts, EA? "
17 minutes ago
EA replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Some of the people that provide their opinions on Lorenzo have barely seen him play a game lol."
20 minutes ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Good points, Super.
Iongi also came along in leaps & bounds once playing first grade, though. His ball-play especially and isolating defenders / draw and pass, which he struggled with early. HIs support play was non-existant early also, which he's…"
21 minutes ago
Trent replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"If they get anyone from outside my guess will be burton"
23 minutes ago
Manuel Dortimer replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Game Day Blog R10 v Cowboys: The Townsville Graveyard (Eels upset Cows in 33-30 Golden Point Thriller)
"Form is temporary.  Penisini has done many great things for the squad since his debut at 18.  Parra fans are quick to turn on their squad. "
32 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"I think you're overlooking some of the issues some of those players had. Sam Walker struggled physically for several years when he started first grade. He got dropped to reserve grade in 2023.
Dylan Brown missed half his first season due to stress…"
32 minutes ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Feels this way from the outside, Cap. Ryles must have his reasons, defence? 
Or it could just be that Volkman has made himself un-droppable currently, he's been great & has clearly worked very hard on his defence.
Sure Lorenzo will get his this…"
36 minutes ago
Offside replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Yes you are correct on all of those both Moses and Hawkins were unavailable. 
What is ment is he has had a strong finish to last year and is showing good signs but the club is backing Lorenzo so that puts Volkman into a unknown zone"
38 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"This is all assumption and even if Lorenzo doesn't debut this season, who is to say he wouldn't start next season? That's what happened with Dylan. Didn't play at all in 2018 even with our terrible form and lack of depth, then debuted round 1 of…"
39 minutes ago
Manuel Dortimer replied to Joel K's discussion Ryles on 2gb
"You really are pushing this hard.  This you Jake?"
41 minutes ago
Mallee57 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth
"Agree "
41 minutes ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2411

 

Ryles on 2gb

https://omny.fm/shows/the-continuous-call-team/full-show-the-continuous-call-team-live-at-accor-stadium-may-9?t=49m16sPretty interesting comments, he starts talking around 49 minutes in

Read more…
35 Replies · Reply by Prof. Daz 12 minutes ago
Views: 2162

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>