Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Quality of this game has been so shit. Errors after errors or penalties "
24 seconds ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"10-12"
8 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Now sharks turn lol. Eels get the ball in good zone. On the last they shift right. 3 on 3. Davis uses his speed to attack the centr and create a 2v1. He plays short to Howlett who scores running the gap between centre and winger. "
8 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"The sloppy continues. Naeur drops the ball in the set after kick off. He really has this in his game. Sharks get a line drop out during the set. The shot drop off goes out on a full. Sharks then score from diving over at dummy half as Davis and…"
11 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Eels start has been very sloppy. Sharks spread left and create an overlap to score on the wing. 4-0. 
Pakatoi is driven back but gets an offload away to Bamblett who fends off 3 tackle attempts before nearly splitting the line and offloading to…"
17 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"SG ball about to start. Looks like Risati is out of the game. I did take note that he had ice on his hammy as he did not finish last game. Looks like it means Bamblett is moving to 5/8 with Davis at FB"
44 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Yep for sure:"
48 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"20-10 FT in HM."
48 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Eels in good ball again. Sharks scrambling to hold on. Perret gets it at first receiver and plays short to Khan Jackson who scores. 20-10"
52 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Eels in good ball. Eels shift left and Bell digs deep into the line before playing short to Thomas Jackson who breaks a one on one tackle to score under the posts. 16-10"
57 minutes ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Sharks score from a simple crash play. 10-10. Poor position from Capovilla"
1 hour ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"And the cheat code has scored. Eels are in good ball. They shift left. Similar to last week Perrret passes to Lorima who runs an underlines back into the middle. He runs through the middle of 2 defenders effortlessly and than is too quick for the…"
1 hour ago
Parrafan101 replied to tyler's discussion MOSES CONFIRMS ALLEGIANCE AHEAD OF WORLD CUP
"lmao"
1 hour ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Fuck I deleted the original comment by accident. Really need to have a confirm option when you press delete lol.
so it has been a scrappy game. Eels first try game shifting the ball to the right. Capovilla gave a good offload to Liam Martin who…"
1 hour ago
EA replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"XL And sharks score during that set. They spread it to the left and good finish in the corner. HT 4-4"
1 hour ago
Randy Handlinger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion CONFIRMED: Storm asked NRL to bully Eels into Lomax deal
"Gus is being coy as he has his own "blowtorch hotline""
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2072

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>