Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Poupou Escobar replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"The PNG Chiefs can only sign 30 players on more than minimum salary. Teams aren't going to have to overmatch them for every player."
14 minutes ago
Hector Bob Down replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Coryn possibly most of probably the majority of us didn't fully understand the full ramifications of this whoe deal between  the Government and PNG and how it will affect the hole game .        I suppose . All Albo and his mob is worried about China…"
38 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"The reality is the PNG team is nothing more than a political pawn. It's not even hidden.
Albo literally came out and said when he handed over $600 million to set up this team and facilities to PNG that this was on the proviso that PNG don't let the…"
41 minutes ago
Longfin Eel replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"The alternative is to buy someone in and see Talitaina walk. I feel the club is damned by the fans either way."
56 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"The clubs made there bed on this one it's Talataina or bust.
No point in going to market when the above is the future.
You'll find out if this was worth the wait come 28-29 season when he has 50 odd games under his belt.
This is the bed and…"
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"I can't understand why everyone is worried about it now when this has been on the table for 2-3 years but now Tax free and Free TPAs is now unfair 😂 why wasn't there so much noise around this when Expansion was first floated.
The players and there…"
3 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Hail the Visconti
"Only thing the club is on top of is their pay check"
8 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"The only thing Mon and Ryles probe into is their pay check "
8 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"Ryles and Co won't go for anyone except maybe another Pezet part 2 "
8 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"Mon, Ryles and Co aren't going to sign anyone of any value on the footy field. They're quite content with just plodding along very nicely and collecting their pay check and superannuation for retirement in a mansion on the coast. Pezet was the big…"
8 hours ago
Parra-all-the-way replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"Id rather the club go hard for herbie, give Lorenzo and chance if the club rate him"
8 hours ago
Joel K replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"I reckon Lorenzo will be a first-grader. I'd be looking to sign props and centres"
9 hours ago
Michael W. replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"What do you mean will, they already have."
9 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Your right mate it is political. Albo only did this to make sure china didn't come in. It will be interesting if the deal sticks if albo loses the election. V'landys has created a shit storm with this tax free money and tpa's. Most fans are asleep…"
9 hours ago
Michael W. replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"I wonder if this 600 mil will still be available if Albo loses the next election. The only reason the government is bankrolling this, is political, the Chinese want PNG. Also heard on MMM today, that Luai is also pocketing upwards of $500k a year in…"
10 hours ago
KENDOZA replied to Richard Jackson's discussion Hail the Visconti
"Played cup last week. Former rooster"
10 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2383

 

Jake Clifford?

Been a fan of this bloke for sometime.Strong kicking game,solid pass selection,good in the air and hard runner close to the line.With cows meeting with CHT and if they get him.Itll prob squeeze out cliffo.He'd actually go well with Moses I…

Read more…
16 Replies · Reply by Longfin Eel 56 minutes ago
Views: 586

Parra 2027 2028 2029

Our ceiling is prtty limited for these yearsWhat can we really do next year?Not muchEven with a full squad sideEven with Seal Russell leaving (a big big up)Even with One signing8th would be over performing for 2027.Ryles will be either signed or…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Parra_Greg yesterday
Views: 850

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>