Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Nightmare Off-Season replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"Great points also."
19 minutes ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"Some teams do better Coryn because they are given more time in the ruck, have a smaller 10m defensive line and can jump early cutting down time for the attackers to gain momentum.
Everyone sees it especially the 10m at the game, everyone knows which…"
40 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Eels2025's discussion Anyone else feel like this week against Tigers is make or break?
"Fair call on Fletcher - I just worry that Ryles isn't going to have the political capital to last through 2 more years of rebuild before we get the two most influential positions in the team (the halves).
I hope we hold the line with Ryles and can…"
51 minutes ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"Good questions, Coryn.
You feel its first contact first & foremost?
The thing for me is at the end of 2025, we were great defensively as the Eels seemed to be 100% cohesive.
So what has changed? 
- We haven't handled the change to ruck speed as well…"
54 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"The question is why are some teams a hell of alot better defending the ruck than what we are.
Part of it undoubtedly is talent but there's technique coaching and other mentionables.Some teams have been good at defending the ruck for years and yet…"
1 hour ago
Carlos Marrickvillian replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"I'm still a fan of the Pezet signing but I would prefer he was there just as a back up 7 for Mitch not as a 6. With Joash now getting some time at 1 its a great opportunity to offer Apa or Lorenzo a few games at 6 to see how it goes. Theres way more…"
1 hour ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Eels2025's discussion Anyone else feel like this week against Tigers is make or break?
"Get where you are coming from for sure, and I know it's a cop-out, but honestly its how this game plays out - especially how we start - that is more important than the result for me.
There's been a lot of justification of our defence due to…"
1 hour ago
Nightmare Off-Season replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"Nailed it with ‘over-compensating’ Alfred, although Kelma was poor defensively last week, he had to cover Moses’ man more than once as Mitch was pushed off (Papalli targeted him).
Kutouga has had a lot of work to do due to Pezet, and it's not just…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"how come he (MON) hasn't been sacked Chiefy? who is protecting him, few weeks ago Ryles could do nothing wrong, now you are telling him about positioning forwards, anything else you would like to comment on with regard to Ryles and his coaching…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 5 Team List v Wests Tigers
"Pork Rind how fast is he Porky, have you seen him make a break and get into the clear? I actually haven't and I am a supporter of his and while you are thinking about that i have never seen him rag dolled either?
He is nippy and elusive, he catches…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Eels2025's discussion Anyone else feel like this week against Tigers is make or break?
"Partial rebuild is more a reboot. Using what you have and just upgrading around them with either juniors or diamond in the roughs or upgrading other areas quickly.
We are not rebooting. But the type of rebuild you are suggesting we are sort of doing…"
2 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"I was at that game as well, nothing better than sitting amongst a heap of broncos fans in your eels gear and leaving with a win. Catching the train afterwards isn't much fun "
2 hours ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"look on the bright side Bluey. After this month it is only 350.....there no freeing up my son!"
2 hours ago
The Captain replied to Eels2025's discussion Anyone else feel like this week against Tigers is make or break?
"Agree totally - rebuilds can either be partial or full.
If we're competitive (ie top 6) then a partial rebuild makes sense, trying to keep momentum whilst transitioning to the future. Not as transformational, but most clubs won't accept tanking…"
2 hours ago
Alfred Mateo replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"I'm stating the obvious, but our defence is the biggest letdown this year. Even conceding 20 against Saints who are a rabble in attack is unacceptable. The tries we are conceding are way too soft and the majority are coming defending on our try line…"
2 hours ago
Adam Magrath replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Club Statement
"We were leading the storm to start the game and when they got over the top of us it was to a large extent our own ill discipline that led to fatigue. The broncos first try was Walsh when Tuilagi missed his assignment. Second was a grabber through…"
3 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2264

 

An idea

Wondering last night and what people thought, imo walker is most effective off the bench, can we start ryley at 13 and talyn at 9 with walker on the bench, then you bring in walker to lock, ryley to 9 and talyn to the bench for a break?

Read more…
3 Replies · Reply by LB yesterday
Views: 325

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>