Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Randy Handlinger replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"Our local side is firing back up in SE Qld. Half will be workers from Fiji and Christmas Island. Lots of folks real happy that the Cutters are back
 "
23 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Blue Eel's discussion Jerome Luai Has More Get Out Clauses!
""
27 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"I watched Chad Townsend's recent video going through his contract, and he said the values the media quotes are mostly completely inaccurate."
30 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"No i mean they wouldn't know about Keaon going to Parra if he was that early."
31 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Or just put Kelly on the Wing. Why make two new combinations when you can just have one?
Moving Russell means it is Penisini/Russell and Kelly/JAC. Instead Russell/JAC stay the same and Penisini has to work with Kelly. Vice versa if a Centre goes…"
33 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"LB, I don't think people should be believing every figure the media puts out there. For all we know the dragons could be offering 1.1mil or higher.  Now do you believe the Eels should go as high as 1.1 for him or 1.2.
What im saying is that no fan…"
34 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Even though he got sacked for an unknown reason and is a pest, i still reckon Maloney has a lot to offer as a coach. His footy brain is immense and it is no coincidence he made a GF with three different teams. (Warriors, Roosters, Sharks). Winning…"
36 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Well apparently the deal that Dragons have offered is 5 year $1mil a year. I think the money is slightly high but with the new TV deal coming in it would be reasonable and manageable. We have offered around $900k if you believe the outlets. 
Souths…"
41 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"In terms of forward planning, yes. They were planning the 2027 squad at the start of this year. I will ask about the demographics and if that's a consideration. "
50 minutes ago
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Why whats wrong with Keaon ??
Good enough to play for Australia "
52 minutes ago
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Tyson resign with Newcastle and Nelson retired from NRL takeing up boxing Tino wants to much money  and keoan never will happen if he leaves the rabbits he go to the dogs or bears"
58 minutes ago
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Thats a big IF to LB
My money never will happen IF he leaves the Rabbits he go to the dogs or bears "
1 hour ago
Wild_Eels replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Players Vote Eels No.2 Club, Behind the Panthers
"Exactly "
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Ok so what's the maximum amount the Eels should be offering Kolomatagi LB??.  There has to be a point where Parramatta should not go overboard. "
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"Super, when Lomax left us, there was talk of a transfer fee.
We can assume at the time it was a R360 involvement, but where do we stand now in that capacity.
Finally in relation to Lomax leaving, I would like a club response as to why this was…"
1 hour ago
Bup replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Your questions to the Eels bosses
"I'd like to know in our plans for the future do we ever think ahead and identify a particular year where we go all in for a premiership.
Do we think about structuring our cap in such away we can make a run at a comp ,front loading contracts so we…"
1 hour ago
More…

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 24

 

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
36 Replies · Reply by LB 2 hours ago
Views: 1598

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>