Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

John Boyle replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Various sources saying Keon is a done deal
"Surely we could find/offer 2 x 18-20 Year olds with Origin potential $500k a year each instead ?
Not against the player as I really rate him but just not a fan of the price I have in my head that I think we will be paying."
53 seconds ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"Frankie, you're a clever & successful man, and often correct.
The thing is we think the world of Matt Cameron now, and so do I. But have a look at what we said about Matt Cameron back in 2012. He was "rubbish" and a reason our juniors were stuffed.…"
7 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"They are different types of CEO's Frankie, Jim is a tradional finance backed CEO with a corporate management approach. I think he is learning pretty quickly about the football side of things. We and he did not have the experience or guidance that…"
8 minutes ago
John Boyle replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"I like him as a player but not for the price.
Surely we can identify 2 x 18-20 Year old forwards that will potentially play Origin and offer them $500k a season each ?"
10 minutes ago
Michael W. replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"I hope we don't get him, would rather see him stay at Souths or go to Saints. He is not worth anywhere near a mil. He's a middle that can play big minutes, that's it. "
26 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"Public perception in the media and world is more bullish outside 1EE and our circles of contacts which is more Doomsday & Fatalistic. Birds of a feather stick together. Even the bookies, Sportsbet, has us 8th with the Sharks. We came second on the…"
28 minutes ago
Parra2win replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"Put in our calendar and he surely will not be playing with us - we have not had a calendar with current players the last few years lol"
34 minutes ago
Alfred replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"Please don't be another Justin Poore "
36 minutes ago
Trent replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"Lock is where he should be"
38 minutes ago
Frankie Fong replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"Well the the people who run the club have been a embarrassment when it comes to recruitment and they can't afford to miss out yet again because everyone will come out for them so what do they do to save themselves ? Offer a outlandish amount  .  "
44 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"If the club are signing KK for the pure optics of landing a big fish and saving face, then they would be as silly as we are. The tail wagging the dog. I'd rather some keep throwing Poo Bombs until their final breath than that.
 "
50 minutes ago
Frankie Fong replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"Every player says money is not a factor when it is 95% the only factor ."
50 minutes ago
Frankie Fong replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"Parramatta are odds on of getting this slightly above average forward for one reason only , Jim , Mark and the Board have been such epic failure and laughing stock when it comes to recruitment that if they faiil to get KK they will be absolutely…"
53 minutes ago
Wizardssleeves official receipts replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Players Vote Eels No.2 Club, Behind the Panthers
"Imagine the basket case we'd be if we didn't pay for big silly looking flower necklaces for the polys to wear post game , and drag our team to Darwin to show our support for the Koori players.  
Fark,  we'd probably be broke without the rainbow safe…"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"LB, keon prefers Front row over Back rower or lock.   Thats a fact"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels table mammoth four-year deal for Rabbitohs star
"I agree, Ryles would be a key attraction, because it's his strategies, like Cleary, driving the footy programme. But are the Panthers in the KK hunt despite losing more talent up front? 
I'd be disappointed if the optics of "winning at the…"
1 hour ago
More…

ANY MORE SIGNINGS???

I've been frustrated recently about the work we have been doing in the open market. Jonah's alright for a year and JDB is solid but he's getting old. I feel we need more in the forwards and some a replacement outside back. All I have seen is links…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 54

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>