Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

LB replied to Joel K's discussion Our new signing
"Alamoti is the reason they are letting Jenkins walk i believe? They are prioritising the likes of McLean, Alamoti and the likes. They only had reportedly $350k to offer Jenkins."
6 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Our new signing
"Oh of course they have. Wouldn't that be the same for BA then? But you never replied when i asked why Ryles gets a pass on recruitment but BA did not?
And they do not only sign fringe players to get 95% but they front load deals as well. So for…"
6 hours ago
Gucci replied to Joel K's discussion Our new signing
"Another player we can raid Penrith for is Alamoti. Can negotiate from November 1st. Penrith have a lot of players to keep and extend. We could go hard for him. Good defender, kicks, has alittle X factor about him. "
6 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Joel K's discussion Our new signing
"My sources are saying Ryles asked for x y and b, but the people negotiating the contracts couldn't sell water in the Sahara desert so they ended up having to spend on dud players as usual to get to 95% of the total cap"
6 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Our new signing
"Good point. Doesn't mean he is wrong but we all mentioned he said Galvin was all but done. He mentioned NSW leaks and were way off, same as Hooper. There are others where he mentioned he heard this and was not the case.He says "75% done" to save…"
7 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Our new signing
"Firstly, well done calling out Ryles as well if this signing is true as some here wont admit it. But also there would be a lot here hoping and praying he does sign so they can continue to criticise as it is more fun."
7 hours ago
LB replied to Joel K's discussion Our new signing
"Can we stop with the whole "New signing" thing until it is announced otherwise mentioned by another outlet? Why haven't others ran with it if Kenty has? His track record is rubbish.
Once he signs, if he is to, then go for your life.
I believe we…"
7 hours ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Joel K's discussion Our new signing
"Only one person who is usually wrong has suggested we have looked at him. Im not stressing."
7 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Any Suli admirers watching vs sharks
"Russell, Penisini, and Samrani are easily better than Suli."
8 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"He's an elite player not playing Grand Finals... you gotta give him State of Origin so the poor bugger can accomplish something in his career. "
8 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"Having a player out there with a hammy about to snap is a huge risk to Daley's chance of winning Game 2. If it blows mid game he wastes one of his interchanges to bring in Ethan Strange. Plus, you can't have a 5/8 who's running lame in probably the…"
8 hours ago
Clintorian replied to Joel K's discussion Our new signing
"Honestly, I really hope the rumours aren't true. This signing is up there with Morgan Harper and Ben Roberts, a truly fucking horrendous decision here from Ryles."
8 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Mason and Scope on Parramatta Recruitment and How Premierships Are Won
"Hoe, im not singling out players when talking about our development as a whole.  When you look at the list that I've posted in comparison to who they've kept,  those who have left by far outweigh their counterparts. 
Now, how can the fans have faith…"
9 hours ago
Ezra replied to Mallee57's discussion Will Moses be in Origin 2 & Should He?
"Mosses is fit to play and wanted to play club ruled him out . Been told there is some interesting selections in regards to who plays because of injuries. Trying to protect who they have until a couple of players return from injuries. "
10 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Mason and Scope on Parramatta Recruitment and How Premierships Are Won
" Badger, yep. You're right.
Panthers had all the momentum. They're so well connected. For all the Tigers' impressive recruitment, many here would sacrifice half a dozen small animal farms for (or more), they looked impotent against the Panthers'…"
10 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Mason and Scope on Parramatta Recruitment and How Premierships Are Won
"Bluey,
Liam Martin may not have played for Penrith as a toddler or through early puberty blues, but he's been at the Panthers for what 12 years or so. Came as an teenager and went through their pathways. The McLean Brothers also have come through…"
10 hours ago
More…

Remember Rodney Hogg

Rodney was a late arrival to Test cricket at age 27. Born in Victoria he was overlooked by state selectors and moved to Adelaide to find an earlier path to Shield.He was selected and within a year he was noticed by Alan Davidson who mentioned his…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Poppa May 27
Views: 288

 

SULI - NO THANKS

3 runs, 4 tackles and one bad miss that led to a try in Dragons v Sharks game today. Cumbersome at best. Centres need speed and he doesn't have it. Hoping that the rumours about him signing are wrong.

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 185

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>