Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Prof. Daz replied to Mallee57's discussion Annoying Advertising
"Get Brave. Go Brave. Be Brave. Braaaaaave"
8 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mallee57's discussion Annoying Advertising
"Report back, Mallee. I bet you'll like it. Also don't forget the tip to make 1EE your homepage and then only use Brave for 1EE. Makes it like an app for 1EE"
9 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mallee57's discussion Annoying Advertising
"Captain, I only use Brave for 1EE. It's basically functioning like a dedicated app for 1EE. No frickin ads to make all scrolling of blogs a nightmare"
11 minutes ago
Parraboy replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"Fk Melbourne & fk Lomax the 🐶 "
15 minutes ago
Strange-eel replied to Mallee57's discussion Annoying Advertising
"On my Iphone it is terrible as you desribe, on my PC with ad blocker fine."
1 hour ago
The Captain replied to Blue Eel's discussion The Club and Foul Play Injuries.
"Here's where the long game comes in though HoE - we need to create a brand that can nab the billionaires of tomorrow. Aim to get brand deals with elite Aussie brands who would benefit from the alignment.
Folks like the Contos' who own White Fox.…"
1 hour ago
Richard Jackson replied to Muttman's discussion Pezet: Hamstring 4-6 weeks
"You are brutal Pop, you realise that don't you"
1 hour ago
Richard Jackson replied to Muttman's discussion Pezet: Hamstring 4-6 weeks
"We got off light Cap, we would have signed him for 3years if we were able"
1 hour ago
Richard Jackson replied to Muttman's discussion Pezet: Hamstring 4-6 weeks
"But would the Broncos want him early after seeing his "talent so far'"
1 hour ago
Darren Munro replied to Muttman's discussion Pezet: Hamstring 4-6 weeks
"100%"
1 hour ago
Darren Munro replied to Muttman's discussion Pezet: Hamstring 4-6 weeks
"Pezet might be a good bloke but his been absolute flop. We should do a player swap with the broncos.  How much is he on anyways  ?"
1 hour ago
Richard Jackson replied to Blue Eel's discussion The Club and Foul Play Injuries.
"You're aware AE...chuckle
 "
1 hour ago
WMD replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"We took the pricks to court and won, of course they wouldn't give us leeway.  "
1 hour ago
Offside replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"In fairness we chose to go into the season with 28 players including Matto 
Melbourne offered us players that could of been added to the squad 
 
Still in the interest of a fair comp loosing players to foul play you could argue a case but also all…"
1 hour ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"I'm ready Zip Zip."
2 hours ago
Hell On Eels replied to Blue Eel's discussion The Club and Foul Play Injuries.
"Great discussion, gents.
NOS and Pops, great points there. Happy to agree to disagree.
I just don’t buy this idea that if we’re clever or savvy enough, we suddenly become the “Parramatta Roosters”. Find a billionaire or two and start swimming in…"
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2284

 

Gough & THAT Capt challenge

Did Gough make a mistake in the "can't Captains Challenge" incident (Williams' almost-try) with 2:56 remaining in the first half against the Tigers Round 5? Is that and other referring indiscretions - basically orchestrating thee game - why Gough…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 35

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>