Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Gucci replied to Fiddy's discussion Leave Samrani at centre
"Same as To'o with less skill"
1 hour ago
Flow Basket replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 3,2,1 😊😊
"Jac 
Volkon 
Tds"
1 hour ago
Flow Basket replied to Fiddy's discussion Leave Samrani at centre
"Samrani has defence problems last night but coming back from injury to keep going the way he did impressive. He's always good in attack .if he's defence was OK in previous games he's a keeper"
1 hour ago
Old School Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Leave Samrani at centre
"He has no speed. When is the last time he scored a runaway try?  He could be a good meter eater in the wing, not a speedy one."
1 hour ago
Blue Eel replied to Fiddy's discussion Leave Samrani at centre
"They don't have to find a way. It appears he is not signed past this year, even though he has said in an interview some 6 months ago that he was resigned."
2 hours ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to Fiddy's discussion Leave Samrani at centre
"The Lebanese Ibis"
2 hours ago
Darren Munro replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 3,2,1 😊😊
"I think doorey will be starting at lock if jdb is moved on. Unless another junior does well in first grade."
3 hours ago
Raptor Jesus replied to Fiddy's discussion Leave Samrani at centre
"Penisini is straight up terrible. Someone said he costs us games, which is completely true. I dunno if I've ever seen a player butcher as many tries as Penisini fingers. Pack his bags, send him to perth with his mate Sean. Or PNG. Plus he gets…"
3 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to Fiddy's discussion Leave Samrani at centre
"Thought Nanva was ready for top grade. He played very well last time"
4 hours ago
paul taylor replied to Fiddy's discussion Leave Samrani at centre
"Samrani is the most improved player in our club. Before his injury he was going well. I just love how he is an all in team player. Nothing selfish, thinks of the best person in the best position gets the ball ( Eg  Papali ). His carries are strong…"
5 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Fiddy's discussion Leave Samrani at centre
"I no for sure we need an upgrade on the right wing and an upgrade at left centre at bare minimum.I looked at Chester and Perdue last night and they put the shits up our guys everytime they touched the ball.All of our centres struggle because of lack…"
5 hours ago
EA replied to Fiddy's discussion Leave Samrani at centre
"Richie Pensini ruled out of nsw cup again. Petrus starting. Talagi and Miller on the bench "
5 hours ago
EA replied to Fiddy's discussion Leave Samrani at centre
"Yea Samrani will improve the more he plays there. I think he has a future whether it's a centre, wing or backrower is the question "
5 hours ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to Fiddy's discussion Leave Samrani at centre
"100% but he's also a bloke that's started under 10 games at centre. Will has shown an inability to learn over 100+ games. I think the biggest things for me other than adding more athleticism is Samrani has more of a footy IQ and be competes on…"
5 hours ago
EA replied to Eli Stephens's discussion 3,2,1 😊😊
"I think Koina will be starting there in 2 years time "
5 hours ago
Parra-all-the-way replied to Fiddy's discussion Leave Samrani at centre
"Surely a priority re-signing ! Id leave him at centre for the remainder of this year at least!"
5 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2408

 

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>