Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

EA replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"https://www.1eyedeel.com/forum/topics/finals-junior-team-list-and-g...
This is the first blog I actually rate Lorenzo properly in April 2024. 
I dont think Lorenzo was disappointing at the end of last year. The cup team was just filled with kids as…"
9 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"I was a stern TDS supporter while also liking but not loving Smith. It is no question at all we are a better outfit with Smith. After a full pre-season Da Silva looks similar which is not a great at the moment."
13 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"With new 6 man bench you can put Da Silva on bench after Cup as well some weeks."
16 minutes ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"Iongi
Addo-Carr
Kelly
Penisini
Russell
Pezet
Moses
Paulo
Smith
Hopgood
Williams
Kautoga
Doorey
Walker
Tuivaiti
De-Belin
Samrani
Simonsson
Papalii 

TDS isn't good enough. JDB will improve and Moretti seems on the outer. Simonsson is still not there…"
19 minutes ago
Alfred replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"Would have Joash Papali’i over Simmonson at this stage in some sort of capacity "
21 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"Yep, he wasn't bought or has ever been used as an offensive forward....we have him tightening our defence in the middle of the ruck! The fact that he has learnt some nice ball playing moves, just adds to his overall game."
28 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"Don't worry Rango, lightening doesn't strike in the same place twice..............., though being a bright spark probably does help!
If the NRL was smart they would hand/ have everyone a "one iron" on the hill.....think how many lives PVL can claim…"
36 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"knuckfuckle"
39 minutes ago
Troy Wade replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"💯"
41 minutes ago
Troy Wade replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"Agree"
42 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"I feel that TDS is looking to establish himself as a genuine FG Hooker and will look to take opportunities elsewhere eventully. Our key is to make sure we have another one or two coming through the system to replace TDS on a positive basis. Letting…"
50 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Your best 19 vs Storm
"Agreed "
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"No! I know her name, but I alter it to match the status of my commentary in regard to your mental health at the time......PS Indian women are beautiful looking Randork and you need to understand that's racial and discriminatory......definately not…"
1 hour ago
Longfin Eel replied to Acme's discussion Another Matterson Concussion
"I just hope he is ok. He's had an awful lot of concussions over the years. "
1 hour ago
Tin Tim replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"You were probably one of the knobs that didn't like Russell, now look at him. "
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Blue Eel's discussion Trial #2, Game Day Blog v Roosters: We Just Won the Pre-Season Cup
"Sorry EA, I thought it might be dated in that sense.
Why do you feel he was disappointing in the tail end of last year when he went to cup? Is it just one of those things, looks like nothing would worry him now."
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2098

 

Your best 19 vs Storm

Based on the pre-season trials, training reports, and incumbency, I’ve settled on a top 19 that largely picks itself — particularly the starting top 13, which I think is pretty much locked in.Samrani, for mine, has done enough to be locked into a…

Read more…
10 Replies · Reply by LB 13 minutes ago
Views: 543

Melbourne's Matterson offer

So it becomes more clearer, the $300k offered from Melbourne included $211,000 of that going towards Matterson's contract and $89,000 as a transfer fee. Instead of what we thought of $300k transfer fee and maybe taking Matto as well. So many felt…

Read more…
5 Replies · Reply by Randy Handlinger 5 hours ago
Views: 706

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>