Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"You know what Mitchy, I cannot even argue that, BA for all his faults in coaching would not have been a good listener, as I might add were not the Parra people who sent him away?.... but that is a hindsight comment from me, because I was not there,…"
3 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"No the shame is PG that people that want to intellectualise a problem can be seen to be able to do so by wanting the team (read club)to do better and be successful, just like you do. Accepting that is a starting point because we all have that in…"
13 minutes ago
Yehez replied to Joel K's discussion Volkman shopped to Super Leage clubs
"I'm leaning towards keeping him, but I can see us signing a back up half whether Volk stays or goes. I think the club would go into next year with Moses, Talataina, +1, +1. I think with the 6 man bench Papalii might be kept as 18th man or cup…"
26 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Well you maybe right Mongo, but can Anasta continue to be a player manager, if he becomes a CEO or Head of Football for Parra.....nice to have's are usually just that, I saw Sharon Stone as a nice to have, but I am sure I would have lost interest if…"
38 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"This is starting to sound like Animal Farm.....where's Sluggy when you need him, bloody sleeping PIG. Actually 1984 we lost the premiership after 3 in a row.... really what is 40 years in history?"
45 minutes ago
Sparky the Eel replied to Joel K's discussion Volkman shopped to Super Leage clubs
"Panthers off contract in 2027 Nathan Cleary, Isaah Yeo, Liam Martin, Brian To'o, Moses Leota, Mitch Kenny, Isaiah Papali'i, Blaize Talagi and Paul Alamoti in a perfect world we snag all of them get them lining up with Ado Carr , Moses , Williams &…"
48 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Chiefy dont bother giving suggestions the opposing view are not providing ANY and are happy as it stands and intellectualise/insult our position and or suggestions.
Fairplay to you for at least trying to come up with alternatives.
It appears the…"
50 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Jesus if that is the baseline for top level recruitment department ability we really are in trouble "
54 minutes ago
Fiddy replied to Joel K's discussion Volkman shopped to Super Leage clubs
"lets be real, he is a turnstyle in defence...watch the cowboys game again..."
56 minutes ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"ok Super if its not hard to find that out.....cheap shots are ok from Moderators huh ?
then Ben Rodgers, MON and the whole team need a review and make there position tenable or should be sacked"
56 minutes ago
Seraph replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Not defending MON here, but im all fairness Chiefy, we dont know what/if any are the metrics for the KPIs. MON and Jim came in at a time when things were upside down, so 'success' then vs success now could be very different things
Dont get me wrong,…"
1 hour ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"How can our complaint lack specificity...Its quite clear the Recuitment department headed by MON.
why is it different when it comes to the coach I dont understand ?
and how is it scatter gun.   The opposing view has been very clear in the issues.…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion Speed, Power, Athleticism, But Not Specifically Size; These are the Key Areas Emerging Under These Rules Forced on Teams
"Thanks JC, the main thing is you are still teaching us (me anyway), even if it was 30 years ago and we may have opened a front that is still worthwhile....LOL
Personally I didn't have much to do with touch football outside of school days, there…"
1 hour ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Thats false.. If the recruitment people below Mark aren't meeting kpi's, then its up to Mark to deal with the issue. 
If Mark isn't hitting kpi's , its up to Sarantinos to deal with Mark
Thats tge same for all clubs"
1 hour ago
JC replied to Poppa's discussion Speed, Power, Athleticism, But Not Specifically Size; These are the Key Areas Emerging Under These Rules Forced on Teams
1 hour ago
Parra_Greg replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"100% agree"
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2421

 

Volkman shopped to Super Leage clubs

https://www.loverugbyleague.com/post/parramatta-eels-halfback-offered-to-super-league-clubs Ronald Volkman is the latest NRL player to be offered up to Super League clubs heading into 2027.The halfback is currently out of contract at Parramatta Eels…

Read more…
12 Replies · Reply by Yehez 26 minutes ago
Views: 483

Metcalf Dragons bound.

Bulldogs have pulled out of the race for Metcalf and his asking price is around 1 million dollars. Dragons most likely spot but to get him immediately I wonder if this means they will allow Sua to join us early to free up cap space to get Metcalf…

Read more…
136 Replies · Reply by Poppa 3 minutes ago
Views: 2044

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>