Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

KENDOZA replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Someone said on fb the other day he's linked with a move to canterbury"
1 minute ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Outer?? Fmd so Guymer and Mataele are in front of him. Lol. And newcomer Edwards also"
7 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"I think suspension 
He's not in cup or injury lists"
8 minutes ago
Parraboy replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"that's one depressing Lineup. i don't know how we're going to get out of this mess with that bald kunt and the tigers fan still there
 "
9 minutes ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Something tells me Tuivati is on the outer. Pezet not picked is neither here or there for me."
10 minutes ago
Numbers replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Pezet must be injured or has pissed Ryles off. "
10 minutes ago
ParramattaLurker’s discussion was featured
 1. Isaiah Iongi2. Brian Kelly3. Jordan Samrani4. Sean Russell5. Josh Addo-Carr6. Joash Papaili7. Ronald Volkman8. Luca Moretti9. Tallyn Da Silva10. Jack Williams (c)11. Kelma Tuilagi12. Kitione Kautoga13. Jack De Belin Interchange:14. Dylan…
11 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"There's no way Edwards Guymer and Mataele can be in front of Sam Tuivaiti 
Also I don't like Volkman at 7.  He should be in either ron massey cup or reserve grade "
11 minutes ago
macybrown replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 13 Team List v Newcastle Knights
"Must say Im surprised we haven't named pezet at 7. Thought this is what we bought him for and it's his best position? Is he injured?"
11 minutes ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Ramien is an ill disciplined, loose footballer. Pass.
Katoa, when not injured, is class. Problem is he's struggled the last 2 years plus with injuries. Pass."
14 minutes ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Where's the love for Mataele?
He's played only100 minutes of NRL this year and has averaged 10 metres per run along with a 98% tackle efficiency rate. He bends the line consistently  and has one of the highest post contact metres rates in the…"
25 minutes ago
Yehez replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Entire cowboys back line is better than these two. They are signing them as cover. "
33 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"I'd suggest Milky and Tago as instant improvements and without a word of a lie it couldn't happen quick enough if we are in competition with others the odds are dropping by the minute.
I'd be shocked if Farnworth or any other elite player is looked…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Simonsson was already signed long term before that so Ryles had a plan for him. So makes sense just keeping him. 
Issue is why complain about not signing Katoa or Ramien? They are fine and are slightly better than what we have but there are options…"
1 hour ago
Joel K replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Lomax was a top 3 winger in the comp, I was never expecting a 1:1 replacement and I would've accepted Sami, Katoa or Cobbo.
its just the fact that we we ended up taking the easy option in bringing Simonsson back who had a cry and requested a release…"
1 hour ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kent: "Players Revolt & Ref Turmoil"; A Ticking Time Bomb?
"Not an intelligent response overall but "like your dementia" was funny and witty.
Now I have figured out that Mr Vlandy/s problem in your eyes is that he is "ugly" .....and I am the excitable child???
I don't squeal (defintely not with glee) unless…"
1 hour ago
More…

 

Injury Report Round 13

Looks like Simmonson will return this year, have lost Paulo for 8 weeks. Penisni for another 8-10 weeks and Moses is TBCInjury Report:Simmo - Round 23Will - Round 21-23Paulo - Round 21Mitch - TBCR Penisni - To return next weekFletcher & Tago - Round…

Read more…
0 Replies
Views: 6

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>