Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lets just shoot the whole planet into space................. oh, wait, i'll get back to this later.

    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Adam Magrath replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"I'm pleased that this is how Ryles responded, perfect reaction to this situation."
9 seconds ago
iamnot replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"the ban won't apply with the club releasing him, unless the NRL want to start a full on investigation into the dealings of Schifcofske and find evidence that negotiations with R360 have already taken place, whilst Lomax was still contracted. Whilst…"
4 minutes ago
iamnot replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"where would he play, thoough? What rugby team would sign someone, who has no rugby background, to a contract knowing hes's only there until R360 starts? He may find it hard to get a start anywhere other than the Afghan Premier Rugby comp... would be…"
6 minutes ago
Die hard eels Supporter replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"Feels like we are always going 1 step forward, 3 steps back. So far we are going into next season considerably worse with no Dylan Brown and Lomax and basically have no depth if a winger or centre gets injured. The only signing we have made for our…"
16 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"Bailey is not on the same planet, if you think he is, go back to your comic book."
22 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"Its encouraging to see we have IEE's top thinkers on solving this problem.
At this stage we have Mutts and Bluey on here that are over 30 and have an IQ higher than 110
You may get to a 110 if you combine Randolph and Wiz,
For all you guys under 30,…"
25 minutes ago
Muttman replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"Losing Paps closed their window for sure. They'll still be strong "
32 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"Your not on your lonesome Mutts.
Absolutely irreplacable, destroys a lot of my optimism for this upcoming season."
36 minutes ago
The Badger replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion How Many Good Players have Left Eels
"Break contract - Foran ...mental health break then Warriors
Others reasons ... means anyone who left for any reason. There's hundreds."
47 minutes ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"Nah good fill in as emergency but not full-time starting. "
50 minutes ago
Eli Stephens replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"Bailey when he's firing yeah, he can run for 200 metres and plays a good physical game. Just doesn't have the leaping of Lomax but Bailey is solid "
1 hour ago
LB replied to Cumberland Eel's discussion How Many Good Players have Left Eels
"And we should exploit that looking for a new Winger."
1 hour ago
Snottie Pimpin replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Clinton Schifcofske
"It's an ascending roster without being complete, but if you look across the league almost every roster has question marks. There's no doubt we will need some strike , depth and athleticism in the outside backs but aside from that obvious area of…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"No that's just recency bias and who exactly have you got in the Parra ranks who replaces his yardage output and teams target getting our sets started and who has a combination with Moses exactly."
2 hours ago
Parrafan101 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Lomax gone immediately
"This is probably the worst I've seen parramatta operate as a club from front office. Nothing but clown activities."
2 hours ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Snottie Pimpin's discussion Clinton Schifcofske
"That's great and all finding that character and the right fit for the club which I completely agree with.
Point here is our best player is burning his prime we've still got gaping holes all over this roster we don't have the quality depth to deal…"
2 hours ago
More…

NAS Not Saying No

https://www.zerotackle.com/nas-discusses-potential-eels-move-228804/?utm_campaign=Zero+Tackle&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter"The 29-year-old admitted he's uncertain whether his next chapter will be in the NRL, rugby union, or even away from…

Read more…
1 Reply · Reply by Coryn Hughes on Thursday
Views: 255

 

Clinton Schifcofske

First off, let me start by saying I couldn't really care less about Zac leaving. There's enough red flags about decsions he's made off field and on it to show he might not be the full package.  Being 1 year into a 4 year deal and letting this crap…

Read more…
2 Replies · Reply by Snottie Pimpin 1 hour ago
Views: 405

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>