Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Blue Eel replied to LB's discussion Caption this
"What they've missed another signing I wanted,  for F%^7 sake!"
1 hour ago
Browny replied to LB's discussion Caption this
"I will need to get some more mouth guards."
1 hour ago
Clintorian replied to Roy tannous's discussion Jake Clifford?
"I don't think so, but you don't normally rely on a 5/8 to do that? They're your attacking threats, not generals."
2 hours ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to LB's discussion Caption this
"Until the experts on 1eyed eel come and help the front office, this is the squad in stuck with.
 "
2 hours ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to LB's discussion Caption this
"I will say this for the last time, I have never met Josh King's mother..."
3 hours ago
Mallee57 replied to LB's discussion Caption this
"'Im not the man for this Job' 
 "
3 hours ago
Offside replied to LB's discussion Caption this
"My thoughts on our recruitment ill just umm well umm yeah. Jonah um kelly yeah...."
3 hours ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill's 🪓 replied to LB's discussion Caption this
"""Coaching a team while management plays spin the wheel."""
4 hours ago
Longfin Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 9 Team List v New Zealand Warriors
"By the way, how bad is tonight's game? Parra would beat both these teams even with our depleted squad."
4 hours ago
Longfin Eel replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 9 Team List v New Zealand Warriors
"That's quite concerning really. No real size on the bench. It will take quite some effort to win this. We could certainly do with some players back!"
4 hours ago
LB replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 9 Team List v New Zealand Warriors
"Toni Mataele is out, Tuilagi added to the bench, Talataina and Samrani on extended bench. Makes us tad smaller, more likely Williams moves to the middle at some point and Tuilagi occupies an edge."
4 hours ago
Poppa replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"The dog ain't that hot anymore Krupty, but with a bit of sauce and a touch of mustard..... you never know? lol"
13 hours ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"They will, question is by year 2 or 3 how many of those signings see it out."
14 hours ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"He's been on record saying he would never play against his dad again."
14 hours ago
LB replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"The tax free money is great but this can still fail if the compound doesn't fit with what players and their family want. Some might get to the end of year 1 and think "stuff this I want out." 
PNG could be a revolving door of players and it will…"
14 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Pato's discussion Jack Williams
"Cut migration and reskill "everyone" on "welfare". Which skills? Who decides which skills? How do we decide those skills? Who pays for those skills?
Given this cure-all of cut migration and reskill has pinged exactly what to do, I'm sure you have…"
14 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2385

 

Jake Clifford?

Been a fan of this bloke for sometime.Strong kicking game,solid pass selection,good in the air and hard runner close to the line.With cows meeting with CHT and if they get him.Itll prob squeeze out cliffo.He'd actually go well with Moses I…

Read more…
29 Replies · Reply by Clintorian 2 hours ago
Views: 1357

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>