Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

BEM replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Game Day Blog R1 vs Storm: Gilgamesh and the Beer Goddess
"I can't see us beating them at their home ground in round 1.
Storm 30 Parra 12"
15 minutes ago
Pickled eel replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"mattosmattos career defining moment courtesy of storm. I don't recall him returning to his best after this Kafusi special."
26 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"Super if he was very concerned about his concussion situation why has it been reported that he would have agreed to joining Melbourne if there was a guaranteed extra year as opposed to a club option. 
Braith reported last night that Matterson would…"
44 minutes ago
Kenny Power replied to LB's discussion Barnett swap for Lomax
"Looks like Barnett to broncos
and this is why our club is sticking to its guns for player trade which others in media are softening their stance 
 
no many elite players and when they are they go to clubs like broncos roosters or storm or have to do…"
45 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"I see no problem with his statement, shame a few others don't follow, rather than their management spitting out politically correct spoofs.
Sorry Cappy, cannot agree with your below mentioned statement.
The fact he got "likes" from media and other…"
48 minutes ago
Acme replied to Hell On Eels's discussion 1EE Launches Inaugural Podcast
"Any chance you can upload it to YouTube as well?"
49 minutes ago
Phil Mann replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Game Day Blog R1 vs Storm: Gilgamesh and the Beer Goddess
"Looking for any good sledges, rants, ditty's for my verbal arsenal tonight.  
Daz and I will march into the storm (pun intended) tonight and not hold back!!
Maybe we'll need a "go fund me" afterwards for dental work as well (win, lose or draw)"
58 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion 1EE Launches Inaugural Podcast
"We have some interesting interviews coming up.
We intially aimed to have these previews go on for around 30 minutes, but it went on longer than planned.
Let us know your thoughts."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to LB's discussion Barnett swap for Lomax
"The problem with getting Barnett is the Warriors are going to want one possibly 2 players in return to release him early.So to land him as above the Warriors are going to want the same sought or type of talent that they are losing.There not just…"
1 hour ago
The Badger replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"I think you're spot on.
Melb threw it up as a last roll of the dice. We went to Matto (mgmt) with their offer. He said 2yrs guaranteed or no dice. Melb then said - no deal."
1 hour ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"I find the Matto situation a fair outcome. He doesn't need to go to Melbourne. It's his decision. And both the Eels and Storm can ask him to be involved in that swap. No harm, no foul here. Especially given his current concussion struggles. I'd…"
1 hour ago
Axel replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Braith loves us.
"I agree. That's his role on the show - to be the contrarian!But I felt his performance last night had a bit more personal stuff going on. He got a bit agitated and so did Braith. I reckon something was said at the pre show rehersal.  "
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"Chiefy, the tricky part here is that media speculation that Matterson was one of the cards on the table is not the same as Matterson formally being a card on the table. Hence the other way to interpret the post is that Matterson has went on record…"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"Thx for posting Matto's post, Eli. That post says it all. Matto was not involved until given a fait accompli, but of course Storm-friendly media need to paint his as "stubborn". This is called "cooling out the mark", which is where the loser (Storm)…"
2 hours ago
Prof. Daz replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Matterson - The gift that keeps on giving
"But, Blue Eel, according to TCT, it's been the toughest preseason ever and Matterson has trained the house down. 
Kidding, fake news, but anyway has Matto been at training?"
2 hours ago
Acme replied to LB's discussion Barnett swap for Lomax
"Braith had to stop himself from saying too much on NRL360. He was talking about how there were 6 other clubs interested back in December. For some reason, they all walked away, except the storm, who tried to sneakily sign Zac in the background, then…"
2 hours ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2152

 

1EE Launches Inaugural Podcast

Hi Folks,  Super has launched 1EE's first ever podcast (spotify link).   Well done Super and LB. They did a great job at short notice. I only did a small cameo of a few minutes due to time restraints. There will be interviews with figures in the…

Read more…
2 Replies · Reply by Acme 49 minutes ago
Views: 88

1EE Modern day Eels team: Halfback

Ok so going through these rapid fire, particularly this one as this i reckon would be 100% for one player. I did some Halfbacks to make it respectful but not many to choose from.Dylan Brown won the vote at 6.https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HGCBD291.…

Read more…
10 Replies · Reply by Rabz S 16 hours ago
Views: 294

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>