Ok , so here it goes .  I haven’t bothered to Google the size of space however the very minimal knowledge I have on this topic tells me that it’s so large nobody actually knows where it starts and where it finishes ( god botherers excluded as they have inside knowledge ) .  So I’m also no expert on what it takes to launch projectiles into space but for the sake of my idea I’m going to assume we can get stuff into space without a rocket to project it ? Maybe not humans , but stuff .  If not now , I wouldn’t assume it’d be too hard to divert their space exploration efforts from getting humans up there and invent something merely to get “stuff” up there . 

 

So what kinda “ stuff “ you ask ?  .. so here’s the kicker and the answer the so called professionals should be welcoming with open arms .  Garbage , waste , fumes , non biodegradeables , anything really we don’t want here .   We could make big cannonball like projectiles and launch the shit into space . I’m thinking like a big hydraulic gun barrel that just launches shit into space . Even the worst criminals if you wish . If they splat from the gforce of launch meh .. but since there is this big black area of nothing why can’t we just launch our shit into it whilst we work on a better soulution ? It’d buy us at least a few thousand years and we won’t be extinct by 2030 as a bonus .   

 

Ok , so what’s the hurdles and/ or negatives ? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Didnt krypton blast that bad bastard and his crew into space supposed to be for ever and stay there But the bastard ended up coming here and that didn't end to well .so all the shit we send might end up back here .just saying

  • Interesting concept.

    2 points that I can think of:

    1. I imagine it would be quite costly to propel masses of waste outside of earths atmosphere. See the giant rockets on NASA shuttles just to get them outside of our atmosphere. Gravity is the enemy here.

    2. If it were feasible to get all of our junk into outer space, whats to stop it re-entering our atmosphere again at a later time?

    • Isn’t there already heaps of space junk ?  Only going off what I’ve seen in movies but I’m thinking space is littered with rocks and shit which only rarely enters Earth ?  Needs to enter at speed ? 

      • I think you are right. Once out of our atmosphere, it would take some sort of impetus to send it back our way. And besides, who doesn't love a tin can and banana peel shower when they are lounging on the beach?

  • How much shit can we throw out and how much will it cost to set it up and  run.

    If it costs too much to get the shit up there then it wont happen as greedy people want it done for nothing.

    • Well this costs  I don’t have any idea of . I’ve just thrown up an idea without any regard for its financial viability . Pretty much just like the climate alarmists 

       

      I guess when you look over say the next 100 years , the designing , building and operation costs would be pretty minimal .  Compared to the carbon taxes , tip fees , climate research and donations to the multitudes of fucktards we fund to research things like wind farms , and god knows what other of our taxes are leeched in the name of climate , it’d be a pittance . 

       

      In regards to what we can throw out , well the sky’s literally not the limit . I guess as first and foremost I’d start with things like asbestos , toxic waste, African gangs , child abusers ,all copies of political correct movie remakes like Ghostbusters  and I guess the biggest environmental risks .  

       

      But in all seriousness , if we aren’t researching the possibility of launching waste out of our atmosphere , then this climate “ emergency “ isn’t really as bad as they’d have you believe .  We could send a couple of big balloons up and then use rocket propulsion to send it the last leg . 

       

       

      Wheres Kramer ? 

      • I reckon the idea is brilliant but we don't have the technology to viably do it. The amount of fuel/energy it would take to propel a meaningfull amount of waste out of our atmosphere and on a path out of our galaxy would be massive.

        The Saturn 5 Rocket (the one that got us to the moon - Apollo 11)) punched out about 7 million pounds of thrust on launch (a jumbo produces about 24,000 pounds of thrust) and chewed thru about twenty tonnes of fuel per second, and got to about 30,000kph to escape the earth's pull. . . . the most amazing piece of kit ever produced I reckon:). Mate, if you ever have some spare time do a bit of research on the Saturn rockets - truly incredible feat of engineering.

        This was all to get a little capsule out into space and heading toward the moon - imagine how much grunt it would take to push a dirty big waste container out there. 

        Good idea though - I reckon you should patent it. There's a new "heavy lift rocket" called the Falcon Heavy which can get about 50 tonnes of payload into low orbit, or about 10 tonnes further out - but that's nowhere near enough..

        Although I'm sure there's aliens out there somewhere that are doin' it already...

      • I have an answer for you. Like Willy Wonkers machine that shrinks. If we can shrink everything from the current size to less than 1mm in size then we could easily manage our waste better or just like third world countries just burn it all daily instead of having rubbish bins. If you are old enough to remember back in the day thats what every country did. They just burnt it all.

        Climate Change is real however everyone trying to spunge off it financially is a problem. However if we can contine to develop and grow our solar and wind we will be more sustainable. Also if we nuked a few countries. China and India and America come to mind. We would rid the planet of 3 Billion people. Im down for that first then we can rebuild without all these problems.

        • The problem with solar and wind is that they both need more carbon to make than they’re worth . 

This reply was deleted.

Latest comments

Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"Parraborn1
I happen to agree with your inference, I have aleady posted that it would be most unlike Parra to discuss such tactics in public. The journalist's seek out people like you who get taken, not for the right reasons, but because you can…"
1 minute ago
Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"Trouble is you guys get carried away with "flashy one offs" you don't like looking outside the box, to see what else we have or need. 
Samrani is promissing and has potential, but he is not going to be a destructive forward and more than likely a…"
10 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"That's a bad idea on so many levels, I doubt there is much truth to this at all."
11 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"Geez you have made some early season assumptions, De Belin likely to go, Titans lose a game, they are not going so well.....what about the Eels LB, how are they going?
Lot of cooks pissing into this broth!......this deal with Barnett, have you ever…"
21 minutes ago
Jack replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"I don't mind giving samarni but I just don't think Barrett is worth 820. Not sure we wouldn't just offer Kolo that extra year or may that money at the time "
47 minutes ago
parra supporter replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"Yep no jbd and no paulo try to extend walker "
1 hour ago
parra supporter replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"Samrani is a great back up and can see him having a 50-100 game career scattered over 6-10 years. 
but at the end of the day we will be swapping a fringe player for a sure 17 player.
samrani is 4th choice winger (jac simmoson and Russell)
4th choice…"
1 hour ago
Axel replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
""Believe nothing you hear, and only one half that you see" - Edgar Allan Poe"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"Again I'm not completely against Barnett, if we move on De Belin, which seems likely, all good I'm all in. For Samrani? At this stage we need depth in the backs."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"In terms of 1 target, i would go off based on who is realistically off-contract. The only middle who is off-contract worthwhile for the middles is Ata Mariota. I would offer around $600k for him to start.
But one who is a pipedream but would try and…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"I'm with this after looking at what's around the nrl we are devoid of talent we don't have it to go with the best in the comp.If your not in for Barnett we may aswell think about moving Moses as it appears with the team as it is now we can go so…"
1 hour ago
BEM replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 2 Team List v Brisbane Broncos
"No, he copped a 1 week ban.  2 weeks if he challenged it."
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"Maybe but all I'm seeing is adding SoO talent to a foward pack thats devoid of that quality.Yes he's up there in age he's probably at the end of it but we've lost Brown Lomax in 12 months and replaced them with soso talent.
We need a win in…"
1 hour ago
Parraborn1 replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"I really don't like these player swap offers being made public. Knowing our club (like the ryan matterson saga), we probably didn't even consult Samrani. Not a good look.
And even if they did consult Samrani, how would he feel knowing he's not…"
1 hour ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"I doubt Warriors accept it though. They would want top tier quality. Lomax would have been ideal."
1 hour ago
LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion Eels offering Jordan samrani
"He was technically a Cronulla junior, went to Dogs then to us last year."
1 hour ago
More…

Keaon done deal

As of Thursday, December 11, 2025, South Sydney Rabbitohs forwardKeaon Koloamatangi has reportedly agreed to a deal with the Parramatta Eels, but it is not yet officially announced by the clubs.  Soon to be announced.

Read more…
14 Replies · Reply by Poppa Jan 9
Views: 2186

 

Eels offering Jordan samrani

It keeps lagging when I try putting the article up so I won't bother but coming from code sports.The eels are offering Jordan samrani in a player swap for Mitch Barnett and also a three year 2.6 million dollar deal.Personally I think it's a bit to…

Read more…
41 Replies · Reply by Poppa 1 minute ago
Views: 857

1eE Modern day Eels team: Bench Props

Dylan Walker narrowly edged out Daniel Wagon for the Utility spot.Now onto Bench Props where the best two will get on the bench.https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PSSXZSS 1. Hayne2. Burt3. Lyon4. Tahu5. Radradra6. Brown7. Moses8. Cayless9. Marsh10.…

Read more…
6 Replies · Reply by Offside 4 hours ago
Views: 219

<script src="https://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js"></script>
<!-- Sidebar -->
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script>// <![CDATA[
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
// ]]></script>