Moses...for no more than $750k on the books.
Thats all I got.
Our cattle and their cattle could not be more polar
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"EA I see you had Drown over Mamm...I wil just say "I don't like it""
"Absolutely you can blame him . If he wanted to maximise his career earnings he wouldn't sign for the security of a 4 year deal . As it stands he's using the 4 year deal to his benefit and seeing what else is out there for himself if he wants to…"
"Did you blank out on the keys midpost again? Stop drinking and press the Medalert buton...stat"
"Would you swap packs? All or nothing...I would"
Replies
Sean Russell would have a lot of people looking over their shoulder.
He smashed Staggs when they met last. But I would still prefer Staggs.
Staggs? You mean Sean's son? Hahaha
Moses, Lomax, fox,William, hopgood
Arnie, I saw this and thought of you and your dog...If you are still travelling, I hope it's going well
Heel be back!!!!
Moses , maybe a few others that have been mentioned , Fox and Lomax , the rest would be a stretch. if the found themselves short and in the market I'm sure Williams or Walker wouldn't find themselves in QLD cup very much either .
The interesting question here how good would we be if Reece was playing for us, I have a good mate (bestie) who is a out and out Broncos supporter and he reckons Walsh would be a sensational 5/8........I cannot disagree he has fantastic vision with the ball in his hands......don't worry I am not advocating we go after him ......there is more chance that Randolph will go fcuk himself before that would happen.
0
He did play some 5/8 at warriors and looked great there. Fullback gives him much more space however and he still gets his hands on the footy a bunch. Just smarter to leave him at the back like ponga
Yep well said. Ponga and Hayne are prime examples of the 6 experiment not working. Not saying it can't, Lockyer is case in point. Just do not see the need when I consider Fullback more important than a 6 when you have a 7 already.
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
of 6 Next