One man teams

After watching the Rewce Walsh show.What a star 

Just wondering how many teams can't win without their star.

Parramatta need Moses.

Cornell's Hynes 

Raiders Strange

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • We need the great Jarryd Hayne at his best.

    • The greatest IMO.

      Walsh wishes he had a tenth of Haynesys talent. What a waste.

  • I wouldn't say Reece done it all his own, yes in the red zone he was amazing and defensively great but with Payne Haas, Pat Carrigan, Kobe Hethrington's best game, the wingers were outstanding, the centres fantastic and the rest of the pack toiling away. Was a very good team performance for them last night but of course without Reece they don't win but it takes more then one player to win it all.

    • Agreed but all teams need the x factor 

       

  • You do need that one player to push you over the top, Moses is definitely that for parra. Broncos have way more support along side Walsh then we do for Moses. That's the biggest issue 

    • This is exactly right and is the reason why it's going to be very hard to topple Melbourne Brisbane Riffs of the world because it's not just on the park that they are ahead it's off it also.

  • Walsh was not on his - bue hes sharp and had an 'on' day; he can be rocks and diamonds and lets be honest Parra had little else in terms of X factors back in 09; The Broncos have Haas / Carrigan / Reynolds / Hunt / Staggs / Mamm the dog  and Walsh; that's a fair salary cap there!!

    Go back to 09 and we had Hindy / Mortimer / Hayne / Cayless / Moi Moi / Inu and Mateo? You can hardly say we had many stars...and didn't Finch leave us mid year?

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"He is also doing what is best for his client and he is mates with Ryles too. A lot of backlash over the deal, he is coming in saying this was the plan all along with no thought of long term where i am saying there definately was an interest long…"
36 seconds ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Well why say yes to the question we wanted him long term?"
6 minutes ago
Tin Tim replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"It was explained at the time, but some here still had their own thoughts & like most of the time the people here were wrong. "
13 minutes ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never offered Pezet more than 1 year
"Mate, im just asking you which one is correct?  Your the one that said the second version is incorrect as Anasta is  protecting the Eels 
Prove it LB"
14 minutes ago
More…