WILL TOOVEY COP A FINE?

Hey all,

Geoff Toovey showed his true colours as a typical Manly whinger after the Souths game, giving it big time to the refs.

Only problem is that what he said was absolute garbage.  He claimed the Matai 'no-try' clearly showed the ball was grounded by Matai. This is not the case - even on the Footy Show today, Sterlo and co all agreed that there was not enough evidence to overturn the on-field ref's call.

We all know that Sticky has been fined twice this year. On the second occasion, he hardly said enough to hurt the feelings of a dog.

So, with this in mind, does Toovey cop a fine, and if so, how much?

If not, big questions need to be asked?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • probably no
  • The refs are so inconsistent with the 'on-field' refs original decision. The dogs Canberra game had a call like that where the video ref did not have enough evidence but still went against the original call.

    And yes Toovey should cop a fine.

  • Should be a carbon tax on top of the fine, due the burning manure coming out of his mouth. 

  • He will cop a fine of 10k for sure, but it was funny seeing him go off, ive never seen him like that before, he was like a little kid lol, it was great viewing.

  • Oh no NRL doesn't want to be upsetting Tony Abbott's favourite team. No, he'll get a reward like a kiss on the cheek

  • Toovs went off his head hes a nutter. Yes, Get the cheque book out toovs 10 grand thanx

  • The last angle / replay clearly showed Matai did not ground the ball. Toovey was always in the ref's face whinging as a player. The guy has not changed. Manly had enough ball / opportunities in the second half to win the game.  

  • I loved it. Great rant. Watch Manly get a few favourable calls in the semi's.

  • Toovey just copped a 10k fine, it was always going to happen.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
"I thought all assistant coaches would have a get-out clause if offered a Head role, so why would we consult with this entitled-billionaire fuckbumper"
6 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion ‘Leaks and grandstanding’: Storm boss unloads on Eels over Lomax
6 minutes ago
LB replied to Clintorian's discussion Lomax Update - Zac Lomax entered into preliminary contracts with R360 and the Melbourne Storm prior to being given his blessing by Parramatta
"Yep, i have seen the sudden shift of "Good on Parra, they should fight this" to "It sucks but move on". 
That is why i recently love listening to the likes of Willie Mason and Dan Ginnane who tell it like it is."
6 minutes ago
LB replied to Clintorian's discussion Lomax Update - Zac Lomax entered into preliminary contracts with R360 and the Melbourne Storm prior to being given his blessing by Parramatta
"There could be pressure from Lomax and his camp to get something done if 10 year ban is on table since it seems he had signed with R360. Now Melbourne might just brush their hands and move on, or they will talk the talk, be stubborn and get him and…"
7 minutes ago
More…