Who would you swap for Lomax?

With all the talk that Flanagan won't realese him early unless he gets a good player. Who would you let go? 

Me personally I would let Paulo, Sivo or Matterson go fo him. Paulo just seems to be running in cruise control these days, doesn't have the same effect he once did. 

Lomax would be a great pick up and needed for our backline, we must go hard for him. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

          • I completely get that super, but he is slowing down each year at a massive rate. He isn't the prop he used to be and sadly every year getting worse. I know he isn't the battering ram like some props and so on. But go back and watch his game on the weekend against the tigers. He was outplayed and couldn't keep up, made some stupid decisions in defence and attack Everytime we started getting our heels in. Yes if we moved him on we would miss him but others will fill his roll. Hopegood, matto and woody can play the second phase. 

            • He's at the back end and IMO, his value will continue decline vs what we are paying him.

              Using the super coach mentality he's an easy sell/swap.

  • Sivo definitely but who replaced him? Matterson definitely as he seems dis interested and has been for awhile. Not sure about Paulo as he's been good coming off the bench...He shouldn't be starting

    • Lomax to centre and push simmonson or tualigi to the wing when Moses is back. 

    • He was only playing for his contract, once he got it, he didn't care..

  • Definitely not Paulo.

    Not Sivo.

    Matterson or Simonsson and if they hesitate, offer up Hands as well.

    • No way they would even think of simonsson, they have a heap of hookers and we need that depth. 

      • They have 2 hookers. Jacob Liddle and Connor Mulheisen.

        • I thought they had the other lussick and some other young fella coming through as well. Too bad we got no hookers. 

          • Nah Freddie is at the Warriors I think.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion The Ticking Time Bomb
"Adam, well said. And my mail is you're on the money. Still, people are free to assume things, and paint whatever picture they see. Of course the club needs to start winning, improve and get some recruitment results or we know what happens.…"
35 seconds ago
JC replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion The Ticking Time Bomb
"No I'm not, I'm asking you how long does the club accept poor performance before doing something decisive. It's a simple question. 
For me that time has already come but there has been no action from the club at this point, surely another poor…"
7 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Nightmare Off-Season's discussion The Ticking Time Bomb
"JC, appreciate the question mate. You’re not really asking about accountability, change or improvement: ongoing things I fully support.
You’re asking about sackings. Heads on a pike.
There are already more than enough people talking about that and…"
21 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels news
"Well sure but if we was going to Penrith why didn't he go in the first place? They badly wanted him. Hell reports were the reason they settled on Blaize, after missing on Galvin, was due to them thinking they could get Ryda as well. 
Could he join…"
46 minutes ago
More…