Who would you swap for Lomax?

With all the talk that Flanagan won't realese him early unless he gets a good player. Who would you let go? 

Me personally I would let Paulo, Sivo or Matterson go fo him. Paulo just seems to be running in cruise control these days, doesn't have the same effect he once did. 

Lomax would be a great pick up and needed for our backline, we must go hard for him. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

          • I completely get that super, but he is slowing down each year at a massive rate. He isn't the prop he used to be and sadly every year getting worse. I know he isn't the battering ram like some props and so on. But go back and watch his game on the weekend against the tigers. He was outplayed and couldn't keep up, made some stupid decisions in defence and attack Everytime we started getting our heels in. Yes if we moved him on we would miss him but others will fill his roll. Hopegood, matto and woody can play the second phase. 

            • He's at the back end and IMO, his value will continue decline vs what we are paying him.

              Using the super coach mentality he's an easy sell/swap.

  • Sivo definitely but who replaced him? Matterson definitely as he seems dis interested and has been for awhile. Not sure about Paulo as he's been good coming off the bench...He shouldn't be starting

    • Lomax to centre and push simmonson or tualigi to the wing when Moses is back. 

    • He was only playing for his contract, once he got it, he didn't care..

  • Definitely not Paulo.

    Not Sivo.

    Matterson or Simonsson and if they hesitate, offer up Hands as well.

    • No way they would even think of simonsson, they have a heap of hookers and we need that depth. 

      • They have 2 hookers. Jacob Liddle and Connor Mulheisen.

        • I thought they had the other lussick and some other young fella coming through as well. Too bad we got no hookers. 

          • Nah Freddie is at the Warriors I think.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Prof. Daz replied to Mallee57's discussion Annoying Advertising
"Oh, forgot to mention, there is a finders fee paid to 1EE of:"
1 hour ago
The Captain replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Gough & THAT Capt challenge
"Gough 100% stuffed the tackle/held call up, which happens. That's annoying but forgivable.
But him refusing the challenge, that's doubling down on a call he would have known was wrong. That's why he's been benched this week. 
If he'd just let the…"
1 hour ago
The Captain replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion NRL reject dispensation
"I mean I would have done the same thing. The NRL doesn't want to open this particular can of worms.
Our only shot at this was a backroom deal with the higher ups in the NRL, as soon as we spoke out of turn to the media I knew we were cooked.
Looked…"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Gough & THAT Capt challenge
"On Mallee's point, about stopping of momentum and a tackle being complete regardless of whether the ref calls held, it is interesting to look at the laws of the game. This is because Mallee's suggestion is correct. But Google or AI Overview is not…"
1 hour ago
More…