Who would you swap for Lomax?

With all the talk that Flanagan won't realese him early unless he gets a good player. Who would you let go? 

Me personally I would let Paulo, Sivo or Matterson go fo him. Paulo just seems to be running in cruise control these days, doesn't have the same effect he once did. 

Lomax would be a great pick up and needed for our backline, we must go hard for him. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

          • I completely get that super, but he is slowing down each year at a massive rate. He isn't the prop he used to be and sadly every year getting worse. I know he isn't the battering ram like some props and so on. But go back and watch his game on the weekend against the tigers. He was outplayed and couldn't keep up, made some stupid decisions in defence and attack Everytime we started getting our heels in. Yes if we moved him on we would miss him but others will fill his roll. Hopegood, matto and woody can play the second phase. 

            • He's at the back end and IMO, his value will continue decline vs what we are paying him.

              Using the super coach mentality he's an easy sell/swap.

  • Sivo definitely but who replaced him? Matterson definitely as he seems dis interested and has been for awhile. Not sure about Paulo as he's been good coming off the bench...He shouldn't be starting

    • Lomax to centre and push simmonson or tualigi to the wing when Moses is back. 

    • He was only playing for his contract, once he got it, he didn't care..

  • Definitely not Paulo.

    Not Sivo.

    Matterson or Simonsson and if they hesitate, offer up Hands as well.

    • No way they would even think of simonsson, they have a heap of hookers and we need that depth. 

      • They have 2 hookers. Jacob Liddle and Connor Mulheisen.

        • I thought they had the other lussick and some other young fella coming through as well. Too bad we got no hookers. 

          • Nah Freddie is at the Warriors I think.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Pops, well said. This statement is brilliant.
It calmly and factually frames the narrative and reveals what the club has quietly tolerated and patiently endured with Team Lomax, exposing a dynamic that private negotiations never could.
It surgically…"
47 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"So glad this is going to court I like this.
Jim and the club from the very beginning have made there point of view on this matter very clear.
They haven't got sucked into the media circus and comment around it.
They have a legally binding agreement…"
1 hour ago
Hell On Eels replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"Kudos to the club, Jim Sarantinos, and Matthew Beach for taking the bull by the horns after Team Lomax gave the NRL-registered agreement the middle finger.
The pressure-cooker for Lomax starts today in the Supreme Court, symbolically, at high noon.…"
1 hour ago
Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Official Club Statement: Parramatta Eels commence legal proceedings against Zac Lomax
"One thing I do know is, sometimes the courts work in mysterious ways. You could have your T's crossed and i's dotted and still the courts find a way to punish you. Only winners here are the lawyers."
1 hour ago
More…