Who would you swap for Lomax?

With all the talk that Flanagan won't realese him early unless he gets a good player. Who would you let go? 

Me personally I would let Paulo, Sivo or Matterson go fo him. Paulo just seems to be running in cruise control these days, doesn't have the same effect he once did. 

Lomax would be a great pick up and needed for our backline, we must go hard for him. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

          • I completely get that super, but he is slowing down each year at a massive rate. He isn't the prop he used to be and sadly every year getting worse. I know he isn't the battering ram like some props and so on. But go back and watch his game on the weekend against the tigers. He was outplayed and couldn't keep up, made some stupid decisions in defence and attack Everytime we started getting our heels in. Yes if we moved him on we would miss him but others will fill his roll. Hopegood, matto and woody can play the second phase. 

            • He's at the back end and IMO, his value will continue decline vs what we are paying him.

              Using the super coach mentality he's an easy sell/swap.

  • Sivo definitely but who replaced him? Matterson definitely as he seems dis interested and has been for awhile. Not sure about Paulo as he's been good coming off the bench...He shouldn't be starting

    • Lomax to centre and push simmonson or tualigi to the wing when Moses is back. 

    • He was only playing for his contract, once he got it, he didn't care..

  • Definitely not Paulo.

    Not Sivo.

    Matterson or Simonsson and if they hesitate, offer up Hands as well.

    • No way they would even think of simonsson, they have a heap of hookers and we need that depth. 

      • They have 2 hookers. Jacob Liddle and Connor Mulheisen.

        • I thought they had the other lussick and some other young fella coming through as well. Too bad we got no hookers. 

          • Nah Freddie is at the Warriors I think.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V’landys Backflips but the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"On SEN Radio, Frank Ponissi says “the vast majority of people are disappointed it’s going to court” and the Storm “would love Zac.”
He engages both equity limbs of the NSW  Restraints of Trade Act: the public interest question and Lomax's 'lost…"
3 minutes ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion OUR CLUB IS IN GREAT HANDS
"Hopgood wood stand out in any position, the dummy half role is the key difference and he has more ball distribution skills than most of our forwards. It should be the least of our problems, buy a second stringer and you sacrifice the opportunities…"
7 minutes ago
Parra fan on The Hill replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion OUR CLUB IS IN GREAT HANDS
"Thanks for the write up. Much appreciated. "
12 minutes ago
Poppa replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion OUR CLUB IS IN GREAT HANDS
"What makes you think Ryley Smith is not an 80 minutes hooker, I would think with the proliferation of good young forwards we have many "potential hookers" if we need them. Ryley has probably the highest aeorobic fitness of anyone in the club, if he…"
12 minutes ago
More…