Who would you swap for Lomax?

With all the talk that Flanagan won't realese him early unless he gets a good player. Who would you let go? 

Me personally I would let Paulo, Sivo or Matterson go fo him. Paulo just seems to be running in cruise control these days, doesn't have the same effect he once did. 

Lomax would be a great pick up and needed for our backline, we must go hard for him. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

          • I completely get that super, but he is slowing down each year at a massive rate. He isn't the prop he used to be and sadly every year getting worse. I know he isn't the battering ram like some props and so on. But go back and watch his game on the weekend against the tigers. He was outplayed and couldn't keep up, made some stupid decisions in defence and attack Everytime we started getting our heels in. Yes if we moved him on we would miss him but others will fill his roll. Hopegood, matto and woody can play the second phase. 

            • He's at the back end and IMO, his value will continue decline vs what we are paying him.

              Using the super coach mentality he's an easy sell/swap.

  • Sivo definitely but who replaced him? Matterson definitely as he seems dis interested and has been for awhile. Not sure about Paulo as he's been good coming off the bench...He shouldn't be starting

    • Lomax to centre and push simmonson or tualigi to the wing when Moses is back. 

    • He was only playing for his contract, once he got it, he didn't care..

  • Definitely not Paulo.

    Not Sivo.

    Matterson or Simonsson and if they hesitate, offer up Hands as well.

    • No way they would even think of simonsson, they have a heap of hookers and we need that depth. 

      • They have 2 hookers. Jacob Liddle and Connor Mulheisen.

        • I thought they had the other lussick and some other young fella coming through as well. Too bad we got no hookers. 

          • Nah Freddie is at the Warriors I think.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

The Badger replied to Eelawarra's discussion BYES SCRAPPED, 19-ROUND NRL DRAW, ORIGIN WINDOW : ARLC EXPLORING BIGGEST SCHEDULING OVERHAUL IN 40 YEARS
"Shrinkflation is real. Smaller product same amount or more. Sold as better quality than the old one.
Hell, the network boffins and NRL can do what the AFL do and have mandated ad breaks after each try and goal etc. Sell more advertising equals more…"
7 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to LB's discussion The draw idea with 20 teams and the issues around it. (LONG BLOG)
"Surley no one would suggest such an impractical stupidity.....(Randy looks at watch and wonders how long till someone does).
What do folks remember about the last time they tried to fix something that wasn't broken...Hint: You made it worse
The…"
20 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to LB's discussion The draw idea with 20 teams and the issues around it. (LONG BLOG)
"Conferences are a dumb idea here. Boring and prone to manipulation\. 
LB nailed it..Peter V'Landys idiolizes American sports...he sees the $$$ yanks pull in and it makes him jizz in his knickers. The bloke gives no fucks about our game beyond…"
29 minutes ago
iamnot replied to Eelawarra's discussion BYES SCRAPPED, 19-ROUND NRL DRAW, ORIGIN WINDOW : ARLC EXPLORING BIGGEST SCHEDULING OVERHAUL IN 40 YEARS
"more games doesn't equate to a better quality spectacle. I highly doubt V'Landys is into any decision that will cost the game revenue. The fact it has gotten this far would indicate that there's merit in it. "
45 minutes ago
More…