With the score locked in at 4 all and after battling defenders Nofuluma finaly is set free and just plays the ball correctly and he gets penalised .It doesn't matter wether the refs called or did not call for the play the ball. At worst, Sutton should have just called Nofuluma to play the ball again after the Sharks defence is reset and ready to go. What is happening with our great game, are the refs really falling apart under the pressure or is it corruption?????? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I think the call for penalty was right.

    He refs never called "held" and the Tigers player was worried about having the ball stripped from him as the Sharks had almost stripped it a moment earlier. It's just like surrendering for the tackle without pressure which under the rules is penalised.

    • Should have just told Nofuluma to play the ball. 

      • Why? They didn't call held. Parra fan is right, it's the same as a surrendered tackle. Penalty every day of the week. The refs got it right, for once...

        • it was nothing like a surrendered tackle. Nofoaluma was in a wrestle and battling to break the wtwo Sharkies restle hold and when he finally broke free he went down to play the ball.

          There was no surrender involved.

          He was just trying to maintain the speed at the play the ball.

          Maybe he heard or assumed or imagined the refs say play the ball but whatever happened there Nofoaluma should have just been called back to play the ball again.

          Later in the 2nd half a Shark player did something similar and the ref called the Shark player back to play the ball again. WTF.

          • You can't simply play the ball because you feel like it. Yes, he was being a robot and trying to get a quick play the ball away. Problem was no referee called held. They were right. End of story. 

  • Sharks running away with it now, as if it was ever in doubt, should have been docked points like we were , fucking cheats have gotten away with too much over the years. 

  • All said and done..Tigers didn't turn up for the 2nd half.

    • Their first set after halftime set the tone for the second half. 

  • Being a Parra fan can be shite but at least we don't follow the tigers, they are crap in every way, two best players are 40 and their halfback is a reverse transvestite 

    • Love it!

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Picking Up Where We Left Off?
"Poppa, I know the chance of dementia plays on your mind. Here's a rabbit hole for you. A way to stave off the diagnosis of dementia. It's the first I have heard of it. This link  should start at the right spot (13min), don't worry about the title…"
30 minutes ago
Archie replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Vlandy's is a dick, a tiny dick, but a dick nevertheless. He is now showing himself and the NRL to be corrupt, who knows what he owes the Storm and Mr Tripp.
The legal eagles will not buy the babbling idiots bullshit."
33 minutes ago
Yehez replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Ryles 2.0: 2026 gets off to a bright start in Eels trial
"Tago will be NSW cup fodder. I think if we take JAC-Kelly-Will-Simmo as our start 2-5, our backup would be Russell, Richie, Samrani and even Twidle before we pick Tago. And according to MON we are still looking to sign an outside back. So Tago might…"
37 minutes ago
Yehez replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Ryles 2.0: 2026 gets off to a bright start in Eels trial
"I said in another blog that middle defence in our red zone remains my main worry. So we'll see.
But overall I am optimistic. I like how many players seem to be playing well and adapting to different roles.
I see possible significant contribution…"
41 minutes ago
More…