With the score locked in at 4 all and after battling defenders Nofuluma finaly is set free and just plays the ball correctly and he gets penalised .It doesn't matter wether the refs called or did not call for the play the ball. At worst, Sutton should have just called Nofuluma to play the ball again after the Sharks defence is reset and ready to go. What is happening with our great game, are the refs really falling apart under the pressure or is it corruption?????? 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I think the call for penalty was right.

    He refs never called "held" and the Tigers player was worried about having the ball stripped from him as the Sharks had almost stripped it a moment earlier. It's just like surrendering for the tackle without pressure which under the rules is penalised.

    • Should have just told Nofuluma to play the ball. 

      • Why? They didn't call held. Parra fan is right, it's the same as a surrendered tackle. Penalty every day of the week. The refs got it right, for once...

        • it was nothing like a surrendered tackle. Nofoaluma was in a wrestle and battling to break the wtwo Sharkies restle hold and when he finally broke free he went down to play the ball.

          There was no surrender involved.

          He was just trying to maintain the speed at the play the ball.

          Maybe he heard or assumed or imagined the refs say play the ball but whatever happened there Nofoaluma should have just been called back to play the ball again.

          Later in the 2nd half a Shark player did something similar and the ref called the Shark player back to play the ball again. WTF.

          • You can't simply play the ball because you feel like it. Yes, he was being a robot and trying to get a quick play the ball away. Problem was no referee called held. They were right. End of story. 

  • Sharks running away with it now, as if it was ever in doubt, should have been docked points like we were , fucking cheats have gotten away with too much over the years. 

  • All said and done..Tigers didn't turn up for the 2nd half.

    • Their first set after halftime set the tone for the second half. 

  • Being a Parra fan can be shite but at least we don't follow the tigers, they are crap in every way, two best players are 40 and their halfback is a reverse transvestite 

    • Love it!

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Chief, the premise of scapegoating is to isolate one person (or social category, like 'immigrant') for critique, lodging what is distributed (sometimes no) responsibility in that one person or category, and blame them for a larger series of effects.…"
46 seconds ago
Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion Speed, Power, Athleticism, But Not Specifically Size; These are the Key Areas Emerging Under These Rules Forced on Teams
"Good point Chiefy.....
Hey JC this is meant to be your blog, if you get the chance can you run through the touch football connection you illustrated else where......"
6 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion Speed, Power, Athleticism, But Not Specifically Size; These are the Key Areas Emerging Under These Rules Forced on Teams
"I think those people were the non thinkers Adam (as you point out), we are always going to need 2 hookers, it will become a norm shortly and their will be occasions when one of them has to play the 80 mins. Again through pathways, we should be…"
11 minutes ago
Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Metcalf Dragons bound.
"Mitchy, thanks for making my point for me! Of course Anderson was part of a system that wasn't working. He was definitely accountable even if not solely responsible.  But that has been my point about scapegoating. Hence why I was surprised Chiefy…"
18 minutes ago
More…