We should've won that game.

After beating the Broncos last week I said to myself that the match against the storm will be a good indicator to see just how far we've really come from round 1. To be honest I had my doubts as to whether we'd be able to back up last weeks intensity and effort for the full 80 minutes. 'To my surprise, we did. Not only that, in my opinion we were coming home stronger at the end and Melbourne looked a little gassed. Even though the Storm looked uncharacteristically clunky at times, our attack was probably the worst it's been over the last few weeks. We made too many mistakes because our guys were a bit trigger happy and tried to score off every break. If we hadn't bombed a few good attacking opportunities, I'm convinced we win that game.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • That's the life of a Parra fan we should have one that game. The problem is we keep losing them. Even last week we should have lost. Bulldogs have looked for players who have had experience winning. We have looked for fringe players reserve graders from other clubs. The players we have bought are not going to win us a premiership. 

  • Did Sam get injured as he was only the field I thought for a very short period

  • Shoulda woulda coulda.....when we stop admiring mediocrity we might give it a proper shake 40 years and counting...yes there are some green shoots but Jesus its 3 years and no semis and we cant attract that key big name whether it be in the forwards or backs.....Lomax and Hopgood had poor games ....

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Re-read it and you're not wrong...williams is a good point
Tear 'em up Daz"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Spagnolo launches another campaign to undermine the club
"Even the Oompa Loompas were complicit in Willy Wonka's dark sh*t, and that's before we get to truly evil orange motherf***ers"
1 hour ago
Prof. Daz replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"Randy, it seems to mean Kane is trying to white ant the Parramatta case.
1) A restraint of trade case is going to be in trouble if the employee had no idea what was going on. But Kane adds the adverb "apparently" to every instance in which he refers…"
1 hour ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Eli Stephens's discussion Update on Lomax situation
"The Storm is owned by a consortium of wealthy business owners:
Executive Management | Storm"
2 hours ago
More…