Replies

  • Broncos 

  • If the Tigers win today they will be in a contest for the last top 8 spot next week against the Sharks so it could be the Tigers.

    There are so many ways this could play out, if we beat Manly by 12 or more we finish 5th and play 8th, if we lose we finish 6th and play 7th.

    • Need to beat manly by 22+ to get ahead of them. We can't get lower than 6th now the Sharks lost today.

       

      • No we need to beat manly by 11 or more because their positive will decrease by that margin and ours will increase

        • Sorry,  you're right. Guess I should have listened closer to my Maths teachers!

  • You fcukin beauty

  • Best scenario would to play brisbane. Sharks in semi final would be tricky

  • TIGERS 

  • Definately want to play Broncos.  We will blow them off the park in a full house at home.  Even rub of the green our way being at home.   Sharks lot lot harder to beat.

  • 1st case scenario:: Roosters defeat Rabbits by 26+ and we beat Manly by 26+ and we jump to 5th spot and still play Storm in Melb if they lose their 1st semi after winning ours and from there we then revenge all the News Limited/NRL years of corriuption waged against us since 1999, and then play Roosters or Rabbits or Raiders or possibly Sharks, Knights, Cronulla, Broncos or Tigers if any of them manage to get this far for a shot at the Grand Final which we go on to win. 

    2nd Case scenario: We neat Manly by 12+ and we jump into 5th spot and play the Broncos or Cronulla, Tigers or Knights at Bankwest, and from there after beating whoever, we play whoever of the above in the next finals game and win that and then play any of the above for a shot at the Grand Final which we will win. 

    3rd Case scanario: We beat Manly by less than 11 or we lose and still play @ Bankwest the following week against Sharks, Broncos, Knights, or Tigers, win that game and go on to play Storm, Roosters, Raiders or Rabbits and beat them and then play any of the above to go on and win that final and then win the GF the following week v whoever, ideally the Storm. 

    3499046775?profile=RESIZE_930x

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Blue Eel replied to Hell On Eels's discussion In the Wake of V’landys’ Backflips, the Lomax Case May Hinge on One Question
"Hoe , another great summary and viewpoint, Love it. 
I'd like to add something re that window around December. If Lomax had signed with R36o prior to getting a release and the Eels became aware of that, then surely when Lomax allegedly asked to come…"
3 minutes ago
LB replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"I was there to watch HM as my wife's friend had their brother playing in the Wests team, we are local so had a look. 
Bell was good, Capovilla was fine but nothing overly special in this game. Seu Seu was class in a lot of his runs"
6 minutes ago
LB replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Though Russell coming through was seen as a toiler type Fullback, not this flashy player. Bamblett seems more flashy.
Russell though in attack is ok, in defence he is quality at Centre."
9 minutes ago
LB replied to EA's discussion EA & SB Rookie Report - SG Ball Watchlist
"Could there be a little bit of comfortability? He knows he is in Cup soon and more likely play NRL soon so no need to impress etc?
Or is he prone to being off in games.
Or is he the big 'O' word, overrated?
Koina looks the goods at least."
11 minutes ago
More…