Replies

  • Broncos 

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Need to beat manly by 22+ to get ahead of them. We can't get lower than 6th now the Sharks lost today.

       

      • No we need to beat manly by 11 or more because their positive will decrease by that margin and ours will increase

        • Sorry,  you're right. Guess I should have listened closer to my Maths teachers!

  • You fcukin beauty

  • Best scenario would to play brisbane. Sharks in semi final would be tricky

  • TIGERS 

  • Definately want to play Broncos.  We will blow them off the park in a full house at home.  Even rub of the green our way being at home.   Sharks lot lot harder to beat.

  • 1st case scenario:: Roosters defeat Rabbits by 26+ and we beat Manly by 26+ and we jump to 5th spot and still play Storm in Melb if they lose their 1st semi after winning ours and from there we then revenge all the News Limited/NRL years of corriuption waged against us since 1999, and then play Roosters or Rabbits or Raiders or possibly Sharks, Knights, Cronulla, Broncos or Tigers if any of them manage to get this far for a shot at the Grand Final which we go on to win. 

    2nd Case scenario: We neat Manly by 12+ and we jump into 5th spot and play the Broncos or Cronulla, Tigers or Knights at Bankwest, and from there after beating whoever, we play whoever of the above in the next finals game and win that and then play any of the above for a shot at the Grand Final which we will win. 

    3rd Case scanario: We beat Manly by less than 11 or we lose and still play @ Bankwest the following week against Sharks, Broncos, Knights, or Tigers, win that game and go on to play Storm, Roosters, Raiders or Rabbits and beat them and then play any of the above to go on and win that final and then win the GF the following week v whoever, ideally the Storm. 

    3499046775?profile=RESIZE_930x

    • This reply was deleted.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kent: "Players Revolt & Ref Turmoil"; A Ticking Time Bomb?
"All this doesn’t prove the game is “broken,”...agreed. The overpaced, fatigue riddled ref-a-thon points blitz that hurts my eyes & feelings is what proves to me the game is broken.
I would hazard that Ugly Pete pushed that other guy (can't remember…"
4 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion V'landyball: The Momentum Wars
"Hoey, as you know I am not a stats man but what you outlined in considerable detail is outstanding.
I read your "death zone" notes early in the season and have been quoting them regularly since then to both Parra and other club supporters.
I think…"
5 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Signing predictions !
"Yeah Anasta said we got him for a good deal. Really could be anything. But also could be more than letting on as when talking about him he was in protective mode as many were knocking the signing so Anasta was saying all these things to Parra fans…"
6 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Kent: "Players Revolt & Ref Turmoil"; A Ticking Time Bomb?
"I see a few things to take out of this.
Firstly, the players complaining they are not enjoying it, a portion of Melbourne players mentioned how they are hating football. Now is it because of the rules or because they are losing like never before?…"
8 minutes ago
More…