Replies

  • Broncos 

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Need to beat manly by 22+ to get ahead of them. We can't get lower than 6th now the Sharks lost today.

       

      • No we need to beat manly by 11 or more because their positive will decrease by that margin and ours will increase

        • Sorry,  you're right. Guess I should have listened closer to my Maths teachers!

  • You fcukin beauty

  • Best scenario would to play brisbane. Sharks in semi final would be tricky

  • TIGERS 

  • Definately want to play Broncos.  We will blow them off the park in a full house at home.  Even rub of the green our way being at home.   Sharks lot lot harder to beat.

  • 1st case scenario:: Roosters defeat Rabbits by 26+ and we beat Manly by 26+ and we jump to 5th spot and still play Storm in Melb if they lose their 1st semi after winning ours and from there we then revenge all the News Limited/NRL years of corriuption waged against us since 1999, and then play Roosters or Rabbits or Raiders or possibly Sharks, Knights, Cronulla, Broncos or Tigers if any of them manage to get this far for a shot at the Grand Final which we go on to win. 

    2nd Case scenario: We neat Manly by 12+ and we jump into 5th spot and play the Broncos or Cronulla, Tigers or Knights at Bankwest, and from there after beating whoever, we play whoever of the above in the next finals game and win that and then play any of the above for a shot at the Grand Final which we will win. 

    3rd Case scanario: We beat Manly by less than 11 or we lose and still play @ Bankwest the following week against Sharks, Broncos, Knights, or Tigers, win that game and go on to play Storm, Roosters, Raiders or Rabbits and beat them and then play any of the above to go on and win that final and then win the GF the following week v whoever, ideally the Storm. 

    3499046775?profile=RESIZE_930x

    • This reply was deleted.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Angry Eel replied to Joel K's discussion Club to take up De Belin option
"Let Critta go but you could argue McLean is going to be better."
6 minutes ago
LB replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"They worked with him in 2024 when he was protesting and having a go at the club over BA. Since then they took access away and he carried on. If they gave it back to try and get him back onside, why didn't they just do that then? Would have been…"
19 minutes ago
Clintorian replied to SuperEel 22's discussion Unity is Strength: Back the Badge
"Nice write up Super.
I share the some confusion... We're all frustrated with how this year's gone after such hi off-season hopes. But it doesn't take a genius to see that the critical injuries have played a significant role in how we're travelling…"
20 minutes ago
LB replied to Jason's discussion Here we go again 😂
"He did the same in 2024. The club brought him in, gave him access to spread postivity. He did that. Then things went sour quickly again late last year and have eventuated to this. Titan, look at his instagram post on April 1st about Olantekkers and…"
23 minutes ago
More…