Replies

  • Broncos 

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Need to beat manly by 22+ to get ahead of them. We can't get lower than 6th now the Sharks lost today.

       

      • No we need to beat manly by 11 or more because their positive will decrease by that margin and ours will increase

        • Sorry,  you're right. Guess I should have listened closer to my Maths teachers!

  • You fcukin beauty

  • Best scenario would to play brisbane. Sharks in semi final would be tricky

  • TIGERS 

  • Definately want to play Broncos.  We will blow them off the park in a full house at home.  Even rub of the green our way being at home.   Sharks lot lot harder to beat.

  • 1st case scenario:: Roosters defeat Rabbits by 26+ and we beat Manly by 26+ and we jump to 5th spot and still play Storm in Melb if they lose their 1st semi after winning ours and from there we then revenge all the News Limited/NRL years of corriuption waged against us since 1999, and then play Roosters or Rabbits or Raiders or possibly Sharks, Knights, Cronulla, Broncos or Tigers if any of them manage to get this far for a shot at the Grand Final which we go on to win. 

    2nd Case scenario: We neat Manly by 12+ and we jump into 5th spot and play the Broncos or Cronulla, Tigers or Knights at Bankwest, and from there after beating whoever, we play whoever of the above in the next finals game and win that and then play any of the above for a shot at the Grand Final which we will win. 

    3rd Case scanario: We beat Manly by less than 11 or we lose and still play @ Bankwest the following week against Sharks, Broncos, Knights, or Tigers, win that game and go on to play Storm, Roosters, Raiders or Rabbits and beat them and then play any of the above to go on and win that final and then win the GF the following week v whoever, ideally the Storm. 

    3499046775?profile=RESIZE_930x

    • This reply was deleted.
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Richard Jackson replied to Prof. Daz's discussion R5 vs TIGERS: The Trial
"Thanks Prof for your honest but gloomy expose of our current and future chances in this game. Appreciate your summary but it does make it a little harder to be strong.
In answer to your question 'Will we turn on our team' you know the answer to…"
5 minutes ago
The Captain replied to Clintorian's discussion Panthers put 50 on Storm, you love to see it!
"I assume a heck of a lot of the players are on gear cycles throughout their development stages. I'm sure it's pure coincidence that Nathan Cleary's chin looks like it has hoarded HGH.
But there's a big step up between players doing things during…"
7 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill' Sack !'s discussion Eels Targets 2027
"LOL, very clever....."
10 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin🐐 - Mark O'neill' Sack !'s discussion Eels Targets 2027
"Do you see any avenue for Bamblett to break into FG? Like maybe Wing or Centre for time being?"
16 minutes ago
More…