Was Ricky right to blow up?

So there has been alot of noise from the Raiders v Warriors game yesterday. Ricky has had another blow up in the presser, and a point that I found interesting out of this was the sin binning of Wighton for being deliberately offside, according to the ref. I'm no expert on the play-the-ball and ruck rules, so I've done a bit of research this morning, and as much as it pains me to say it, I think Ricky was justified in blowing up about this particular incident.

Here is what I have found for play-the-ball rules. The is from genral rugby league rules:

7949680874?profile=RESIZE_710x

And this is from the NRL rules:

7949681096?profile=RESIZE_710x

And here is an image showing Wighton at the time the ball is played:

7949681875?profile=RESIZE_710x

From this point he sprints out of the line, so he would appear to be offside, but that is because the rest of his team move slowly off the line.

The ball was in play, Wighton made it back to his own goal line, and he didn't appear to leave early, so I don't think he did anything wrong here. Note the position of the ref in relation to the play-the-ball and Wighton. There is no way he can have any idea where Wighton is at the time the ball is played. He follows the ball after it is played, and the next time he sees Wighton he is out past the 10m line when the ball has been passed to the right side of the ruck, while the rest of his team have advanced about 4 or 5 metres:

7949736901?profile=RESIZE_710x

Only natural that he concludes that Wighton must have been offisde, albeit in this case it just appears he is wrong.

What does everyone think?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If it was any other coach I'd listen, but pricky whinges so much it becomes meaningless. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Coryn Hughes replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
"Yep going to say the same the messaging here is 2 faced saying you'd rather have and spend on a guy who wants to be here then sign Pezet for 5 minutes and he's off at the drop of a hat.
Like it's been explained some of the wording by the CEO sounds…"
5 minutes ago
Poupou Escobar replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
""Zak is under contract" means we're not letting him go unless it suits us."
4 hours ago
Gaz Nelson replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Vlandys to speak with Haas
"Parra agreeing to let Lomax go so quickly, you can only hope we got a transfser deal"
4 hours ago
Gucci replied to Eelawarra's discussion EELS COACH JASON RYLES PUSHED TO SIGN OFF ON ZAC LOMAX’S RELEASE REQUEST - THIS IS WHY
"For those that haven't listened to the interview with our goober CEO.
 
https://www.2gb.com/how-well-spend-zacs-money-eels-boss-on-parras-p...
 
Now I usually am pretty good at reading between the lines. Typically when we are asked about player…"
5 hours ago
More…