Was Ricky right to blow up?

So there has been alot of noise from the Raiders v Warriors game yesterday. Ricky has had another blow up in the presser, and a point that I found interesting out of this was the sin binning of Wighton for being deliberately offside, according to the ref. I'm no expert on the play-the-ball and ruck rules, so I've done a bit of research this morning, and as much as it pains me to say it, I think Ricky was justified in blowing up about this particular incident.

Here is what I have found for play-the-ball rules. The is from genral rugby league rules:

7949680874?profile=RESIZE_710x

And this is from the NRL rules:

7949681096?profile=RESIZE_710x

And here is an image showing Wighton at the time the ball is played:

7949681875?profile=RESIZE_710x

From this point he sprints out of the line, so he would appear to be offside, but that is because the rest of his team move slowly off the line.

The ball was in play, Wighton made it back to his own goal line, and he didn't appear to leave early, so I don't think he did anything wrong here. Note the position of the ref in relation to the play-the-ball and Wighton. There is no way he can have any idea where Wighton is at the time the ball is played. He follows the ball after it is played, and the next time he sees Wighton he is out past the 10m line when the ball has been passed to the right side of the ruck, while the rest of his team have advanced about 4 or 5 metres:

7949736901?profile=RESIZE_710x

Only natural that he concludes that Wighton must have been offisde, albeit in this case it just appears he is wrong.

What does everyone think?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If it was any other coach I'd listen, but pricky whinges so much it becomes meaningless. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Wonder who that rep quality Back-Rower that journo said we had signed or were close to signing."
9 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"Your intentions are noble, Bluey, yet we’ll need to agree to disagree. For me, having a chat with NAS (like 6–7 clubs did) & not even offering a contract (he’s moved on from the NRL emotionally) doesn’t really qualify as a disaster or “failure.”…"
27 minutes ago
Kenny Power replied to Blue Eel's discussion Jerome Luai Has More Get Out Clauses!
"He will either go back to riff or Perth .. would love for him to go to dogs to reunite with Galvin "
33 minutes ago
BEM replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Eels eye Titans' Brian Kelly as Lomax replacement
"He is a better centre option than winger but still not a quality first grade starter in any position.
Kelly is the same."
44 minutes ago
More…