Was Ricky right to blow up?

So there has been alot of noise from the Raiders v Warriors game yesterday. Ricky has had another blow up in the presser, and a point that I found interesting out of this was the sin binning of Wighton for being deliberately offside, according to the ref. I'm no expert on the play-the-ball and ruck rules, so I've done a bit of research this morning, and as much as it pains me to say it, I think Ricky was justified in blowing up about this particular incident.

Here is what I have found for play-the-ball rules. The is from genral rugby league rules:

7949680874?profile=RESIZE_710x

And this is from the NRL rules:

7949681096?profile=RESIZE_710x

And here is an image showing Wighton at the time the ball is played:

7949681875?profile=RESIZE_710x

From this point he sprints out of the line, so he would appear to be offside, but that is because the rest of his team move slowly off the line.

The ball was in play, Wighton made it back to his own goal line, and he didn't appear to leave early, so I don't think he did anything wrong here. Note the position of the ref in relation to the play-the-ball and Wighton. There is no way he can have any idea where Wighton is at the time the ball is played. He follows the ball after it is played, and the next time he sees Wighton he is out past the 10m line when the ball has been passed to the right side of the ruck, while the rest of his team have advanced about 4 or 5 metres:

7949736901?profile=RESIZE_710x

Only natural that he concludes that Wighton must have been offisde, albeit in this case it just appears he is wrong.

What does everyone think?

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • If it was any other coach I'd listen, but pricky whinges so much it becomes meaningless. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Mark replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"don't know last text was his banned with no explanation as to why or how long other than what's been discussed. You'd think you'd be happy to say why so the crowds aware of what's acceptable. If you're happy to devuldge the reasoning behind Brett's…"
1 minute ago
Mark replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"So enforce non footy blogs into social blogs. It's a rule everyone's happy to follow and just delete them if they don't.  I'm sure the group can all live with that other than the gooses who just need to get rid of them to feel they got a win for…"
8 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
""Arbeit macht frei""
9 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Your Thoughts on the Future of the Site?
"I lurked here for quite a while before i started posting. Some blogs are stand alone reading material (eg you, Daz) but most need the comments to be worthwhile. Folks opening the blogs are reading the comments. If replies to blogs were removed the…"
17 minutes ago
More…