Replies

  • Wtf 2 weeks for touching a reff. Lol they high 5
  • It certainly makes you wonder........

  • What the hickety heck????!!!!
  • That is seriously messed up! I can't say I am surprised though
  • Nice Professional look from an Un-Professional organisation.

    Todd Greenburg will brush it under the carpet and pretend as if he never saw it.

     

  • This reall needs to be questioned sent further. Players were missing games for touching refs last year. This is clearly a bad look on the game and shows they were defiantly against us this game.
    • Good point! so nrl like isn’t it... even yesterday’s taboo rule is always old news a few months later 

  • Hmmmmm... I am usually the first to say the refs aren't corrupt. I usually put their mistakes down to human error, poor judgement, laziness, stupidity, lack of awareness etc.

    But I can't defend this. I am at a loss. This is disgusting. I hope they come out and explain it because I love my footy and this is hurts.
    • No matter what reasons the NRL give for this incident, none of them are of a professional nature!

      Officials should be made to identify players by number only, as well. Total garbage to expect to be called Sir after approaching a player with "Ay Clinton!" An exception would be the Captain.

      Hi fiving, low fiving, secret handshakes, winking, etc. between officials and players is absurd! I'm all for the ban on players touching officials but why the double standards here? 

      Also bullshit is the coaching some players receive during play! Statements like "you've been offside the last 3 tackles" or "I won't warn you again"  is hard to hear when we're behind! The refs counting penalties and discussing on-field performance is another joke!

      • Pretty sure Brisbane got warned 3 times last night that if they gave another penalty someone would be binned. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Frank The Tank replied to Rabz S's discussion Potential NRL changes
"I reckon clubs should have the option to play anyone in the top 30 man squad, so if any key player goes down you can have a like for like replacement - still with a maximum 8 interchanges.
The way it's structured now it disadvantages teams who are…"
3 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Blue Eel's discussion Pivot to the Next.
"Joel, does this article really state "expected to show interest"? Comical if true. Where is it out of curiosity: Zerotackle, TikTok, facebook? Sounds like it's written by one of our site's patrons to gee us up."
6 minutes ago
LB replied to Blue Eel's discussion Pivot to the Next.
"It says Souths as they lost Keaon.
No matter the middle, Souths and Parra are linked since it appears there is a need. 
It would be the same if we lost Moses, we would be linked to every Halfback available ."
14 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Blue Eel's discussion Pivot to the Next.
"There offering but no one's taking."
17 minutes ago
More…