Replies

  • Wtf 2 weeks for touching a reff. Lol they high 5
  • It certainly makes you wonder........

  • What the hickety heck????!!!!
  • That is seriously messed up! I can't say I am surprised though
  • Nice Professional look from an Un-Professional organisation.

    Todd Greenburg will brush it under the carpet and pretend as if he never saw it.

     

  • This reall needs to be questioned sent further. Players were missing games for touching refs last year. This is clearly a bad look on the game and shows they were defiantly against us this game.
    • Good point! so nrl like isn’t it... even yesterday’s taboo rule is always old news a few months later 

  • Hmmmmm... I am usually the first to say the refs aren't corrupt. I usually put their mistakes down to human error, poor judgement, laziness, stupidity, lack of awareness etc.

    But I can't defend this. I am at a loss. This is disgusting. I hope they come out and explain it because I love my footy and this is hurts.
    • No matter what reasons the NRL give for this incident, none of them are of a professional nature!

      Officials should be made to identify players by number only, as well. Total garbage to expect to be called Sir after approaching a player with "Ay Clinton!" An exception would be the Captain.

      Hi fiving, low fiving, secret handshakes, winking, etc. between officials and players is absurd! I'm all for the ban on players touching officials but why the double standards here? 

      Also bullshit is the coaching some players receive during play! Statements like "you've been offside the last 3 tackles" or "I won't warn you again"  is hard to hear when we're behind! The refs counting penalties and discussing on-field performance is another joke!

      • Pretty sure Brisbane got warned 3 times last night that if they gave another penalty someone would be binned. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Roy tannous's discussion What the lineup should be
"With a bye around the corner, do you risk them a week early? I mean if they are 100% sure why not as Melbourne are gettable. But with a bye might be better to keep them on ice ready for Newcastle."
2 minutes ago
LB replied to Jiver's discussion Team sheet Tuesday - the questions
"Well if Smith is still out, who plays Hooker?
All he has to do from Dummy half is be as pedestrian as possible. Just feed forward and halves. 
Smith should be out this week, give him this week and next week off."
6 minutes ago
LB replied to Jiver's discussion Team sheet Tuesday - the questions
"Edwards will be in the 19. Depending on Smith will depend if he is in the 17. Pryke i reckon misses out. Pezet i could see being in the 19 instead of Lorenzo and i'm fine with that. Let's Lorenzo play a full game of Cup."
9 minutes ago
macybrown replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion External signing likely for Eels’ next five-eighth. Boom Breaking news *****Updated Metcalf seeking permission to leave
"Hope we'd jump at it myself. "
13 minutes ago
More…