Replies

  • Wtf 2 weeks for touching a reff. Lol they high 5
  • It certainly makes you wonder........

  • What the hickety heck????!!!!
  • That is seriously messed up! I can't say I am surprised though
  • Nice Professional look from an Un-Professional organisation.

    Todd Greenburg will brush it under the carpet and pretend as if he never saw it.

     

  • This reall needs to be questioned sent further. Players were missing games for touching refs last year. This is clearly a bad look on the game and shows they were defiantly against us this game.
    • Good point! so nrl like isn’t it... even yesterday’s taboo rule is always old news a few months later 

  • Hmmmmm... I am usually the first to say the refs aren't corrupt. I usually put their mistakes down to human error, poor judgement, laziness, stupidity, lack of awareness etc.

    But I can't defend this. I am at a loss. This is disgusting. I hope they come out and explain it because I love my footy and this is hurts.
    • No matter what reasons the NRL give for this incident, none of them are of a professional nature!

      Officials should be made to identify players by number only, as well. Total garbage to expect to be called Sir after approaching a player with "Ay Clinton!" An exception would be the Captain.

      Hi fiving, low fiving, secret handshakes, winking, etc. between officials and players is absurd! I'm all for the ban on players touching officials but why the double standards here? 

      Also bullshit is the coaching some players receive during play! Statements like "you've been offside the last 3 tackles" or "I won't warn you again"  is hard to hear when we're behind! The refs counting penalties and discussing on-field performance is another joke!

      • Pretty sure Brisbane got warned 3 times last night that if they gave another penalty someone would be binned. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Brett Kenny Fanclub replied to Sneaky Pete's discussion What we need.
"Seriously all the conjecture, posits and postulates continue to ignore the bloody obvious. We don't have the cattle. The forwards lack presence, we have no strike in the backs and our defence is an absolute disgrace. It's no more and no less.…"
7 minutes ago
Slippery. replied to Poppa's discussion Poppa's Corner; The cattle is the problem, this maybe the catalyst to make us do some drastic things!

 Without putting too much thought into it,  how would this forward pack of former Eels go against what we have now??
 
8 Stefano Utoikamanu
9 Reed Mahoney
10 Trey Mooney
11 Isaiah Papali'i
12 Marata Niukore
13 Alex Twal 
 
All 6 of these discarded…"
11 minutes ago
LB replied to Sneaky Pete's discussion What we need.
"Well Paul Kent brought up Melbourne could go for Ryles for 2027. Imagine if they went for him though. "
14 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion Eels lock in Adidas as jersey manufacturer
"Good point lol."
14 minutes ago
More…