Replies

        • Actullally I think my eyesight is getting worse.....probably the seatbelt is interfereing with it! Lol

          PS Remember when you said I probably was the one that got you banned and my reply was I couldn't think of anything we had been involved with to do that.......from what I now understand it was nothing to do with me.

          No worries no harm done, good to know.

  • I can't see Rodwell making the top 17 to start the year in front of:

    Paulo, RCG, Brown, Papilii, Matterson, Niukore, Lane, Kaufusi

    • In front of Kaufusi imo

    • Still a bench spot there up for grabs. Plus if Rodwell is going better than papali or Nuikore , he should get first crack because they are leaving. 

      • Nah can't agree with that

    • Mate, 5 are starters and 3 will be bench spots, I'd give him a run ahead of Kaufusi, otherwise injuries will see him get his shot.

      • Cartwright as well. Injuries will be the only way Rodwell makes the 17 in round 1

  • I'm going to reserve all judgements until I see him perform in the NRL, over a bit of time. The proof will be in the pudding; and the NRL is one tough arena. IMO, with Kaufusi and Ice going it's probably a good idea to give him some time in the middle rotation off the bench, even if it's limited time, to see how he goes.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"He was provided all the legal advice before signing the release and understood the stipulations. Just because R360 didn't eventuate doesn't mean he can force his way out of it lol. Spoilt brat defence is not going to work for Lomax or the storm 🤣 "
18 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"LB, Eli, good stuff gents. We've acted in good-faith. By the book. With clean hands. Lomax appears not to. Still, equity is not unlikely to view an NRL-wide 3-year restraint until 31Oct 28' as overly-punitive and read it down.
We'd still win,…"
1 hour ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The best thing for the Eels is if we say nothing our position is clear we only have to come back to the table if Melbourne come with something we see as advantageous for us that really is the bottom line.
Best thing about this there the ones doing…"
3 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"If you look at it from a player for player deal, would you rather Lomax or Howarth if you are the Storm but ? I just don't see any way legally the storm can force the eels to hand them Lomax 🤣 either way don't really care what storm end up doing but…"
8 hours ago
More…