Sportsbet are offering $1.18 for the Raiders to beat the Sharks, the latter of whom are paying $5.00 to win. I understand that because the Sharks are no hope of winning after getting towelled by Raiders B grade side last week.
Thing is, Melbourne and Eels are paying the exact same prices respectively... that means the punters don't give the Eels a hope in hell of winning either. I don't think it is as clear cut as the first game.
I will be punting on Eels +13.5 at $1.90. I think that is really good value and havnt given up on the upset win. We were so close in 2017 and we have a better side this time around.
Replies
Just put a multi on, Chooks and Parra $50
I know the odds are statistically correct (we don't do well against the Storm, we don't do well away from home, we have been in a form slump, we're lower on the ladder, the Storm rested all their key players, we have Brown just back from an injury) but I also don't feel like it's quite as much of a done deal as many are saying.
If there's one thing we know about Parra it's that we're unpredictable. We have a history of underperforming in games we should win and overperforming in games we should lose.
The Storm deserve to be strong favourites with all of the factors taken into account, but that would just make it all the sweeter if we won. I'm still backing us - it's what true supporters do.
Johnny this same team bar one player got humiliated 32 0 by the storm last year so what does 2017 have to do with anything?
At least we got humiliated by the most dominant team of the last few decades.
The Roosters got humiliated and obliterated by the Rabbits, and that wasn't last year, that was last week. Bush team with a bush coach.
I didn't draw any direct comparisons with rosters of last year or 2017. The only things analogous with 2017 and 2020 is that its a finals game, against Melbourne, away from home, in which the Eels are expected to get belted. In 2017 we almost won (probably should have), despite expectations.
The eels finish 3rd yet are paying $5 to beat the the team that came 2nd and $26 to win the comp , just shows how having a easy draw can make a team look better than what they are.
I agree. The overall quality of the surface at bank west has gone backwards fast as well. It's turned from a high scoring track to a low scoring one.
You can work it out as the season progresses, and when you do Fong is still wrong. Eels place 3rd when Strength of Opposition is factored in, and Roosters drop to 5th...oops
Strength of Schedule in advance is a useless metric (lots of people had Broncos in the Top 4 at the beginning of the season) but SoS factored in historically absolutely shows if any teams are pretenders and don't deserve their ranking.
The Eels deserve their ranking. We are rightfully 3rd.
Wrong, again.
Eels against Top 8 this year: Win 5, Lost 3
Roosters against Top 8 this year: Win 5, Lost 5
Eels against Bottom 8 this year: Win 10, Lost 2
Rooster against Bottom 8 this year: Win 9, Lost 1
When you take Strength of Schedule into account for the 2020 season (which means you get more points for being teams high on the ladder and less for beating teams lower) you end up with Eels in 3rd place and Roosters in 5th place.
We are placed EXACTLY where we should be based on basically every single way you cut the season. Roosters by many cuts should actually be placed below Canberra.
But don't let facts and statistics ruin your incorrect opinions eh?
Check out the data: https://www.reddit.com/r/nrl/comments/j16ifs/wins_losses_vs_top_8_s...
Parra finished 3rd yet are paying $26 dollars to win the comp, when was the last time a team that finshed in the top 4 and in 3rd place were paying over $20 to win the comp and were so lowly rated ? Never. Teams who finished lower on the ladder are paying less and rated higher so what does that tell you Eh?
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next