The new rule in NRL is kick do not punch

While I do not agree with the statement that Ricky Stuart has made I have some real issues with the consistency of the NRL. Salmon should have at least been sin binned and should be given 2 weeks for the offence. He kicked the player twice once where it hurts and again directly to the head of the player. These should be regarded as deliberate as you do not accidentally kick out. To just get a fine is a licence to kick instead of punch. Also how does Simms not get sent for his offence? I always hate it when these things occur because the next week there is always a ref over reaction and usually it is Parramatta that cops.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • It's was purely accidental and no way did Salmon intentionally kick the player. It was clear he was trying to get up. Also I think the Canberra player clearly over reacted 

    • Yes! That’s exactly how it was. Starling used his legs to jam Salmons  leg in there,  another player had him pinned down trying to prevent a quick play the ball ...can’t see what the huge fuss is about for an accident

  • Was his kicking accidental or on purpose! I don't think it matters and should be rubbed out of the game. It is purely showmanship trying to milk a penalty and does not aid in getting up at all, you cant get up while kicking out and the out come to someone in the way whether his own team mate or oppertition could be struck and hurt so the one doing it should be penalised so this showman ship trying to milk a penalty is erradicated out of the game. 

    • nice to hear some sense. Simple the kick was deliberate you do not kick accidently. It should be rubbed out like punching has been. He knew where where one leg was and kicked with the other. It was a dog act (not defending Ricky who went way over the top). He then lashed out a second time to the head of the player. Not on and should have copped 2 weeks.

      • What this does show Speech is that everyone sees things differently.....you say "nice to see some sense" but others not so.

        What we don't know is what the two incumbents intentions were, unless you can read minds, we never will.

        • the key is do not kick out. If you do you are likely to cause injury. It is the refs job to penalise if the player is being held down. The person is usually trying to milk a penalty but the damage can be savage when studs are involved especially to areas of your body that are vulnarable. Did he mean to kick him yes did him mean to kick him in the nuts I hope not but likeley.

          • No, players are trained to scrap for every inch. Quick play the calls are the holy grail to success. He wasn't kicking out, he was attempting to get the tacklers off him. 

            • then change the training. He lashed out twice with his boot. Rub it out of the game. Scrap for how much you run in yardage not for how many kicks you can get in.

      • No, you're hearing someone who agrees with you, not the same thing. 

  • Simms was forceful contact to the head but no swinging arm sin bin and suspension is fair.

    The kicking out in ruck happens all the time and is a result of the slowing down at the ruck.

    That been said I wish they still threw punches 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him replied to LB's discussion Will Manly be smarting next week?
"So that says we have a coach that can beat Penrith . The fact we lost to the tigers says we have a poor attitude . And we have for decades. On and off feild leadership is as big a problem as coaching. And that may not necessarily only apply to the…"
1 hour ago
Poupou Escobar replied to LB's discussion Will Manly be smarting next week?
""Friday nights game should have been nearly closed out in the first 25 minutes. We had enough ball and field position to take the wind out of the Phins."
You really think so? At halftime we had 50% possession: iStats/NRL (championdata.com)
If we had…"
1 hour ago
Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him replied to ParramattaLurker's discussion Round 8 Team List v Manly Warringah Sea Eagles (ANZAC Round)
"You know that 40/20 is not a persons real name , nor does it divulge who said person is off screen , ya Wally. Could you try any harder to find an excuse to be outraged ?   What the difference between mentioning a podcasters alias and talking about…"
2 hours ago
Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him replied to LB's discussion BA's Round 8 presser
"Mattersons a Christian sect member, pretty sure he's a convert from Catholic. Confusing I know , considering he acts Jewish. "
2 hours ago
More…