Replies

      • This coming from a juvenile, smutty little twat that calls himself 'vertical smile'!!

        Fair dinkum! You're the sort of 'limited' person who watches re-runs of John Hopoate sticking his finger up players' dates and doing 'that's gold'!

        • Drinking Bundy OG and watching Fatty on the Footy Show box set. 

           

      • Stop with the bold italics. Your not in the office.

  • This reply was deleted.
    • Actually they ruled on the knick on bunker never checked the try as they could only rule on the captain's challenge.

      The system is confusing and ridiculous 

    • It's actually easy to be negative when you support this club

    • Flicking through your posts one would be mistaken for concluding you are this site’s most negative person. So often your comments are laced with a putdown against the other person, who, in the main are simply putting forward their opinion. I have said it before ‘pot calling kettle black’.   Chill, smell the roses, find a hobby. 

  • OK - so I am more than a little confoozed here.

    A tip on, that allegedly goes forward is now a Knock on?

    In the past tip ons, that travel forward have been called a forward pass.

    You will see one in the Cows (?) I think which is a forward pass.

    A knock-on is committed when, in an attempt to play at the ball, a player knocks the ball towards their opponents' dead ball line with their hands or arms and it touches either the ground, or an opposing player. However, the ball may be knocked back.

    At which point did the ball touch an opposing player or hit the ground?

    Another "Penalty" Peranara Pathetic Perfomance.

    The bottom line has become "If a player does not catch the ball 'cleanly' then it will be deemed a knock on regardless of the direction the ball may take after being touched" - That is now how 99.99% of these issues are adjudicated on field.

    THERE WAS NO KNOCK ON !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  •  Amazing what you can learn from all the geniuses on twitter, hey Offside?

    • I Don't have Twitter don't understand the attraction to it my mate sent that to me. 

      I think it should be a try but the way they rule most obstructions as a no try I and watching the play again if it was sent up for review it would of been interesting.

  • what the photo doesn't show is a milli second later the player is free to chase, Fergo from the position HE put himself in.. he wasn't impeded . Don't forget it was a tap on by king Gutherson .. that's how fast the play was .. so stop thinking about it 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"They have never been in a position of not getting what they want. They said when first started Ryles should just tell the board to let him go as they let him go, despite not letting him touch Storm players for 12 months, they also said the Sydney…"
56 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Yeah they have backs but also how often do they get Origin talent?"
1 hour ago
Troy Wade replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"I'm sick of all the attention this bloke is getting. Go play bush footy for 3 years. End of story. You made your bed - now sleep on it..The NRL and the Storm can well and truely go get f....."
1 hour ago
DYNASTY.LOADING replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"Only reason I think he remains at the club is on a minimum wage deal to have someone integrated in the culture available as an experienced head in NSW cup to help steer the team around. I agree he is not going to be a priority signing and he hasn't…"
1 hour ago
More…