So we have got penalised numerous times for impeding chasers over the last couple weeks which is fair enough but when it happens to us nothing. Cronk changed his line and moved backwards just to intentionally deny Taka any chance of contesting that last kick of the game. Without that Taka was a great chance to get to it and perhaps score or at least keep it alive. Either way shoulda been a penalty. Agree/Disagree?
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
But should have been a penalty along with the three players leaving their line early non penalty
6-1 penalty count in second half with those glaring let offs for Melbourne
Here I am this morning still spitting chips and feeling miserable.....
What worries me is what happens if next week we suffer more cruel unfair decisions. The players are only human.