Vunivalu gets held back, it's a penalty and a sinbin. But in the wet chasing a bouncing ball, it's no certainty. The problem is the on field call. The ONLY reason it was a penalty try was the ref said "check for a penalty try". Without that, no way is it called. Another woeful call by the bunker. The ball bounced away from him and they were 100% "certain" he picks it up cleanly and scores in the rain?

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Two things:
    1) How was it any more certain that Vunivalu would score than the incident with Moses being shoved off the ball a few weeks back? Is it that Moses was not wearing purple?
    2) As Brett points out, the rule refers to the opinion of the ref and not having to be certain. So why did Brandy quote the rule and even display it on the screen on Foxtel, only to read a condition (certainty) into the rule that is clearly different than the condition stated in the rule (opinion)?
    • Moses had more of a claim to a penalty try then Vanavalu
    • Yeah it's going to be really interesting to see what penalty Vuinavalu faces for that outrageous knee incident. If that was Kenny Edwards he would be looking at 6 weeks on the sidelines
  • Yep. Apparently if you're in purple like Vunivalu you're also allowed to leap into the opposition at head height with your knees. One rule for purple, another for other colours...
    • Bellamy said he don't know what he should be charged with. Reckless careless high dangerous?
  • Agree that the 100% is garbage to reason for penalty try or not. There is no 100% until they actually ground the ball. As usual there is no consistency from week to week in the nrl in everything from that to play the ball to kick chase being impeded. I seriously wonder if there is any communication from top to bottom in the nrl. It's a joke of an organisation.
    • Back in the day it was easy, simple and successful interpretation. Defender can't change their line to impede a chaser. Today they allow on any chaser but only the blatant obvious ones get pulled up. Nrl is stoopid. They introduce 7 tackle set for any discretion in the in goal to promote attack yet they allow all this other crap to take disadvantage attack.
  • A penalty and 10 in the bin is what was warranted.
    There's no way it could be said the Storm scorebthere. The ball was bouncing around and actually took a sharp turn. Very big chance he misses that.
    Anyway it's probably a 50:50 call.
  • Exactly Clive...or remember that run Mau was pinged with?
This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

HKF replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"I'm not suggesting throwing Lorenzo or any other young player in there now, they aren't ready, my point is they still won't be ready for a start in 2027 either so are we going to sign another 1 year stop gap 6 for 2027?."
39 seconds ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"Thanks KN/ EA. Just checking my gut feeling. Hopefully, he stays & makes good on his potential. I like his upside: footy nous, big body, kicking game, goal-kicker. Ain't many sixes offering all that. He's called by many in RU as a "Sua'ali'i clone…"
9 minutes ago
LB replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Cooper Cronk: On the Parramatta Eels, Pezet, Lomax and Recruitment
"Rasati might find his path to NRL replacing Russell or Penisini.
Do you see Talataina as the better talent and the must keep if only keep 1 EA?"
10 minutes ago
Slippery. replied to Eelawarra's discussion NRL LEGENDS EXPLAIN WHY THEY HATE BRETT KENNY

 Brett Kenny is the reason I support the Eels. He was the most naturally gifted player I have ever seen. In my opinion Imortal status he is worthy of. However, what I find even more bizarre is the fact that Brett Kenny was not once named in the…"
11 minutes ago
More…