Just want to get a general feel on opinion, should MA join the nrl side towards end of year in a 14 role (10-15 min) or should he stay in nsw cup and keep working on his craft. Plenty of good things in the 19s origin but also some issues with his game. Getting him into the nrl side could be good to see what that level is about so wouldn't mind him in the 14 for last couple of games. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • BEM, i see your pain and view mate; i think give the kid 2-3 games ideally it would have been better around origin time (if we were embedded in the top 4) but now for me do it later on in the season. Mate Lussick is not going to be our future, whereas MA will be or should be for me.

      • I agree about Lussick. 

        When most were saying he is great and better than Mahoney, I was saying he is bog average and we shouldn't be bringing him back.

        I just don't won't the young blokes confidence destroyed playing in our lacklustre 1st grade squad with a bum coach.

    • Cayless for coach BEM, I dont think so. He plays first grade it is with Moses, Brown, Gutherson and Hopgood, I will trust them to look after him and teach him more than he will learn in 3 seasons of Cup under Cayless! The kids already smarter than most of them!

      • Well said Poppa.

      • Cayless isn't there anymore so that's no longer a concern. 

    • Absolutely accurate 👍 

  • still a baby faced kid. what would he do if he see jarred run at him

    • Did you see the size of the blokes running against him last night?

  • No where near ready for 1st grade.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Mitchy replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"HOE, spot on, and you can only assume (and I know we can assume a lot) that his has occurred. I am really impressed with the club here and just hope we can get a decent win from this; as if not it will mean that the NRL and the stronger clubs…"
14 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"He certainly has Bobbie, I have been a past admirer of PVL and his astuteness, in this area he has shown himself to be complacent and mis reading the room...... My suspicions are he has become over confident and probably tired, unfortunately for him…"
19 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Hoey, That's an excellent point re Crawley.....one of the side benefits of these issues is seeing how the media is manipulated by their masters......its not just sugar you get when sqeezing cane, there is the side benefit of the Rum! Lol
 "
26 minutes ago
Hell On Eels replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Thanks, Mitchy. 
It's interesting, Crawley was emphatic on Feb 12 in backing the Eels, labelling Lomax’s case “complete nonsense.”
Since then, there’s been no follow-up column on Lomax despite significant reported developments, including messages…"
36 minutes ago
More…