Sack Ryles

This is simply embarrassing 16-0 against the wooden spooners at home. Ryles ain't a head coach. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Can't sack the new coach lol, he's just doing what he can with what's left of the team. Might take a year but have to reshape the whole team 

    • Agreed. We have half the Reserve Grade out there at the moment. I'll hold my judgement until the best 17 gets some game time.

      • He's basically stuck with 90% of what BA roster was and some rookies lol 

      • Won't make a difference, who we gonna beat "full strength "" ?

      • This reply was deleted.
        • We are also missing Matterson, Simonson, Lussick. Believe it or not, these are our in best 17 but poor form keeping some of these guys out. Yes recruitment is to blame here. We relied too heavily on juniors this season, but they are only getting a taste of NRL now. This is poor management from the club.

    • That's bull got rid of our best forward in Gillard and our captain it's all on him

      • 100%

        Shows his arrogance 

  • His cleaning bas mess, not his fault lol

    fuck we're a cursed club 

     

    • Correct Parrapowa, it's a huge mess that needs to be clean up - can't blame Jason it's not his fault but of course others will disagree 

       

    • In the offseason everyone was praising the great signings we'd made , we cut some overpaid players and had oodles of money to spend , and yet upgraded some poor options and bought virtually nobody of note other than Fox. Cant blame that on the last coach. Whilst I think we must give Ryles a chance , blaming BA is just wallpapering over the fact that we recruited poorly leading up to this season .  BA has been gone for almost 12 months. They had almost a whole year to get their shit together post BA . And here we are . 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Hell On Eels replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"LB, Eli, good discussion gents. We've acted in good-faith. By the book. With clean hands. Lomax appears not to. Regardless, equity is not unlikely to view an NRL-wide 3-year restraint until 31Oct 28' as overly-punitive and read it down.
We'd still…"
29 minutes ago
Coryn Hughes replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"The best thing for the Eels is if we say nothing our position is clear we only have to come back to the table if Melbourne come with something we see as advantageous for us that really is the bottom line.
Best thing about this there the ones doing…"
2 hours ago
Eli Stephens replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"If you look at it from a player for player deal, would you rather Lomax or Howarth if you are the Storm but ? I just don't see any way legally the storm can force the eels to hand them Lomax 🤣 either way don't really care what storm end up doing but…"
6 hours ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion Lomax legal promise could create salary-cap headache for Storm
"I know i have said it before but Storm fans say we are being unreasonable and see no outcome in which we win this case. Despite all the released, that is still the belief. I believe in bias and backing your team but come on.
But i do not think they…"
7 hours ago
More…