Sack Ryles

This is simply embarrassing 16-0 against the wooden spooners at home. Ryles ain't a head coach. 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Can't sack the new coach lol, he's just doing what he can with what's left of the team. Might take a year but have to reshape the whole team 

    • Agreed. We have half the Reserve Grade out there at the moment. I'll hold my judgement until the best 17 gets some game time.

      • He's basically stuck with 90% of what BA roster was and some rookies lol 

      • Won't make a difference, who we gonna beat "full strength "" ?

      • This reply was deleted.
        • We are also missing Matterson, Simonson, Lussick. Believe it or not, these are our in best 17 but poor form keeping some of these guys out. Yes recruitment is to blame here. We relied too heavily on juniors this season, but they are only getting a taste of NRL now. This is poor management from the club.

    • That's bull got rid of our best forward in Gillard and our captain it's all on him

      • 100%

        Shows his arrogance 

  • His cleaning bas mess, not his fault lol

    fuck we're a cursed club 

     

    • Correct Parrapowa, it's a huge mess that needs to be clean up - can't blame Jason it's not his fault but of course others will disagree 

       

    • In the offseason everyone was praising the great signings we'd made , we cut some overpaid players and had oodles of money to spend , and yet upgraded some poor options and bought virtually nobody of note other than Fox. Cant blame that on the last coach. Whilst I think we must give Ryles a chance , blaming BA is just wallpapering over the fact that we recruited poorly leading up to this season .  BA has been gone for almost 12 months. They had almost a whole year to get their shit together post BA . And here we are . 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Muttman replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"It's now out of the NRL's hands. If the court says the conditions of the release are valid and still stand then that is that. The NRL can't stomp all over the Eels' legal rights.  Lomax told the Eels in writing he was proceeding with the Storm…"
1 hour ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"You'd think it's in the NRL's best interest to be on Parra's side here. If they take the side of Lomax then every player contract means nothing. This is bigger than a single case- it could open up a world where players do whatever they want,…"
2 hours ago
Eelovution replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"When the announcement was made by the Eels regarding the dispute with Lomax, the club made a very important note in their commentary- the agreement was made in 'Good Faith'. This is a very important principle in legal agreements- both parties agree…"
3 hours ago
RB replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Yeah, but does that count if the opportunity never eventuated, is what I think they'll argue"
3 hours ago
More…