RYLES REVEALS WHY HE SIGNED PEZET FOR ONE YEAR

Parramatta coach Jason Ryles has described the signing of Jonah Pezet on a one-year deal as the “perfect storm”, an arrangement he believes will benefit all parties. The Eels on Wednesday officially announced they had secured Pezet for 2026, before he joins Brisbane the following year on a long-term deal to replace veteran halfback Adam Reynolds. Pezet, stuck behind the established Melbourne halves pairing of Cameron Munster and Jahrome Hughes, became a free agent after the latter signed a contract extension.

 

Parramatta’s decision to sign Pezet for only one season has divided blue-and-gold fans, with some believing they are developing a player for another club’s benefit.

 

Speaking for the first time about the unusual situation – that will result in Pezet playing for three clubs in as many years – Ryles said he felt it was a positive outcome for all parties.

 

“It just happened through circumstance really; he made himself a free agent and we saw a bit of a gap there with our depth,” Ryles said on Wednesday.

 

“[Back-up halfback] Dean Hawkins had made it pretty clear that he was keen to potentially move on if he could do something bigger and better, and we understood that. It was a bit of a perfect storm in that regard. That’s how it all happened, it wasn’t planned or perfect, but it ended up like that. Everyone benefits out of it.”

Ryles has a strong relationship with Pezet from their time together at the Storm and the pair were keen to reunite.

 

“I get on with everyone, obviously, but there’s one or two you always sort of gravitate to,” Ryles explained. “For whatever reason we did, and we just have that relationship there. We spoke in and around it, never thinking that anything like this would ever come up, and I wouldn’t do that to the Storm either. It was more just we had that relationship.”

 

Pezet has made only 18 NRL appearances since making his debut three years ago, but will get the chance to add to that tally alongside halves partner Mitchell Moses.

 

“He’s done a lot of hours of training and he spent a lot of time on the field and in [State] Cup, and had those [NRL] games as well,” Ryles said.

 

“His kicking game is one of his strengths and he’s a really good organiser. He understands the game and will compliment Mitchell really well. Joash [Papalii] is going to learn a lot off him and hopefully we can develop them both together. Jonah will benefit from Mitchell and Joash will benefit from Mitchell. We’ll just let them fight it out in the preseason.”

 

Parramatta have some of the best junior halves in the game already in their system. Lincoln Fletcher and Lorenzo Talataina are earmarked as likely successors to Pezet, but the club also has Talen Risati and Te Hurinui Twidle as options.

 

“It benefits everyone and it benefits the guys coming through,” Ryles said.

 

“The pathway that Jonah has chosen to take is a pretty good way to do it. He’s taken his time and making sure he gets the reps in because it’s a hard position to play, especially at NRL level, both physically and mentally. He’s given himself plenty of time to develop it and then this is just another part of his journey.”

 

Asked about the prospects of Fletcher and Talataina, Ryles said: “They’re obviously good young talents. They got us to the final of SG Ball, there’s no fluke in that, they were a big influence on that. They’ve got a long way to go in regards to seeing if they can make the NRL, but they’re certainly giving themselves every opportunity. It’s just going to be good for their development.

 

“I’m not going to say [their progression] is going to be a black-and-white strategy for us, but ideally we want to maximise what we’ve got in our pathways for us. This allowed us to do it, we want to continue to do that wherever we can.”

 

Ryles recently returned from a study tour of the UK alongside chairman Matthew Beach, CEO Jim Sarantinos and general manager of football Mark O’Neill. Highlights included spending time at EPL clubs Chelsea and Manchester United and rugby clubs Saracens and Bath.

 

“Obviously everyone does the PD [personal development] tours at the end of the year and everyone gets little bits out of them,” Ryles said.

 

“We got gold nuggets for us, but I reckon the most beneficial thing was [the four Eels officials] got to spend a week together. We got to do a little bit of planning for the club for the future and obviously get to know each other a little bit better. Whilst the PD was really good and high level, that was just as beneficial.”

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

    • I thought long-term would have been a goal and wanted it to be, but solid sources indicate a formal long-term contract was never tabled.

      Ryles isn't a hypnotist: Pezet wants to be a half not wait 4 years behind Moses or Hughes. Not for the Storm. Not for Us. Not anyone else. Refer his PO get out of Storm clause. Clear as day. Broncos are a perfect fit. 

       

      • Mate we are needing a half,  Moses can quite easily be shifted to 6 if the Pezet deal hinged on it.  I'm not buying this shit about it being positional.  It was good enough for Thurston and Moses was a 6. 

        It's not as if Moses would be getting a demotion .  

        • Moses wants to be the General. So does Pezet long-term. So your suggestion is: Moses would still be the General (a 7 but wear 6), while Pezet would play Robin, second-fuddle (a 6 but wear 7)? Fork me. Ryles needs to work on his hypnosis skills with some sandalwood.

          I'd love for it to work! A circle doesn't end up fitting in a square hole, even if you change the name of the circle to square.

          I'm not sure that would be enough to pull the wool over Team Pezet-Anasta's eyes. If I'm Pezet, I'd say thanks for the thought, but I want to play 7, wear 7, be a general, a half, long-term. I don't want to wait 4 years like I had to at the Storm with all this bollocks.

          Additionally, this, moving the centre of the universe for a rookie, Doggie-Galvin-style, I'm not sure, is a great strategy. It didn't help the Dogs much at the end of the year. They ended up going back to what was the more natural fit.

           

          • Ok that's different if you're suggesting Peasant wants to run a show and not just play as a 7.  I haven't read anything about him saying he wants to run his own team.  Big jump from playing NSW cup to running the possibly 2 time premiers in 12 months. I'm not buying it. 

            Our situation is totally different to Melbournes where he'll possibly be behind Wishart , Munster and Hughes.  We could offer him a full time starting gig in the halves.  From there he's the master of his own domain.  Suggesting he only chose to go to Brisbane due to some egotistical garbage about playing second fiddle seems a stretch at 22 lol. 

            Canterbury again, is not comparable .  We wouldn't be moving a guy out of the squad. Mitch is the captain, so any success is a reflection on him . Would you rather be a winning captain @6 or a loser in the  7 ?  Again seems egotistical. 

            Me thinks people are just looking for excuses as to why it makes sense he chose another club that doesn't insinuate it's because they're a better club. 

            • Wizzy, Let’s not go off the reservation, naively. Elite sportspeople have egos. We all do.

              Bollocks, a 22yo can’t. Pezet will be 23 soon. Sam Walker debuted at half at 19, full-time for the Roosters (21 games debut year, after Keary's injury). Keary didn't play with him that year, so we can cross that off as an "excuse", because it's fictional.

              My understanding is he wants to be a half — to became that General and organizer that his kicking game suits. He has said on the record he feels he is ready to be a seven at NRL. 

              Why in the heck do you think he had a PO get out clause to get out of Storm long-term contract as soon as Hughes, their seven, re-signed?

              He's already had a taste of NRL on-off 2023-25. He's already waited for years. But he doesn’t want to wait for another four years behind a Moses or Hughes. Yes, Call it ego. Nature’s calling. The Call of the Wild.

               

               

              • He had the clause so he could play NRL .  I think we are getting carried away suggesting he wants his very own team and that's the be all and end all of why he chose Brisbane.   

                So if something happens and Brisbane sign an experienced player to partner him and be the senior half , for 2027 , you're saying he'll want out and seek a release  ? 

                • It's both. Blind Freddy can see that. He wants to play NRL. But he's already waited in the wings for 3yrs at NRL level at the Storm. 23 next year, It's utterly naive to assume he's going to wait another 4yrs to get a shot at his dream: at seven. He literally said he's ready to play "seven" at NRL. That's what he wants. His game is more suited to that. His PO activated in relation to Hughes (7) immediately speaks to that. Anasta will protect his interests at all times.

                  Comparing Moses and Reynolds, though, is comparing apples and oranges. Realistically.

                  Moses

                  • Just turned 31
                  • Prime as a seven even if father time will catch up on him. A General. Origin Class. Kangaroo tour
                  • Never won a GF; fire in the belly (celebrates a coin toss win)
                  • Spent the last 9 years (almost 200 games) becoming a seven and General, after transitioning from six at the Tigers (75 games)
                  • Why would he throw the General role away? To please Pezet? I doubt Ryles is that silly, tbh. You say it's not a demotion? C'mon He'd be prepared for a short-term stint, say Origin or rep footy under Cleary. But long-term, I reckon it's pipe dreaming.

                  Reynolds

                  • Will be 36 mid-next year
                  • Twilight of his career
                  • Won 2 GFs
                  • Below Moses/Cleary types in Origin/Rep pecking order
                  • Spent 14 years as a general, a seven (21-35yo); some say it's not possible at 22? He did it at 21 (Sam Walker at 19) Egotistical?
                  • Would he be prepared to let Pezet take the reigns in 2027 and play a six-mentoring role? 
                  • Would he be willing to do that, demoted from a role he's played for 14 years and 300 plus game career, and wear six for the first time in 15yrs as well as probably accept a pay cut? Maybe, if he had no other options and it was for a year or two before retiring. Convenience. Let's see. There's a lot of moving pieces there. For Pezet it depends where that puts him.

                  If Reynolds didn't want to play ball, maybe the Broncos could go for an agreeable Luke Keary type: I'll be Robin, helping you become our Batman. 

                  PS: I was initially hoping Pezet might be prepared to play six under Moses for years, and be seven cover, maybe even try your idea (which is doomed to fail) but all that was completely unrealistic and naive.

                   

                  • I think we are in agreement he wants to play 7. My dispute is that he only chose Brisbane due to him wanting to be the big swinging dick.  It's naive to suggest we are as equally attractive as Brisbane all things positional being the same.

                    If Jarome left Melbourne and he got to have his number 7 , do you think he'd be the big bossman over Munster ?   

                    We never stood a chance even if he was able to be captain coach and number 7. 

                    Totally used and cuckolded and did a huge favour for both Anasta and Peasant . 

                • It is the be all and end all why he chose Brisbane. Name a 7 that doesn't run or own a team. HOE is 100% correct in everything he said.

                  • So if Munster left and he was offered his position he'd have still wanted out of Melbourne ?   No , so it's not the be all and end all dopey. Or vice versa , he wouldn't be running the show next to Munster AND as has been confirmed , he was happy to stay until Hugues extended . So that wipes your theory out . Hed be second fiddle to Munster end of debate. 


                    So if I can name one halfback that didn't own their team will you promise to vanish for a month ?  I'll take this bet if you will. 

                    How about , almost anyone who played with Locky for a start.   See ya in December champ. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Jonah Pezet Deal: An Optical Illusion?
"I really like pears"
3 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Jonah Pezet Deal: An Optical Illusion?
"Hoe, comments like that are why 1EE needs a "Like" button"
5 minutes ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Jonah Pezet Deal: An Optical Illusion?
"hahaha"
9 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Jonah Pezet Deal: An Optical Illusion?
"When you learn to stop hating Chiefy you can start to be accepted as a credible person.
It does you no accolades to have a "most hated player" in your iteniary, maybe when your intellect gets somewhere above that of a 14 year old you may understand…"
12 minutes ago
More…