Ryles confirms Pezet play

Michael Chammas is reporting, though not final, the deal is close. The reason for the deal is they only want Pezet for one year max to not block the path of their talent of the future. https://www.zerotackle.com/munster-reveals-contract-intention-ryles-confirms-pezet-play-228340/

 

Well it is hard as Joash more likely plays Fullback in Cup and with Hawkins and Volkman more likely the halves in Cup, where does Talataina get reps other than Flegg? Still do not agree with it but Ryles has a plan and all we can do is hope for the best. It is very weird but i wonder, just wonder if there is more to it here where we have a Brisbane player on our mind and this is a type of you can have him if you do this. 

Not saying It is the case, tin foil hat theory.

But Ryles has a plan behind it, not saying i think it makes sense but let's see how it goes.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Anasta and Brisbane are going thanks for doing our job for us Parra well done.

    • As  much as I disagree with this whole exercise.....I refuse to believe that Ryles involvement is anything but bad judgement and not any favours to Anasta or anyone else for that matter. Doesn't mean Anasta is not an influence notwithstanding!

      I alternatively could be coerced into thinking that somehow Bellamey has advised Ryles!

      This rationale of not wanting to hold back juniors by appointing Pezet has that smell of "bullshit" that Ryles alluded to in his podcast with the "Johns Boys"......just cannot rationalise it.....we went after Pezet (disagree but subjectively) for a term period i.e 3/4 year contract. At this point I understand the intention!   BUT WAIT

      Anasta comes forward with a new player in the game (Bronco's) and then Ryles has been told you are going to miss him because of ....lets say money or wants to be a Bronc.

      Ryles then relents to the suggestion of the swap to make up for the difference of his disappoinment in losing him altogether, justifies the "smell of bullshit" with the perception of a partial win.

      This may be deep, but being an old money market trader I have seen how convoluted thinking can fuck you in the head.....someone needs to get to Ryles and explain he has fcuked up!!!

      • You did say yesterday though you were laughing at us for believing this. So now you believe it?

        • I don't want to believe it LB, BUT if it walks like a duck, looks like a duck and goes quack quack it is pretty hard to ignore..... I get up Eli for not expressing his own opinion and mimicking the journalists.......never let it be said that Poppa doesn't express his own!! 

          PS You have probbaly realised by now that I don't give a fuck about what other people see me as on social media.

      • Pops what I more have an issue with is this club has 2-3 years to win a comp.We aren't winning next year and Moses still doesn't have a right hand man.

        I'm not interested in it being JR's fault or questioning his judgment I'm looking at the reality of this situation we are burning MM's prime it's not lasting forever and we still have a huge hole in the spine into filled.

        This is the bigger issue this club searching for a coach was a fiasco and now we are seemingly repeating history and we haven't learnt our lesson.

        • So if we're now winning in 2026,  where do you see us finishing up Coryn?????????

          • Anything past what we did this year and show growth that's a win if we make the 8 that's overachieving for me.

  • Is it just me or does this reek of Ryles letting his personal relationship with Briath & Pezet influence his descision here at the cost of the club?

    As you pointed out this  forces the 2 primary 6 long term options to FB and Flegg respectivley where their development will be stunted. Additionally we will may lose promising players like Twidle to accomodate the shuffle caused by Pezet coming.

    I wonder if it was a player that he had no relationship with would he make the same move?

    • Well that is the thing, neither of them i feel will see full benefit of the year developing when they are not starting at 5/8 in either competition. 

      I do not rate Joash highly as a 5/8, though he is ok and passable. Can we get by with him at 5/8? Maybe and that is a way for him to develop further by playing FG at that spot. I wonder if Volkman had signed a top 30 deal when he signed his dev deal for us, as he could be blocking Talataina playing NSW Cup in 2026 regularly. Volkman was good in Cup, but if Talataina is the future he needs reps in open age footy.

      • Im prob alot higher on Joash then you and was excited to see how he would develop after getting a full preseaon at 6. In a perfect world he starts 2026 as 5/8 and Pezet is purley Mitches back up.

        Volkman is a great attacking player but he is poor defensivley and his body language leaves a lot to be desired in my eyes.

        If they really are all in on Lorenzo (which is a dumb position in my eyes not because hes not talented but becuase jnr development isnt an excact science and isnt linear so whilst he looks good now doesnt mean he will look good in 2027) He needs to play NSW cup. This means 2 of Joash, Volkman, Hawkins, Twidle need to leave to get an opportunity. Massive distruption to accomodate a 1 year deal

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Ryles never wanted Pezet as a long-term signing- Chammas
"It is confusing as Anasta did say we wanted long term deal, then said originally it was always meant to be a loan. I would take a lot of what Anasta says about Pezet's ability with a grain of salt. What is he going to say? "Brisbane signed an…"
1 minute ago
The Captain replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Joash to keep his 6 jersey - Pezet the back up for Moses
"Pezet isn't leaving Melbourne to sit in reserves. That makes no sense. He was getting plenty of injury cover time at Melbourne because their spine are frequently injured.
We are signing him for 1 year because we're desperate as the other plans to…"
1 minute ago
Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐 replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Joash to keep his 6 jersey - Pezet the back up for Moses
"Cover up lol.   Can you identify the person at the club that actually said we didn't want Pezet  long term PM, or do you just believe every single thing a reporter rumour.says. jesh"
3 minutes ago
Perpetual Motion replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Joash to keep his 6 jersey - Pezet the back up for Moses
"Thats the thing, I dont care that we didnt sign him long term, its all the BS and cover up that makes us the laughing stock of the NRL"
6 minutes ago
More…