Replies

        • if we drop Paulo who do we bring? We dont have the roster to accomodate it

          • Anyone, he doesn't get massive metres, lead the tackle count or put on any hits. May as well play lussick prop as you get the same inept go forward 

        • Should have kept RCG and got rid of Paulo

    • I would have preferred a rotation of Arthur and Smith at hooker. Either one on the bench in 14. I just got a feeling that would have worked.

      • I would prefer Joash on the bench.

        When Smith needs a break, move Brown to hooker and Joash to 5/8.

        • Maybe Ryles should train up one of the forwards to give Smith a rest at dummy half, possibly Doorey?

           

          • Why waste time and resources for that though? Hopgood can do it and is in the team everyweek.

            • Smith has been given about 55 mins in his first 2 games, that could easily be pushed out to about 60 - 65..  He starts then gets a break about 10 before half-time.  I'd rather his replacement have fresh legs at that time of the game than Hopgood who's been busting his balls for 30 mins.

              I do think 4 forwards on the bench will help

        • I would not put Papali'i at 6. He is 5"5, imagine Olakau'atu running at him? Plus has played way more Fullback than 5/8. So he would not be used to defending as much as he would need to in 5/8.

  • Jr really has been speaking to the wok! Real wok stuff This.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"Yep he said it can be used for their junior development
He said exactly it was a great deal."
4 minutes ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to LB's discussion V'Landys on Hello Sport
"This isn't just Vlandy's doing.  We all know certain clubs seem to get everything there own way and all this is doing is allowing the fans to see what has been happening for years due to the court case.
Protected clubs using the NRL to bully smaller…"
4 minutes ago
fake midget pseudoachondroplasia replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"Lomax has played this perfectly for his boxing career not so much for his footy career or reputation.
If he is as good as reports say, he will earn a lot in boxing as he is getting the public to hate him which means they will tune in hoping he gets…"
21 minutes ago
Mitchy replied to Hell On Eels's discussion The Eels v Lomax: Timeline and Key Questions
"HOE, spot on, and you can only assume (and I know we can assume a lot) that his has occurred. I am really impressed with the club here and just hope we can get a decent win from this; as if not it will mean that the NRL and the stronger clubs…"
36 minutes ago
More…