Replies

          • I understand that but replacing poor with utter crap is just as bad.

            • I don't remember lussick being as bad as hands has been the first two games. He isn't as good but I don't think his floor is as low as hands.

      • Paulo should of been dropped 3 years ago..

        • if we drop Paulo who do we bring? We dont have the roster to accomodate it

          • Anyone, he doesn't get massive metres, lead the tackle count or put on any hits. May as well play lussick prop as you get the same inept go forward 

        • Should have kept RCG and got rid of Paulo

    • I would have preferred a rotation of Arthur and Smith at hooker. Either one on the bench in 14. I just got a feeling that would have worked.

      • I would prefer Joash on the bench.

        When Smith needs a break, move Brown to hooker and Joash to 5/8.

        • Maybe Ryles should train up one of the forwards to give Smith a rest at dummy half, possibly Doorey?

           

          • Why waste time and resources for that though? Hopgood can do it and is in the team everyweek.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

ian glover replied to Poppa's discussion Poppas Corner; JAC is proving to be a real Jewell
"I would still keep Lomax in the centres. Either way, the best backline they have had in a few years, "
4 hours ago
ian glover replied to Poppa's discussion Poppas Corner; JAC is proving to be a real Jewell
"I  thought the ball was going dead  when watching on tv. It was a split second decision so really not a big mistake, albeit costly at that stage of the game. I love watching the Fox, I think he brings a lot of energy and confidence that rubs off on…"
4 hours ago
Muttman replied to Poppa's discussion Poppas Corner; JAC is proving to be a real Jewell
"Agreed"
4 hours ago
ian glover replied to ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER's discussion Magic round NRL makes me sick
"That makes sense."
4 hours ago
More…