RULE CHANGES IF HEAD INJURY PROTECTION IS PRIORITY #1.

 

 If the NRL are serious about head injuries moving forward, these rule changes should be considered.

 1. Many head injuries occur due to high-speed collisions. The best way to reduce collision speed is by shortening the space between defenders and attackers. To do this the 10-metre rule must be made less, possibly 5-metres would be the best option. Another area that currently provides many high-speed collisions is from kick-offs. Changing this part of the game is nearly impossible unless the kick-off is removed totally. 

 2. Player numbers in tackles and target areas. If the total number of players allowed in tackles was set at 3 and contact was limited to below the shoulders would help. If players were somehow rewarded for legs tackles coaches would quickly change the way players are expected to tackle currently. 

 3. The shoulder charge rule. I have said for many years the current shoulder charge rule is stupid. Shoulder charging is not allowed if your defending. The ball carrier can turn their upper body and shoulder charge as much as they want. The shoulder charge must be either allowed but punished severely if head contact happens, or it must be banned totally for both attackers and defenders.

 4. Lower the amount of interchanges. When you have fresh players more often on the field collision speed is increased more often. Lowering the interchange rule by 50% from 8 down to 4 would work in more than 1 way. Not only would it result in lowering the amount of time with fresh players on the field it would also change the ideal body shape we see today. The average weight of players would become lower and the smaller / faster players would become more valuable. 

 

 Obviously, there would be many other rules that should be looked at. Unfortunately, it's only a matter of time until former players suffering from head injuries caused by playing Rugby League take legal action. If / when this happens the NRL could have massive problems. Personally, I can't see how the NRL would survive if enough former players joined each other and took the NRL to court.

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Change the rules around back slams too. Usually happen when a player is wrapped up by two others, cowardly tackle for mine. There's some simple answers, but the overall problem is a hard one without making the game less. 

  • Head protection mandatory.  

    2 men in tackle tops. 

     

    • Brain trauma is caused by impact.  Head protection does not stop impact/dispacement etc to the brain within the skull,  It protects from cuts and the like.  

      • What he said 👆, headgear has been proven to be ineffective for concussions.  NFL players wear helmets and they're still suffering brain trauma based injuries in their post playing years. 

  • Or we can just acknowledge and accept that Rugby League is a violent & dangerous sport and the people who play it at the professional level know this and accept the risks. 

    • About 50% of what everyone else mentioned and 50% of what you just said but there needs to be both. 

    • I don't think so Brett  The sporting body has a responsibility and has lessened the risks somewhat over the past 5 years and still discussions need to be had on how to further lessen the risk. 

       

      • With everything they've done there are still as many concussions as before. 

        • yes but now they are coming off the field not playing on like the old days and missing the following weeks game to 

    •  No Brett Allen we can't take that approach anymore. Unlike boxing and MMA where everyone knows the intention is to strike the head many times, head Knocks in the NRL are not the intention, so players need to be protected by the game as much as possible, the game has a duty of care and legal action could badly damage the game if it can be shown the games administrators did not infact afford the players a duty of care as best as reasonably possible with rule changes and punishments. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Michael Ennis sucking the c** of Dylan Brown
"It wont be on Brown but fans and media will make it on him."
18 seconds ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Michael Ennis sucking the c** of Dylan Brown
"Brown was distracted this year and i wonder if he had his time again and given the offer later would he accept it? He more likely still would but seemed he was wondering about his decision. But Brown is coming into his peak as a half, usually mid…"
1 minute ago
Blue Eel replied to Prof. Daz's discussion Moses on Pezet
"I'm not the religious type Pops, so I've chosen to always believe in Santa and his furry friends. They at least bring presents."
35 minutes ago
Richard Jackson replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin 🐐's discussion Michael Ennis sucking the c** of Dylan Brown
"How dylan goes next year depends whether or not the Knights can bolster their pack over the orf season.
If they do Brown will at six be teamed up with halfback Fletcher Sharpe and they would be a good combination, Sharpe is also a talent.
What…"
35 minutes ago
More…