Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • That was the point of putting this up. If we went into the knit picking of this game you will find that around 9 times in the game the Warriors were were given the olive branch from the refs, while we were given it 3 times, if I remember correctly - it was something like this. The point is we won the game regardless of al the crap reffing going on. 

      • This reply was deleted.
        • This reply was deleted.
  • Who cares, he had to slow down to catch it, he caught it way in front from where the ball was passed, it was called a forward pass and you move on. It could have been the winning pass. We would be here saying, look how it travelled forward. Again, who cares we move on. Bring on the Dragons!!! 

  • It went a little forward from the point he threw it but maybe was not forward relative to where he would have been if he kept travelling at the same velocity. 50/50 decision by the same refs and linesmen that missed an obvious Warriors knockon that led to their second try and was a major turning point in the first half. The refs seemed to make a bad decision and then try to even it up and were constantly chasing their tails trying to even up

  • Ball came out of his hand backwards then floated forward. Play on, try, warriors win.

    • You can’t say Warriors win. There was still 4 minutes left and we play the last 4 minutes completely differently if we were behind. Parramatta has probably been on the wrong end of these sort of calls no less than 4 or 5 times this year. The referee ruled on this and he was in the best position anyone in the ground was to rule on it. They are in a no win situation here. The bunker can’t rule, they alone have to make a decision. If he lets it go on, plenty of Parramatta supporters would be unhappy if wasn’t ruled forward. 

      • Warriors win.

  • thought it was a try live

  • Forward to me.

  • It was forward. I have seen Foxtel footage illustrating exactly where the players were when the ball was passed and where it was caught. The player catching the ball is at least two metres in front of where the ball left RTShek’s hands.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"Yeah the fact he came out and pretty much responded to the favouritism chat, shows he is listening and is concerned as well. He could have not commented with the approach of I'm the boss and can do as pleased but he is concerned. 
Let's be honest…"
35 seconds ago
Randy Handlinger replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"I gazed into my crystal bong and it told me that the Mullahs in Iran see the armada gathering off their coast, realise regime change is happening and go scorched earth. Taking out all Gulf oil terminals is within their abilities. Stock Market gonna…"
11 minutes ago
LB replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"The back peddling is strong with this one. What a liar, he made it clear with the $300k is a great deal comment.
But on a side note, it is mentioned and true that a strong storm is crucial for tv deal. But at the same time does that mean…"
12 minutes ago
Adam Magrath replied to Johnny Suede's discussion V’landys denies favouritism towards Storm & Lomax; Parra Leagues to back case "to the bitter end"
"I was reading this morning about the US supreme Court's ruling on Donnie's tariffs. Be interesting to see what happens to the stock market."
21 minutes ago
More…