Replies

  • This reply was deleted.
    • That was the point of putting this up. If we went into the knit picking of this game you will find that around 9 times in the game the Warriors were were given the olive branch from the refs, while we were given it 3 times, if I remember correctly - it was something like this. The point is we won the game regardless of al the crap reffing going on. 

      • This reply was deleted.
        • This reply was deleted.
  • Who cares, he had to slow down to catch it, he caught it way in front from where the ball was passed, it was called a forward pass and you move on. It could have been the winning pass. We would be here saying, look how it travelled forward. Again, who cares we move on. Bring on the Dragons!!! 

  • It went a little forward from the point he threw it but maybe was not forward relative to where he would have been if he kept travelling at the same velocity. 50/50 decision by the same refs and linesmen that missed an obvious Warriors knockon that led to their second try and was a major turning point in the first half. The refs seemed to make a bad decision and then try to even it up and were constantly chasing their tails trying to even up

  • Ball came out of his hand backwards then floated forward. Play on, try, warriors win.

    • You can’t say Warriors win. There was still 4 minutes left and we play the last 4 minutes completely differently if we were behind. Parramatta has probably been on the wrong end of these sort of calls no less than 4 or 5 times this year. The referee ruled on this and he was in the best position anyone in the ground was to rule on it. They are in a no win situation here. The bunker can’t rule, they alone have to make a decision. If he lets it go on, plenty of Parramatta supporters would be unhappy if wasn’t ruled forward. 

      • Warriors win.

  • thought it was a try live

  • Forward to me.

  • It was forward. I have seen Foxtel footage illustrating exactly where the players were when the ball was passed and where it was caught. The player catching the ball is at least two metres in front of where the ball left RTShek’s hands.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Poppa replied to Poppa's discussion Poppas Corner; Kangaroo Tour Upcoming..... early discussion
"No that's fine, I do these things out of my head, interestingly enough I always got the 62/63 series as 2 years and cannot remember why. Dementia is an excuse these days, you should see me with my grandkids names, I even confuse them with our dogs.…"
2 minutes ago
Poppa replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Reversing Four Years of Regression
"Great post Hammer, could not agree more!"
10 minutes ago
SuperEel 22 replied to Mr 'BringBackFitzy' Analyst's discussion Wouldn't bloody read about it!!! Joke!!
"We didn't get any dispensation for Shaun."
31 minutes ago
HAMMER replied to Hell On Eels's discussion Reversing Four Years of Regression
"I think the "2nd year syndrome" will be the next big test for Ryles. Most of what we acheived in the latter half of the season was through attitude & discipline, even if other teams figure out how you play & try to come up with plans to counteract…"
34 minutes ago
More…