You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
More stuff to read
"Email was sent yesterday. Should be from Parramatta Leagues Club Ltd, not Parramatta Leagues Directors."
"The usual suspects. They need to get a hobby.
I may be going crazy as I can't see any link to vote in that email. I see 2 links - AGM page, Pitt-town Amalgamation page."
I may be going crazy as I can't see any link to vote in that email. I see 2 links - AGM page, Pitt-town Amalgamation page."
"The purpose of the article was to be an article. Content baby, yeah. It is adding a slant to an article that was going to run anyways. It is not a straight up placed hit-piece"
"I noticed these subtleties as well DAZ but what is the pupose of this article except as a click bait, it tells nothing really? is trying to sway public opinion, which is overwhlemingly in our favour? or trying to influence the decision of the…"
Replies
That was the point of putting this up. If we went into the knit picking of this game you will find that around 9 times in the game the Warriors were were given the olive branch from the refs, while we were given it 3 times, if I remember correctly - it was something like this. The point is we won the game regardless of al the crap reffing going on.
Hahaha nice
Who cares, he had to slow down to catch it, he caught it way in front from where the ball was passed, it was called a forward pass and you move on. It could have been the winning pass. We would be here saying, look how it travelled forward. Again, who cares we move on. Bring on the Dragons!!!
It went a little forward from the point he threw it but maybe was not forward relative to where he would have been if he kept travelling at the same velocity. 50/50 decision by the same refs and linesmen that missed an obvious Warriors knockon that led to their second try and was a major turning point in the first half. The refs seemed to make a bad decision and then try to even it up and were constantly chasing their tails trying to even up
Ball came out of his hand backwards then floated forward. Play on, try, warriors win.
You can’t say Warriors win. There was still 4 minutes left and we play the last 4 minutes completely differently if we were behind. Parramatta has probably been on the wrong end of these sort of calls no less than 4 or 5 times this year. The referee ruled on this and he was in the best position anyone in the ground was to rule on it. They are in a no win situation here. The bunker can’t rule, they alone have to make a decision. If he lets it go on, plenty of Parramatta supporters would be unhappy if wasn’t ruled forward.
Warriors win.
thought it was a try live
Forward to me.
It was forward. I have seen Foxtel footage illustrating exactly where the players were when the ball was passed and where it was caught. The player catching the ball is at least two metres in front of where the ball left RTShek’s hands.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next