Very interested in the charges--if any--the Dog`s Reynolds faces this coming week. He ought to be charged on three accounts. But what ought to be with Canterbury and what is, are two different things. They seem to have an angle at their table. I wonder who it could be? I will make a prediction, against all odds, Reynolds will not be charged at all, or if charged, will be found innocent! Conversely, Junior Paulo will be charged and will be found guilty and do time thus missing the Eels -Dogs match. Its not what you know its who you know. To change subject a little , Craig Bellamy is quiet correct in blaming referee Kline in the Storms lose at Newcastle. A penalty count of seven nil to Newcastle in the second half is appalling. But it is nothing new. The penalties always go to Newcastle at Newcastle. The Eels have no chance of winning the game against the Knights at Newcastle--coming up. With the referees biased to the Knights the Eels should forfeit that match, give the two points away and not suffer injury and hope we have enough points to make the eight. It will make a statement about the appalling refereeing.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
rosay, don`t forget the guarding angle!
MontoEel that is the point I was making. We will see in the next couple of days.
He should be looking at 4 weeks for the trip minimum, let alone the kick to the face and the head high tackle.
They should really throw the book at him, doubt they will but.
Alan Hunt, I agree entirely with what you say. If it were an Eels player that is what would happen. Canterbury have an olive wreath around their head. I`m tipping no case to answer for Reynolds and Junior Paulo to do time.
Right and proper too if you are focusing on going forward and protecting the brand--now where have I heard that before?
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 5 Next