Great gutsy win by the Eels but gee, the refereeing was again disgraceful. Not to allow Reed Mahoney that try in the 2nd half (in spite of the stupid rules) was ridiculous, why not play advantage? I've seen heaps of those not get penalised! I lost count of how many penalties were given to the Knights for high shots and yet the Knights were seldom penalised for the same infringement. It was also deplorable how the referee tried to assist the Knights back into the game in the 2nd half. Eels should have won the game by more. Glad they won nevertheless.
You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!
Replies
Apparently today was only the second game in 11 years Sutton has lost a game for the Knights.(in Newcastle)
Haha he will be filthy...
I think he was morw worried about his car tgan tge game. Those Newy fans were calling out all game for six again and he obliged.
Mitchell pierce accidental of side play on just before they had that no try could of been costly
Agree but he certainly tried to get the game to golden point.
Bup was right ponga has been watching Cameron smiths book of milking -
It all started from the kick off, where the touchie said Lane had put his foot out. LOL fmd they were woeful.
I was watching fox did Lane even put his foot on the line off the kick off it didn't look like it.
Bup, it didn't look like Lane was out on the Nine coverage and brissyeel I have to agree with you on all those.
With the Lane no try, Andrew Johns or it could've been Freddy said the game isn't played in slow motion and probably should've been a try. Sterlo also said that Parra were hard done by with the Reed Mahoney no try.
On a different note, it was the first time in a long time that I've watched a game on Nine and I gotta say I much prefer Fox.
in times past, that would have rattled our cage. We're a very mentally tough team now and can deal with that sort of rubbish.
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next