Replies

        • He is good yes. I would take him.

          • This reply was deleted.
            • You need a mix of established stars and promising juniors.

              AFB is an established dominant forward.

              Hollis/Rodwell/Greig/Kaufusi can still be bench forwards doing their apprenticeship even if we buy AFB.

            • So how many more years are you prepared to wait for that to be a possability based on an if?  RCG is proven, these others are not.

              • This reply was deleted.
                • Remember the season after we lost Semi? We came dead bloody last. If BA falls out of the top 8 he is toast.

                  The answer to not having those big cap hits long term is short contracts. 

                  • We didn't finish last because we lost Semi. 2018 was a confluence of a number of different forces. 

                    • One of the factors being that we lost the best winger in the comp and tried to replace him with a reserve grader in George Jennings. It went just about as well as you would predict. Terribly.

                      This just illustrates the point that you can't replace rep quality players with reserve graders and expect the same outcome.

                      Replacing RCG with a reserve grader will have the same outcome. You need a like for like replacement. You can't just WISH that one of the juniors or reserve graders will turn rep quality. It doesn't work that way.

                • Would you run your business with just apprentices ? You need quality experienced tradesman. We haven't had fuck all tradesmen in any of the key positions for the current players in said positions to learn off .  No Hooker , no 5/8 , No halfback , RCG is the first real big bopper our young bucks can take something from. Yes they'll have next year , but unless they're exceptional talents it's not enough. Anyone that's played grade as a young bloke knows who showed them the ropes. It was always the older blokes you absorbed off. . 

                  • We still have Junior, Nathan Brown, Papa & Ryan Matterson. Our forward pack is not lacking for toughness, experience or leadership. 

                  • This reply was deleted.
                    • There's a fair resume amongst their pack. Not to mention they've done their apprenticeship under a fair bunch of pommy brothers. 

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

Clintorian replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"I fee like we need one maniac in the pack... it could be Moretti, but we do need someone with some real aggression that can lay a platform for the other athletic forwards."
13 minutes ago
Hell On Eels posted a discussion
 

More Than a Contract
Everyone understands the Zac Lomax situation isn’t really just about a contractual dispute. A registered agreement. Legal technicalities. R360 gone pear-shaped. Timelines. Even Storm agendas. That version is neat.…
27 minutes ago
Alfred Mateo replied to Johnny Suede's discussion The Tele has ranked the Eels forward pack 9th for season '26 (Roosters at #1)
"Can't argue with that. Hopgood might be in the mix for origin selection but no real mongrels/tough hombres in our current pack.
Interesting to see how Newcastle goes this year. On paper, their backline is probably ranked in the top 5 but some doubt…"
34 minutes ago
EelsAgeMe replied to EelsAgeMe's discussion The Lomax Case: What Are We Missing?
"Doing things in 'good faith' doesn't stand up in this cut throat business. It's like the good old handshake deal when your word and a handshake meant something. You respected each other.  Unfortunately, respect and honour means shit in the court of…"
35 minutes ago
More…