Podcast Debate: Have Your Say

Some fans want major changes and sackings at the club. Some want minor changes.

Others think the club needs stability and patience.

And some,  like me, are strongly against calls to sack people like Jim Sarantinos and want to leave club decisions to the club.

So we’re thinking about hosting a civilised fan debate on the podcast, featuring voices from both sides.

We’re looking for volunteers (say up to 3) willing to respectfully back their opinions on change and discuss the direction of the club.

Be bold. Be courageous. And we can keep it respectful.

I’m a complete podcast novice myself, so don’t worry about being polished or experienced. I'm pretty poor at it. This isn’t professional media, it’s just fans having their say on social media.

This is your opportunity for the club to hear your voice. Literally. Who's up for it? 

 

 

 

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I will volunteer HOE hahaha

  • This is a great idea HOE! There are some really strong and interesting voices on this site and it'd be cool to hear them debate it out in real time.

    • Cap will you come on to be the judge? Haha.

      • Debate moderator - takes me back to high school days.

        I'll declare the winner, and then the club has to take that winners advice as legally binding orders. laughing

        • Cap, you'd be great representative to argue in favour of changes. Hopefully, we can get at least two. Two heads are better than one. Maybe you and LB?

          I'm staying out of declaring winners. There could be outrage over moderator bias if we don't lose lol.

          We can preserve people's privacy even give them an alias or whatever works for people.

  • Love this idea, HOE. 

    If there is even a 1% chance the club listen to this, I'd definitely put my hand up for it.

    More than happy to be debated on any point I've made, or many others have made, in regards to recruitment. 

  • Great idea Hoe! That's a winning concept. Nos and Capt have expressed the position for considered change in recruitment strategies,  and the call for an inquiry into what is going wrong has been supported by both. They would both do the cause a great service in a debate forum. Coryn has some great views as well. I'd enjoy listening to them, and presenting the reasons for certain things to improve.

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

The Captain replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LARIE DALEY
"Edwards, Moses, Strange and Brailey should be the spine.
But NSW doing NSW things have made sure that Teddy and Cleary will keep their spots even though they were both super average. Yes, a few clutch moments when we had an extra player on the…"
8 minutes ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LARIE DALEY
"The only difference was Walsh got hit after passing so the argument was he was relaxed and his head hit the floor after. What made it worse for Ponga, to be send off, was not rapping the arm."
20 minutes ago
HH - Love You Iongi Time! replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LARIE DALEY
"Was not a send off. Definitely a sin bin.
Have not seen too many replays however he did not wrap his arms around in a genuine tackle attempt and even though there was head to head contact it was still a dangerous, high risk play. 
Koula was…"
28 minutes ago
BlacJac replied to Cʜɪᴇғy Mclovin's discussion SACK LARIE DALEY
"Agree with the horrible post game interviews, didn't realise how much better Fox was than 9 until this game. Can't stand 9 presentation "
30 minutes ago
More…