The first origin without the extra ref Cam Smith for a long time so I was very interested in the play the ball speed and other things which I kept a close eye on.
I know so called journalists such as buzz rothfield and others who criticise the penalty crack down probably wet their pants with excitement thinking they forced the refs into less penalties and will print as much in upcoming stories as not too many were blown. But if you watch game and pay attention you will release the play the balls were lot quicker then usual and players made genuine attempts to get on side minus the Inglis tackle on tommy turbo from 3 metres offside.
To me that shows players are capable of delivering high quality product without conceeding penalties however are coached to do so in club games.
It also shows the affect Cam Smith has had particularly in origin knowing not as many penalties are blown. This allowed him to wrestle and hold players as he was involved in over 40 penalties a game and other players followed his lead. He is the best wrestler and ref manipulator by a country mile and gets very few penalties blown against him. That led to refs allowing more leeway to both sides as it hard let Smith and co. hold nsw for few extra seconds without giving nsw more time as well (although usually less then smith and qld were allowed) slowing origin games for recent years.
This was one of the more free flowing origins in recent memory and not just because of the players each team picked but for who wasn't there.
I would like to know if others also think results of qld winning or lack of shoulder charge and biffo aren't what has hurt origin recently with many feeling it had lost some of its spark. I think Smith was so dominant in changing ruck speed not only for his team but any game he was involved in. Especially in origin knowing penalties aren't blown for offside play and wrestling as often, it prevented the talent to shine through and we got more grinding style matches. This played into qld hand to clinch close games late with their experience as happened in many series clinching wins.
Gallen and others replaced with fresh faces for nsw has helped open nsw up as well but the lack of Smith should see more open footy and less grinding ruck controlled games for origin in the near future.
I just hope that it is not used as an argument for some in media to preach their don't blow penalties argument with the refs as it was players abiding by rules that resulted in faster game with less stoppages not the refs

You need to be a member of 1Eyed Eel to add comments!

Join 1Eyed Eel

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Yep, all even & look what happens, no win with off side or toward passes.
  • Thought NSW got all the 50:50s

    at 12-8 the turning point was the non penalty when Chriton knocked the ball out in a two person tackle after the ref called held

    the last try could have easily been called forward pass - worse than Bevans non try last game

    • Yeah the last try was a long way forward from Mahoney
    • Qld got away with many forward passes, watch the game again and count them
      • They were just so used to Smith being in the #9 and still applying Cameron's 'as long as it no more than 1m forward from DH it's ok' rule.

  • Wondered why the game was better and faster without Smith. I noticed how lost the Inbreds were without his leadership. Not saying that the traitor Inglis wasn’t a bad leader but having JT and Smith on the field leading you can see the quality but last night the Inbreds were woeful in attack, the defence wasn’t too bad but thank God Parra didn’t buy Napa, he was terrible...then again, he would’ve fitted in with Parra

  • Smith-less Origin definitely had a very different feel to it - flowed much better. 

  • Qld missed him that's for sure, no direction in attack . Without turncoat Inglis they would have nothing at all.
    • Queensland’s attack without Smith reminded me of Parra

  • One thing I wonder if he will get in shit for it is Will Chambers continuious knee lifts when running with the ball, it is so obvious and dangerous. I remember when Konrad Hurrell got in trouble for doing it all the time then why shouldn’t Chambers?

This reply was deleted.

More stuff to read

MeelK replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"I'd sign for that."
4 hours ago
LB replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"Look i think it is more than just being put on the Wing. I think Flanno is a reason. Wanting to play semi's is another.
I think a move away will be an awakening for Lomax. He was on with Fltech and Hindy with Lawrie in 2022 and he mimicked Griffin.…"
5 hours ago
AlShaw replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"600k is OK for the right winger. The Panthers sets are built on what their back 3 do on tackle one. The more momentum at the start of a set the more expansive a team can play but if our back three are getting smashed on tackle one and two it puts…"
5 hours ago
Uncle Wizards Sleeve indigenous elder He/Him replied to Cʜɪᴇғ -'s discussion Big News On Lomax
"Agree , need to keep him. "
5 hours ago
More…