Anasta 24.10 min
https://youtu.be/-Ly4UtWcy4g?si=FrcQ6McxrMSjS0ic
Watch the latest Anasta podcast-
Straight from the horses mouth, " Parramatta - Ryles, never offered Jonah Pezet a long-term deal" He says Parramatta only ever wanted Pezet for one year.
The conversation was always 1 yrar.
So all the talk about the club being used, and all the cuckold blogs, you can just flush them.
He also says the kids Parramatta have coming through are the succession plan.
Replies
Well it was, don't trigger the option. To trigger the option he would have known the deal before doing that. He wasn't doing a Zac Lomax.
Hold on, in the recent podcast Anasta said we never offered him long term. So which Anasta do you believe, ?
Doesn't matter what Anasta i believe, he said it. That was an interview before he had even signed officially. You are trying to get a "Gotcha ya" claim and there is not one to be had here Chief. He said that. If it wasn't true why say it? Especially saying it was always intended as a long term deal.
It is not like someone in a journal article said Anasta said this or hinted at it and then he cleared the air saying no. Anasta said it loud and clear and Maitua's questioning was clear.
And Anasta said it loud and clear in yesterday's podcast aswell.
No.use jumping to conclusions if we don't know the real answer.
This blog is concerning the Kayo podcast. Where he wasn't promoted by his mates, and he wasn't drunk on his Bali trip. Id put more.trust ith.his latest more formal podcast
Chief, I think you mean you'd put more trust in the version that suits your narrative...
Others are putting more trust in the other version.
When i posted this blog I didn't see both versions. Im just saying both can't be correct, and how would anyone prove which one is.
So you're saying the second version is bs - prove it.
What im saying is in the second version nobody prompted him. And in the first version Matuia prompted him
Im not making judgement, because nobody will ever know. But if I was in the jury I'd be leaning towards the second version slightly, until more evidence turns up.
Well why say yes to the question we wanted him long term?
Gents, which is true: we want/wanted Lomax long-term or we didn't/ don't? And, is it a conspiracy or a lie?
And one more: If your 13 partners before your wife didn't work out, is your wife your 14th choice off the bench?
BA wanted him long term, i reckon Ryles would have too for the right price.
Write him a letter cousin. Go ask him
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 6 Next